Ngữ hệ Hán-Tạng (Vietnamese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Ngữ hệ Hán-Tạng" in Vietnamese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Vietnamese rank

18doi.org

2^nd place

9jstor.org

26^th place

50^th place

6archive.org

6^th place

4^th place

6academia.edu

121^st place

233^rd place

3berkeley.edu

580^th place

543^rd place

2soas.ac.uk

5,013^th place

4,694^th place

1uni-frankfurt.de

4,572^nd place

3,921^st place

1books.google.com

3^rd place

6^th place

1escholarship.org

1,523^rd place

858^th place

1himalayanlanguages.org

low place

1web.archive.org

1^st place

1sites.google.com

626^th place

246^th place

1sealang.net

9,284^th place

1,545^th place

academia.edu

Handel (2008), tr. 422. Handel, Zev (2008), “What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a Field and a Language Family in Flux”, Language and Linguistics Compass, 2 (3): 422–441, doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00061.x.
Handel (2008), tr. 422, 434–436. Handel, Zev (2008), “What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a Field and a Language Family in Flux”, Language and Linguistics Compass, 2 (3): 422–441, doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00061.x.
Handel (2008), tr. 434. Handel, Zev (2008), “What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a Field and a Language Family in Flux”, Language and Linguistics Compass, 2 (3): 422–441, doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00061.x.
Handel (2008), tr. 425–426. Handel, Zev (2008), “What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a Field and a Language Family in Flux”, Language and Linguistics Compass, 2 (3): 422–441, doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00061.x.
Handel (2008), tr. 431. Handel, Zev (2008), “What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a Field and a Language Family in Flux”, Language and Linguistics Compass, 2 (3): 422–441, doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00061.x.
Handel (2008), tr. 435. Handel, Zev (2008), “What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a Field and a Language Family in Flux”, Language and Linguistics Compass, 2 (3): 422–441, doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00061.x.

archive.org

Kuhn (1889), tr. 189: "wir das Tibetisch-Barmanische einerseits, das Chinesisch-Siamesische anderseits als deutlich geschiedene und doch wieder verwandte Gruppen einer einheitlichen Sprachfamilie anzuerkennen haben." (also quoted in van Driem (2001), tr. 264.) Kuhn, Ernst (1889), “Beiträge zur Sprachenkunde Hinterindiens” (PDF), Sitzungsberichte der Königlichen Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Philologische und Historische Klasse, Sitzung vom 2 März 1889, München, tr. 189–236. ——— (2001), Languages of the Himalayas: An Ethnolinguistic Handbook of the Greater Himalayan Region, Brill, ISBN 978-90-04-12062-4.
Logan (1856), tr. 31. Logan, James R. (1856), “The Maruwi of the Baniak Islands”, Journal of the Indian Archipelago and Eastern Asia, 1 (1): 1–42.
Klaproth (1823), tr. 346, 363–365. Klaproth, Julius (1823), Asia Polyglotta, Paris: B.A. Shubart.
Finck (1909), tr. 57. Finck, Franz Nikolaus (1909), Die Sprachstämme des Erdkreises, Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.
Przyluski (1924), tr. 361. Przyluski, Jean (1924), “Langues sino-tibétaines”, trong Meillet, Antoine; Cohen, Marcel (biên tập), Les langues du monde, Librairie ancienne Édouard Champion, tr. 361–384.
Przyluski (1924), tr. 380. Przyluski, Jean (1924), “Langues sino-tibétaines”, trong Meillet, Antoine; Cohen, Marcel (biên tập), Les langues du monde, Librairie ancienne Édouard Champion, tr. 361–384.

berkeley.edu

stedt.berkeley.edu

Benedict (1972), tr. 20–21. ——— (1972), Sino-Tibetan: A Conspectus (PDF), Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-08175-7.
Benedict (1972), tr. 17–18, 133–139, 164–171. ——— (1972), Sino-Tibetan: A Conspectus (PDF), Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-08175-7.
Benedict (1972), tr. 98–123. ——— (1972), Sino-Tibetan: A Conspectus (PDF), Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-08175-7.

