奥萨马·本·拉登之死 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "奥萨马·本·拉登之死" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Chinese rank
1st place
1st place
24th place
29th place
48th place
146th place
7th place
31st place
49th place
81st place
34th place
129th place
28th place
71st place
79th place
143rd place
30th place
111th place
197th place
183rd place
117th place
166th place
41st place
182nd place
108th place
449th place
219th place
201st place
542nd place
27th place
8th place
32nd place
22nd place
110th place
14th place
18th place
965th place
1,476th place
109th place
368th place
2,255th place
67th place
1,013th place
1,467th place
268th place
470th place
821st place
4,979th place
354th place
2,115th place
595th place
3,257th place
61st place
145th place
7,245th place
7,174th place
138th place
1,399th place
193rd place
421st place
228th place
597th place
312th place
1,093rd place
6,864th place
low place
1,029th place
1,629th place
443rd place
366th place
99th place
225th place
152nd place
440th place
911th place
1,176th place
2,008th place
3,294th place
1,116th place
1,030th place
144th place
3rd place
38th place
9th place
187th place
481st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
482nd place
931st place
1,418th place
1,994th place
2,558th place
2,642nd place
9,687th place
low place
1,367th place
1,579th place
505th place
609th place
5,470th place
6,870th place
752nd place
2,156th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
166th place
570th place
132nd place
386th place
1,427th place
5,413th place
198th place
378th place
146th place
656th place
4,834th place
low place
5,329th place
6,708th place
327th place
843rd place
634th place
410th place
1,299th place
1,412th place
907th place
1,343rd place
474th place
1,083rd place
2,025th place
5,906th place
237th place
329th place
445th place
5,158th place
254th place
330th place
737th place
997th place
598th place
1,943rd place
low place
low place
9th place
2nd place
1,387th place
5,614th place
163rd place
188th place
5,506th place
1,181st place
853rd place
2,949th place
low place
low place
94th place
1,782nd place
low place
low place
97th place
122nd place
915th place
3,225th place
low place
5,828th place
3,005th place
107th place
3,547th place
9,150th place
low place
low place
476th place
1,277th place
3,163rd place
9,098th place
low place
low place
60th place
1,119th place
low place
low place
583rd place
low place
36th place
153rd place
low place
low place
2,677th place
1,482nd place
309th place
19th place
20th place
41st place
881st place
1,292nd place
1,181st place
1,520th place
330th place
895th place
9,290th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
791st place
1,198th place
3,184th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
8,908th place

airforcetimes.com (Global: 7,245th place; Chinese: 7,174th place)

alarabiya.net (Global: 598th place; Chinese: 1,943rd place)

english.alarabiya.net

aljazeera.com (Global: 268th place; Chinese: 470th place)

allheadlinenews.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

amnesty.org (Global: 1,367th place; Chinese: 1,579th place)

archive.today (Global: 14th place; Chinese: 18th place)

atimes.com (Global: 5,506th place; Chinese: 1,181st place)

aviationweek.com (Global: 1,181st place; Chinese: 1,520th place)

bbc.co.uk (Global: 8th place; Chinese: 32nd place)

bbc.com (Global: 20th place; Chinese: 41st place)

belfasttelegraph.co.uk (Global: 915th place; Chinese: 3,225th place)

bloomberg.com (Global: 99th place; Chinese: 225th place)

cbn.com (Global: 3,184th place; Chinese: low place)

blogs.cbn.com

cbsnews.com (Global: 108th place; Chinese: 449th place)

cnn.com (Global: 28th place; Chinese: 71st place)

articles.cnn.com

edition.cnn.com

whitehouse.blogs.cnn.com

religion.blogs.cnn.com

csmonitor.com (Global: 791st place; Chinese: 1,198th place)

dailymail.co.uk (Global: 219th place; Chinese: 201st place)

dawn.com (Global: 354th place; Chinese: 2,115th place)

discovery.com (Global: 1,299th place; Chinese: 1,412th place)

news.discovery.com

economist.com (Global: 254th place; Chinese: 330th place)

fas.org (Global: 505th place; Chinese: 609th place)

fastcoexist.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

fbi.gov (Global: 881st place; Chinese: 1,292nd place)

federaltimes.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

flickr.com (Global: 1,013th place; Chinese: 1,467th place)

foreignpolicy.com (Global: 1,116th place; Chinese: 1,030th place)

afpak.foreignpolicy.com

foreignpolicy.com

foxnews.com (Global: 152nd place; Chinese: 440th place)

funeralwise.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

blogs.funeralwise.com

gallup.com (Global: 2,558th place; Chinese: 2,642nd place)

gizmodo.com (Global: 474th place; Chinese: 1,083rd place)

globalsecurity.org (Global: 443rd place; Chinese: 366th place)

go.com (Global: 48th place; Chinese: 146th place)

abcnews.go.com

abclocal.go.com

sports.espn.go.com

google.com (Global: 163rd place; Chinese: 188th place)

google.com.tw (Global: 2,255th place; Chinese: 67th place)

books.google.com.tw

granma.cu (Global: 9,687th place; Chinese: low place)

guardian.co.uk (Global: 197th place; Chinese: 183rd place)

guernicamag.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

hamptonroads.com (Global: 5,470th place; Chinese: 6,870th place)

huffingtonpost.com (Global: 109th place; Chinese: 368th place)

ibtimes.com (Global: 911th place; Chinese: 1,176th place)

ifeng.com (Global: 542nd place; Chinese: 27th place)

