Türkiye'deki azınlıklar (Turkish Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Türkiye'deki azınlıklar" in Turkish language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Turkish rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
5th place
5th place
8th place
436th place
3rd place
2nd place
4th place
1,423rd place
376th place
121st place
39th place
1,840th place
1,385th place
2,310th place
544th place
low place
5,015th place
low place
low place
low place
283rd place
1,543rd place
26th place
3,274th place
43rd place
low place
1,289th place
low place
low place
20th place
23rd place
low place
low place
97th place
94th place
339th place
143rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
8th place
25th place
5,480th place
3,949th place
647th place
6,852nd place
8,486th place
2,325th place
low place
low place
1,804th place
648th place
3,649th place
900th place
low place
low place
1,395th place
21st place
low place
8,789th place
low place
158th place
5,072nd place
80th place
14th place
20th place
612th place
97th place
low place
low place
5,333rd place
low place
89th place
51st place
low place
3,428th place
6th place
6th place
low place
7,599th place
low place
6,516th place
low place
low place
2,915th place
1,104th place
low place
5,277th place
low place
912th place
low place
low place
459th place
801st place
low place
low place
4,829th place
1,240th place
3,172nd place
8,022nd place
5,447th place
7,308th place

academia.edu

academia.edu

  • Garabet K Moumdjian, Ph D.; Bayir, Derya. "DERYA BAYIR, MINORITIES AND NATIONALISM IN TURKISH LAW". 22 Ocak 2023 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 10 Ekim 2023. 
  • Bayır, Derya (2016). Minorities and nationalism in Turkish law. Cultural diversity and law. Londra: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-315-59551-1. 22 Ocak 2023 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 8 Ekim 2023. Oran farther points out that the rights set out for the four categories are stated to be the ‘fundamental law’ of the land, so that no legislation or official action shall conflict or interfere with these stipulations or prevail over them (article 37). [...] According to the Turkish state, only Greek, Armenian and Jewish non-Muslims were granted minority protection by the Lausanne Treaty. [...] Except for non-Muslim populations - that is, Greeks, Jews and Armenians - none of the other minority groups’ language rights have been de jure protected by the legal system in Turkey. 

khas.academia.edu

  • Alankuş, Sevda; Taymaz, Erol (2009). "The Formation of a Circassian Diaspora in Turkey". Adyghe (Cherkess) in the 19th Century: Problems of War and Peace. Adygea, Russia: Maikop State Technology University. s. 2. 1 Haziran 2018 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 4 Mayıs 2016. Today, the largest communities of Circassians, about 5–7 million, live in Turkey, and about 200,000 Circassians live in the Middle Eastern countries (Jordan, Syria, Egypt, and Israel). The 1960s and 1970s witnessed a new wave of migration from diaspora countries to Europe and the United States. It is estimated that there are now more than 100,000 Circassian living in the European Union countries. The community in Kosovo expatriated to Adygea after the war in 1998. 

adherents.com

anayasa.gov.tr

siyasipartikararlar.anayasa.gov.tr

ankara.edu.tr

dergiler.ankara.edu.tr

archive.org

  • Yildiz, Kerim; Fryer, Georgina (2004). The Kurds: Culture and Language Rights. Kurdish Human Rights Project.  Data: 18% of Turkey, 20% of Iraq, 8% of Iran, 9.6%+ of Syria; plus 1–2 million in neighboring countries and the diaspora

