Meta-analiz (Turkish Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Meta-analiz" in Turkish language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Turkish rank

7doi.org

2^nd place

4^th place

5nih.gov

4^th place

11^th place

4archive.org

6^th place

3web.archive.org

1^st place

3books.google.com

3^rd place

5^th place

1ox.ac.uk

613^th place

607^th place

1nice.org.uk

3,258^th place

6,339^th place

1worldcat.org

5^th place

8^th place

1cochrane.org

7,609^th place

low place

archive.org

Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park, California; London; New Delhi: SAGE Publications. 1990.
"Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century". Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. The Potsdam International Consultation on Meta-Analysis. 48 (1): 71-79. January 1995. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(94)00110-C. PMID 7853050.
"Meta-analysis: Its strengths and limitations". Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 75 (6): 431-439. June 2008. doi:10.3949/ccjm.75.6.431. PMID 18595551.
"The role of judgment calls in meta-analysis". Journal of Applied Psychology. 74 (2): 259-264. 1989. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.2.259. ISSN 0021-9010.

books.google.com

Beyond Versus: The Struggle to Understand the Interaction of Nature and Nurture (İngilizce). MIT Press. 9 Mayıs 2014. ISBN 978-0-262-02737-3.
Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences (İngilizce). Cengage Learning. 1 Ocak 2018. s. 36. ISBN 978-1-337-61331-6. Some examples of secondary sources are (1) books and textbooks in which the author describes and summarizes past research, (2) review articles or meta-analyses...
Research Methods, Statistics, and Applications (İngilizce). SAGE Publications. 2 Şubat 2018. ISBN 978-1-5063-5046-2. The most common types of secondary sources found in academic journals are literature reviews and meta-analyses.

cochrane.org

"Glossary: meta-analysis". The Cochrane Collaboration. 20 Aralık 2014 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.

doi.org

Herrera Ortiz AF., Cadavid Camacho E, Cubillos Rojas J, Cadavid Camacho T, Zoe Guevara S, Tatiana Rincón Cuenca N, Vásquez Perdomo A, Del Castillo Herazo V, & Giraldo Malo R. A Practical Guide to Perform a Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis. Principles and Practice of Clinical Research. 2022;7(4):47–57. https://doi.org/10.21801/ppcrj.2021.74.6
"Is meta-analysis of RCTs assessing the efficacy of interventions a reliable source of evidence for therapeutic decisions?". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 91: 159-167. February 2022. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.11.007. PMID 34922183.
"Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century". Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. The Potsdam International Consultation on Meta-Analysis. 48 (1): 71-79. January 1995. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(94)00110-C. PMID 7853050.
"Meta-analysis: Its strengths and limitations". Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 75 (6): 431-439. June 2008. doi:10.3949/ccjm.75.6.431. PMID 18595551.
"Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence?". Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 42 (4): 497-507. December 2011. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.07.003. PMID 22035723.
"The role of judgment calls in meta-analysis". Journal of Applied Psychology. 74 (2): 259-264. 1989. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.2.259. ISSN 0021-9010.
"Genome-wide association study in 8,956 German individuals identifies influence of ABO histo-blood groups on gut microbiome". Nature Genetics. 53 (2): 147-155. February 2021. doi:10.1038/s41588-020-00747-1. PMID 33462482. KB1 bakım: göster-yazarlar (link)

nice.org.uk

Developing NICE guidelines: the manual (PDF). Londra: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2014. 10 Aralık 2020 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi (PDF). Erişim tarihi: 21 Aralık 2020.

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

"Is meta-analysis of RCTs assessing the efficacy of interventions a reliable source of evidence for therapeutic decisions?". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 91: 159-167. February 2022. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.11.007. PMID 34922183.
"Meta-analysis: statistical alchemy for the 21st century". Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. The Potsdam International Consultation on Meta-Analysis. 48 (1): 71-79. January 1995. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(94)00110-C. PMID 7853050.
"Meta-analysis: Its strengths and limitations". Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 75 (6): 431-439. June 2008. doi:10.3949/ccjm.75.6.431. PMID 18595551.
"Is meta-analysis the platinum standard of evidence?". Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 42 (4): 497-507. December 2011. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.07.003. PMID 22035723.
"Genome-wide association study in 8,956 German individuals identifies influence of ABO histo-blood groups on gut microbiome". Nature Genetics. 53 (2): 147-155. February 2021. doi:10.1038/s41588-020-00747-1. PMID 33462482. KB1 bakım: göster-yazarlar (link)

ox.ac.uk

cebm.ox.ac.uk

"Levels of Evidence". Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM). University of Oxford. March 2009. 9 Eylül 2020 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 21 Aralık 2021.

web.archive.org

"Levels of Evidence". Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM). University of Oxford. March 2009. 9 Eylül 2020 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 21 Aralık 2021.
Developing NICE guidelines: the manual (PDF). Londra: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2014. 10 Aralık 2020 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi (PDF). Erişim tarihi: 21 Aralık 2020.
"Glossary: meta-analysis". The Cochrane Collaboration. 20 Aralık 2014 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi.

worldcat.org

"The role of judgment calls in meta-analysis". Journal of Applied Psychology. 74 (2): 259-264. 1989. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.2.259. ISSN 0021-9010.