不自由的民主 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "不自由的民主" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Chinese rank

26web.archive.org

1^st place

9worldcat.org

5^th place

12^th place

8doi.org

2^nd place

23^rd place

6semanticscholar.org

11^th place

332^nd place

3books.google.com

3^rd place

8^th place

2storm.mg

2,424^th place

75^th place

2journalofdemocracy.org

low place

2jstor.org

26^th place

113^th place

2archive.org

6^th place

4^th place

1cityupress.edu.hk

low place

1whogovernstw.org

low place

1scu.edu.tw

low place

1,663^rd place

1askdefine.com

low place

1researchgate.net

120^th place

337^th place

1odi.org.uk

8,198^th place

4,391^st place

1kormany.hu

9,333^rd place

low place

1bloomberg.com

99^th place

225^th place

1cnn.com

28^th place

71^st place

1erikmeyersson.com

low place

1tandfonline.com

507^th place

610^th place

1vox.com

484^th place

976^th place

1udn.com

392^nd place

10^th place

1cna.com.tw

527^th place

24^th place

1upmedia.mg

3,392^nd place

112^th place

1rthk.hk

2,797^th place

109^th place

1appledaily.com

521^st place

22^nd place

1dw.com

204^th place

124^th place

1ft.com

210^th place

353^rd place

1reuters.com

49^th place

81^st place

1theguardian.com

12^th place

60^th place

1economist.com

254^th place

330^th place

appledaily.com (Global: 521^st place; Chinese: 22^nd place)

hk.appledaily.com

全面管治權︱李永達批北京閹選舉香港民主倒退至殖民時期. 蘋果日報. 2021-03-12 [2021-05-23]. （原始内容存档于2021-04-01）.

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; Chinese: 4^th place)

Populism in Europe and the Americas: threat or corrective for democracy?. Mudde, Cas,, Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2012. ISBN 9781139424233. OCLC 795125118.
Sadurski, Wojciech. Illiberal Democracy or Populist Authoritarianism?. Poland's Constitutional Breakdown. Oxford University Press. 2019: 242–66. ISBN 978-0-19-884050-3. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198840503.003.0009.

askdefine.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

illiberalism.askdefine.com

Define illiberal. 5 January 2014 [2018-12-27]. （原始内容存档于2018-10-17）.

bloomberg.com (Global: 99^th place; Chinese: 225^th place)

Simon, Zoltan. Orban Says He Seeks to End Liberal Democracy in Hungary. Bloomberg Businessweek. 28 July 2014. （原始内容存档于2015-01-29）.

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; Chinese: 8^th place)

Mounk, Yascha. The People Vs. Democracy - Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Harvard University Press. 2020-03-18 [2023-03-18]. ISBN 978-0-674-24502-0. （原始内容存档于2022-11-26）（英语）.
Schedler, Andreas. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Lynne Rienner Publishers. 2006 [2023-03-18]. ISBN 978-1-58826-415-2. （原始内容存档于2022-11-25）（英语）.
Zakaria, Fareed. The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad Revised. W. W. Norton & Company. 2007-10-17 [2023-03-18]. ISBN 978-0-393-33152-3. （原始内容存档于2023-03-18）（英语）.

cityupress.edu.hk (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

民主的概念 (PDF). 香港城市大學. [2019-04-30]. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2019-04-30）.

cna.com.tw (Global: 527^th place; Chinese: 24^th place)

全球民主指數台灣排名第8 高居亞洲之冠 | 國際 | 中央社 CNA. www.cna.com.tw. [2022-11-15]. （原始内容存档于2022-06-11）（中文（臺灣））.

cnn.com (Global: 28^th place; Chinese: 71^st place)

edition.cnn.com

What in the World: Turkey's transition into an illiberal democracy. CNN. （原始内容存档于2023-03-20）.

