Ґуґарк (Ukrainian Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Ґуґарк" in Ukrainian language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Ukrainian rank

6worldcat.org

5^th place

9^th place

6google.am

6,495^th place

4,365^th place

3web.archive.org

1^st place

2cyberleninka.ru

475^th place

271^st place

1wikipedia.org

low place

1iranicaonline.org

358^th place

1,747^th place

1historic.ru

5,612^th place

832^nd place

1urfu.ru

6,395^th place

6,650^th place

1britannica.com

40^th place

82^nd place

1saunje.ge

low place

britannica.com

Ґуґарк — стаття з Британника

cyberleninka.ru

Muskhelishvili David Some aspects of Georgian History in the light of Armenian historiography // The Caucasus & Globalization. 2011. № 1-2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/some-aspects-of-georgian-history-in-the-light-of-armenian-historiography [Архівовано 27 березня 2020 у Wayback Machine.] (дата обращения: 28.03.2020).
Muskhelishvili David Some aspects of Georgian History in the light of Armenian historiography // The Caucasus & Globalization. 2011. № 1-2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/some-aspects-of-georgian-history-in-the-light-of-armenian-historiography [Архівовано 27 березня 2020 у Wayback Machine.] (дата обращения: 28.03.2020).
Оригінальний текст (англ.)
It was Gugark/Gogarani, that is, the province of Kvemo (Lower) Kartli, that also remained an inviolable part of the Georgian state after the Arabs conquered Eastern Georgia in the mid-7th century. Later, when the comprehensive development of feudal relations caused the early feudal Iberian (Kartlian) state to disintegrate at the end of the 8th century into separate feudal principalities, Gugark/ Gogarani remained within the Tbilisi Arab Emirate that broke away from the Caliphate.

google.am

books.google.am

Ilkka Syvanne. Military History of Late Rome 284-361. — Pen and Sword, 2015.
The Ashgate Research Companion to Byzantine Hagiography / Edited by Stephanos Efthymiadis. — Ashgate, 2019. — Vol. I. — P. 302—303.
Bayarsaikhan Dashdondog. The Mongols and the Armenians (1220-1335). — BRILL. — 2010. — P. 33.
Bayarsaikhan Dashdondog. The Mongols and the Armenians (1220-1335). — BRILL. — 2010. — P. 55, 102.
Dimitri Korobeĭnikov. Byzantium and the Turks in the Thirteenth Century. — Oxford University Press, 2014. — P. 174.
Armenian Gospel Iconography: The Tradition of the Glajor Gospel / Edited by Thomas F. Mathews. — Dumbarton Oaks, 1991. — P. 12.

historic.ru

Армения в III—IV вв. // Всемирная история / Под редакцией С. Л. Утченко (ответственный редактор), Д. П. Каллистова, А. И. Павловская, В. В. Струве. — М. : Гос. изд.-во полит. лит-ры, 1956. — Т. 2. — С. 761—770.

iranicaonline.org

Ґуґарк — стаття з Ираника. M. Weiskopf

saunje.ge

«Грузинская советская энциклопедия», ст. «Борчало». Тбилиси, 1965. Архів оригіналу за 11 листопада 2013. Процитовано 18 квітня 2020.

urfu.ru

elar.urfu.ru

В. П. Степаненко. Из истории армяно-византийских отношений второй половины X—XI в. (к атрибуции монет Кюрикэ куропалата) // Античная древность и средние века. — Свердловск, 1978. — Вип. 15. — С. 44.

web.archive.org

Muskhelishvili David Some aspects of Georgian History in the light of Armenian historiography // The Caucasus & Globalization. 2011. № 1-2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/some-aspects-of-georgian-history-in-the-light-of-armenian-historiography [Архівовано 27 березня 2020 у Wayback Machine.] (дата обращения: 28.03.2020).
Muskhelishvili David Some aspects of Georgian History in the light of Armenian historiography // The Caucasus & Globalization. 2011. № 1-2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/some-aspects-of-georgian-history-in-the-light-of-armenian-historiography [Архівовано 27 березня 2020 у Wayback Machine.] (дата обращения: 28.03.2020).
Оригінальний текст (англ.)
It was Gugark/Gogarani, that is, the province of Kvemo (Lower) Kartli, that also remained an inviolable part of the Georgian state after the Arabs conquered Eastern Georgia in the mid-7th century. Later, when the comprehensive development of feudal relations caused the early feudal Iberian (Kartlian) state to disintegrate at the end of the 8th century into separate feudal principalities, Gugark/ Gogarani remained within the Tbilisi Arab Emirate that broke away from the Caliphate.
«Грузинская советская энциклопедия», ст. «Борчало». Тбилиси, 1965. Архів оригіналу за 11 листопада 2013. Процитовано 18 квітня 2020.

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

Rapp, Stephen H., author. The Sasanian world through Georgian eyes : Caucasia and the Iranian commonwealth in late antique Georgian literature. — ISBN 978-1-317-01671-7, 1-317-01671-8, 978-1-317-01672-4, 1-317-01672-6, 978-1-317-01670-0, 1-317-01670-X, 978-1-315-55313-9, 1-315-55313-9.
Оригінальний текст (англ.)
[In Armenian sources the toparchs of the Armeno-K‛art‛velian frontier are known as bdeašxes of the March of Virk‛ (Վիրք, “Iberia”, i.e., K‛art‛li), also called Gugark‛ (Գ֌գարք; Gk. Gogarēnē, Γωγαρηνή). But from the eastern Georgian point of view, these bidaxšes administered the Armenian March, Somxit‛i (სომხითი). In Old Georgian “Armenia” – especially Arsacid Armenia and then Persarmenia^[en] – is normally designated by the nearly identical term Somxet‛i (სომხეთი). In some cases, received sources use Somxit‛i and Somxet‛i interchangeably, a situation probably arising from the confusion of later scribes and authors who no longer perceived the distinction. Both toponyms derive from samxret‛i (სამხრეთი), “south”. Thus, the K‛art‛velians called the marchlands 'Somxit‛i, the Armenia or Southern March, whereas the Armenians called the same territory the March of Virk‛ (K‛art‛li) and, alternately, Gugark‛. p.67] Помилка: {{Lang}}: текст має погано сформований шрифт (допомога)

