White 2014 cites Bodart 1916 White, Matthew (2014), “Statistics of Wars, Oppressions and Atrocities of the Nineteenth Century (the 1800s)”, the Historical Atlas of the 20th Century, necrometrics.com. (See Matthew White.) White notes: "The era of almost continuous warfare that followed the overthrow of the French monarchy is traditionally split into three parts: The Revolution itself (including all internal conflicts) The Revolutionary Wars during which France fought international wars as a Republic" (White 2014). White notes in section called "Main sequence" on another page "There's a string of authorities who seem to build their research on each other's earlier guesstimates: Sorokin, Small & Singer, Eckhardt, Levy, Rummel, the Correlates of War Project, etc. Most mainstream statistical analysis of war is based on these authorities; however, if you look at the individual authorities on the Main Sequence, you'll see that some have specific problems that carry over as they borrow from one another. See the wars in Algeria or South Africa for examples of how the Main Sequence agrees with itself and not with historians of the specific war" (White 2014). White cites:
Clodfelter, Micheal, Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991Bodart, Gaston (1916), Losses of Life in Modern Wars
White 2014 cites Urlanis 1971 White, Matthew (2014), “Statistics of Wars, Oppressions and Atrocities of the Nineteenth Century (the 1800s)”, the Historical Atlas of the 20th Century, necrometrics.com. (See Matthew White.) White notes: "The era of almost continuous warfare that followed the overthrow of the French monarchy is traditionally split into three parts: The Revolution itself (including all internal conflicts) The Revolutionary Wars during which France fought international wars as a Republic" (White 2014). White notes in section called "Main sequence" on another page "There's a string of authorities who seem to build their research on each other's earlier guesstimates: Sorokin, Small & Singer, Eckhardt, Levy, Rummel, the Correlates of War Project, etc. Most mainstream statistical analysis of war is based on these authorities; however, if you look at the individual authorities on the Main Sequence, you'll see that some have specific problems that carry over as they borrow from one another. See the wars in Algeria or South Africa for examples of how the Main Sequence agrees with itself and not with historians of the specific war" (White 2014). White cites:
Clodfelter, Micheal, Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991 Urlanis, Boris (1971), Wars and Population
White 2014 cites Danzer White, Matthew (2014), “Statistics of Wars, Oppressions and Atrocities of the Nineteenth Century (the 1800s)”, the Historical Atlas of the 20th Century, necrometrics.com. (See Matthew White.) White notes: "The era of almost continuous warfare that followed the overthrow of the French monarchy is traditionally split into three parts: The Revolution itself (including all internal conflicts) The Revolutionary Wars during which France fought international wars as a Republic" (White 2014). White notes in section called "Main sequence" on another page "There's a string of authorities who seem to build their research on each other's earlier guesstimates: Sorokin, Small & Singer, Eckhardt, Levy, Rummel, the Correlates of War Project, etc. Most mainstream statistical analysis of war is based on these authorities; however, if you look at the individual authorities on the Main Sequence, you'll see that some have specific problems that carry over as they borrow from one another. See the wars in Algeria or South Africa for examples of how the Main Sequence agrees with itself and not with historians of the specific war" (White 2014). White cites:
Clodfelter, Micheal, Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991 Danzer, Arme-Zeitun (bằng tiếng Đức)
White 2014 cites Payne White, Matthew (2014), “Statistics of Wars, Oppressions and Atrocities of the Nineteenth Century (the 1800s)”, the Historical Atlas of the 20th Century, necrometrics.com. (See Matthew White.) White notes: "The era of almost continuous warfare that followed the overthrow of the French monarchy is traditionally split into three parts: The Revolution itself (including all internal conflicts) The Revolutionary Wars during which France fought international wars as a Republic" (White 2014). White notes in section called "Main sequence" on another page "There's a string of authorities who seem to build their research on each other's earlier guesstimates: Sorokin, Small & Singer, Eckhardt, Levy, Rummel, the Correlates of War Project, etc. Most mainstream statistical analysis of war is based on these authorities; however, if you look at the individual authorities on the Main Sequence, you'll see that some have specific problems that carry over as they borrow from one another. See the wars in Algeria or South Africa for examples of how the Main Sequence agrees with itself and not with historians of the specific war" (White 2014). White cites:
Clodfelter, Micheal, Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991 Payne, Stanley G., A History of Spain and Portugal, 2
White 2014 cites Dumas 1923 citing Hodge: 92,386 Royal Navy + 219,420 British Army White, Matthew (2014), “Statistics of Wars, Oppressions and Atrocities of the Nineteenth Century (the 1800s)”, the Historical Atlas of the 20th Century, necrometrics.com. (See Matthew White.) White notes: "The era of almost continuous warfare that followed the overthrow of the French monarchy is traditionally split into three parts: The Revolution itself (including all internal conflicts) The Revolutionary Wars during which France fought international wars as a Republic" (White 2014). White notes in section called "Main sequence" on another page "There's a string of authorities who seem to build their research on each other's earlier guesstimates: Sorokin, Small & Singer, Eckhardt, Levy, Rummel, the Correlates of War Project, etc. Most mainstream statistical analysis of war is based on these authorities; however, if you look at the individual authorities on the Main Sequence, you'll see that some have specific problems that carry over as they borrow from one another. See the wars in Algeria or South Africa for examples of how the Main Sequence agrees with itself and not with historians of the specific war" (White 2014). White cites:
Clodfelter, Micheal, Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991 Dumas, Samuel (1923), Losses of Life Caused By War cites four sources
White 2014 cites Urlanis 1971 560,000; Danzer 799,000; Bodart 1916 c. 1 million; Dumas 1923 (citing Delbrück) 1.5 million; Levy 1983 1,869,000 White, Matthew (2014), “Statistics of Wars, Oppressions and Atrocities of the Nineteenth Century (the 1800s)”, the Historical Atlas of the 20th Century, necrometrics.com. (See Matthew White.) White notes: "The era of almost continuous warfare that followed the overthrow of the French monarchy is traditionally split into three parts: The Revolution itself (including all internal conflicts) The Revolutionary Wars during which France fought international wars as a Republic" (White 2014). White notes in section called "Main sequence" on another page "There's a string of authorities who seem to build their research on each other's earlier guesstimates: Sorokin, Small & Singer, Eckhardt, Levy, Rummel, the Correlates of War Project, etc. Most mainstream statistical analysis of war is based on these authorities; however, if you look at the individual authorities on the Main Sequence, you'll see that some have specific problems that carry over as they borrow from one another. See the wars in Algeria or South Africa for examples of how the Main Sequence agrees with itself and not with historians of the specific war" (White 2014). White cites:
Clodfelter, Micheal, Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991 Urlanis, Boris (1971), Wars and Population Danzer, Arme-Zeitun (bằng tiếng Đức) Bodart, Gaston (1916), Losses of Life in Modern Wars Dumas, Samuel (1923), Losses of Life Caused By War cites four sources Levy, Jack (1983), War in the Modern Great Power System
White 2014 cites Eckhardt 1987 2,380,000; Ellis 2003 (citing Esdaile) 3 million combatants + 1 million civilians; Dumas 1923 (citing Fröhlich) 5,925,084 White, Matthew (2014), “Statistics of Wars, Oppressions and Atrocities of the Nineteenth Century (the 1800s)”, the Historical Atlas of the 20th Century, necrometrics.com. (See Matthew White.) White notes: "The era of almost continuous warfare that followed the overthrow of the French monarchy is traditionally split into three parts: The Revolution itself (including all internal conflicts) The Revolutionary Wars during which France fought international wars as a Republic" (White 2014). White notes in section called "Main sequence" on another page "There's a string of authorities who seem to build their research on each other's earlier guesstimates: Sorokin, Small & Singer, Eckhardt, Levy, Rummel, the Correlates of War Project, etc. Most mainstream statistical analysis of war is based on these authorities; however, if you look at the individual authorities on the Main Sequence, you'll see that some have specific problems that carry over as they borrow from one another. See the wars in Algeria or South Africa for examples of how the Main Sequence agrees with itself and not with historians of the specific war" (White 2014). White cites:
Clodfelter, Micheal, Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991 Eckhardt, William (1987), “Three page table”, trong Sivard, Ruth Leger (biên tập), World Military and Social Expenditures 1987–88 (ấn bản thứ 12) Ellis, Geoffrey (2003) [1991], The Napoleonic Empire , cites Esdaile Dumas, Samuel (1923), Losses of Life Caused By War cites four sources