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; Chinese: 23^rd place)

Nyyssönen, Heino; Metsälä, Jussi. Liberal Democracy and its Current Illiberal Critique: The Emperor's New Clothes?. Europe-Asia Studies. 24 September 2020, 73 (2): 273–290. doi:10.1080/09668136.2020.1815654 . Thus, there is a real danger of ‘pseudo-democracy’, especially because elections can be manipulated and often are. In these cases, elections and other democratic institutions are simply adapted patterns of authoritarianism, not democracy in some imperfect form, having the dual purpose of legitimising the incumbent’s rule and guarding it from any danger of democratic change.
DeVotta, Neil. From civil war to soft authoritarianism: Sri Lanka in comparative perspective. Global Change, Peace & Security. 2010, 22 (3): 331–343. S2CID 143630796. doi:10.1080/14781158.2010.510268.
Mutalib, Hussin. Illiberal Democracy and the Future of Opposition in Singapore. Third World Quarterly. 2000, 21 (2): 313–342 [2023-03-18]. ISSN 0143-6597. JSTOR 3993422. S2CID 154321304. doi:10.1080/01436590050004373. （原始内容存档于2023-03-18）.
Garrido, Marco. The ground for the illiberal turn in the Philippines. Democratization. 2022, 29 (4): 673–691 [2023-03-18]. S2CID 244535286. doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.2005586. （原始内容存档于2023-03-18）.
Berman, Sheri. The Pipe Dream of Undemocratic Liberalism. Journal of Democracy. 2017, 28 (3): 29–38. ISSN 1086-3214. S2CID 149050938. doi:10.1353/jod.2017.0041.
Berman, Sheri. The Pipe Dream of Undemocratic Liberalism. Journal of Democracy. 2017, 28 (3): 29–38. ISSN 1086-3214. S2CID 149050938. doi:10.1353/jod.2017.0041.
Sadurski, Wojciech. Illiberal Democracy or Populist Authoritarianism?. Poland's Constitutional Breakdown. Oxford University Press. 2019: 242–66. ISBN 978-0-19-884050-3. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198840503.003.0009.
Miller, Michael K. Electoral Authoritarianism and Human Development. Comparative Political Studies. 2015-10-01, 48 (12): 1526–62. ISSN 0010-4140. S2CID 154285722. doi:10.1177/0010414015582051 （英语）.

dw.com (Global: 204^th place; Chinese: 124^th place)

EU slams proposed Hong Kong electoral reforms. Deutsche Welle. 5 March 2021 [2021-05-23]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-12）.

economist.com (Global: 254^th place; Chinese: 330^th place)

The Republican Party has lurched towards populism and illiberalism. The Economist. [2022-11-15]. ISSN 0013-0613. （原始内容存档于2020-11-18）.

erikmeyersson.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

Which country has the most illiberal democracy in the world?. erikmeyersson.com. 18 June 2015 [22 October 2017]. （原始内容存档于2023-03-28）.

ft.com (Global: 210^th place; Chinese: 353^rd place)

China passes Hong Kong election law despite US warning. Financial Times. 11 March 2021 [2021-05-23]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-12）.

journalofdemocracy.org (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

Diamond, Larry. Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Journal of Democracy. April 2002, 13 (2): 51–65 [2023-03-18]. （原始内容存档于2022-11-25）.
Norris, Pippa. Online Exchange on "Democratic Deconsolidation (PDF). Journal of Democracy. 2017.

jstor.org (Global: 26^th place; Chinese: 113^th place)

Christie, Kenneth. Illiberal Democracy, Modernisation and Southeast Asia. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory. 1998, (91): 102–118 [2023-03-18]. ISSN 0040-5817. JSTOR 41802094. （原始内容存档于2022-11-25）.
Mutalib, Hussin. Illiberal Democracy and the Future of Opposition in Singapore. Third World Quarterly. 2000, 21 (2): 313–342 [2023-03-18]. ISSN 0143-6597. JSTOR 3993422. S2CID 154321304. doi:10.1080/01436590050004373. （原始内容存档于2023-03-18）.

kormany.hu (Global: 9,333^rd place; Chinese: low place)

Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's Speech at the 25th Bálványos Summer Free University and Student Camp. 30 July 2014 [2023-03-18]. （原始内容存档于2020-10-15）. And so in this sense the new state that we are constructing in Hungary is an illiberal state, a non-liberal state. It does not reject the fundamental principles of liberalism such as freedom, and I could list a few more, but it does not make this ideology the central element of state organisation, but instead includes a different, special, national approach.

odi.org.uk (Global: 8,198^th place; Chinese: 4,391^st place)

Rocha Menocal, A., Fritz, V. & Rakner, L. "Hybrid regimes and the challenges of deepening and sustaining democracy in developing countries 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2014-03-26.", South African Journal of International Affairs, 2008, 15(1), pp. 29–40

researchgate.net (Global: 120^th place; Chinese: 337^th place)

DeVotta, Neil. From civil war to soft authoritarianism: Sri Lanka in comparative perspective. Global Change, Peace & Security. 2010, 22 (3): 331–343. S2CID 143630796. doi:10.1080/14781158.2010.510268.

reuters.com (Global: 49^th place; Chinese: 81^st place)

UK says Hong Kong electoral changes undermine trust in China. Reuters. 11 March 2021 [2021-05-23]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-12）.

rthk.hk (Global: 2,797^th place; Chinese: 109^th place)

news.rthk.hk

譚耀宗：立法會以40、30、20比例分配議席. 香港電台. 2021-03-30 [2021-05-23]. （原始内容存档于2021-05-23）.

scu.edu.tw (Global: low place; Chinese: 1,663^rd place)

人權與民主 (I)：共生或互斥？. 东吴大学. [2018-12-26]. （原始内容存档于2016-11-03）.

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11^th place; Chinese: 332^nd place)

api.semanticscholar.org

DeVotta, Neil. From civil war to soft authoritarianism: Sri Lanka in comparative perspective. Global Change, Peace & Security. 2010, 22 (3): 331–343. S2CID 143630796. doi:10.1080/14781158.2010.510268.
Mutalib, Hussin. Illiberal Democracy and the Future of Opposition in Singapore. Third World Quarterly. 2000, 21 (2): 313–342 [2023-03-18]. ISSN 0143-6597. JSTOR 3993422. S2CID 154321304. doi:10.1080/01436590050004373. （原始内容存档于2023-03-18）.
Garrido, Marco. The ground for the illiberal turn in the Philippines. Democratization. 2022, 29 (4): 673–691 [2023-03-18]. S2CID 244535286. doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.2005586. （原始内容存档于2023-03-18）.
Berman, Sheri. The Pipe Dream of Undemocratic Liberalism. Journal of Democracy. 2017, 28 (3): 29–38. ISSN 1086-3214. S2CID 149050938. doi:10.1353/jod.2017.0041.
Berman, Sheri. The Pipe Dream of Undemocratic Liberalism. Journal of Democracy. 2017, 28 (3): 29–38. ISSN 1086-3214. S2CID 149050938. doi:10.1353/jod.2017.0041.
Miller, Michael K. Electoral Authoritarianism and Human Development. Comparative Political Studies. 2015-10-01, 48 (12): 1526–62. ISSN 0010-4140. S2CID 154285722. doi:10.1177/0010414015582051 （英语）.

storm.mg (Global: 2,424^th place; Chinese: 75^th place)

不自由的民主 illiberal democracy. 風傳媒. 2018-10-20 [2019-04-30]. （原始内容存档于2021-06-21）（中文（臺灣））.
經濟不好沒關係 3因素讓戰鬥民族擁抱非自由民主. 風傳媒. 2017年12月10日 [2018年12月26日]. （原始内容存档于2018年12月26日）.

tandfonline.com (Global: 507^th place; Chinese: 610^th place)

Garrido, Marco. The ground for the illiberal turn in the Philippines. Democratization. 2022, 29 (4): 673–691 [2023-03-18]. S2CID 244535286. doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.2005586. （原始内容存档于2023-03-18）.

theguardian.com (Global: 12^th place; Chinese: 60^th place)

Republicans closely resemble autocratic parties in Hungary and Turkey – study. the Guardian. 2020-10-26 [2022-11-15] （英语）.

udn.com (Global: 392^nd place; Chinese: 10^th place)

