کمالزم (Urdu Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "کمالزم" in Urdu language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Urdu rank
6th place
4th place
1st place
1st place
2nd place
11th place
3rd place
3rd place
low place
low place
70th place
116th place
4,028th place
295th place
low place
low place
7,974th place
6,339th place
low place
low place
745th place
1,300th place
low place
low place
3,142nd place
8,194th place
6,988th place
3,504th place
27th place
106th place
low place
low place
699th place
888th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,220th place
8,911th place
11th place
2,494th place
low place
low place

agos.com.tr

archive.org

  • William L Cleveland؛ Martin Bunton (2009)۔ A History of the Modern Middle East (4th ایڈیشن)۔ Westview Press۔ ص 82
  • Andrew Mango (2002) [1999]۔ Ataturk: The Biography of the Founder of Modern Turkey (Paperback ایڈیشن)۔ Woodstock, NY: Overlook Press, Peter Mayer Publishers, Inc۔ ص 394۔ ISBN:1-58567-334-X
  • Caroline Finkel (2006)۔ Osman's Dream: The History of the Ottoman Empire۔ New York: Basic Books۔ ص 549–550۔ ISBN:0-465-02396-7
  • Jacob M. Landau (1995)۔ Pan-Turkism: From Irredentism to Cooperation۔ Indiana University Press۔ ص 275۔ ISBN:0-253-20960-9 Page 186-187
  • Zülküf Aydın (2005)۔ The Political Economy of Turkey۔ Pluto Press۔ ص 25–56۔ DOI:10.2307/j.ctt18dzt8j

atam.gov.tr

  • "Atatürk ve Laiklik"۔ Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi Dergisi, Issue: 24, Volume: VIII۔ 2011-12-10 کو اصل سے آرکائیو کیا گیا۔ اخذ شدہ بتاریخ 2017-07-28

books.google.com

cankaya.edu.tr

psi203.cankaya.edu.tr

  • Hasan Kayalı (1995) "Elections and the Electoral Process in the Ottoman Empire, 1876-1919" International Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp 273–274. "The prominent leaders of the Entente [Freedom and Accord Party] were Turkish-speaking and no different from the Unionists as far as their basic attitudes toward Islam were concerned. Nevertheless, they sought to frustrate the CUP by encouraging non-Turkish groups to attack it for pursuing a policy of Turkification and by pointing out to the conservatives its alleged disregard for Islamic principles and values. The overall effect of this propaganda was to instill ethnic and sectarian-religious discord, which survived the Entente's defeat at the polls ... The Unionists proved to be less vulnerable to accusations of disregard for Islamic precepts and values. Some of the Entente members were known for their cosmopolitan attitudes and close relations with foreign interests. But this did not keep the Entente from accusing the CUP of violating Islamic principles and attempting to restrict the prerogatives of the sultan-caliph in its pamphlets. One such pamphlet, Afiksoz (Candid Words), appealed to the religious-national sentiments of Arabs and claimed that Zionist intrigue was responsible for the abandonment of Libya to the Italians. Such propaganda forced the CUP to seize the role of the champion of Islam. After all, the secular integrationist Ottomanism that it had preached was failing, and the latest manifestation of this failure was the Entente's appeal to segments of Christian communities. The Unionists used Islamic symbols effectively in their election propaganda in 1912. They accused the Entente of trying to separate the offices of the caliphate and the sultanate and thus weakening Islam and the Muslims. There seemed no end to the capital to be gained from the exploitation and manipulation of religious rhetoric. In Izmir, the Entente attacked the CUP's intention to amend Article 35 of the constitution by arguing that the Unionists were thus denouncing the "thirty" days of fasting and "five" daily prayers. This led the town's mufti to plead that "for the sake of Islam and the welfare of the country" religion not be used to achieve political objectives. As with the rhetoric on Turkification, Islam too remained in political discourse long after the elections were over."

dersim-massacre-1937-1938.html

doi.org

google.ch

books.google.ch

insightturkey.com

  • İhsan Dağı (1 Jan 2012). "Why Turkey Needs a Post-Kemalist Order". Insight Turkey (بزبان ترکی). Non-Muslims, whose citizenship was only nominal in the eyes of the Kemalists, faced پوگرومs. This relationship of the Kemalist regime with the people of different ethnicity, religion, and life-style positioned the state with its loyal Kemalist elite as a hegemonic power vis-à-vis the society.

iue.it

vlib.iue.it

jhu.edu

muse.jhu.edu

loc.gov

lccn.loc.gov

meb.gov.tr

oxfordislamicstudies.com

sabah.com.tr

arsiv.sabah.com.tr

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

taylorfrancis.com

tsk.mil.tr

turkishembassy.org

web.archive.org

wikimedia.org

commons.wikimedia.org

wikisource.org

ur.wikisource.org