Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

ResearchGate (Turkish Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "ResearchGate" in Turkish language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Turkish rank
25web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
5doi.org
2nd place
4th place
5researchgate.net
120th place
117th place
4nytimes.com
7th place
36th place
3worldcat.org
5th place
8th place
2nih.gov
4th place
11th place
1universityofcalifornia.edu
low place
low place
1timeshighereducation.com
1,554th place
672nd place
1harvard.edu
18th place
47th place
1books.google.com
3rd place
5th place
1wlv.ac.uk
low place
low place
1psu.edu
207th place
424th place
1forbes.com
54th place
81st place
1theguardian.com
12th place
44th place
1venturevillage.eu
low place
low place
1bloomberg.com
99th place
191st place
1researchinformation.info
low place
low place
1techcrunch.com
187th place
210th place
1torontosun.com
1,440th place
4,174th place
1archive.today
14th place
20th place
1swinburne.edu.au
low place
low place
1aisnet.org
low place
low place
1scilogs.de
low place
low place
1jpma.org.pk
low place
low place
1discovermagazine.com
3,042nd place
2,774th place
1fossilsandshit.com
low place
low place

aisnet.org

aisel.aisnet.org

archive.today

bloomberg.com

books.google.com

discovermagazine.com

blogs.discovermagazine.com

doi.org

  • Van Noorden, Richard (13 Ağustos 2014). "Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network". Nature. 512 (7513): 126-129. Bibcode:2014Natur.512..126V. doi:10.1038/512126a Özgürce erişilebilir. PMID 25119221. 
    Quote 1: ResearchGate is certainly well-known [...] More than 88% of scientists and engineers said that they were aware of it.
    Quote 2: "They do send you a lot of spam," Billie Swalla says
    Quote 3: [...] regularly sending out automated e-mails that profess to come from colleagues active on the site
    Quote 4: "I think it is a disgraceful kind of marketing and I am choosing not to use their service because of that", [Lars Arvestad] says
    Quote 5: "I've met basically no academics in my field with a favourable view of ResearchGate", says Daniel MacArthur
    Quote 6: Some of the apparent profiles on the site are not owned by real people, but are created automatically – and incompletely – by scraping details of people's affiliations, publication records and PDFs
    Quote 7: That annoys researchers who do not want to be on the site, and who feel that the pages misrepresent them – especially when they discover that ResearchGate will not take down the pages when asked.
    Quote 8: [Madisch] will not say how many of [the papers available on ResearchGate] have been automatically scraped from freely accessible places elsewhere.
  • Crawford, Mark (2011). "Biologists Using Social-networking Sites to Boost Collaboration". BioScience. 61 (9): 736. doi:10.1525/bio.2011.61.9.18 Özgürce erişilebilir. ISSN 0006-3568. 
  • Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K. (2014). "ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring Scholarship?" (PDF). Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66 (5): 876-889. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.589.5396 $2. doi:10.1002/asi.23236. 18 Şubat 2018 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi (PDF). Erişim tarihi: 30 Temmuz 2018. 
  • Yu (February 2016). "ResearchGate: An effective altmetric indicator for active researchers?". Computers in Human Behavior. 55: 1001-1006. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.007. 
  • Jamali, Hamid R. (16 Şubat 2017). "Copyright compliance and infringement in ResearchGate full-text journal articles". Scientometrics (İngilizce). 112 (1): 241-254. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2291-4. ISSN 0138-9130. 

forbes.com

fossilsandshit.com

harvard.edu

adsabs.harvard.edu

  • Van Noorden, Richard (13 Ağustos 2014). "Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network". Nature. 512 (7513): 126-129. Bibcode:2014Natur.512..126V. doi:10.1038/512126a Özgürce erişilebilir. PMID 25119221. 
    Quote 1: ResearchGate is certainly well-known [...] More than 88% of scientists and engineers said that they were aware of it.
    Quote 2: "They do send you a lot of spam," Billie Swalla says
    Quote 3: [...] regularly sending out automated e-mails that profess to come from colleagues active on the site
    Quote 4: "I think it is a disgraceful kind of marketing and I am choosing not to use their service because of that", [Lars Arvestad] says
    Quote 5: "I've met basically no academics in my field with a favourable view of ResearchGate", says Daniel MacArthur
    Quote 6: Some of the apparent profiles on the site are not owned by real people, but are created automatically – and incompletely – by scraping details of people's affiliations, publication records and PDFs
    Quote 7: That annoys researchers who do not want to be on the site, and who feel that the pages misrepresent them – especially when they discover that ResearchGate will not take down the pages when asked.
    Quote 8: [Madisch] will not say how many of [the papers available on ResearchGate] have been automatically scraped from freely accessible places elsewhere.

jpma.org.pk

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Van Noorden, Richard (13 Ağustos 2014). "Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network". Nature. 512 (7513): 126-129. Bibcode:2014Natur.512..126V. doi:10.1038/512126a Özgürce erişilebilir. PMID 25119221. 
    Quote 1: ResearchGate is certainly well-known [...] More than 88% of scientists and engineers said that they were aware of it.
    Quote 2: "They do send you a lot of spam," Billie Swalla says
    Quote 3: [...] regularly sending out automated e-mails that profess to come from colleagues active on the site
    Quote 4: "I think it is a disgraceful kind of marketing and I am choosing not to use their service because of that", [Lars Arvestad] says
    Quote 5: "I've met basically no academics in my field with a favourable view of ResearchGate", says Daniel MacArthur
    Quote 6: Some of the apparent profiles on the site are not owned by real people, but are created automatically – and incompletely – by scraping details of people's affiliations, publication records and PDFs
    Quote 7: That annoys researchers who do not want to be on the site, and who feel that the pages misrepresent them – especially when they discover that ResearchGate will not take down the pages when asked.
    Quote 8: [Madisch] will not say how many of [the papers available on ResearchGate] have been automatically scraped from freely accessible places elsewhere.
  • Memon, Aamir Raoof (December 2016). "ResearchGate is no longer reliable: leniency towards ghost journals may decrease its impact on the scientific community" (PDF). Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. 66 (12): 1643-1647. PMID 27924967. 3 Aralık 2016 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi (PDF). Erişim tarihi: 2 Aralık 2016. ResearchGate more recently, has been lenient in its policies against this dark side of academic writing. 

nytimes.com

nytimes.com

bits.blogs.nytimes.com

psu.edu

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

researchgate.net

researchgate.net

explore.researchgate.net

researchinformation.info

scilogs.de

swinburne.edu.au

blogs.swinburne.edu.au

techcrunch.com

theguardian.com

timeshighereducation.com

torontosun.com

universityofcalifornia.edu

osc.universityofcalifornia.edu

venturevillage.eu

web.archive.org

wlv.ac.uk

scit.wlv.ac.uk

worldcat.org