聯合新聞網. 馬英九投書／臺灣已經是「不自由的民主」（illiberal democracy）. 聯合新聞網. 20211209T031704Z [2022-11-13] （中文（臺灣））. 请检查|date=中的日期值 (帮助)

upmedia.mg (Global: 3,392^nd place; Chinese: 112^th place)

什麼是「不自由民主」？馬英九的說法問題在哪裡 -- 上報 / 評論. www.upmedia.mg. [2022-11-15].

vox.com (Global: 484^th place; Chinese: 976^th place)

The Philippine election is the latest example of illiberalism's popularity. 17 May 2022 [2023-03-18]. （原始内容存档于2023-03-27）.

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; Chinese: 1^st place)

民主的概念 (PDF). 香港城市大學. [2019-04-30]. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2019-04-30）.
不自由的民主 illiberal democracy. 風傳媒. 2018-10-20 [2019-04-30]. （原始内容存档于2021-06-21）（中文（臺灣））.
蘇慶軒. 威權與憲法. 菜市場政治學. 2018-03-01 [2019-04-30]. （原始内容存档于2018-03-14）（中文（臺灣））. 憲法也能成為威權統治的窗飾（window dressing），憲法內容雖然載明國內外期待的基本人權保障以及對政府體制的規範，但威權政體卻僅相應施行徒具形式而無實質內涵的制度或政策。如第三波民主化後，部分新興民主國家出現民主倒退與威權復辟，非自由民主（illiberal democracy）政體繼之興起，其徒有民主形式而無實質自由權利保障的統治形態，可說見證了窗飾功能的實踐。
人權與民主 (I)：共生或互斥？. 东吴大学. [2018-12-26]. （原始内容存档于2016-11-03）.
Mounk, Yascha. The People Vs. Democracy - Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Harvard University Press. 2020-03-18 [2023-03-18]. ISBN 978-0-674-24502-0. （原始内容存档于2022-11-26）（英语）.
Define illiberal. 5 January 2014 [2018-12-27]. （原始内容存档于2018-10-17）.
Schedler, Andreas. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Lynne Rienner Publishers. 2006 [2023-03-18]. ISBN 978-1-58826-415-2. （原始内容存档于2022-11-25）（英语）.
Diamond, Larry. Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Journal of Democracy. April 2002, 13 (2): 51–65 [2023-03-18]. （原始内容存档于2022-11-25）.
Christie, Kenneth. Illiberal Democracy, Modernisation and Southeast Asia. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory. 1998, (91): 102–118 [2023-03-18]. ISSN 0040-5817. JSTOR 41802094. （原始内容存档于2022-11-25）.
經濟不好沒關係 3因素讓戰鬥民族擁抱非自由民主. 風傳媒. 2017年12月10日 [2018年12月26日]. （原始内容存档于2018年12月26日）.
Rocha Menocal, A., Fritz, V. & Rakner, L. "Hybrid regimes and the challenges of deepening and sustaining democracy in developing countries 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2014-03-26.", South African Journal of International Affairs, 2008, 15(1), pp. 29–40
Zakaria, Fareed. The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad Revised. W. W. Norton & Company. 2007-10-17 [2023-03-18]. ISBN 978-0-393-33152-3. （原始内容存档于2023-03-18）（英语）.
Prime Minister Viktor Orbán's Speech at the 25th Bálványos Summer Free University and Student Camp. 30 July 2014 [2023-03-18]. （原始内容存档于2020-10-15）. And so in this sense the new state that we are constructing in Hungary is an illiberal state, a non-liberal state. It does not reject the fundamental principles of liberalism such as freedom, and I could list a few more, but it does not make this ideology the central element of state organisation, but instead includes a different, special, national approach.
Simon, Zoltan. Orban Says He Seeks to End Liberal Democracy in Hungary. Bloomberg Businessweek. 28 July 2014. （原始内容存档于2015-01-29）.
Mutalib, Hussin. Illiberal Democracy and the Future of Opposition in Singapore. Third World Quarterly. 2000, 21 (2): 313–342 [2023-03-18]. ISSN 0143-6597. JSTOR 3993422. S2CID 154321304. doi:10.1080/01436590050004373. （原始内容存档于2023-03-18）.
What in the World: Turkey's transition into an illiberal democracy. CNN. （原始内容存档于2023-03-20）.
Which country has the most illiberal democracy in the world?. erikmeyersson.com. 18 June 2015 [22 October 2017]. （原始内容存档于2023-03-28）.
Garrido, Marco. The ground for the illiberal turn in the Philippines. Democratization. 2022, 29 (4): 673–691 [2023-03-18]. S2CID 244535286. doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.2005586. （原始内容存档于2023-03-18）.
The Philippine election is the latest example of illiberalism's popularity. 17 May 2022 [2023-03-18]. （原始内容存档于2023-03-27）.
全球民主指數台灣排名第8 高居亞洲之冠 | 國際 | 中央社 CNA. www.cna.com.tw. [2022-11-15]. （原始内容存档于2022-06-11）（中文（臺灣））.
譚耀宗：立法會以40、30、20比例分配議席. 香港電台. 2021-03-30 [2021-05-23]. （原始内容存档于2021-05-23）.
全面管治權︱李永達批北京閹選舉香港民主倒退至殖民時期. 蘋果日報. 2021-03-12 [2021-05-23]. （原始内容存档于2021-04-01）.
EU slams proposed Hong Kong electoral reforms. Deutsche Welle. 5 March 2021 [2021-05-23]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-12）.
China passes Hong Kong election law despite US warning. Financial Times. 11 March 2021 [2021-05-23]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-12）.
UK says Hong Kong electoral changes undermine trust in China. Reuters. 11 March 2021 [2021-05-23]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-12）.
The Republican Party has lurched towards populism and illiberalism. The Economist. [2022-11-15]. ISSN 0013-0613. （原始内容存档于2020-11-18）.