archive.today

atolyebia.org

ayk.gov.tr

bahairights.org

bahaitr.org

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

bbc.com

bnr.bg

bolsohays.com

books.google.com

brill.com

cia.gov

dergipark.org.tr

doi.org

  • Akbulut, Olgun (19 Ekim 2023). "For Centenary of the Lausanne Treaty: Re-Interpretation and Re-Implementation of Linguistic Minority Rights of Lausanne". International Journal on Minority and Group Rights. –1 (aop): 1-24. doi:10.1163/15718115-bja10134. ISSN 1385-4879. 24 Ekim 2023 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 21 Ekim 2023. 
  • Kaya, Nurcan (24 Kasım 2015). "Teaching in and Studying Minority Languages in Turkey: A Brief Overview of Current Issues and Minority Schools". European Yearbook of Minority Issues Online (İngilizce). 12 (1): 315-338. doi:10.1163/9789004306134_013. ISSN 2211-6117. 25 Kasım 2022 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 7 Ekim 2023. 
  • Phillips, Thomas James (16 Aralık 2020). "The (In-)Validity of Turkey's Reservation to Article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights". International Journal on Minority and Group Rights. 27 (1): 66-93. doi:10.1163/15718115-02701001. ISSN 1385-4879. 11 Ekim 2023 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 10 Ekim 2023. The fact that Turkish constitutional law takes an even more restrictive approach to minority rights than required under the Treaty of Lausanne was recognised by the UN Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD) in its concluding observations on the combined fourth to sixth periodic reports of Turkey. The CERD noted that “the treaty of Lausanne does not explicitly prohibit the recognition of other groups as minorities” and that Turkey should consider recognising the minority status of other groups, such as Kurds. In practice, this means that Turkey grants minority rights to “Greek, Armenian and Jewish minority communities while denying their possible impact for unrecognized minority groups (e.g. Kurds, Alevis, Arabs, Syriacs, Protestants, Roma etc.)”. Thus, the Turkish reservation purports to grant Turkey the freedom to limit a right intended for all persons belonging to ethnic, religious, or linguistic minorities – in other words, a right which “establishes and recognises a right which is conferred on individuals belonging to minority groups” – to just one elevated subset of one category of minorities, namely particular non-Muslims. [...] Nothing in Turkey’s explanation indicates the level of importance that it attaches to the reservation. However, in its combined second and third periodic reports to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, Turkey highlights that the state’s “supreme interests” require minority rights to be used “as a sign of respect for ethnic, linguistic and religious diversity” rather than “as a tool for separatism and secessionism”. To that end, Turkey reports that “it is essential that current practices are sustained”. The report indicates that Turkey considers its current practices relating to minority rights essential to the avoidance of separatism and secessionism, and that its current practice is part of its supreme interests. 

ecoi.net

ekurd.net

ethnologue.com

eurasianet.org

euronews.com

tr.euronews.com

google.nl

books.google.nl

h-net.org

hs.fi

i-cias.com

ihf-hr.org

international.gc.ca

internethaber.com

joshuaproject.net

konda.com.tr

interaktif.konda.com.tr

kosovali.net

ljmu.ac.uk

researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk

  • Phillips, Thomas James (16 Aralık 2020). "The (In-)Validity of Turkey's Reservation to Article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights". International Journal on Minority and Group Rights. 27 (1): 66-93. doi:10.1163/15718115-02701001. ISSN 1385-4879. 11 Ekim 2023 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 10 Ekim 2023. The fact that Turkish constitutional law takes an even more restrictive approach to minority rights than required under the Treaty of Lausanne was recognised by the UN Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD) in its concluding observations on the combined fourth to sixth periodic reports of Turkey. The CERD noted that “the treaty of Lausanne does not explicitly prohibit the recognition of other groups as minorities” and that Turkey should consider recognising the minority status of other groups, such as Kurds. In practice, this means that Turkey grants minority rights to “Greek, Armenian and Jewish minority communities while denying their possible impact for unrecognized minority groups (e.g. Kurds, Alevis, Arabs, Syriacs, Protestants, Roma etc.)”. Thus, the Turkish reservation purports to grant Turkey the freedom to limit a right intended for all persons belonging to ethnic, religious, or linguistic minorities – in other words, a right which “establishes and recognises a right which is conferred on individuals belonging to minority groups” – to just one elevated subset of one category of minorities, namely particular non-Muslims. [...] Nothing in Turkey’s explanation indicates the level of importance that it attaches to the reservation. However, in its combined second and third periodic reports to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, Turkey highlights that the state’s “supreme interests” require minority rights to be used “as a sign of respect for ethnic, linguistic and religious diversity” rather than “as a tool for separatism and secessionism”. To that end, Turkey reports that “it is essential that current practices are sustained”. The report indicates that Turkey considers its current practices relating to minority rights essential to the avoidance of separatism and secessionism, and that its current practice is part of its supreme interests. 

