南千島群島爭議 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "南千島群島爭議" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Chinese rank
1st place
1st place
7th place
31st place
14th place
18th place
389th place
464th place
49th place
81st place
1,408th place
1,529th place
1,382nd place
937th place
4,267th place
2,052nd place
low place
low place
8th place
32nd place
3rd place
8th place
2,565th place
4,580th place
1,021st place
1,145th place
1,109th place
564th place
9th place
2nd place
low place
low place
309th place
19th place
low place
low place
3,727th place
5,380th place
low place
679th place
154th place
271st place
5,506th place
1,181st place
26th place
113th place
3,728th place
7,979th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,872nd place
2,637th place
6,266th place
3,082nd place
low place
low place
278th place
414th place
361st place
450th place
965th place
1,476th place
12th place
60th place
1,388th place
1,547th place
481st place
798th place
268th place
470th place
144th place
3rd place
559th place
76th place
343rd place
13th place
495th place
21st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7,060th place
low place
36th place
153rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
8,825th place
393rd place
low place
7,425th place
392nd place
10th place
68th place
209th place
280th place
150th place
4,540th place
9,550th place
2,247th place
low place
260th place
1,374th place
low place
low place

aljazeera.com (Global: 268th place; Chinese: 470th place)

archive.today (Global: 14th place; Chinese: 18th place)

atimes.com (Global: 5,506th place; Chinese: 1,181st place)

  • The convoluted case of the coveted Kurils.页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆) By Kosuke Takahashi. Asia Times. November 25, 2004. "Japan and the Allied Powers, including the US and the UK, signed the peace treaty in San Francisco in 1951, when the Soviet Union participated but did not sign the treaty. At the conference, Japan renounced the "Kuril Islands", excluding Etorofu, Kunashiri, Shikotan, or the Habomai islands, which Japan claimed had always been Japanese territories and wished to claim them after the war."

bbc.co.uk (Global: 8th place; Chinese: 32nd place)

news.bbc.co.uk

bbc.co.uk

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; Chinese: 8th place)

  • Sohn, Joan. 36 Letters. Jewish Publication Society. 2011 [2017-02-20]. ISBN 0827609264. (原始内容存档于2019-06-06). The fabled Russian military machine proved to be inept and the Russo-Japanese War of 1904–1905 was a slaughterhouse and a disaster. ... Brest was a transit station and camp for the army, and the city was full of soldiers and reservists returning from the disastrous Russo-Japanese War. 
  • Papastratigakis, Nicholas. Russian Imperialism and Naval Power: Military Strategy and the Build-Up to the Russo-Japanese War. I. B. Tauris. 2011 [2017-02-20]. ISBN 1848856911. (原始内容存档于2019-06-12). Gatrell has asserted that the navy, in contrast to the army, was not underfunded and the armament requirements of the Navy Ministry were satisfied, since most of the money was spent on the construction and repair of vessels. In this sense he attributed the navy's disastrous performance in the Russo-Japanese War to the mismanagement of adequate resources and enforced economies impairing the training of crews. 

chinapost.com.tw (Global: 6,266th place; Chinese: 3,082nd place)

ckxx.net (Global: low place; Chinese: 7,425th place)

m.ckxx.net

dur.ac.uk (Global: 3,728th place; Chinese: 7,979th place)

emb-japan.go.jp (Global: 3,872nd place; Chinese: 2,637th place)

ru.emb-japan.go.jp

europa.eu (Global: 68th place; Chinese: 209th place)

eur-lex.europa.eu

europarl.eu.int (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

  • European Parliament resolution on relations between the EU, China and Taiwan and security in the Far East #15 [1] Archive.today存檔,存档日期2012-10-11

explained.at (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

everything.explained.at

  • 存档副本. [2016-11-09]. (原始内容存档于2013-03-04).  By E. Vovk. The Public Opinion Foundation Database. November 25, 2004

france24.com (Global: 481st place; Chinese: 798th place)

mobile.france24.com

independent.co.uk (Global: 36th place; Chinese: 153rd place)

iranintl.com (Global: 2,247th place; Chinese: low place)

itar-tass.com (Global: 2,565th place; Chinese: 4,580th place)

japantimes.co.jp (Global: 389th place; Chinese: 464th place)

search.japantimes.co.jp

japantoday.ru (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

jstor.org (Global: 26th place; Chinese: 113th place)

kamtime.ru (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

koueki.jp (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

kyodonews.net (Global: 4,267th place; Chinese: 2,052nd place)

tchina.kyodonews.net

china.kyodonews.net

english.kyodonews.net

l99.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

mainichi.jp (Global: 278th place; Chinese: 414th place)

mdn.mainichi.jp

mfa.gov.cn (Global: 8,825th place; Chinese: 393rd place)

mid.ru (Global: 3,727th place; Chinese: 5,380th place)

ln.mid.ru

mofa.go.jp (Global: 1,109th place; Chinese: 564th place)

ndl.go.jp (Global: 154th place; Chinese: 271st place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; Chinese: 31st place)

select.nytimes.com

nytimes.com

on.cc (Global: 495th place; Chinese: 21st place)

hk.on.cc

pravdareport.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

reuters.com (Global: 49th place; Chinese: 81st place)

rfi.fr (Global: 559th place; Chinese: 76th place)

rian.ru (Global: 1,408th place; Chinese: 1,529th place)

en.rian.ru

rt.com (Global: 1,021st place; Chinese: 1,145th place)

russia-insider.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

russiatoday.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

russiatoday.ru (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

samlib.ru (Global: 7,060th place; Chinese: low place)

sina.com.cn (Global: 144th place; Chinese: 3rd place)

mil.news.sina.com.cn

sohu.com (Global: 343rd place; Chinese: 13th place)

spf.org (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

sputniknews.cn (Global: low place; Chinese: 679th place)

tass.ru (Global: 260th place; Chinese: 1,374th place)

tehrantimes.com (Global: 4,540th place; Chinese: 9,550th place)

theaustralian.com.au (Global: 965th place; Chinese: 1,476th place)

thediplomat.com (Global: 1,382nd place; Chinese: 937th place)

theguardian.com (Global: 12th place; Chinese: 60th place)

themoscowtimes.com (Global: 1,388th place; Chinese: 1,547th place)

tianditu.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

map.tianditu.com

tokachi.co.jp (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

udn.com (Global: 392nd place; Chinese: 10th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Chinese: 1st place)

xinhuanet.com (Global: 309th place; Chinese: 19th place)

news.xinhuanet.com

xinhuanet.com

yahoo.co.jp (Global: 280th place; Chinese: 150th place)

news.yahoo.co.jp

yomiuri.co.jp (Global: 361st place; Chinese: 450th place)

youtube.com (Global: 9th place; Chinese: 2nd place)