whogovernstw.org (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

蘇慶軒. 威權與憲法. 菜市場政治學. 2018-03-01 [2019-04-30]. （原始内容存档于2018-03-14）（中文（臺灣））. 憲法也能成為威權統治的窗飾（window dressing），憲法內容雖然載明國內外期待的基本人權保障以及對政府體制的規範，但威權政體卻僅相應施行徒具形式而無實質內涵的制度或政策。如第三波民主化後，部分新興民主國家出現民主倒退與威權復辟，非自由民主（illiberal democracy）政體繼之興起，其徒有民主形式而無實質自由權利保障的統治形態，可說見證了窗飾功能的實踐。

worldcat.org (Global: 5^th place; Chinese: 12^th place)

Christie, Kenneth. Illiberal Democracy, Modernisation and Southeast Asia. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory. 1998, (91): 102–118 [2023-03-18]. ISSN 0040-5817. JSTOR 41802094. （原始内容存档于2022-11-25）.
Rakner, Lise. Democratisation's third wave and the challenges of democratic deepening: assessing international democracy assistance and lessons learned. Advisory Board for Irish Aid. 2007. OCLC 229412697.
Mutalib, Hussin. Illiberal Democracy and the Future of Opposition in Singapore. Third World Quarterly. 2000, 21 (2): 313–342 [2023-03-18]. ISSN 0143-6597. JSTOR 3993422. S2CID 154321304. doi:10.1080/01436590050004373. （原始内容存档于2023-03-18）.
The Republican Party has lurched towards populism and illiberalism. The Economist. [2022-11-15]. ISSN 0013-0613. （原始内容存档于2020-11-18）.
Populism in Europe and the Americas: threat or corrective for democracy?. Mudde, Cas,, Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2012. ISBN 9781139424233. OCLC 795125118.
Berman, Sheri. The Pipe Dream of Undemocratic Liberalism. Journal of Democracy. 2017, 28 (3): 29–38. ISSN 1086-3214. S2CID 149050938. doi:10.1353/jod.2017.0041.
Berman, Sheri. The Pipe Dream of Undemocratic Liberalism. Journal of Democracy. 2017, 28 (3): 29–38. ISSN 1086-3214. S2CID 149050938. doi:10.1353/jod.2017.0041.
Siegle, Joseph T.; Weinstein, Michael M. The Democracy Advantage: How Democracies Promote Prosperity and Peace. New York: Routledge. 2005. ISBN 0-415-95052-X. OCLC 55055113.
Miller, Michael K. Electoral Authoritarianism and Human Development. Comparative Political Studies. 2015-10-01, 48 (12): 1526–62. ISSN 0010-4140. S2CID 154285722. doi:10.1177/0010414015582051 （英语）.