White 2014 cites Dumas 1923 citing Hodge White, Matthew (2014), “Statistics of Wars, Oppressions and Atrocities of the Nineteenth Century (the 1800s)”, the Historical Atlas of the 20th Century, necrometrics.com. (See Matthew White.) White notes: "The era of almost continuous warfare that followed the overthrow of the French monarchy is traditionally split into three parts: The Revolution itself (including all internal conflicts) The Revolutionary Wars during which France fought international wars as a Republic" (White 2014). White notes in section called "Main sequence" on another page "There's a string of authorities who seem to build their research on each other's earlier guesstimates: Sorokin, Small & Singer, Eckhardt, Levy, Rummel, the Correlates of War Project, etc. Most mainstream statistical analysis of war is based on these authorities; however, if you look at the individual authorities on the Main Sequence, you'll see that some have specific problems that carry over as they borrow from one another. See the wars in Algeria or South Africa for examples of how the Main Sequence agrees with itself and not with historians of the specific war" (White 2014). White cites:
Clodfelter, Micheal, Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991 Dumas, Samuel (1923), Losses of Life Caused By War cites four sources
White 2014 cites Ellis 2003 (citing Esdaile); Eckhardt 1987; Fröhlich White, Matthew (2014), “Statistics of Wars, Oppressions and Atrocities of the Nineteenth Century (the 1800s)”, the Historical Atlas of the 20th Century, necrometrics.com. (See Matthew White.) White notes: "The era of almost continuous warfare that followed the overthrow of the French monarchy is traditionally split into three parts: The Revolution itself (including all internal conflicts) The Revolutionary Wars during which France fought international wars as a Republic" (White 2014). White notes in section called "Main sequence" on another page "There's a string of authorities who seem to build their research on each other's earlier guesstimates: Sorokin, Small & Singer, Eckhardt, Levy, Rummel, the Correlates of War Project, etc. Most mainstream statistical analysis of war is based on these authorities; however, if you look at the individual authorities on the Main Sequence, you'll see that some have specific problems that carry over as they borrow from one another. See the wars in Algeria or South Africa for examples of how the Main Sequence agrees with itself and not with historians of the specific war" (White 2014). White cites:
Clodfelter, Micheal, Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991 Ellis, Geoffrey (2003) [1991], The Napoleonic Empire , cites Esdaile Eckhardt, William (1987), “Three page table”, trong Sivard, Ruth Leger (biên tập), World Military and Social Expenditures 1987–88 (ấn bản thứ 12)
necrometrics.com
White 2014 cites Bodart 1916 White, Matthew (2014), “Statistics of Wars, Oppressions and Atrocities of the Nineteenth Century (the 1800s)”, the Historical Atlas of the 20th Century, necrometrics.com. (See Matthew White.) White notes: "The era of almost continuous warfare that followed the overthrow of the French monarchy is traditionally split into three parts: The Revolution itself (including all internal conflicts) The Revolutionary Wars during which France fought international wars as a Republic" (White 2014). White notes in section called "Main sequence" on another page "There's a string of authorities who seem to build their research on each other's earlier guesstimates: Sorokin, Small & Singer, Eckhardt, Levy, Rummel, the Correlates of War Project, etc. Most mainstream statistical analysis of war is based on these authorities; however, if you look at the individual authorities on the Main Sequence, you'll see that some have specific problems that carry over as they borrow from one another. See the wars in Algeria or South Africa for examples of how the Main Sequence agrees with itself and not with historians of the specific war" (White 2014). White cites:
Clodfelter, Micheal, Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991Bodart, Gaston (1916), Losses of Life in Modern Wars
White 2014 cites Urlanis 1971 White, Matthew (2014), “Statistics of Wars, Oppressions and Atrocities of the Nineteenth Century (the 1800s)”, the Historical Atlas of the 20th Century, necrometrics.com. (See Matthew White.) White notes: "The era of almost continuous warfare that followed the overthrow of the French monarchy is traditionally split into three parts: The Revolution itself (including all internal conflicts) The Revolutionary Wars during which France fought international wars as a Republic" (White 2014). White notes in section called "Main sequence" on another page "There's a string of authorities who seem to build their research on each other's earlier guesstimates: Sorokin, Small & Singer, Eckhardt, Levy, Rummel, the Correlates of War Project, etc. Most mainstream statistical analysis of war is based on these authorities; however, if you look at the individual authorities on the Main Sequence, you'll see that some have specific problems that carry over as they borrow from one another. See the wars in Algeria or South Africa for examples of how the Main Sequence agrees with itself and not with historians of the specific war" (White 2014). White cites:
Clodfelter, Micheal, Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991 Urlanis, Boris (1971), Wars and Population