worldcat.org

Туманов, Кирилл. Studies in Christian Caucasian history.. — Georgetown University Press, [1963?].
Оригінальний текст (англ.)
Lower Iberia contained the following lands: 1. Tialet'i, in the upper valley of the K'ts'ia. north-east of Javakhet'i, between the T'rialet'i range, in the north, and the Mashaveri valley, in the south. 2. Gach'iani, occupying the middle valley of the JCts'ia and that of the Mashavei (the Dbanis-valley), east of Trialet'i and Javakhet'i and south of the Cyrus valley and Tiflis. Its great fortress was Orbeti-Samshvilde, on the K'ts'ia. 3. Gardabani, east of Gach'iani, in the lower valleys of the K'ts'ia and the Debeda, bounded by the Cyrus in the north-east and possessed of the city-fortress of Khunani on the last-named iver. 4. Tashiri, occupying the plain between the upper Debeda and the Pambaki, with the city of Loi, on the former river. 5. Abots'i, between Tashiri in the east, Gach'iani in the north, and Javakhet'i and lake Palakats'io in the west. p. 440
Rapp, Stephen H., author. The Sasanian world through Georgian eyes : Caucasia and the Iranian commonwealth in late antique Georgian literature. — ISBN 978-1-317-01671-7, 1-317-01671-8, 978-1-317-01672-4, 1-317-01672-6, 978-1-317-01670-0, 1-317-01670-X, 978-1-315-55313-9, 1-315-55313-9.
Оригінальний текст (англ.)
[In Armenian sources the toparchs of the Armeno-K‛art‛velian frontier are known as bdeašxes of the March of Virk‛ (Վիրք, “Iberia”, i.e., K‛art‛li), also called Gugark‛ (Գ֌գարք; Gk. Gogarēnē, Γωγαρηνή). But from the eastern Georgian point of view, these bidaxšes administered the Armenian March, Somxit‛i (სომხითი). In Old Georgian “Armenia” – especially Arsacid Armenia and then Persarmenia^[en] – is normally designated by the nearly identical term Somxet‛i (სომხეთი). In some cases, received sources use Somxit‛i and Somxet‛i interchangeably, a situation probably arising from the confusion of later scribes and authors who no longer perceived the distinction. Both toponyms derive from samxret‛i (სამხრეთი), “south”. Thus, the K‛art‛velians called the marchlands 'Somxit‛i, the Armenia or Southern March, whereas the Armenians called the same territory the March of Virk‛ (K‛art‛li) and, alternately, Gugark‛. p.67] Помилка: {{Lang}}: текст має погано сформований шрифт (допомога)
Cyrille Toumanoff. Studies in Christian Caucasian history. — Washington : Georgetown University Press, 1963.
Оригінальний текст (англ.)
During the decline of the Armenian monarchy in the first century, Cholarzene must have returned to Iberian political sphere. The Iberian historical tradition mentions this land under the control of first-century king, Aderk and Azork, until the revolt, upon an understanding with the king of Armenia, of the duke of Cholarzene and some other dukes against king amazaspes II of Iberia. This no doubt reflects reversal of the Ibero-Armenian marchlands to The Third Armenian monarchy of the Arsacids, which had revived by the end of the first century, and definitively by third century, the emire-building tradition of the Artaxiads. Accordinlgly, for Ptolemy, Cholarzene is a part of Armenia. It was after this return to Armenia that Cholarzene must have been included in the Vitaxate of Gogarene: the viceroyalty of the North which had been formed by the Artaxiads out of their Iberian acuisitions and other lands. This inclusion must be the reason why it is counted by Ananias of Siracene as a part of Gogarene. The earliest monuments of Armenian literature, documents of the Gregorian Cycle seem to know of Cholarzene as an Armenian frontier province. pp. 457-458
Suny, Ronald Grigor. The making of the Georgian nation. — 2nd ed. — Bloomington : Indiana University Press, 1994. — xviii, 418 pages с. — ISBN 0-253-35579-6, 978-0-253-35579-9, 0-253-20915-3, 978-0-253-20915-3.
The Georgian chronicles of Kʻartʻlis Cʻxovreba (A History of Georgia) : translated and with commentary. — Tʻbilisi. — 443 pages с. — ISBN 9941-445-52-4, 978-9941-445-52-1.
Оригінальний текст (англ.)
And the Tatars assigned chiefs for every ten thousand men, whom they called heads of a duman, and appointed mtavaris: the first was Egarslan Bak’urtsikheli, a thoughtful person, but lacking military talents. And he was charged with the troops of Hereti, K’akheti and K’ambechiani, from Tbilisi and up to the Shemakhia mountains. And Shanshe was charged with his estates and those of Avag. Varam was charged with the whole of Somkhiti, and Grigol of Surami – with Kartli; Gamrek’eli of Tori like Egarslan, because of his young age, was charged with Javakheti, Samtskhe and further up to K’arnukalaki, and Tsot’ne Dadiani and the eristavi of Rach’a – with the whole Imerian part of the Kingdom. p. 339
Lang, David Marshall. Landmarks in Georgian literature: an inaugural lecture delivered on 2 November 1965.. — School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, 1966.