news.ifeng.com

independent.co.uk (Global: 36th place; Chinese: 153rd place)

indianexpress.com (Global: 60th place; Chinese: 1,119th place)

indiatoday.in (Global: 94th place; Chinese: 1,782nd place)

m.indiatoday.in

inewsone.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

intoday.in (Global: 445th place; Chinese: 5,158th place)

indiatoday.intoday.in

jamestown.org (Global: 2,677th place; Chinese: 1,482nd place)

latimes.com (Global: 22nd place; Chinese: 110th place)

articles.latimes.com

law.com (Global: 3,163rd place; Chinese: 9,098th place)

longwarjournal.org (Global: 5,329th place; Chinese: 6,708th place)

miamiherald.com (Global: 752nd place; Chinese: 2,156th place)

micevhill.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

mid-day.com (Global: 583rd place; Chinese: low place)

montrealgazette.com (Global: 2,025th place; Chinese: 5,906th place)

motherjones.com (Global: 2,008th place; Chinese: 3,294th place)

msn.com (Global: 117th place; Chinese: 166th place)

msnbc.msn.com

firstread.msnbc.msn.com

nationaljournal.com (Global: 6,864th place; Chinese: low place)

ndtv.com (Global: 138th place; Chinese: 1,399th place)

newsday.co.tt (Global: low place; Chinese: 5,828th place)

newsday.com (Global: 853rd place; Chinese: 2,949th place)

newyorker.com (Global: 146th place; Chinese: 656th place)

nwsource.com (Global: 907th place; Chinese: 1,343rd place)

seattletimes.nwsource.com

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; Chinese: 31st place)

nytimes.com

mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com

atwar.blogs.nytimes.com

pakistanweatherportal.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

pakobserver.net (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

  • Khalid Iqbal. Without Osama. Pakobserver.net. 2001年12月13日 [2012年1月17日]. (原始内容存档于2012年3月16日) (英语). 

pbs.org (Global: 198th place; Chinese: 378th place)

pewresearch.org (Global: 1,418th place; Chinese: 1,994th place)

politico.com (Global: 312th place; Chinese: 1,093rd place)

publicpolicypolling.com (Global: low place; Chinese: 8,908th place)

reuters.com (Global: 49th place; Chinese: 81st place)

rferl.org (Global: 737th place; Chinese: 997th place)

rttnews.com (Global: 9,290th place; Chinese: low place)

scribd.com (Global: 482nd place; Chinese: 931st place)

sfgate.com (Global: 166th place; Chinese: 570th place)

sina.com.cn (Global: 144th place; Chinese: 3rd place)

mil.news.sina.com.cn

news.sina.com.cn

sinchew.com.my (Global: 3,005th place; Chinese: 107th place)

sltrib.com (Global: 1,427th place; Chinese: 5,413th place)

smh.com.au (Global: 132nd place; Chinese: 386th place)

stltoday.com (Global: 1,387th place; Chinese: 5,614th place)

suntimes.com (Global: 327th place; Chinese: 843rd place)

techcrunch.com (Global: 187th place; Chinese: 481st place)

eu.techcrunch.com

techcrunch.com

telegraph.co.uk (Global: 30th place; Chinese: 111th place)

theatlantic.com (Global: 228th place; Chinese: 597th place)

theatlanticwire.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

theaustralian.com.au (Global: 965th place; Chinese: 1,476th place)

thedailybeast.com (Global: 330th place; Chinese: 895th place)

thehill.com (Global: 476th place; Chinese: 1,277th place)

thenews.com.pk (Global: 821st place; Chinese: 4,979th place)

thespywhobilledme.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

time.com (Global: 61st place; Chinese: 145th place)

time.com

healthland.time.com

swampland.time.com

timesnews.net (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

tribune.com.pk (Global: 595th place; Chinese: 3,257th place)

tweetdeck.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

un.org (Global: 97th place; Chinese: 122nd place)

usatoday.com (Global: 41st place; Chinese: 182nd place)

usatoday.com

content.usatoday.com

usnews.com (Global: 634th place; Chinese: 410th place)

utsandiego.com (Global: 3,547th place; Chinese: 9,150th place)

  • Hamza Hendawi. Islamic scholars criticize bin Laden's sea burial. 《聖地牙哥聯合論壇報》(U-T San Diego). 2011年5月2日 [2012年1月19日]. (原始内容存档于2012年10月19日) (英语). But Mohammed Qudah, a professor of Islamic law at the University of Jordan, said burying the Saudi-born bin Laden at sea was not forbidden if there was nobody to receive the body and provide a Muslim burial. "The land and the sea belong to God, who is able to protect and raise the dead at the end of times for Judgment Day," he said. "It's neither true nor correct to claim that there was nobody in the Muslim world ready to receive bin Laden's body." 

washingtonpost.com (Global: 34th place; Chinese: 129th place)

washingtontimes.com (Global: 1,029th place; Chinese: 1,629th place)

wbru.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

news.wbru.com

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Chinese: 1st place)

webcitation.org (Global: 24th place; Chinese: 29th place)

wikileaks.ch (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

wired.com (Global: 193rd place; Chinese: 421st place)

wsj.com (Global: 79th place; Chinese: 143rd place)

online.wsj.com

blogs.wsj.com

xinhuanet.com (Global: 309th place; Chinese: 19th place)

yahoo.com (Global: 38th place; Chinese: 9th place)

old.news.yahoo.com

sports.yahoo.com

youtube.com (Global: 9th place; Chinese: 2nd place)