Torices, Rubén; Méndez, Marcos; Gómez, José María (2011). Where do monomorphic sexual systems fit in the evolution of dioecy? Insights from the largest family of angiosperms. New Phytologist(англ.). 190 (1): 234—248. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03609.x. ISSN1469-8137. PMID21219336.
David, J.R. (2001). Evolution and development: some insights from evolutionary theory. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 73 (3): 385—395. doi:10.1590/s0001-37652001000300008. PMID11600899.
Esser, K. (1971). Breeding systems in fungi and their significance for genetic recombination. Molecular and General Genetics. 110 (1): 86—100. doi:10.1007/bf00276051. PMID5102399.
Charlesworth D., Willis J. H. (2009). The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10 (11): 783—96. doi:10.1038/nrg2664. PMID19834483.
Bruijning, Marjolein; Visser, Marco D.; Muller-Landau, Helene C.; Wright, S. Joseph; Comita, Liza S.; Hubbell, Stephen P.; de Kroon, Hans; Jongejans, Eelke (2017). Surviving in a Cosexual World: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Dioecy in Tropical Trees. The American Naturalist. 189 (3): 297—314. doi:10.1086/690137. ISSN0003-0147. PMID28221824.
Sabath, Niv; Goldberg, Emma E.; Glick, Lior; Einhorn, Moshe; Ashman, Tia-Lynn; Ming, Ray; Otto, Sarah P.; Vamosi, Jana C.; Mayrose, Itay (2016). Dioecy does not consistently accelerate or slow lineage diversification across multiple genera of angiosperms. New Phytologist. 209 (3): 1290—1300. doi:10.1111/nph.13696. PMID26467174.
Torices, Rubén; Méndez, Marcos; Gómez, José María (2011). Where do monomorphic sexual systems fit in the evolution of dioecy? Insights from the largest family of angiosperms. New Phytologist(англ.). 190 (1): 234—248. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03609.x. ISSN1469-8137. PMID21219336.
David, J.R. (2001). Evolution and development: some insights from evolutionary theory. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 73 (3): 385—395. doi:10.1590/s0001-37652001000300008. PMID11600899.
Esser, K. (1971). Breeding systems in fungi and their significance for genetic recombination. Molecular and General Genetics. 110 (1): 86—100. doi:10.1007/bf00276051. PMID5102399.
Charlesworth D., Willis J. H. (2009). The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10 (11): 783—96. doi:10.1038/nrg2664. PMID19834483.
Bruijning, Marjolein; Visser, Marco D.; Muller-Landau, Helene C.; Wright, S. Joseph; Comita, Liza S.; Hubbell, Stephen P.; de Kroon, Hans; Jongejans, Eelke (2017). Surviving in a Cosexual World: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Dioecy in Tropical Trees. The American Naturalist. 189 (3): 297—314. doi:10.1086/690137. ISSN0003-0147. PMID28221824.
Sabath, Niv; Goldberg, Emma E.; Glick, Lior; Einhorn, Moshe; Ashman, Tia-Lynn; Ming, Ray; Otto, Sarah P.; Vamosi, Jana C.; Mayrose, Itay (2016). Dioecy does not consistently accelerate or slow lineage diversification across multiple genera of angiosperms. New Phytologist. 209 (3): 1290—1300. doi:10.1111/nph.13696. PMID26467174.
oed.com
diœcious, adj. Oxford English Dictionary online. Oxford University Press. Процитовано 25 січня 2022.
Torices, Rubén; Méndez, Marcos; Gómez, José María (2011). Where do monomorphic sexual systems fit in the evolution of dioecy? Insights from the largest family of angiosperms. New Phytologist(англ.). 190 (1): 234—248. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03609.x. ISSN1469-8137. PMID21219336.
Bruijning, Marjolein; Visser, Marco D.; Muller-Landau, Helene C.; Wright, S. Joseph; Comita, Liza S.; Hubbell, Stephen P.; de Kroon, Hans; Jongejans, Eelke (2017). Surviving in a Cosexual World: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Dioecy in Tropical Trees. The American Naturalist. 189 (3): 297—314. doi:10.1086/690137. ISSN0003-0147. PMID28221824.