Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Рух за незалежність Тайваню" in Ukrainian language version.
newspapers with the help of Roman letters within one month's learning." To be sure, Roman letters are a very effective means to transcribe Formsan. On this point Mr. Ozaki seems to mean that it is against the "Racial style", which is misleading...atmosphere covered the whole Japanese territories, including Korea and Formosa, and the Japanese mainlands as well. So quite naturally works to applaud the "holy war" were not infrequently produced. But who could blame them and who had a right to throw a stone atOriginal from the University of Michigan
{{cite web}}: Обслуговування CS1: Сторінки з текстом «archived copy» як значення параметру title (посилання){{cite web}}: Вказано більш, ніж один |url-архіву= та |archiveurl= (довідка); Вказано більш, ніж один |дата-архіву= та |archivedate= (довідка){{cite web}}: Вказано більш, ніж один |url-архіву= та |archiveurl= (довідка); Вказано більш, ніж один |дата-архіву= та |archivedate= (довідка)ch. II, art. 2, (b) Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores.
Further, Kinmen differs from Taiwan in its consistently close ties with the Chinese Nationalist Party or Kuomintang (KMT). Indeed, Kinmen is one of the few locations in ROC territory that the DPP has never controlled. The reason can be traced to the late 1940s, when some Taiwanese began to view the KMT as unwelcome occupiers. That view never took hold in Kinmen, Weng notes. During the Cold War, “the military was here on the front lines protecting people from the enemy – Communist China,” he says. Since soldiers were numerous, “they made important contributions to the local economy too. Their presence created many business opportunities.” Critically, Kinmen did not experience the 2-28 Incident, an uprising against Nationalist rule in Taiwan that began on February 28, 1947. Government troops brutally suppressed the rebellion; the death toll is generally estimated at 18,000- 28,000. To this day, opponents of the KMT in Taiwan trace their antipathy toward the party to the 2-28 Incident and the subsequent White Terror.
Early on in the presidential debates, Kennedy was asked if the United States defense line in the Far East should include Quemoy and Matsu. Kennedy responded that these islands — just a few miles off the coast of China and more than a hundred miles from Taiwan — were strategically indefensible and were not essential to the defense of Taiwan. The Massachusetts Senator also alluded to the unsuccessful efforts by the Eisenhower Administration to persuade Chiang Kai-shek to abandon the offshore islands in order to avoid the possibility of being dragged into a major confrontation with the PRC over these two islands. Perhaps feeling the need to disagree with Kennedy, Vice President Nixon countered. Since Quemoy and Matsu were in the “area of freedom,” Nixon contended that they should not be surrendered to the Communists as a matter of "principle." Theodore H. White was of the opinion that Kennedy’s initial answer to the question on Quemoy and Matsu was "probably one of the sharpest and clearest responses of any question of the debates."
{{cite web}}: Вказано більш, ніж один |url-архіву= та |archiveurl= (довідка); Вказано більш, ніж один |дата-архіву= та |archivedate= (довідка){{cite web}}: Обслуговування CS1: Сторінки з текстом «archived copy» як значення параметру title (посилання){{cite web}}: Вказано більш, ніж один |url-архіву= та |archiveurl= (довідка); Вказано більш, ніж один |дата-архіву= та |archivedate= (довідка)ch. II, art. 2, (b) Japan renounces all right, title and claim to Formosa and the Pescadores.
Early on in the presidential debates, Kennedy was asked if the United States defense line in the Far East should include Quemoy and Matsu. Kennedy responded that these islands — just a few miles off the coast of China and more than a hundred miles from Taiwan — were strategically indefensible and were not essential to the defense of Taiwan. The Massachusetts Senator also alluded to the unsuccessful efforts by the Eisenhower Administration to persuade Chiang Kai-shek to abandon the offshore islands in order to avoid the possibility of being dragged into a major confrontation with the PRC over these two islands. Perhaps feeling the need to disagree with Kennedy, Vice President Nixon countered. Since Quemoy and Matsu were in the “area of freedom,” Nixon contended that they should not be surrendered to the Communists as a matter of "principle." Theodore H. White was of the opinion that Kennedy’s initial answer to the question on Quemoy and Matsu was "probably one of the sharpest and clearest responses of any question of the debates."
Further, Kinmen differs from Taiwan in its consistently close ties with the Chinese Nationalist Party or Kuomintang (KMT). Indeed, Kinmen is one of the few locations in ROC territory that the DPP has never controlled. The reason can be traced to the late 1940s, when some Taiwanese began to view the KMT as unwelcome occupiers. That view never took hold in Kinmen, Weng notes. During the Cold War, “the military was here on the front lines protecting people from the enemy – Communist China,” he says. Since soldiers were numerous, “they made important contributions to the local economy too. Their presence created many business opportunities.” Critically, Kinmen did not experience the 2-28 Incident, an uprising against Nationalist rule in Taiwan that began on February 28, 1947. Government troops brutally suppressed the rebellion; the death toll is generally estimated at 18,000- 28,000. To this day, opponents of the KMT in Taiwan trace their antipathy toward the party to the 2-28 Incident and the subsequent White Terror.
{{cite web}}: Вказано більш, ніж один |url-архіву= та |archiveurl= (довідка); Вказано більш, ніж один |дата-архіву= та |archivedate= (довідка){{cite journal}}: Вказано більш, ніж один |url-архіву= та |archive-url= (довідка); Вказано більш, ніж один |дата-архіву= та |archive-date= (довідка){{cite web}}: Вказано більш, ніж один |url-архіву= та |archiveurl= (довідка); Вказано більш, ніж один |дата-архіву= та |archivedate= (довідка){{cite journal}}: Вказано більш, ніж один |url-архіву= та |archive-url= (довідка); Вказано більш, ніж один |дата-архіву= та |archive-date= (довідка)