Ad hominem (Uzbek Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Ad hominem" in Uzbek language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Uzbek rank

5worldcat.org

5^th place

10^th place

4doi.org

2^nd place

3^rd place

4semanticscholar.org

11^th place

82^nd place

3dougwalton.ca

low place

1escholarship.org

1,523^rd place

376^th place

1web.archive.org

1^st place

1oxforddictionaries.com

710^th place

184^th place

1wsj.com

79^th place

146^th place

1cambridge.org

305^th place

363^rd place

1books.google.com

3^rd place

4^th place

1wikipedia.org

low place

8,011^th place

1newmanreader.org

low place

1aeon.co

low place

3,528^th place

aeon.co

Mizrahi. „How Ad Hominem Arguments Can Demolish Appeals to Authority“ (en). Aeon (2019-yil 10-iyul). Qaraldi: 2021-yil 13-mart.

books.google.com

Walton, Douglas N.. Informal Fallacies: Towards a Theory of Argument Criticisms, Pragmatics & beyond companion series. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, 1987 — 218-bet. ISBN 1556190107. OCLC 14586031. See also: „Newman Reader – Apologia (1865) – Preface“. newmanreader.org.

cambridge.org

dictionary.cambridge.org

„whataboutism“, Cambridge Dictionary

doi.org

Walton 2001, s. 208; Tindale 2007, s. 82. Walton, Douglas N. (2001). „Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument“ (PDF). Argumentation. 15-jild, № 2. 207–221-bet. doi:10.1023/A:1011120100277. ISSN 0920-427X. S2CID 16864574.
Walton 2001, s. 207–209; Wong 2017, s. 49. Walton, Douglas N. (2001). „Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument“ (PDF). Argumentation. 15-jild, № 2. 207–221-bet. doi:10.1023/A:1011120100277. ISSN 0920-427X. S2CID 16864574. Wong, Andrew David (2017). Unmitigated Skepticism: The Nature and Scope of Pyrrhonism (PDF) (Thesis). University of California.
Walton 2001. Walton, Douglas N. (2001). „Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument“ (PDF). Argumentation. 15-jild, № 2. 207–221-bet. doi:10.1023/A:1011120100277. ISSN 0920-427X. S2CID 16864574.
Orkibi 2018. Orkibi, Eithan (2018-02-27). „Precedential Ad Hominem in Polemical Exchange: Examples from the Israeli Political Debate“. Argumentation. 32-jild, № 4. 485–499-bet. doi:10.1007/s10503-018-9453-2. ISSN 0920-427X. S2CID 149120204.

dougwalton.ca

Walton 2001, s. 208; Tindale 2007, s. 82. Walton, Douglas N. (2001). „Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument“ (PDF). Argumentation. 15-jild, № 2. 207–221-bet. doi:10.1023/A:1011120100277. ISSN 0920-427X. S2CID 16864574.
Walton 2001, s. 207–209; Wong 2017, s. 49. Walton, Douglas N. (2001). „Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument“ (PDF). Argumentation. 15-jild, № 2. 207–221-bet. doi:10.1023/A:1011120100277. ISSN 0920-427X. S2CID 16864574. Wong, Andrew David (2017). Unmitigated Skepticism: The Nature and Scope of Pyrrhonism (PDF) (Thesis). University of California.
Walton 2001. Walton, Douglas N. (2001). „Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument“ (PDF). Argumentation. 15-jild, № 2. 207–221-bet. doi:10.1023/A:1011120100277. ISSN 0920-427X. S2CID 16864574.

escholarship.org

Walton 2001, s. 207–209; Wong 2017, s. 49. Walton, Douglas N. (2001). „Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument“ (PDF). Argumentation. 15-jild, № 2. 207–221-bet. doi:10.1023/A:1011120100277. ISSN 0920-427X. S2CID 16864574. Wong, Andrew David (2017). Unmitigated Skepticism: The Nature and Scope of Pyrrhonism (PDF) (Thesis). University of California.

newmanreader.org

Walton, Douglas N.. Informal Fallacies: Towards a Theory of Argument Criticisms, Pragmatics & beyond companion series. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, 1987 — 218-bet. ISBN 1556190107. OCLC 14586031. See also: „Newman Reader – Apologia (1865) – Preface“. newmanreader.org.

