Tuomela, R (1987). "Chapter 4: Science, Protoscience, and Pseudoscience". Pitt JC, Marcello P (Ed.). Rational Changes in Science: Essays on Scientific Reasoning. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. 98. Springer. ss. 83-101. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3779-6_4. ISBN978-94-010-8181-8.
Baran GR, Kiana MF, Samuel SP (2014). "Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How Do They Differ?". Chapter 2: Science, Pseudoscience, and Not Science: How Do They Differ?. Healthcare and Biomedical Technology in the 21st Century. Springer. ss. 19-57. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8541-4_2. ISBN978-1-4614-8540-7. within the traditional medical community it is considered to be quackery
Shang A, Huwiler-Müntener K, Nartey L, Jüni P, Dörig S, Sterne JA, Pewsner D, Egger M (2005), "Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy", The Lancet, 366 (9487), ss. 726-732, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67177-2, PMID16125589KB1 bakım: Birden fazla ad: yazar listesi (link)
Shang A, Huwiler-Müntener K, Nartey L, Jüni P, Dörig S, Sterne JA, Pewsner D, Egger M (2005), "Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy", The Lancet, 366 (9487), ss. 726-732, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67177-2, PMID16125589KB1 bakım: Birden fazla ad: yazar listesi (link)
Edzard Ernst, White AR (1995), "Homoeopathy and immunization", Br J Gen Pract, 45 (400), ss. 629-630, PMC1239445 $2, PMID8554846
