Markaziy Osiyo (Uzbek Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Markaziy Osiyo" in Uzbek language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Uzbek rank
1st place
1st place
520th place
4,722nd place
2nd place
3rd place
4th place
7th place
121st place
287th place
18th place
35th place
5th place
10th place
40th place
16th place
low place
8,011th place
358th place
84th place
3,817th place
3,806th place
234th place
712th place
9,110th place
44th place
low place
27th place
low place
1,341st place
104th place
212th place

academia.edu

  • Phillips, Andrew; James, Paul (2013). „National Identity between Tradition and Reflexive Modernisation: The Contradictions of Central Asia". National Identities. № 3 (1). 23–35-bet. doi:10.1080/14608940020028475. „In Central Asia the collision of modernity and tradition led all but the most deracinated of the intellectuals-clerics to seek salvation in reconstituted variants of traditional identities rather than succumb to the modern European idea of nationalism. The inability of the elites to form a united front, as demonstrated in the numerous declarations of autonomy by different authorities during the Russian civil war, paved the way, in the early 1920s for the Soviet re-conquest of the Central Asia in the early 1920s“
  • Okur, Mehmet Akif (2014). „Classical Texts of the Geopolitics and the "Heart of Eurasia“. Journal of Turkish World Studies. № XIV (2). 73–104-bet.

britannica.com

doi.org

  • Phillips, Andrew; James, Paul (2013). „National Identity between Tradition and Reflexive Modernisation: The Contradictions of Central Asia". National Identities. № 3 (1). 23–35-bet. doi:10.1080/14608940020028475. „In Central Asia the collision of modernity and tradition led all but the most deracinated of the intellectuals-clerics to seek salvation in reconstituted variants of traditional identities rather than succumb to the modern European idea of nationalism. The inability of the elites to form a united front, as demonstrated in the numerous declarations of autonomy by different authorities during the Russian civil war, paved the way, in the early 1920s for the Soviet re-conquest of the Central Asia in the early 1920s“
  • Damgaard, Peter de Barros; Marchi, Nina; Rasmussen, Simon; Peyrot, Michaël; Renaud, Gabriel; Korneliussen, Thorfinn; Moreno-Mayar, J. Víctor; Pedersen, Mikkel Winther; Goldberg, Amy; Usmanova, Emma; Baimukhanov, Nurbol; Loman, Valeriy; Hedeager, Lotte; Pedersen, Anders Gorm; Nielsen, Kasper (May 2018). „137 ancient human genomes from across the Eurasian steppes“. Nature. № 557 (7705). 369–374-bet. Bibcode:2018Natur.557..369D. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0094-2. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 29743675.
  • Zhabagin, Maxat; Balanovska, Elena; Sabitov, Zhaxylyk; Kuznetsova, Marina; Agdzhoyan, Anastasiya; Balaganskaya, Olga; Chukhryaeva, Marina; Markina, Nadezhda; Romanov, Alexey; Skhalyakho, Roza; Zaporozhchenko, Valery; Saroyants, Liudmila; Dalimova, Dilbar; Davletchurin, Damir; Turdikulova, Shahlo (2017). „The Connection of the Genetic, Cultural and Geographic Landscapes of Transoxiana“. Scientific Reports. № 7 (1). 3085-bet. Bibcode:2017NatSR...7.3085Z. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03176-z. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 5465200. PMID 28596519.{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ()

geonames.org

gov.uz

data.gov.uz

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

iranicaonline.org

  • Bosworth, C. E. (1990). „CENTRAL ASIA iv. In the Islamic Period up to the Mongols“. In Yarshater, Ehsan (ed.). Encyclopædia Iranica, Volume V/2: C̆ehel Sotūn, Isfahan–Central Asia XIII. London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul. pp. 169–172. ISBN 978-0-939214-69-3. In early Islamic times Persians tended to identify all the lands to the northeast of Khorasan and lying beyond the Oxus with the region of Turan, which in the Šāh-nāma of Ferdowsī is regarded as the land allotted to Ferēdūnʼs son Tūr. The denizens of Tūrān were held to include the Turks, in the first four centuries of Islam essentially those nomadizing beyond the Jaxartes, and behind them the Chinese (see Kowalski; Minorsky, „Tūrān“). Tūrān thus became both an ethnic and a geographical term, but always containing ambiguities and contradictions, arising from the fact that all through Islamic times the lands immediately beyond the Oxus and along its lower reaches were the homes not of Turks but of Iranian peoples, such as the Sogdians and Khwarezmians.

nature.com

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

opendemocracy.net

samarkand.uz

stat.uz

unesco.org

unesdoc.unesco.org

web.archive.org

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

  • Bosworth, C. E. (1990). „CENTRAL ASIA iv. In the Islamic Period up to the Mongols“. In Yarshater, Ehsan (ed.). Encyclopædia Iranica, Volume V/2: C̆ehel Sotūn, Isfahan–Central Asia XIII. London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul. pp. 169–172. ISBN 978-0-939214-69-3. In early Islamic times Persians tended to identify all the lands to the northeast of Khorasan and lying beyond the Oxus with the region of Turan, which in the Šāh-nāma of Ferdowsī is regarded as the land allotted to Ferēdūnʼs son Tūr. The denizens of Tūrān were held to include the Turks, in the first four centuries of Islam essentially those nomadizing beyond the Jaxartes, and behind them the Chinese (see Kowalski; Minorsky, „Tūrān“). Tūrān thus became both an ethnic and a geographical term, but always containing ambiguities and contradictions, arising from the fact that all through Islamic times the lands immediately beyond the Oxus and along its lower reaches were the homes not of Turks but of Iranian peoples, such as the Sogdians and Khwarezmians.

worldcat.org