联合公民诉联邦选举委员会案 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Memorandum Opinion （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia: January 15, 2008.

veteranstoday.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

Call for Immediate Arrest of Five Supreme Court Justices for Treason. veteranstoday.com<!. 2010-01-22 [2010-01-22]. （原始内容存档于2017-04-10）.

washingtonpost.com (Global: 34^th place; Chinese: 129^th place)

washingtonpost.com

Barnes, Robert. 'Hillary: The Movie' to Get Supreme Court Screening. The Washington Post. 2009-03-15 [2009-03-22]. （原始内容存档于2020-12-13）.
Barnes, Robert. Justices to Review Campaign Finance Law Constraints. The Washington Post. 2009-06-30 [2010-01-25]. （原始内容存档于2019-04-03）.
Who is helped, or hurt, by the Citizens United decision? （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Washington Post, January 24, 2010; A11.

voices.washingtonpost.com

Hillary:The Oral Argument. [2010-01-25]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-08）.

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; Chinese: 1^st place)

Hasen, Richard L. Money Grubbers: The Supreme Court kills campaign finance reform. Slate. 2010-01-21 [2010-01-25]. （原始内容存档于2011-08-28）.
Liptak, Adam, Sotomayor Faces Heavy Workload of Complex Cases, New York Times, August 6, 2009 [2010-01-25], （原始内容存档于2020-11-09）
Barnes, Robert. 'Hillary: The Movie' to Get Supreme Court Screening. The Washington Post. 2009-03-15 [2009-03-22]. （原始内容存档于2020-12-13）.
Memorandum Opinion （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia: January 15, 2008.
Docket for 08-205 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. U.S. Supreme Court
Ross, Lee. March 24: Hillary Clinton Film Challenged. Fox News. 2009-03-18 [2009-03-22]. （原始内容存档于2009-03-25）.
Adam, Liptak. Justices Consider Interplay Between First Amendment and Campaign Finance Laws. The New York Times: 2. 2009-03-25 [2009-05-09]. （原始内容存档于2016-11-08）.
Barnes, Robert. Justices to Review Campaign Finance Law Constraints. The Washington Post. 2009-06-30 [2010-01-25]. （原始内容存档于2019-04-03）.
Anti-Hillary dispute to be re-heard. Associated Press. 2009-06-29 [2009-06-29]. （原始内容存档于2009-08-04）.
Hillary:The Oral Argument. [2010-01-25]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-08）.
Statement from David N. Bossie. Citizens United Blog<!. 2010-01-21 [2010-01-22]. （原始内容存档于2010-01-27）.
Supreme Court decimates McCain-Feingold campaign finance law. Michelle Malkin.com<!. 2010-01-21 [2010-01-22]. （原始内容存档于2013-01-20）.
N/A. Rush Limbaugh.com<!. 2010-01-21 [2010-01-22]. （原始内容存档于2011-01-06）.
Gora, Joel. How Corporate Money Will Reshape Politics: Restoring Free Speech in Elections. Opinion. The New York Times. 2010-01-21 [2010-01-24]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-20）.
Ralph Nader Time to Reign in Out-of-Control Corporate Influences on Our Democracy （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）
Who is helped, or hurt, by the Citizens United decision? （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Washington Post, January 24, 2010; A11.
Obama Criticizes Campaign Finance Ruling. CNN Political Ticker<!. 2010-01-20 [2010-01-22]. （原始内容存档于2021-04-11）.
评美最高法院取消企业资助竞选金额限制. 中国网. [2010-01-25]. （原始内容存档于2016-03-05）.
Decision May Mean More Foreign Cash. Politico<!. 2010-01-21 [2010-01-22]. （原始内容存档于2015-05-10）.
President Blasts Supreme Court Over Citizens United Decision. Huffington Post<!. 2010-01-23 [2010-01-23]. （原始内容存档于2018-11-10）.
Call for Immediate Arrest of Five Supreme Court Justices for Treason. veteranstoday.com<!. 2010-01-22 [2010-01-22]. （原始内容存档于2017-04-10）.

联合公民诉联邦选举委员会案 (Chinese Wikipedia)

china.com.cn (Global: 2,045th place; Chinese: 73rd place)

chinaelections.org (Global: low place; Chinese: 3,280th place)

citizensunited.org (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

cnn.com (Global: 28th place; Chinese: 71st place)

politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com

findlaw.com (Global: 1,478th place; Chinese: 2,525th place)

news.findlaw.com

firstamendmentcenter.org (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

foxnews.com (Global: 152nd place; Chinese: 440th place)

huffingtonpost.com (Global: 109th place; Chinese: 368th place)

michellemalkin.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

nader.org (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; Chinese: 31st place)

nytimes.com

query.nytimes.com

roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com

politico.com (Global: 312th place; Chinese: 1,093rd place)

rushlimbaugh.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

slate.com (Global: 259th place; Chinese: 738th place)

supremecourtus.gov (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

uscourts.gov (Global: 2,275th place; Chinese: 4,889th place)

ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov

veteranstoday.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

washingtonpost.com (Global: 34th place; Chinese: 129th place)

washingtonpost.com

voices.washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Chinese: 1st place)

china.com.cn (Global: 2,045^th place; Chinese: 73^rd place)

chinaelections.org (Global: low place; Chinese: 3,280^th place)

cnn.com (Global: 28^th place; Chinese: 71^st place)

findlaw.com (Global: 1,478^th place; Chinese: 2,525^th place)

foxnews.com (Global: 152^nd place; Chinese: 440^th place)

huffingtonpost.com (Global: 109^th place; Chinese: 368^th place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7^th place; Chinese: 31^st place)

politico.com (Global: 312^th place; Chinese: 1,093^rd place)

slate.com (Global: 259^th place; Chinese: 738^th place)

uscourts.gov (Global: 2,275^th place; Chinese: 4,889^th place)

washingtonpost.com (Global: 34^th place; Chinese: 129^th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; Chinese: 1^st place)