不自由的民主 (Chinese Wikipedia)

appledaily.com (Global: 521st place; Chinese: 22nd place)

hk.appledaily.com

archive.org (Global: 6th place; Chinese: 4th place)

askdefine.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

illiberalism.askdefine.com

bloomberg.com (Global: 99th place; Chinese: 225th place)

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; Chinese: 8th place)

cityupress.edu.hk (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

cna.com.tw (Global: 527th place; Chinese: 24th place)

cnn.com (Global: 28th place; Chinese: 71st place)

edition.cnn.com

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Chinese: 23rd place)

dw.com (Global: 204th place; Chinese: 124th place)

economist.com (Global: 254th place; Chinese: 330th place)

erikmeyersson.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

ft.com (Global: 210th place; Chinese: 353rd place)

journalofdemocracy.org (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

jstor.org (Global: 26th place; Chinese: 113th place)

kormany.hu (Global: 9,333rd place; Chinese: low place)

odi.org.uk (Global: 8,198th place; Chinese: 4,391st place)

researchgate.net (Global: 120th place; Chinese: 337th place)

reuters.com (Global: 49th place; Chinese: 81st place)

rthk.hk (Global: 2,797th place; Chinese: 109th place)

news.rthk.hk

scu.edu.tw (Global: low place; Chinese: 1,663rd place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11th place; Chinese: 332nd place)

api.semanticscholar.org

storm.mg (Global: 2,424th place; Chinese: 75th place)

tandfonline.com (Global: 507th place; Chinese: 610th place)

theguardian.com (Global: 12th place; Chinese: 60th place)

udn.com (Global: 392nd place; Chinese: 10th place)

upmedia.mg (Global: 3,392nd place; Chinese: 112th place)

vox.com (Global: 484th place; Chinese: 976th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Chinese: 1st place)

whogovernstw.org (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

worldcat.org (Global: 5th place; Chinese: 12th place)

appledaily.com (Global: 521^st place; Chinese: 22^nd place)

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; Chinese: 4^th place)

bloomberg.com (Global: 99^th place; Chinese: 225^th place)

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; Chinese: 8^th place)

cna.com.tw (Global: 527^th place; Chinese: 24^th place)

cnn.com (Global: 28^th place; Chinese: 71^st place)

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; Chinese: 23^rd place)

dw.com (Global: 204^th place; Chinese: 124^th place)

economist.com (Global: 254^th place; Chinese: 330^th place)

ft.com (Global: 210^th place; Chinese: 353^rd place)

jstor.org (Global: 26^th place; Chinese: 113^th place)

kormany.hu (Global: 9,333^rd place; Chinese: low place)

odi.org.uk (Global: 8,198^th place; Chinese: 4,391^st place)

researchgate.net (Global: 120^th place; Chinese: 337^th place)

reuters.com (Global: 49^th place; Chinese: 81^st place)

rthk.hk (Global: 2,797^th place; Chinese: 109^th place)

scu.edu.tw (Global: low place; Chinese: 1,663^rd place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11^th place; Chinese: 332^nd place)

storm.mg (Global: 2,424^th place; Chinese: 75^th place)

tandfonline.com (Global: 507^th place; Chinese: 610^th place)

theguardian.com (Global: 12^th place; Chinese: 60^th place)

udn.com (Global: 392^nd place; Chinese: 10^th place)

upmedia.mg (Global: 3,392^nd place; Chinese: 112^th place)

vox.com (Global: 484^th place; Chinese: 976^th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; Chinese: 1^st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 5^th place; Chinese: 12^th place)