H. Matzat, Römische Chronologie I （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） (Berlin, 1883), 13-18. His argument rested on Dio Cassius 48.33.4 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） which mentions a leap day inserted in 41 BC, "contrary to the (i.e. Caesar's) rule", in order to avoid having a market day on the first day of 40 BC. Dio stated that this leap day was compensated "later". Matzat proposed this was done by omitting a scheduled leap day in 40 BC, rather than by omitting a day from an ordinary year.
W. Soltau, Römische Chronologie （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） (Freiburg, 1889) 170-173. He accepted Matzat's phase of the triennial cycle but argued that it was absurd to suppose that Caesar would have made the second Julian year a leap year and that the 36 years had to be accounted from 45 BC.
C. J. Bennett, "The Early Augustan Calendars in Rome and Egypt", Zeitschrift fűr Papyrologie und Epigraphik 142 (2003) 221-240 and "The Early Augustan Calendars in Rome and Egypt: Addenda et Corrigenda", Zeitschrift fűr Papyrologie und Epigraphik 147 (2004) 165-168; see also Chris Bennett, A.U.C. 730 = 24 B.C. (Egyptian papyrus) （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）.
uchicago.edu
penelope.uchicago.edu
H. Matzat, Römische Chronologie I （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） (Berlin, 1883), 13-18. His argument rested on Dio Cassius 48.33.4 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） which mentions a leap day inserted in 41 BC, "contrary to the (i.e. Caesar's) rule", in order to avoid having a market day on the first day of 40 BC. Dio stated that this leap day was compensated "later". Matzat proposed this was done by omitting a scheduled leap day in 40 BC, rather than by omitting a day from an ordinary year.
uni-koeln.de
rhm.uni-koeln.de
G. Radke, "Die falsche Schaltung nach Caesars Tode" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, Geschichte und griechische Philosophie 103 (1960) 178-185. He proposed that Augustus initiated the reform when he became pontifex maximus in 12 BC.
web.archive.org
C. J. Bennett, "The Early Augustan Calendars in Rome and Egypt", Zeitschrift fűr Papyrologie und Epigraphik 142 (2003) 221-240 and "The Early Augustan Calendars in Rome and Egypt: Addenda et Corrigenda", Zeitschrift fűr Papyrologie und Epigraphik 147 (2004) 165-168; see also Chris Bennett, A.U.C. 730 = 24 B.C. (Egyptian papyrus) （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）.
H. Matzat, Römische Chronologie I （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） (Berlin, 1883), 13-18. His argument rested on Dio Cassius 48.33.4 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） which mentions a leap day inserted in 41 BC, "contrary to the (i.e. Caesar's) rule", in order to avoid having a market day on the first day of 40 BC. Dio stated that this leap day was compensated "later". Matzat proposed this was done by omitting a scheduled leap day in 40 BC, rather than by omitting a day from an ordinary year.
W. Soltau, Römische Chronologie （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆） (Freiburg, 1889) 170-173. He accepted Matzat's phase of the triennial cycle but argued that it was absurd to suppose that Caesar would have made the second Julian year a leap year and that the 36 years had to be accounted from 45 BC.
G. Radke, "Die falsche Schaltung nach Caesars Tode" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, Geschichte und griechische Philosophie 103 (1960) 178-185. He proposed that Augustus initiated the reform when he became pontifex maximus in 12 BC.
