Sources vary as to the exact composition of The WB's ownership. According to at least one source, as of 2001, the ownership was split among Warner Bros. (Time Warner) (64%), Tribune Company(英语:Tribune Company) (25%), and Jamie Kellner(英语:Jamie Kellner)'s firm ACME Communications(英语:ACME Communications) (11%) 存档副本. [2011-09-07]. (原始内容存档于2008-05-10).. Published reports in early 2006, dealing with the launch of The CW, suggested Tribune was at the time the only minority shareholder, with just 22.5% (giving Warner Bros. 77.5%), which it would be relinquishing in order to avoid shutdown costs for WB.存档副本. [2013-07-20]. (原始内容存档于2007-09-26).
cmu.edu
contrib.andrew.cmu.edu
Sources vary as to the exact composition of The WB's ownership. According to at least one source, as of 2001, the ownership was split among Warner Bros. (Time Warner) (64%), Tribune Company(英语:Tribune Company) (25%), and Jamie Kellner(英语:Jamie Kellner)'s firm ACME Communications(英语:ACME Communications) (11%) 存档副本. [2011-09-07]. (原始内容存档于2008-05-10).. Published reports in early 2006, dealing with the launch of The CW, suggested Tribune was at the time the only minority shareholder, with just 22.5% (giving Warner Bros. 77.5%), which it would be relinquishing in order to avoid shutdown costs for WB.存档副本. [2013-07-20]. (原始内容存档于2007-09-26).
tribune.com
Sources vary as to the exact composition of The WB's ownership. According to at least one source, as of 2001, the ownership was split among Warner Bros. (Time Warner) (64%), Tribune Company(英语:Tribune Company) (25%), and Jamie Kellner(英语:Jamie Kellner)'s firm ACME Communications(英语:ACME Communications) (11%) 存档副本. [2011-09-07]. (原始内容存档于2008-05-10).. Published reports in early 2006, dealing with the launch of The CW, suggested Tribune was at the time the only minority shareholder, with just 22.5% (giving Warner Bros. 77.5%), which it would be relinquishing in order to avoid shutdown costs for WB.存档副本. [2013-07-20]. (原始内容存档于2007-09-26).
web.archive.org
Sources vary as to the exact composition of The WB's ownership. According to at least one source, as of 2001, the ownership was split among Warner Bros. (Time Warner) (64%), Tribune Company(英语:Tribune Company) (25%), and Jamie Kellner(英语:Jamie Kellner)'s firm ACME Communications(英语:ACME Communications) (11%) 存档副本. [2011-09-07]. (原始内容存档于2008-05-10).. Published reports in early 2006, dealing with the launch of The CW, suggested Tribune was at the time the only minority shareholder, with just 22.5% (giving Warner Bros. 77.5%), which it would be relinquishing in order to avoid shutdown costs for WB.存档副本. [2013-07-20]. (原始内容存档于2007-09-26).
wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Sources vary as to the exact composition of The WB's ownership. According to at least one source, as of 2001, the ownership was split among Warner Bros. (Time Warner) (64%), Tribune Company(英语:Tribune Company) (25%), and Jamie Kellner(英语:Jamie Kellner)'s firm ACME Communications(英语:ACME Communications) (11%) 存档副本. [2011-09-07]. (原始内容存档于2008-05-10).. Published reports in early 2006, dealing with the launch of The CW, suggested Tribune was at the time the only minority shareholder, with just 22.5% (giving Warner Bros. 77.5%), which it would be relinquishing in order to avoid shutdown costs for WB.存档副本. [2013-07-20]. (原始内容存档于2007-09-26).