books.google.com

Logan (1858). ——— (1858), “The West-Himalaic or Tibetan tribes of Asam, Burma and Pegu”, Journal of the Indian Archipelago and Eastern Asia, 2 (1): 68–114.

doi.org

Handel (2008), tr. 422. Handel, Zev (2008), “What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a Field and a Language Family in Flux”, Language and Linguistics Compass, 2 (3): 422–441, doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00061.x.
Handel (2008), tr. 422, 434–436. Handel, Zev (2008), “What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a Field and a Language Family in Flux”, Language and Linguistics Compass, 2 (3): 422–441, doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00061.x.
Sapir (1925), tr. 373. Sapir, Edward (1925), “Review: Les Langues du Monde”, Modern Language Notes, 40 (6): 373–375, doi:10.2307/2914102, JSTOR 2914102.
Przyluski & Luce (1931). Przyluski, J.; Luce, G. H. (1931), “The Number 'A Hundred' in Sino-Tibetan”, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 6 (3): 667–668, doi:10.1017/S0041977X00093150.
Miller (1974), tr. 195. Miller, Roy Andrew (1974), “Sino-Tibetan: Inspection of a Conspectus”, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 94 (2): 195–209, doi:10.2307/600891, JSTOR 600891.
Miller (1974), tr. 195–196. Miller, Roy Andrew (1974), “Sino-Tibetan: Inspection of a Conspectus”, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 94 (2): 195–209, doi:10.2307/600891, JSTOR 600891.
Matisoff (1991), tr. 473. Matisoff, James A. (1991), “Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Present State and Future Prospects”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 20: 469–504, doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.20.1.469, JSTOR 2155809.
Handel (2008), tr. 434. Handel, Zev (2008), “What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a Field and a Language Family in Flux”, Language and Linguistics Compass, 2 (3): 422–441, doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00061.x.
Handel (2008), tr. 425–426. Handel, Zev (2008), “What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a Field and a Language Family in Flux”, Language and Linguistics Compass, 2 (3): 422–441, doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00061.x.
Miller (1974), tr. 197. Miller, Roy Andrew (1974), “Sino-Tibetan: Inspection of a Conspectus”, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 94 (2): 195–209, doi:10.2307/600891, JSTOR 600891.
Matisoff (1991), tr. 471–472. Matisoff, James A. (1991), “Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Present State and Future Prospects”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 20: 469–504, doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.20.1.469, JSTOR 2155809.
Handel (2008), tr. 431. Handel, Zev (2008), “What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a Field and a Language Family in Flux”, Language and Linguistics Compass, 2 (3): 422–441, doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00061.x.
Hill (2014), tr. 97–104. ——— (2014), “Cognates of Old Chinese *-n, *-r, and *-j in Tibetan and Burmese”, Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale, 43 (2): 91–109, doi:10.1163/19606028-00432p02
Matisoff (1991), tr. 472–473. Matisoff, James A. (1991), “Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Present State and Future Prospects”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 20: 469–504, doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.20.1.469, JSTOR 2155809.
Matisoff (1991), tr. 470, 476–478. Matisoff, James A. (1991), “Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Present State and Future Prospects”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 20: 469–504, doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.20.1.469, JSTOR 2155809.
Handel (2008), tr. 435. Handel, Zev (2008), “What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a Field and a Language Family in Flux”, Language and Linguistics Compass, 2 (3): 422–441, doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00061.x.
Matisoff (1991), tr. 482. Matisoff, James A. (1991), “Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Present State and Future Prospects”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 20: 469–504, doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.20.1.469, JSTOR 2155809.
Hill (2012). Hill, Nathan W. (2012), “The six vowel hypothesis of Old Chinese in comparative context”, Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics, 6 (2): 1–69, doi:10.1163/2405478x-90000100.

escholarship.org

Matisoff (2003), tr. 16. ——— (2003), Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan Reconstruction, Berkeley: University of California Press, ISBN 978-0-520-09843-5.

