垃圾科学 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "垃圾科学" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Chinese rank
1st place
1st place
4th place
5th place
2nd place
23rd place
low place
low place
576th place
1,959th place

ajph.org

doi.org

ed.gov

eric.ed.gov

  • "Report of the Tort Policy Working Group on the causes, extent and policy implications of the current crisis in insurance availability and affordability"页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆) (Rep. No. 027-000-01251-5). (1986, February). Washington, D.C.: Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED274437) p.39:

    Another way in which causation often is undermined — also an increasingly serious problem in toxic tort cases — is the reliance by judges and juries on non-credible scientific or medical testimony, studies or opinions. It has become all too common for 'experts' or 'studies' on the fringes of or even well beyond the outer parameters of mainstream scientific or medical views to be presented to juries as valid evidence from which conclusions may be drawn. The use of such invalid scientific evidence (commonly referred to as 'junk science') has resulted in findings of causation which simply cannot be justified or understood from the standpoint of the current state of credible scientific and medical knowledge. Most importantly, this development has led to a deep and growing cynicism about the ability of tort law to deal with difficult scientific and medical concepts in a principled and rational way.

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

web.archive.org