Dẫn độ (Vietnamese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Dẫn độ" in Vietnamese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Vietnamese rank
1st place
1st place
2,915th place
3,069th place
low place
low place
1,812th place
3,253rd place
265th place
1,199th place
3rd place
6th place
703rd place
825th place
264th place
137th place
1,021st place
906th place
low place
6,883rd place
1,873rd place
1,563rd place
2,390th place
7,380th place
low place
low place
8,616th place
3,953rd place
4,009th place
5,965th place
low place
low place
5,131st place
4,312th place
1,676th place
441st place
3,914th place
8,378th place
low place
9,738th place
279th place
538th place
1,962nd place
2,118th place
low place
373rd place
1,481st place
8th place

admin.ch

austlii.edu.au

bka.gv.at

ris.bka.gv.at

bocongan.gov.vn

books.google.com

  • Sadoff, David A. (24 tháng 12 năm 2016). Bringing International Fugitives to Justice: Extradition and its Alternatives (bằng tiếng Anh). Cambridge University Press. tr. 43. ISBN 9781107129283.

gov.cn

ilo.org

io.gov.mo

bo.io.gov.mo

  • Article 7 of Macau Law No. 6/2006 Law of judicial cooperation in criminal matters ((tiếng Bồ Đào Nha) Lei n.º 6/2006, )

juris.de

bundesrecht.juris.de

  • Except to a member state of the European Union or to an international court: Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany, Article 16 (2), 29 July 2009.

legifrance.gouv.fr

lovdata.no

moj.go.jp

moj.gov.tw

law.moj.gov.tw

  • Article 4 of the Law of Extradition () prohibits a citizen of the Republic of China from being extradited from Taiwan, unless the person acquired the citizenship after the request for extradition is made.

refworld.org

  • Kindler v. Canada, CCPR/C/48/D/470/1991, UN Commission on Human Rights, 11 November 1993, at 2.2 [1]
  • Kindler v. Canada, CCPR/C/48/D/470/1991, UN Commission on Human Rights, 11 November 1993, at 14.6 [2]
  • Soering v. The United Kingdom, 1/1989/161/217, Council of Europe: European Court of Human Rights, 7 July 1989, [109]. [3]

rt.com

ssrn.com

  • Dan E. Stigall, “Ungoverned Spaces, Transnational Crime, and the Prohibition on Extraterritorial Enforcement Jurisdiction in International Law”. SSRN 2211219. |url= trống hay bị thiếu (trợ giúp)

state.gov

2009-2017.state.gov

supremecourt.uk

the-japan-news.com

tuoitre.vn

ucdavis.edu

jilp.law.ucdavis.edu

  • Adam Abelson (19 tháng 5 năm 2010). “The prosecute/extradite dilemma: Concurrent criminal jurisdiction and global governance” (PDF). Bản gốc (PDF) lưu trữ ngày 31 tháng 7 năm 2020. Truy cập ngày 11 tháng 6 năm 2019. The criminal laws of the United States, whether state or federal, ordinarily apply only to conduct within U.S. territory. Sometimes, however, they apply to conduct abroad, from antitrust conspiracies to torture. Where such extraterritorial criminal prescriptive jurisdiction exists under U.S. law, jurisdiction typically exists under the law of another country as well, such as the country where the conduct occurred.

usoud.cz

web.archive.org

wikipedia.org

ja.wikipedia.org