White 2014 cites Danzer White, Matthew (2014), “Statistics of Wars, Oppressions and Atrocities of the Nineteenth Century (the 1800s)”, the Historical Atlas of the 20th Century, necrometrics.com. (See Matthew White.) White notes: "The era of almost continuous warfare that followed the overthrow of the French monarchy is traditionally split into three parts: The Revolution itself (including all internal conflicts) The Revolutionary Wars during which France fought international wars as a Republic" (White 2014). White notes in section called "Main sequence" on another page "There's a string of authorities who seem to build their research on each other's earlier guesstimates: Sorokin, Small & Singer, Eckhardt, Levy, Rummel, the Correlates of War Project, etc. Most mainstream statistical analysis of war is based on these authorities; however, if you look at the individual authorities on the Main Sequence, you'll see that some have specific problems that carry over as they borrow from one another. See the wars in Algeria or South Africa for examples of how the Main Sequence agrees with itself and not with historians of the specific war" (White 2014). White cites:
Clodfelter, Micheal, Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991 Danzer, Arme-Zeitun (bằng tiếng Đức)
White 2014 cites Payne White, Matthew (2014), “Statistics of Wars, Oppressions and Atrocities of the Nineteenth Century (the 1800s)”, the Historical Atlas of the 20th Century, necrometrics.com. (See Matthew White.) White notes: "The era of almost continuous warfare that followed the overthrow of the French monarchy is traditionally split into three parts: The Revolution itself (including all internal conflicts) The Revolutionary Wars during which France fought international wars as a Republic" (White 2014). White notes in section called "Main sequence" on another page "There's a string of authorities who seem to build their research on each other's earlier guesstimates: Sorokin, Small & Singer, Eckhardt, Levy, Rummel, the Correlates of War Project, etc. Most mainstream statistical analysis of war is based on these authorities; however, if you look at the individual authorities on the Main Sequence, you'll see that some have specific problems that carry over as they borrow from one another. See the wars in Algeria or South Africa for examples of how the Main Sequence agrees with itself and not with historians of the specific war" (White 2014). White cites:
Clodfelter, Micheal, Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991 Payne, Stanley G., A History of Spain and Portugal, 2
White 2014 cites Dumas 1923 citing Hodge: 92,386 Royal Navy + 219,420 British Army White, Matthew (2014), “Statistics of Wars, Oppressions and Atrocities of the Nineteenth Century (the 1800s)”, the Historical Atlas of the 20th Century, necrometrics.com. (See Matthew White.) White notes: "The era of almost continuous warfare that followed the overthrow of the French monarchy is traditionally split into three parts: The Revolution itself (including all internal conflicts) The Revolutionary Wars during which France fought international wars as a Republic" (White 2014). White notes in section called "Main sequence" on another page "There's a string of authorities who seem to build their research on each other's earlier guesstimates: Sorokin, Small & Singer, Eckhardt, Levy, Rummel, the Correlates of War Project, etc. Most mainstream statistical analysis of war is based on these authorities; however, if you look at the individual authorities on the Main Sequence, you'll see that some have specific problems that carry over as they borrow from one another. See the wars in Algeria or South Africa for examples of how the Main Sequence agrees with itself and not with historians of the specific war" (White 2014). White cites:
Clodfelter, Micheal, Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991 Dumas, Samuel (1923), Losses of Life Caused By War cites four sources
White 2014 cites Urlanis 1971 560,000; Danzer 799,000; Bodart 1916 c. 1 million; Dumas 1923 (citing Delbrück) 1.5 million; Levy 1983 1,869,000 White, Matthew (2014), “Statistics of Wars, Oppressions and Atrocities of the Nineteenth Century (the 1800s)”, the Historical Atlas of the 20th Century, necrometrics.com. (See Matthew White.) White notes: "The era of almost continuous warfare that followed the overthrow of the French monarchy is traditionally split into three parts: The Revolution itself (including all internal conflicts) The Revolutionary Wars during which France fought international wars as a Republic" (White 2014). White notes in section called "Main sequence" on another page "There's a string of authorities who seem to build their research on each other's earlier guesstimates: Sorokin, Small & Singer, Eckhardt, Levy, Rummel, the Correlates of War Project, etc. Most mainstream statistical analysis of war is based on these authorities; however, if you look at the individual authorities on the Main Sequence, you'll see that some have specific problems that carry over as they borrow from one another. See the wars in Algeria or South Africa for examples of how the Main Sequence agrees with itself and not with historians of the specific war" (White 2014). White cites:
Clodfelter, Micheal, Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991 Urlanis, Boris (1971), Wars and Population Danzer, Arme-Zeitun (bằng tiếng Đức) Bodart, Gaston (1916), Losses of Life in Modern Wars Dumas, Samuel (1923), Losses of Life Caused By War cites four sources Levy, Jack (1983), War in the Modern Great Power System
White 2014 cites Eckhardt 1987 2,380,000; Ellis 2003 (citing Esdaile) 3 million combatants + 1 million civilians; Dumas 1923 (citing Fröhlich) 5,925,084 White, Matthew (2014), “Statistics of Wars, Oppressions and Atrocities of the Nineteenth Century (the 1800s)”, the Historical Atlas of the 20th Century, necrometrics.com. (See Matthew White.) White notes: "The era of almost continuous warfare that followed the overthrow of the French monarchy is traditionally split into three parts: The Revolution itself (including all internal conflicts) The Revolutionary Wars during which France fought international wars as a Republic" (White 2014). White notes in section called "Main sequence" on another page "There's a string of authorities who seem to build their research on each other's earlier guesstimates: Sorokin, Small & Singer, Eckhardt, Levy, Rummel, the Correlates of War Project, etc. Most mainstream statistical analysis of war is based on these authorities; however, if you look at the individual authorities on the Main Sequence, you'll see that some have specific problems that carry over as they borrow from one another. See the wars in Algeria or South Africa for examples of how the Main Sequence agrees with itself and not with historians of the specific war" (White 2014). White cites:
Clodfelter, Micheal, Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991 Eckhardt, William (1987), “Three page table”, trong Sivard, Ruth Leger (biên tập), World Military and Social Expenditures 1987–88 (ấn bản thứ 12) Ellis, Geoffrey (2003) [1991], The Napoleonic Empire , cites Esdaile Dumas, Samuel (1923), Losses of Life Caused By War cites four sources
White 2014 cites Dumas 1923 citing Hodge White, Matthew (2014), “Statistics of Wars, Oppressions and Atrocities of the Nineteenth Century (the 1800s)”, the Historical Atlas of the 20th Century, necrometrics.com. (See Matthew White.) White notes: "The era of almost continuous warfare that followed the overthrow of the French monarchy is traditionally split into three parts: The Revolution itself (including all internal conflicts) The Revolutionary Wars during which France fought international wars as a Republic" (White 2014). White notes in section called "Main sequence" on another page "There's a string of authorities who seem to build their research on each other's earlier guesstimates: Sorokin, Small & Singer, Eckhardt, Levy, Rummel, the Correlates of War Project, etc. Most mainstream statistical analysis of war is based on these authorities; however, if you look at the individual authorities on the Main Sequence, you'll see that some have specific problems that carry over as they borrow from one another. See the wars in Algeria or South Africa for examples of how the Main Sequence agrees with itself and not with historians of the specific war" (White 2014). White cites:
Clodfelter, Micheal, Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991 Dumas, Samuel (1923), Losses of Life Caused By War cites four sources
White 2014 cites Ellis 2003 (citing Esdaile); Eckhardt 1987; Fröhlich White, Matthew (2014), “Statistics of Wars, Oppressions and Atrocities of the Nineteenth Century (the 1800s)”, the Historical Atlas of the 20th Century, necrometrics.com. (See Matthew White.) White notes: "The era of almost continuous warfare that followed the overthrow of the French monarchy is traditionally split into three parts: The Revolution itself (including all internal conflicts) The Revolutionary Wars during which France fought international wars as a Republic" (White 2014). White notes in section called "Main sequence" on another page "There's a string of authorities who seem to build their research on each other's earlier guesstimates: Sorokin, Small & Singer, Eckhardt, Levy, Rummel, the Correlates of War Project, etc. Most mainstream statistical analysis of war is based on these authorities; however, if you look at the individual authorities on the Main Sequence, you'll see that some have specific problems that carry over as they borrow from one another. See the wars in Algeria or South Africa for examples of how the Main Sequence agrees with itself and not with historians of the specific war" (White 2014). White cites:
Clodfelter, Micheal, Warfare and Armed Conflict: A Statistical Reference to Casualty and Other Figures, 1618–1991 Ellis, Geoffrey (2003) [1991], The Napoleonic Empire , cites Esdaile Eckhardt, William (1987), “Three page table”, trong Sivard, Ruth Leger (biên tập), World Military and Social Expenditures 1987–88 (ấn bản thứ 12)