Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

ResearchGate (Turkish Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "ResearchGate" in Turkish language version.

Last modified:

Ref.Un. Ref.Website
Global rank Turkish rank
4625web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
125doi.org
2nd place
2nd place
124nytimes.com
7th place
19th place
92archive.org
6th place
4th place
82nih.gov
5th place
8th place
75researchgate.net
96th place
103rd place
71adsabs.harvard.edu
14th place
32nd place
61timeshighereducation.com
1,666th place
755th place
43worldcat.org
4th place
6th place
41aisnet.org
low place
low place
31books.google.com
3rd place
5th place
21bloomberg.com
118th place
150th place
11universityofcalifornia.edu
low place
9,099th place
11wlv.ac.uk
low place
low place
11psu.edu
299th place
435th place
11forbes.com
71st place
88th place
11theguardian.com
16th place
33rd place
11venturevillage.eu
low place
low place
11researchinformation.info
low place
low place
11techcrunch.com
317th place
298th place
11torontosun.com
2,057th place
3,404th place
11archive.today
28th place
14th place
11swinburne.edu.au
low place
low place
11scilogs.de
low place
low place
11jpma.org.pk
low place
low place
11discovermagazine.com
3,982nd place
2,115th place
11fossilsandshit.com
low place
low place

adsabs.harvard.edu (Global: 14th place; Turkish: 32nd place)

  • Van Noorden, Richard (13 Ağustos 2014). "Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network". Nature. 512 (7513): 126-129. Bibcode:2014Natur.512..126V. doi:10.1038/512126a Özgürce erişilebilir. PMID 25119221.
    Quote 1: ResearchGate is certainly well-known [...] More than 88% of scientists and engineers said that they were aware of it.
    Quote 2: "They do send you a lot of spam," Billie Swalla says
    Quote 3: [...] regularly sending out automated e-mails that profess to come from colleagues active on the site
    Quote 4: "I think it is a disgraceful kind of marketing and I am choosing not to use their service because of that", [Lars Arvestad] says
    Quote 5: "I've met basically no academics in my field with a favourable view of ResearchGate", says Daniel MacArthur
    Quote 6: Some of the apparent profiles on the site are not owned by real people, but are created automatically – and incompletely – by scraping details of people's affiliations, publication records and PDFs
    Quote 7: That annoys researchers who do not want to be on the site, and who feel that the pages misrepresent them – especially when they discover that ResearchGate will not take down the pages when asked.
    Quote 8: [Madisch] will not say how many of [the papers available on ResearchGate] have been automatically scraped from freely accessible places elsewhere.

aisnet.org (Global: low place; Turkish: low place)

aisel.aisnet.org

archive.org (Global: 6th place; Turkish: 4th place)

  • Van Noorden, Richard (13 Ağustos 2014). "Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network". Nature. 512 (7513): 126-129. Bibcode:2014Natur.512..126V. doi:10.1038/512126a Özgürce erişilebilir. PMID 25119221.
    Quote 1: ResearchGate is certainly well-known [...] More than 88% of scientists and engineers said that they were aware of it.
    Quote 2: "They do send you a lot of spam," Billie Swalla says
    Quote 3: [...] regularly sending out automated e-mails that profess to come from colleagues active on the site
    Quote 4: "I think it is a disgraceful kind of marketing and I am choosing not to use their service because of that", [Lars Arvestad] says
    Quote 5: "I've met basically no academics in my field with a favourable view of ResearchGate", says Daniel MacArthur
    Quote 6: Some of the apparent profiles on the site are not owned by real people, but are created automatically – and incompletely – by scraping details of people's affiliations, publication records and PDFs
    Quote 7: That annoys researchers who do not want to be on the site, and who feel that the pages misrepresent them – especially when they discover that ResearchGate will not take down the pages when asked.
    Quote 8: [Madisch] will not say how many of [the papers available on ResearchGate] have been automatically scraped from freely accessible places elsewhere.
  • Crawford, Mark (2011). "Biologists Using Social-networking Sites to Boost Collaboration". BioScience. 61 (9): 736. doi:10.1525/bio.2011.61.9.18 Özgürce erişilebilir. ISSN 0006-3568.

archive.today (Global: 28th place; Turkish: 14th place)

bloomberg.com (Global: 118th place; Turkish: 150th place)

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; Turkish: 5th place)

discovermagazine.com (Global: 3,982nd place; Turkish: 2,115th place)

blogs.discovermagazine.com

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Turkish: 2nd place)

forbes.com (Global: 71st place; Turkish: 88th place)

fossilsandshit.com (Global: low place; Turkish: low place)

jpma.org.pk (Global: low place; Turkish: low place)

nih.gov (Global: 5th place; Turkish: 8th place)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Van Noorden, Richard (13 Ağustos 2014). "Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network". Nature. 512 (7513): 126-129. Bibcode:2014Natur.512..126V. doi:10.1038/512126a Özgürce erişilebilir. PMID 25119221.
    Quote 1: ResearchGate is certainly well-known [...] More than 88% of scientists and engineers said that they were aware of it.
    Quote 2: "They do send you a lot of spam," Billie Swalla says
    Quote 3: [...] regularly sending out automated e-mails that profess to come from colleagues active on the site
    Quote 4: "I think it is a disgraceful kind of marketing and I am choosing not to use their service because of that", [Lars Arvestad] says
    Quote 5: "I've met basically no academics in my field with a favourable view of ResearchGate", says Daniel MacArthur
    Quote 6: Some of the apparent profiles on the site are not owned by real people, but are created automatically – and incompletely – by scraping details of people's affiliations, publication records and PDFs
    Quote 7: That annoys researchers who do not want to be on the site, and who feel that the pages misrepresent them – especially when they discover that ResearchGate will not take down the pages when asked.
    Quote 8: [Madisch] will not say how many of [the papers available on ResearchGate] have been automatically scraped from freely accessible places elsewhere.
  • Memon, Aamir Raoof (December 2016). "ResearchGate is no longer reliable: leniency towards ghost journals may decrease its impact on the scientific community" (PDF). Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. 66 (12): 1643-1647. PMID 27924967. 3 Aralık 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi (PDF)2 Aralık 2016. ResearchGate more recently, has been lenient in its policies against this dark side of academic writing.

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; Turkish: 19th place)

nytimes.com

bits.blogs.nytimes.com

psu.edu (Global: 299th place; Turkish: 435th place)

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

researchgate.net (Global: 96th place; Turkish: 103rd place)

researchgate.net

explore.researchgate.net

researchinformation.info (Global: low place; Turkish: low place)

scilogs.de (Global: low place; Turkish: low place)

swinburne.edu.au (Global: low place; Turkish: low place)

blogs.swinburne.edu.au

techcrunch.com (Global: 317th place; Turkish: 298th place)

theguardian.com (Global: 16th place; Turkish: 33rd place)

timeshighereducation.com (Global: 1,666th place; Turkish: 755th place)

torontosun.com (Global: 2,057th place; Turkish: 3,404th place)

universityofcalifornia.edu (Global: low place; Turkish: 9,099th place)

osc.universityofcalifornia.edu

venturevillage.eu (Global: low place; Turkish: low place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Turkish: 1st place)

wlv.ac.uk (Global: low place; Turkish: low place)

scit.wlv.ac.uk

worldcat.org (Global: 4th place; Turkish: 6th place)