Độc quyền cưỡng chế (Vietnamese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Độc quyền cưỡng chế" in Vietnamese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Vietnamese rank

4doi.org

2^nd place

3proquest.com

206^th place

1,753^rd place

2web.archive.org

1^st place

2nathanielbranden.com

low place

2fee.org

low place

8,910^th place

2jstor.org

26^th place

50^th place

2semanticscholar.org

11^th place

76^th place

1polyconomics.com

low place

6,775^th place

1jewishworldreview.com

low place

1archive.org

6^th place

4^th place

1mises.org

3,237^th place

1,775^th place

1justia.com

696^th place

2,098^th place

1ssrn.com

703^rd place

825^th place

archive.org

Hasnas, John (1998). “The Normative Theories of Business Ethics: A Guide for the Perplexed”. Business Ethics Quarterly. 8 (1): 19–42. doi:10.2307/3857520. JSTOR 3857520. S2CID 44030310.

doi.org

Hasnas, John (1998). “The Normative Theories of Business Ethics: A Guide for the Perplexed”. Business Ethics Quarterly. 8 (1): 19–42. doi:10.2307/3857520. JSTOR 3857520. S2CID 44030310.
Gal, Michal S. (tháng 3 năm 2004). “Monopoly Pricing as an Antitrust Offense in the U.S. and the EC: Two Systems of Belief about Monopoly?”. The Antitrust Bulletin. 49 (1–2): 343–384. doi:10.1177/0003603X0404900109. S2CID 55640455. SSRN 700863. ProQuest 201064375.
Lindblom, Charles E. (1958). “Are Labor Unions Monopolies”. Challenge. 6 (5): 26–31. doi:10.1080/05775132.1958.11468630. JSTOR 40717821.

dx.doi.org

“High-Tech Robber Barons:”, Globalization and Postmodern Politics, Pluto Press, tr. 51–66, truy cập ngày 6 tháng 11 năm 2022

fee.org

Richman, Sheldon (27 tháng 6 năm 2012). “Can Mutually Beneficial Exchanges Be Exploitative?”. FEE.
Reed, Lawrence W. (1 tháng 3 năm 1980). “Witch-hunting For Robber Barons: The Standard Oil Story”. FEE.

jewishworldreview.com

“Lawrence Kudlow”. Jewish World Review. 14 tháng 6 năm 2000.

jstor.org

Hasnas, John (1998). “The Normative Theories of Business Ethics: A Guide for the Perplexed”. Business Ethics Quarterly. 8 (1): 19–42. doi:10.2307/3857520. JSTOR 3857520. S2CID 44030310.
Lindblom, Charles E. (1958). “Are Labor Unions Monopolies”. Challenge. 6 (5): 26–31. doi:10.1080/05775132.1958.11468630. JSTOR 40717821.

justia.com

law.justia.com

United States v. Alcoa, 148 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1945)

mises.org

Rothbard, Murray, The State Versus Liberty in The Ethics of Liberty by Rothbard (1982)

nathanielbranden.com

Greenspan, Alan, Antitrust Lưu trữ 2005-12-17 tại Wayback Machine, in Capitalism:The Unknown Ideal by Ayn Rand. Also The Question of Monopolies Lưu trữ 2005-10-24 tại Wayback Machine by Nathaniel Branden defines and discusses coercive monopoly.
Branden, Nathaniel, ''The Question of Monopolies Lưu trữ 2005-10-24 tại Wayback Machine, from The Objectivist Newsletter (June 1962)

polyconomics.com

Greenspan, Alan, Antitrust Lưu trữ 2005-12-17 tại Wayback Machine, in Capitalism:The Unknown Ideal by Ayn Rand. Also The Question of Monopolies Lưu trữ 2005-10-24 tại Wayback Machine by Nathaniel Branden defines and discusses coercive monopoly.

proquest.com

search.proquest.com

Demirdjian, Z S Andrew; Zara, Mokatsian (2012). “The Maligned Image Of Monopoly”. ASBBS Proceedings. San Diego: American Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences. 19 (1): 236–240. ProQuest 1445143081.
Gal, Michal S. (tháng 3 năm 2004). “Monopoly Pricing as an Antitrust Offense in the U.S. and the EC: Two Systems of Belief about Monopoly?”. The Antitrust Bulletin. 49 (1–2): 343–384. doi:10.1177/0003603X0404900109. S2CID 55640455. SSRN 700863. ProQuest 201064375.
Simpson, Brian P. (tháng 8 năm 2010). “Two Theories of Monopoly and Competition: Implications and Applications”. The Journal of Applied Business and Economics. 11 (2): 139–151. ProQuest 815978228.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Hasnas, John (1998). “The Normative Theories of Business Ethics: A Guide for the Perplexed”. Business Ethics Quarterly. 8 (1): 19–42. doi:10.2307/3857520. JSTOR 3857520. S2CID 44030310.
Gal, Michal S. (tháng 3 năm 2004). “Monopoly Pricing as an Antitrust Offense in the U.S. and the EC: Two Systems of Belief about Monopoly?”. The Antitrust Bulletin. 49 (1–2): 343–384. doi:10.1177/0003603X0404900109. S2CID 55640455. SSRN 700863. ProQuest 201064375.

ssrn.com

Gal, Michal S. (tháng 3 năm 2004). “Monopoly Pricing as an Antitrust Offense in the U.S. and the EC: Two Systems of Belief about Monopoly?”. The Antitrust Bulletin. 49 (1–2): 343–384. doi:10.1177/0003603X0404900109. S2CID 55640455. SSRN 700863. ProQuest 201064375.

web.archive.org

Greenspan, Alan, Antitrust Lưu trữ 2005-12-17 tại Wayback Machine, in Capitalism:The Unknown Ideal by Ayn Rand. Also The Question of Monopolies Lưu trữ 2005-10-24 tại Wayback Machine by Nathaniel Branden defines and discusses coercive monopoly.
Branden, Nathaniel, ''The Question of Monopolies Lưu trữ 2005-10-24 tại Wayback Machine, from The Objectivist Newsletter (June 1962)