Vụ án Marbury kiện Madison (Vietnamese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Vụ án Marbury kiện Madison" in Vietnamese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Vietnamese rank

13archive.org

6^th place

4^th place

4doi.org

2^nd place

4jstor.org

26^th place

50^th place

3yale.edu

565^th place

394^th place

2books.google.com

3^rd place

6^th place

2worldcat.org

5^th place

13^th place

1senate.gov

758^th place

1,024^th place

archive.org

McCloskey (2010), tr. 25. McCloskey, Robert G. (2010). The American Supreme Court. Revised by Sanford Levinson (ấn bản 5). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-55686-4.
Pohlman (2005), tr. 21. Pohlman, H. L. (2005). Constitutional Debate in Action: Governmental Powers. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-3593-0.
Epstein (2014), tr. 89. Epstein, Richard A. (2014). The Classical Liberal Constitution: The Uncertain Quest for Limited Government. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-72489-1.
McCloskey (2010), tr. 23–24. McCloskey, Robert G. (2010). The American Supreme Court. Revised by Sanford Levinson (ấn bản 5). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-55686-4.
Brest và đồng nghiệp (2018), tr. 115. Brest, Paul; Levinson, Sanford; Balkin, Jack M.; Amar, Akhil Reed; Siegel, Reva B. (2018). Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking: Cases and Materials (ấn bản 7). New York: Wolters Kluwer. ISBN 978-1-4548-8749-2.
Paulsen và đồng nghiệp (2013), tr. 141. Paulsen, Michael Stokes; Calabresi, Steven G.; McConnell, Michael W.; Bray, Samuel (2013). The Constitution of the United States. University Casebook Series (ấn bản 2). St. Paul: Foundation Press. ISBN 978-1-60930-271-9.
Brest và đồng nghiệp (2018), tr. 124–25. Brest, Paul; Levinson, Sanford; Balkin, Jack M.; Amar, Akhil Reed; Siegel, Reva B. (2018). Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking: Cases and Materials (ấn bản 7). New York: Wolters Kluwer. ISBN 978-1-4548-8749-2.
Tribe (2000), tr. 207. Tribe, Laurence H. (2000). American Constitutional Law (ấn bản 3). New York: Foundation Press. ISBN 978-1-56662-714-6.
Tribe (2000), tr. 207–08. Tribe, Laurence H. (2000). American Constitutional Law (ấn bản 3). New York: Foundation Press. ISBN 978-1-56662-714-6.
Prakash & Yoo (2003), tr. 914. Prakash, Saikrishna; Yoo, John (2003). “The Origins of Judicial Review”. University of Chicago Law Review. 70 (3): 887–982. doi:10.2307/1600662. JSTOR 1600662.
Tribe (2000), tr. 210. Tribe, Laurence H. (2000). American Constitutional Law (ấn bản 3). New York: Foundation Press. ISBN 978-1-56662-714-6.
McCloskey (2010), tr. 26. McCloskey, Robert G. (2010). The American Supreme Court. Revised by Sanford Levinson (ấn bản 5). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-55686-4.
Tribe (2000), tr. 179. Tribe, Laurence H. (2000). American Constitutional Law (ấn bản 3). New York: Foundation Press. ISBN 978-1-56662-714-6.

books.google.com

Miller (2009), tr. 44. Miller, Mark Carlton (2009). The View of the Courts from the Hill: Interactions Between Congress and the Federal Judiciary. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press. ISBN 9780813928104.
Currie (1997), tr. 53. Currie, David P. (1997). The Constitution in Congress: The Federalist Period 1789–1801. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 9780226131146.

doi.org

Amar (1989), tr. 447. Amar, Akhil Reed (1989). “Marbury, Section 13, and the Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court”. University of Chicago Law Review. 56 (2): 443–99. doi:10.2307/1599844. JSTOR 1599844.
Amar (1987), tr. 1485–86. Amar, Akhil Reed (1987). “Of Sovereignty and Federalism”. Yale Law Journal. 96 (7): 1425–1520. doi:10.2307/796493. JSTOR 796493.
Amar (1987), tr. 1486. Amar, Akhil Reed (1987). “Of Sovereignty and Federalism”. Yale Law Journal. 96 (7): 1425–1520. doi:10.2307/796493. JSTOR 796493.
Prakash & Yoo (2003), tr. 914. Prakash, Saikrishna; Yoo, John (2003). “The Origins of Judicial Review”. University of Chicago Law Review. 70 (3): 887–982. doi:10.2307/1600662. JSTOR 1600662.

jstor.org

Amar (1989), tr. 447. Amar, Akhil Reed (1989). “Marbury, Section 13, and the Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court”. University of Chicago Law Review. 56 (2): 443–99. doi:10.2307/1599844. JSTOR 1599844.
Amar (1987), tr. 1485–86. Amar, Akhil Reed (1987). “Of Sovereignty and Federalism”. Yale Law Journal. 96 (7): 1425–1520. doi:10.2307/796493. JSTOR 796493.
Amar (1987), tr. 1486. Amar, Akhil Reed (1987). “Of Sovereignty and Federalism”. Yale Law Journal. 96 (7): 1425–1520. doi:10.2307/796493. JSTOR 796493.
Prakash & Yoo (2003), tr. 914. Prakash, Saikrishna; Yoo, John (2003). “The Origins of Judicial Review”. University of Chicago Law Review. 70 (3): 887–982. doi:10.2307/1600662. JSTOR 1600662.

senate.gov

The Old Supreme Court Chamber, 1810–1860 (PDF). Office of Senate Curator (Bản báo cáo). U.S. Senate Commission on Art. 24 tháng 6 năm 2015 [2014-02-10]. S. Pub. 113-3.

worldcat.org

Nowak & Rotunda (2012), § 1.3, pp. 52–53. Nowak, John E.; Rotunda, Ronald D. (2012). Treatise on Constitutional Law: Substance and Procedure (ấn bản 5). Eagan, Minnesota: West. OCLC 798148265.
Nowak & Rotunda (2012), § 1.3, p. 53. Nowak, John E.; Rotunda, Ronald D. (2012). Treatise on Constitutional Law: Substance and Procedure (ấn bản 5). Eagan, Minnesota: West. OCLC 798148265.

yale.edu

digitalcommons.law.yale.edu

Amar (1989), tr. 447. Amar, Akhil Reed (1989). “Marbury, Section 13, and the Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court”. University of Chicago Law Review. 56 (2): 443–99. doi:10.2307/1599844. JSTOR 1599844.
Amar (1987), tr. 1485–86. Amar, Akhil Reed (1987). “Of Sovereignty and Federalism”. Yale Law Journal. 96 (7): 1425–1520. doi:10.2307/796493. JSTOR 796493.
Amar (1987), tr. 1486. Amar, Akhil Reed (1987). “Of Sovereignty and Federalism”. Yale Law Journal. 96 (7): 1425–1520. doi:10.2307/796493. JSTOR 796493.