希腊-弗里吉亚语 (Chinese Wikipedia)
Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "希腊-弗里吉亚语" in Chinese language version.
refsWebsite
Global rank
Chinese rank
11th place
332nd place
5th place
12th place
2,032nd place
612th place
3rd place
8th place
low place
low place
121st place
591st place
102nd place
492nd place
low place
low place
academia.edu
- Ligorio & Lubotsky (2018)，第1816頁: "Phrygian is most closely related to Greek. The two languages share a few unique innovations [...] It is therefore very likely that both languages emerged from a single language, which was spoken in the Balkans at the end of the third millennium BCE. Ligorio, Orsat; Lubotsky, Alexander. Phrygian. Jared Klein; Brian Joseph; Matthias Fritz (编). Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics. HSK 41.3. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 2018: 1816–1831. ISBN 9783110542431. S2CID 242082908. doi:10.1515/9783110542431-022. hdl:1887/63481.
books.google.com
- Brixhe, Claude. Phrygian. Woodard, Roger D (编). The Ancient Languages of Asia Minor. Cambridge University Press. 2008: 72. ISBN 978-0-521-68496-5. "Unquestionably, however, Phrygian is most closely linked with Greek."
doi.org
- Woodhouse 2009，第171頁:This question is of course only just separable from the question of which languages within Indo-European are most closely related to Phrygian, which has also been hotly debated. A turning point in this debate was Kortlandt's (1988) demonstration on the basis of shared sound changes that Thraco-Armenian had separated from Phrygian and other originally Balkan languages at an early stage. The consensus has now returned to regarding Greek as the closest relative. Woodhouse, Robert. An overview of research on Phrygian from the nineteenth century to the present day. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis. 2009, 126 (1): 167–188. ISSN 2083-4624. doi:10.2478/v10148-010-0013-x
. - Ligorio & Lubotsky (2018)，第1816頁: "Phrygian is most closely related to Greek. The two languages share a few unique innovations [...] It is therefore very likely that both languages emerged from a single language, which was spoken in the Balkans at the end of the third millennium BCE. Ligorio, Orsat; Lubotsky, Alexander. Phrygian. Jared Klein; Brian Joseph; Matthias Fritz (编). Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics. HSK 41.3. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 2018: 1816–1831. ISBN 9783110542431. S2CID 242082908. doi:10.1515/9783110542431-022. hdl:1887/63481.
- Obrador-Cursach 2020，第238–239頁:To the best of our current knowledge, Phrygian was closely related to Greek. This affirmation is consistent with the vision offered by Neumann (1988: 23), Brixhe (2006) and Ligorio and Lubotsky (2018: 1816) and with many observations given by ancient authors. Both languages share 34 of the 36 features considered in this paper, some of them of great significance:…The available data suggest that Phrygian and Greek coexisted broadly from pre-historic to historic times, and both belong to a common linguistic area (Brixhe 2006: 39–44). Obrador-Cursach, Bartomeu. On the place of Phrygian among the Indo-European languages. Journal of Language Relationship. 2020, 17 (3–4): 233–245. S2CID 215769896. doi:10.31826/jlr-2019-173-407 .
- Obrador-Cursach 2020，第243頁:With the current state of our knowledge, we can affirm that Phrygian is closely related to Greek. This is not a surprising conclusion: ancient sources and modern scholars agree that Phrygians did not live far from Greece in pre-historic times. Moreover, the last half century of scientific study of Phrygian has approached both languages and developed the hypothesis of a Proto-Greco-Phrygian language, to the detriment to other theories like Phrygio-Armenian or Thraco-Phrygian. Obrador-Cursach, Bartomeu. On the place of Phrygian among the Indo-European languages. Journal of Language Relationship. 2020, 17 (3–4): 233–245. S2CID 215769896. doi:10.31826/jlr-2019-173-407 .
- Obrador-Cursach 2020，第234–238頁. Obrador-Cursach, Bartomeu. On the place of Phrygian among the Indo-European languages. Journal of Language Relationship. 2020, 17 (3–4): 233–245. S2CID 215769896. doi:10.31826/jlr-2019-173-407 .
ejournals.eu
- Woodhouse 2009，第171頁:This question is of course only just separable from the question of which languages within Indo-European are most closely related to Phrygian, which has also been hotly debated. A turning point in this debate was Kortlandt's (1988) demonstration on the basis of shared sound changes that Thraco-Armenian had separated from Phrygian and other originally Balkan languages at an early stage. The consensus has now returned to regarding Greek as the closest relative. Woodhouse, Robert. An overview of research on Phrygian from the nineteenth century to the present day. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis. 2009, 126 (1): 167–188. ISSN 2083-4624. doi:10.2478/v10148-010-0013-x .