looklex.com

makdanismanlik.org

milliyet.com.tr

ponarseurasia.org

radikal.com.tr

refugeesolidaritynetwork.org

refworld.org

southern-cross-group.org

taraf.com.tr

thearda.com

  • "Most Baha'i Nations (2005)". QuickLists > Compare Nations > Religions >. The Association of Religion Data Archives. 2005. 24 Nisan 2019 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 4 Temmuz 2009. 

umich.edu

www-personal.umich.edu

un.org

unpan1.un.org

unhcr.org

unpo.org

  • Circassia, Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization, 29 Kasım 2010 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi, erişim tarihi: 21 Ağustos 2017 .

usefoundation.org

web.archive.org

wingia.com

worldcat.org

  • Erdem, Fazıl Hüsnü; Öngüç, Bahar (30 Haziran 2021). "SÜRYANİCE ANADİLİNDE EĞİTİM HAKKI: SORUNLAR VE ÇÖZÜM ÖNERİLERİ". Dicle Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 26 (44): 3-35. ISSN 1300-2929. 30 Ekim 2023 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 21 Ekim 2023. 
  • Akbulut, Olgun (19 Ekim 2023). "For Centenary of the Lausanne Treaty: Re-Interpretation and Re-Implementation of Linguistic Minority Rights of Lausanne". International Journal on Minority and Group Rights. –1 (aop): 1-24. doi:10.1163/15718115-bja10134. ISSN 1385-4879. 24 Ekim 2023 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 21 Ekim 2023. 
  • Kaya, Nurcan (24 Kasım 2015). "Teaching in and Studying Minority Languages in Turkey: A Brief Overview of Current Issues and Minority Schools". European Yearbook of Minority Issues Online (İngilizce). 12 (1): 315-338. doi:10.1163/9789004306134_013. ISSN 2211-6117. 25 Kasım 2022 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 7 Ekim 2023. 
  • Phillips, Thomas James (16 Aralık 2020). "The (In-)Validity of Turkey's Reservation to Article 27 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights". International Journal on Minority and Group Rights. 27 (1): 66-93. doi:10.1163/15718115-02701001. ISSN 1385-4879. 11 Ekim 2023 tarihinde kaynağından arşivlendi. Erişim tarihi: 10 Ekim 2023. The fact that Turkish constitutional law takes an even more restrictive approach to minority rights than required under the Treaty of Lausanne was recognised by the UN Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD) in its concluding observations on the combined fourth to sixth periodic reports of Turkey. The CERD noted that “the treaty of Lausanne does not explicitly prohibit the recognition of other groups as minorities” and that Turkey should consider recognising the minority status of other groups, such as Kurds. In practice, this means that Turkey grants minority rights to “Greek, Armenian and Jewish minority communities while denying their possible impact for unrecognized minority groups (e.g. Kurds, Alevis, Arabs, Syriacs, Protestants, Roma etc.)”. Thus, the Turkish reservation purports to grant Turkey the freedom to limit a right intended for all persons belonging to ethnic, religious, or linguistic minorities – in other words, a right which “establishes and recognises a right which is conferred on individuals belonging to minority groups” – to just one elevated subset of one category of minorities, namely particular non-Muslims. [...] Nothing in Turkey’s explanation indicates the level of importance that it attaches to the reservation. However, in its combined second and third periodic reports to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, Turkey highlights that the state’s “supreme interests” require minority rights to be used “as a sign of respect for ethnic, linguistic and religious diversity” rather than “as a tool for separatism and secessionism”. To that end, Turkey reports that “it is essential that current practices are sustained”. The report indicates that Turkey considers its current practices relating to minority rights essential to the avoidance of separatism and secessionism, and that its current practice is part of its supreme interests.