himalayanlanguages.org

van Driem, George. 2014. "Trans-Himalayan Lưu trữ 2020-12-06 tại Wayback Machine". Owen-Smith, Thomas; Hill, Nathan W. (eds.), Trans-Himalayan Linguistics: Historical and Descriptive Linguistics of the Himalayan Area, 11–40. Berlin: de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-031083-2.

jstor.org

Sapir (1925), tr. 373. Sapir, Edward (1925), “Review: Les Langues du Monde”, Modern Language Notes, 40 (6): 373–375, doi:10.2307/2914102, JSTOR 2914102.
Miller (1974), tr. 195. Miller, Roy Andrew (1974), “Sino-Tibetan: Inspection of a Conspectus”, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 94 (2): 195–209, doi:10.2307/600891, JSTOR 600891.
Miller (1974), tr. 195–196. Miller, Roy Andrew (1974), “Sino-Tibetan: Inspection of a Conspectus”, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 94 (2): 195–209, doi:10.2307/600891, JSTOR 600891.
Matisoff (1991), tr. 473. Matisoff, James A. (1991), “Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Present State and Future Prospects”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 20: 469–504, doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.20.1.469, JSTOR 2155809.
Miller (1974), tr. 197. Miller, Roy Andrew (1974), “Sino-Tibetan: Inspection of a Conspectus”, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 94 (2): 195–209, doi:10.2307/600891, JSTOR 600891.
Matisoff (1991), tr. 471–472. Matisoff, James A. (1991), “Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Present State and Future Prospects”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 20: 469–504, doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.20.1.469, JSTOR 2155809.
Matisoff (1991), tr. 472–473. Matisoff, James A. (1991), “Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Present State and Future Prospects”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 20: 469–504, doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.20.1.469, JSTOR 2155809.
Matisoff (1991), tr. 470, 476–478. Matisoff, James A. (1991), “Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Present State and Future Prospects”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 20: 469–504, doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.20.1.469, JSTOR 2155809.
Matisoff (1991), tr. 482. Matisoff, James A. (1991), “Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Present State and Future Prospects”, Annual Review of Anthropology, 20: 469–504, doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.20.1.469, JSTOR 2155809.

sealang.net

Burling (1983), tr. 28. Burling, Robbins (1983), “The Sal Languages” (PDF), Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 7 (2): 1–32.

sites.google.com

Sino-Tibetan Branches Project (STBP).

soas.ac.uk

eprints.soas.ac.uk

Hill (2014), tr. 97–104. ——— (2014), “Cognates of Old Chinese *-n, *-r, and *-j in Tibetan and Burmese”, Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale, 43 (2): 91–109, doi:10.1163/19606028-00432p02
Hill (2012). Hill, Nathan W. (2012), “The six vowel hypothesis of Old Chinese in comparative context”, Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics, 6 (2): 1–69, doi:10.1163/2405478x-90000100.

uni-frankfurt.de

publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de

Kuhn (1889), tr. 189: "wir das Tibetisch-Barmanische einerseits, das Chinesisch-Siamesische anderseits als deutlich geschiedene und doch wieder verwandte Gruppen einer einheitlichen Sprachfamilie anzuerkennen haben." (also quoted in van Driem (2001), tr. 264.) Kuhn, Ernst (1889), “Beiträge zur Sprachenkunde Hinterindiens” (PDF), Sitzungsberichte der Königlichen Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Philologische und Historische Klasse, Sitzung vom 2 März 1889, München, tr. 189–236. ——— (2001), Languages of the Himalayas: An Ethnolinguistic Handbook of the Greater Himalayan Region, Brill, ISBN 978-90-04-12062-4.

web.archive.org

van Driem, George. 2014. "Trans-Himalayan Lưu trữ 2020-12-06 tại Wayback Machine". Owen-Smith, Thomas; Hill, Nathan W. (eds.), Trans-Himalayan Linguistics: Historical and Descriptive Linguistics of the Himalayan Area, 11–40. Berlin: de Gruyter. ISBN 978-3-11-031083-2.