Jahon universitetlarining akademik reytingi (ARWU) (Uzbek Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Jahon universitetlarining akademik reytingi (ARWU)" in Uzbek language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Uzbek rank
1st place
1st place
2,894th place
2,143rd place
2nd place
3rd place
4,161st place
4,848th place
30th place
98th place
12th place
52nd place
2,447th place
low place
low place
low place
791st place
2,308th place
4,555th place
9,500th place
1,512th place
3,546th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
254th place
200th place
14th place
37th place
3,169th place
7,627th place
68th place
50th place
3rd place
4th place
1,554th place
303rd place
702nd place
426th place
2,747th place
9,980th place
1,031st place
1,266th place
low place
low place
4,336th place
low place
83rd place
1,373rd place
1,515th place
7,277th place
low place
low place

abs-cbnnews.com

  • „Shanghai rankings rattle European universities“. ABS-CBN Interactive (2010-yil 8-dekabr). — „France's higher education minister travelled to Jiaotong University's suburban campus last month to discuss the rankings, the Norwegian education minister came last year and the Danish minister is due to visit next month.; The idea for the rankings was born in 1998, when Beijing decreed China needed several world-leading universities.“. Qaraldi: 2015-yil 27-yanvar.

archive.today

  • „A world of opportunity“. The Economics (2005-yil 8-sentyabr). — „It is no accident that the most widely used annual ranking of the world's research universities, the Shanghai index, is produced by a Chinese university.“. 2012-yil 18-iyulda asl nusxadan arxivlangan. Qaraldi: 2015-yil 30-yanvar.

archives-ouvertes.fr

hal.archives-ouvertes.fr

biomedcentral.com

books.google.com

chronicle.com

csmonitor.com

doi.org

  • Pavel, Adina-Petruta (2015). „Global university rankings – a comparative analysis“. Procedia Economics and Finance. 26-jild. 54–63-bet. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00838-2.
  • Răzvan V. Florian (17–iyun 2007–yil). „Irreproducibility of the results of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities“. Scientometrics. 72-jild, № 1. 25–32-bet. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1712-1.{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: date format ()
  • Domingo Docampo (1–iyul 2012–yil). „Reproducibility of the results of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities“. Scientometrics. 94-jild, № 2. 567–587-bet. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0801-y.{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: date format ()

economist.com

rss.economist.com

  • „A world of opportunity“. The Economics (2005-yil 8-sentyabr). — „It is no accident that the most widely used annual ranking of the world's research universities, the Shanghai index, is produced by a Chinese university.“. 2012-yil 18-iyulda asl nusxadan arxivlangan. Qaraldi: 2015-yil 30-yanvar.

edmontonjournal.com

  • Indira Samarasekera & Carl Amrhein. „Top schools don't always get top marks“. The Edmonton Journal. 3-oktabr 2010-yilda asl nusxadan arxivlangan. „There are currently three major international rankings that receive widespread commentary: The Academic World Ranking of Universities, the QS World University Rankings and the Times Higher Education Rankings.“.

euobserver.com

europa.eu

ec.europa.eu

hepi.ac.uk

  • Bahram Bekhradnia. „International university rankings: For good or ill?“. Higher Education Policy Institute (2016-yil 15-dekabr). — „ARWU presents a further data issue. Whereas in the case of the other rankings the results are adjusted to take account of the size of institutions, hardly any such adjustment is made by ARWU. So there is a distortion in favour of large institutions. If two institutions were to merge, the very fact of merger would mean that the merged institution would do nearly twice as well as either of the individual institutions prior to merger, although nothing else had changed.“. Qaraldi: 2017-yil 10-iyun.

insidehighered.com

  • Philip G. Altbach. „The State of the Rankings“. Inside Higher Ed (2010-yil 11-noyabr). — „The major international rankings have appeared in recent months — the Academic Ranking of World Universities, the QS World University Rankings, and the Times Higher Education World University Rankings (THE).“. 2014-yil 19-dekabrda asl nusxadan arxivlangan. Qaraldi: 2022-yil 7-iyun.
  • Philip G. Altbach. „The State of the Rankings“. INSIDE HIGHER ED (2010-yil 11-sentyabr). — „Nonetheless, AWRU's consistency, clarity of purpose, and transparency are significant advantages.“. 2014-yil 19-dekabrda asl nusxadan arxivlangan. Qaraldi: 2022-yil 7-iyun.

lajeunepolitique.com

lemonde.fr

ljpol.com

monde-diplomatique.fr

nst.com.my

qswownews.com

shanghairanking.cn

shanghairanking.com

telegraph.co.uk

  • Marszal, Andrew. „University rankings: which world university rankings should we trust?“. Daily Telegraph (2012-yil 4-oktyabr). Qaraldi: 2018-yil 29-mart.
  • Marszal, Andrew. „University rankings: which world university rankings should we trust?“. The Telegraph (2015). Qaraldi: 27-yanvar 2015-yil. „It is a remarkably stable list, relying on long-term factors such as the number of Nobel Prize-winners a university has produced, and number of articles published in Nature and Science journals. But with this narrow focus comes drawbacks. China's priority was for its universities to 'catch up' on hard scientific research. So if you're looking for raw research power, it's the list for you. If you're a humanities student, or more interested in teaching quality? Not so much.“.

theguardian.com

timeshighereducation.com

upenn.edu

marketing.wharton.upenn.edu

web.archive.org