oxforddictionaries.com

en.oxforddictionaries.com

„whataboutism“, Oxford Living Dictionaries, Oxford University Press, 2017, 9 March 2017da asl nusxadan arxivlandi, qaraldi: 21 July 2017, „Origin - 1990s: from the way in which counter-accusations may take the form of questions introduced by 'What about —?'.... Also called whataboutery“

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Walton 2001, s. 208; Tindale 2007, s. 82. Walton, Douglas N. (2001). „Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument“ (PDF). Argumentation. 15-jild, № 2. 207–221-bet. doi:10.1023/A:1011120100277. ISSN 0920-427X. S2CID 16864574.
Walton 2001, s. 207–209; Wong 2017, s. 49. Walton, Douglas N. (2001). „Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument“ (PDF). Argumentation. 15-jild, № 2. 207–221-bet. doi:10.1023/A:1011120100277. ISSN 0920-427X. S2CID 16864574. Wong, Andrew David (2017). Unmitigated Skepticism: The Nature and Scope of Pyrrhonism (PDF) (Thesis). University of California.
Walton 2001. Walton, Douglas N. (2001). „Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument“ (PDF). Argumentation. 15-jild, № 2. 207–221-bet. doi:10.1023/A:1011120100277. ISSN 0920-427X. S2CID 16864574.
Orkibi 2018. Orkibi, Eithan (2018-02-27). „Precedential Ad Hominem in Polemical Exchange: Examples from the Israeli Political Debate“. Argumentation. 32-jild, № 4. 485–499-bet. doi:10.1007/s10503-018-9453-2. ISSN 0920-427X. S2CID 149120204.

web.archive.org

„whataboutism“, Oxford Living Dictionaries, Oxford University Press, 2017, 9 March 2017da asl nusxadan arxivlandi, qaraldi: 21 July 2017, „Origin - 1990s: from the way in which counter-accusations may take the form of questions introduced by 'What about —?'.... Also called whataboutery“

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

Walton, Douglas N.. Informal Fallacies: Towards a Theory of Argument Criticisms, Pragmatics & beyond companion series. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, 1987 — 218-bet. ISBN 1556190107. OCLC 14586031. See also: „Newman Reader – Apologia (1865) – Preface“. newmanreader.org.

worldcat.org

Walton 2001, s. 208; Tindale 2007, s. 82. Walton, Douglas N. (2001). „Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument“ (PDF). Argumentation. 15-jild, № 2. 207–221-bet. doi:10.1023/A:1011120100277. ISSN 0920-427X. S2CID 16864574.
Walton 2001, s. 207–209; Wong 2017, s. 49. Walton, Douglas N. (2001). „Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument“ (PDF). Argumentation. 15-jild, № 2. 207–221-bet. doi:10.1023/A:1011120100277. ISSN 0920-427X. S2CID 16864574. Wong, Andrew David (2017). Unmitigated Skepticism: The Nature and Scope of Pyrrhonism (PDF) (Thesis). University of California.
Walton 2001. Walton, Douglas N. (2001). „Argumentation Schemes and Historical Origins of the Circumstantial Ad Hominem Argument“ (PDF). Argumentation. 15-jild, № 2. 207–221-bet. doi:10.1023/A:1011120100277. ISSN 0920-427X. S2CID 16864574.
Walton, Douglas N.. Informal Fallacies: Towards a Theory of Argument Criticisms, Pragmatics & beyond companion series. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing, 1987 — 218-bet. ISBN 1556190107. OCLC 14586031. See also: „Newman Reader – Apologia (1865) – Preface“. newmanreader.org.
Orkibi 2018. Orkibi, Eithan (2018-02-27). „Precedential Ad Hominem in Polemical Exchange: Examples from the Israeli Political Debate“. Argumentation. 32-jild, № 4. 485–499-bet. doi:10.1007/s10503-018-9453-2. ISSN 0920-427X. S2CID 149120204.

wsj.com

Zimmer, Ben. „The Roots of the 'What About?' Ploy“. The Wall Street Journal (9-iyun 2017-yil). Qaraldi: 22-iyul 2017-yil. „"Whataboutism" is another name for the logical fallacy of "tu quoque" (Latin for "you also"), in which an accusation is met with a counter-accusation, pivoting away from the original criticism. The strategy has been a hallmark of Soviet and post-Soviet propaganda, and some commentators have accused President Donald Trump of mimicking Mr. Putin's use of the technique.“.