Chiến tranh Ấn Độ – Pakistan 1965 (Vietnamese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Chiến tranh Ấn Độ – Pakistan 1965" in Vietnamese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Vietnamese rank

4books.google.com

3^rd place

6^th place

3archive.org

6^th place

4^th place

2web.archive.org

1^st place

1globalsecurity.org

443^rd place

229^th place

1loc.gov

70^th place

116^th place

1time.com

61^st place

83^rd place

1state.gov

264^th place

137^th place

1berkeley.edu

580^th place

543^rd place

1fas.org

505^th place

315^th place

archive.org

Kux, Dennis (2006). India-Pakistan Negotiations: Is Past Still Prologue?. US Institute of Peace Press. tr. 30. ISBN 9781929223879. The conflict was short, but nasty. After seventeen days, both sides accepted a UN Security Council call for a cease-fire. Although the two militaries fought to a standoff, India won by not losing.
Conley, Jerome (2001). Indo-Russian military and nuclear cooperation: lessons and options for U.S. policy in South Asia. Lexington Books. ISBN 978-0-7391-0217-6.
Riedel, Bruce (2013). Avoiding Armageddon: America, India, and Pakistan to the Brink and Back. Brookings Institution Press. tr. 66–68. ISBN 978-0-8157-2408-7.

berkeley.edu

globetrotter.berkeley.edu

Profile of Pakistan – U.S. Department of State, Failure of U.S.'s Pakistan Policy Lưu trữ 2010-07-12 tại Wayback Machine – Interview with Steve Coll

books.google.com

Lyon, Peter (2008). Conflict between India and Pakistan: an encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. tr. 82. ISBN 978-1-57607-712-2. Truy cập ngày 30 tháng 10 năm 2011.
Hagerty, Devin (2005). South Asia in world politics. Rowman & Littlefield. tr. 26. ISBN 978-0-7425-2587-0. Quote: The invading Indian forces outfought their Pakistani counterparts and halted their attack on the outskirts of Lahore, Pakistan's second-largest city. By the time the United Nations intervened on 22 September, Pakistan had suffered a clear defeat.
Wolpert, Stanley (2005). India (ấn bản thứ 3). Berkeley: University of California Press. tr. 235. ISBN 978-0-520-24696-6. Quote: India, however, was in a position to inflict grave damage to, if not capture, Pakistan's capital of the Punjab when the cease-fire was called, and controlled Kashmir's strategic Uri-Poonch bulge, much to Ayub's chagrin.
Kux, Dennis (1992). India and the United States: Estranged democracies, 1941–1991. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press. tr. 238. ISBN 978-0-7881-0279-0. Quote: India had the better of the war.

fas.org

Speech of Bill McCollum Lưu trữ 2016-03-04 tại Wayback Machine in United States House of Representatives ngày 12 tháng 9 năm 1994

globalsecurity.org

“Indo-Pakistani War of 1965”. Global Security.

loc.gov

memory.loc.gov

Pakistan:: The Indo-Pakistani War of 1965. Library of Congress Country Studies, United States of America. tháng 4 năm 1994. Truy cập ngày 2 tháng 10 năm 2010. "Losses were relatively heavy—on the Pakistani side, twenty aircraft, 200 tanks, and 3,800 troops. Pakistan's army had been able to withstand Indian pressure, but a continuation of the fighting would only have led to further losses and ultimate defeat for Pakistan."

state.gov

2009-2017.state.gov

Profile of Pakistan – U.S. Department of State, Failure of U.S.'s Pakistan Policy Lưu trữ 2010-07-12 tại Wayback Machine – Interview with Steve Coll

time.com

content.time.com

“Asia: Silent Guns, Wary Combatants”. Time. ngày 1 tháng 10 năm 1965. Truy cập ngày 30 tháng 8 năm 2013. Quote: India, by contrast, is still the big gainer in the war. Alternate link content.time.com

web.archive.org

Profile of Pakistan – U.S. Department of State, Failure of U.S.'s Pakistan Policy Lưu trữ 2010-07-12 tại Wayback Machine – Interview with Steve Coll
Speech of Bill McCollum Lưu trữ 2016-03-04 tại Wayback Machine in United States House of Representatives ngày 12 tháng 9 năm 1994