坡氏定律 (Chinese Wikipedia)
Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "坡氏定律" in Chinese language version.
refsWebsite
Global rank
Chinese rank
1,518th place
1,980th place
14th place
18th place
24th place
29th place
low place
low place
30th place
111th place
1st place
1st place
archive.today
- Emily Post for Usenet. November 1, 1983 [December 18, 2014]. （原始内容存档于2013-08-02）. (Emily Post)
- Bush's testing plan.. February 1, 2001 [December 18, 2014]. （原始内容存档于2013-08-02）.
christianforums.com
- Poe, Nathan. Big contradictions in the evolution theory. christianforums.com. 11 August 2005 [December 18, 2014]. （原始内容存档于2014年5月31日）.
Originally Posted by Pete Harcoff "Good thing you included the winky. Otherwise people might think you are serious." - Response - POE'S LAW: Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article.
[失效連結]
groups.google.com
- Emily Post for Usenet. November 1, 1983 [December 18, 2014]. （原始内容存档于2013-08-02）. (Emily Post)
- Bush's testing plan.. February 1, 2001 [December 18, 2014]. （原始内容存档于2013-08-02）.
ssrn.com
- Aikin, Scott F. Poe's Law, Group Polarization, and the Epistemology of Online Religious Discourse. Social Science Research Network. January 23, 2009. SSRN 1332169
.
telegraph.co.uk
- Chivers, Tom. Internet rules and laws: the top 10, from Godwin to Poe. The Telegraph. Oct 23, 2009 [2022-08-10]. （原始内容存档于2018-06-19）.: "Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humour, it is impossible to create a parody of fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing."
web.archive.org
- Chivers, Tom. Internet rules and laws: the top 10, from Godwin to Poe. The Telegraph. Oct 23, 2009 [2022-08-10]. （原始内容存档于2018-06-19）.: "Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humour, it is impossible to create a parody of fundamentalism that someone won't mistake for the real thing."
webcitation.org
- Poe, Nathan. Big contradictions in the evolution theory. christianforums.com. 11 August 2005 [December 18, 2014]. （原始内容存档于2014年5月31日）.
Originally Posted by Pete Harcoff "Good thing you included the winky. Otherwise people might think you are serious." - Response - POE'S LAW: Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article.
[失效連結]