Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Công ước về ngăn ngừa và trừng trị tội diệt chủng" in Vietnamese language version.
where Stalin was presumably anxious to avoid his purges being subjected to genocidal scrutiny.
<ref> không hợp lệ: tên “Ashraph” được định rõ nhiều lần, mỗi lần có nội dung khácThe United States attached a reservation to its ratification of the Genocide Convention, for example, stating that 'before any dispute to which the United States is a party may be submitted to the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice under [Article IX of the Convention], the specific consent of the United States is required in each case.'
Current or former colonial powers—Belgium, Denmark, France, Netherlands, and the United Kingdom—opposed the retention of references to cultural genocide in the draft convention. So did settler countries that had displaced indigenous peoples but otherwise were champions of the development of international human rights standards, including the United States, Canada, Sweden, Brazil, New Zealand, and Australia.
The United States attached a reservation to its ratification of the Genocide Convention, for example, stating that 'before any dispute to which the United States is a party may be submitted to the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice under [Article IX of the Convention], the specific consent of the United States is required in each case.'
{{Chú thích báo cáo}}: Quản lý CS1: địa điểm (liên kết); Human Rights Watch (ngày 24 tháng 9 năm 1996). Shattered Lives: Sexual Violence during the Rwandan Genocide and its Aftermath (Báo cáo). tr. 39. Bản gốc lưu trữ ngày 13 tháng 5 năm 2024.{{Chú thích báo}}: Quản lý CS1: nhiều tên: danh sách tác giả (liên kết)The United States attached a reservation to its ratification of the Genocide Convention, for example, stating that 'before any dispute to which the United States is a party may be submitted to the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice under [Article IX of the Convention], the specific consent of the United States is required in each case.'
The ICJ has also stated that the prohibition of genocide is a peremptory norm of international law (or ius cogens) and consequently, no derogation from it is allowed.
<ref> không hợp lệ: tên “Ashraph” được định rõ nhiều lần, mỗi lần có nội dung khác{{Chú thích báo cáo}}: Quản lý CS1: địa điểm (liên kết); Human Rights Watch (ngày 24 tháng 9 năm 1996). Shattered Lives: Sexual Violence during the Rwandan Genocide and its Aftermath (Báo cáo). tr. 39. Bản gốc lưu trữ ngày 13 tháng 5 năm 2024.