glottolog.org
- Hammarström, Harald; Forkel, Robert; Haspelmath, Martin; Bank, Sebastian (编). Graeco-Phrygian. Glottolog 2.7. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. 2016.
handle.net
hdl.handle.net
- Ligorio & Lubotsky (2018)，第1816頁: "Phrygian is most closely related to Greek. The two languages share a few unique innovations [...] It is therefore very likely that both languages emerged from a single language, which was spoken in the Balkans at the end of the third millennium BCE. Ligorio, Orsat; Lubotsky, Alexander. Phrygian. Jared Klein; Brian Joseph; Matthias Fritz (编). Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics. HSK 41.3. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 2018: 1816–1831. ISBN 9783110542431. S2CID 242082908. doi:10.1515/9783110542431-022. hdl:1887/63481.
muni.cz
phil.muni.cz
- Blažek, Václav. On the internal classification of Indo-European languages: survey (PDF). Linguistica Online. November 2005: 6. ISSN 1801-5336.
semanticscholar.org
api.semanticscholar.org
- Ligorio & Lubotsky (2018)，第1816頁: "Phrygian is most closely related to Greek. The two languages share a few unique innovations [...] It is therefore very likely that both languages emerged from a single language, which was spoken in the Balkans at the end of the third millennium BCE. Ligorio, Orsat; Lubotsky, Alexander. Phrygian. Jared Klein; Brian Joseph; Matthias Fritz (编). Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics. HSK 41.3. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 2018: 1816–1831. ISBN 9783110542431. S2CID 242082908. doi:10.1515/9783110542431-022. hdl:1887/63481.
- Obrador-Cursach 2020，第238–239頁:To the best of our current knowledge, Phrygian was closely related to Greek. This affirmation is consistent with the vision offered by Neumann (1988: 23), Brixhe (2006) and Ligorio and Lubotsky (2018: 1816) and with many observations given by ancient authors. Both languages share 34 of the 36 features considered in this paper, some of them of great significance:…The available data suggest that Phrygian and Greek coexisted broadly from pre-historic to historic times, and both belong to a common linguistic area (Brixhe 2006: 39–44). Obrador-Cursach, Bartomeu. On the place of Phrygian among the Indo-European languages. Journal of Language Relationship. 2020, 17 (3–4): 233–245. S2CID 215769896. doi:10.31826/jlr-2019-173-407 .
- Obrador-Cursach 2020，第243頁:With the current state of our knowledge, we can affirm that Phrygian is closely related to Greek. This is not a surprising conclusion: ancient sources and modern scholars agree that Phrygians did not live far from Greece in pre-historic times. Moreover, the last half century of scientific study of Phrygian has approached both languages and developed the hypothesis of a Proto-Greco-Phrygian language, to the detriment to other theories like Phrygio-Armenian or Thraco-Phrygian. Obrador-Cursach, Bartomeu. On the place of Phrygian among the Indo-European languages. Journal of Language Relationship. 2020, 17 (3–4): 233–245. S2CID 215769896. doi:10.31826/jlr-2019-173-407 .
- Obrador-Cursach 2020，第234–238頁. Obrador-Cursach, Bartomeu. On the place of Phrygian among the Indo-European languages. Journal of Language Relationship. 2020, 17 (3–4): 233–245. S2CID 215769896. doi:10.31826/jlr-2019-173-407 .
tesisenred.net
- Obrador-Cursach 2018，第102頁:Furthermore, if Phrygian were not so-poorly attested perhaps we could reconstruct a Proto-Greco-Phrygian stage of both languages. Obrador-Cursach, Bartomeu. Lexicon of the Phrygian Inscriptions (PDF). University of Barcelona – Faculty of Philology – Department of Classical, Romance and Semitic Philology. 2018.
worldcat.org
- Woodhouse 2009，第171頁:This question is of course only just separable from the question of which languages within Indo-European are most closely related to Phrygian, which has also been hotly debated. A turning point in this debate was Kortlandt's (1988) demonstration on the basis of shared sound changes that Thraco-Armenian had separated from Phrygian and other originally Balkan languages at an early stage. The consensus has now returned to regarding Greek as the closest relative. Woodhouse, Robert. An overview of research on Phrygian from the nineteenth century to the present day. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis. 2009, 126 (1): 167–188. ISSN 2083-4624. doi:10.2478/v10148-010-0013-x .
- Blažek, Václav. On the internal classification of Indo-European languages: survey (PDF). Linguistica Online. November 2005: 6. ISSN 1801-5336.