Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

宗主权 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "宗主权" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Chinese rank
21web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
11books.google.com
3rd place
8th place
3wikisource.org
27th place
30th place
2moe.edu.tw
3,335th place
126th place
1jkcf.or.jp
low place
low place
1cambridge.org
305th place
511th place
1worldcat.org
5th place
12th place
1doi.org
2nd place
23rd place
1dw.de
1,780th place
887th place
1tibetjustice.org
low place
9,115th place
1telegraph.co.uk
30th place
111th place

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; Chinese: 8th place)

  • Oppenheim, L., International Law: A Treatise (Volume I), p162 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, "Modern suzerainty involves only a few rights of the suzerain State over the vassal State which can be called constitutional rights. The rights of the suzerain State over the vassal are principally international rights, of whatever they may consist...One may correctly maintain that suzerainty is a kind of international guardianship, since the vassal State is either absolutely or mainly represented internationally by the suzerain State."
  • Oppenheim, L., International Law: A Treatise (Volume I), p162 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, "Suzerainty is by no means sovereignty. If it were, the vassal State could not be sovereign in its domestic affairs and could never have any international relations whatever of its own."
  • Oppenheim, L., International Law: A Treatise (Volume I), p162 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, "Suzerainty is a term which was originally used for the relation between the feudal lord and his vassal; the lord was said to be the suzerain of the vassal."
  • Oppenheim, L., International Law: A Treatise (Volume I), p163 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, "Egypt, while she was still a vassal State of Turkey, could conclude commercial and postal treaties with foreign States without the consent of suzerain Turkey, and Bulgaria could, while she was under Turkish suzerainty , conclude treaties regarding railways, post, and the like."
  • Oppenheim, L., International Law: A Treatise (Volume I), p161 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, "The union and the relations between a suzerain and its vassal State create much difficulty in the science of the Law of Nations."
  • Lezlee Brown Halper; Stefan A. Halper. Tibet: An Unfinished Story. Oxford University Press. 2014年: 15–16頁 [2017-09-18]. ISBN 978-0-19-936836-5. （原始内容存档于2019-05-13）. 
  • Sam Van Schaik. Tibet: A History. Yale University Press. 2011年: 306頁 [2017-09-18]. ISBN 978-0-300-17217-1. （原始内容存档于2019-05-13）. 
  • Smith, Warren, Tibetan Nation: A History of Tibetan Nationalism and Sino-Tibetan Relations, p157 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, "Negotiations were reopened in 1906 at Peking. The British Government was not interested in an alliance with Russia. A first step in that direction would be to alleviate Russian fears concerning British designs upon Tibet. An agreement was therefore quickly concluded. The Chinese agreed to accept the Lhasa Convention of 1904; the British agreed not to interfere in China's administration of Tibet if the Chinese would exclude all other foreign power. China was defined as not a foreign power in relation to Tibet, which implicitly recognized Chinese sovereignty over Tibet."
  • Addy, P., Tibet: Pawn anf Pivot of the Great Game, pp321-322 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）
  • Keltie, J.S. (Ed.), The Statesman's Year-Book: Statistical and Historical Annual of the States of the World for the Year 1892, p1030 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, "The Principality of Bulgaria was created by the Treaty of Berlin, signed July 13, 1878. It was ordered by Art. 1 of the Treaty that Bulgaria should he 'constituted an autonomous and tributary Principality under the suzerainty of His Imperial Majesty the Sultan. It will have a Christian Government and a national militia.'"
  • Oppenheim, L., International Law: A Treatise (Volume I), p163 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）

cambridge.org (Global: 305th place; Chinese: 511th place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Chinese: 23rd place)

dw.de (Global: 1,780th place; Chinese: 887th place)

  • 西藏問題從何而來？. 德国之声. 2008-03-18 [2013-12-29]. （原始内容存档于2014-01-03）. 現代國際法將北京與拉薩在1907年的關係界定為『宗主關係』，也就是說，除了外交事務由中國掌控外，西藏在其他方面擁有自主權。中國的皇權體制被推翻後，西藏於1913年宣布獨立。達賴喇嘛所領導的西藏流亡政府目前主要依據這項獨立宣言作為立場依據，而中國則堅持認為，西藏的獨立從未獲得中國或其他國家的承認。 

jkcf.or.jp (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

moe.edu.tw (Global: 3,335th place; Chinese: 126th place)

dict.revised.moe.edu.tw

telegraph.co.uk (Global: 30th place; Chinese: 111th place)

tibetjustice.org (Global: low place; Chinese: 9,115th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Chinese: 1st place)

  • Oppenheim, L., International Law: A Treatise (Volume I), p162 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, "Modern suzerainty involves only a few rights of the suzerain State over the vassal State which can be called constitutional rights. The rights of the suzerain State over the vassal are principally international rights, of whatever they may consist...One may correctly maintain that suzerainty is a kind of international guardianship, since the vassal State is either absolutely or mainly represented internationally by the suzerain State."
  • 《重編國語辭典修訂本》：宗主權. 國家教育研究院. [2022-04-05]. （原始内容存档于2022-04-05）. 國家對於屬國的內政外交，具有干預的權利，此權稱為「宗主權」。 
  • Oppenheim, L., International Law: A Treatise (Volume I), p162 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, "Suzerainty is by no means sovereignty. If it were, the vassal State could not be sovereign in its domestic affairs and could never have any international relations whatever of its own."
  • 《重編國語辭典修訂本》：宗主國. 國家教育研究院. [2022-04-05]. （原始内容存档于2022-04-11）. 對屬國有宗主權的國家，通稱為「宗主國」。 
  • Oppenheim, L., International Law: A Treatise (Volume I), p162 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, "Suzerainty is a term which was originally used for the relation between the feudal lord and his vassal; the lord was said to be the suzerain of the vassal."
  • Oppenheim, L., International Law: A Treatise (Volume I), p163 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, "Egypt, while she was still a vassal State of Turkey, could conclude commercial and postal treaties with foreign States without the consent of suzerain Turkey, and Bulgaria could, while she was under Turkish suzerainty , conclude treaties regarding railways, post, and the like."
  • Oppenheim, L., International Law: A Treatise (Volume I), p161 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, "The union and the relations between a suzerain and its vassal State create much difficulty in the science of the Law of Nations."
  • 原田環. 東アジアの国際関係とその近代化－朝鮮と越南－ (PDF). 日韓歴史共同研究委員会 第一期 第3分科報告書 (日韓文化交流基金). 2005-03: 73―102頁 [2023-08-09]. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2015-09-10）. 
  • Zhu, Yuan Yi. Suzerainty, Semi-Sovereignty, and International Legal Hierarchies on China's Borderlands. Asian Journal of International Law. 2020-07, 10 (2) [2023-08-09]. ISSN 2044-2513. doi:10.1017/S204425132000020X. （原始内容存档于2023-08-11） （英语）. 
  • Lezlee Brown Halper; Stefan A. Halper. Tibet: An Unfinished Story. Oxford University Press. 2014年: 15–16頁 [2017-09-18]. ISBN 978-0-19-936836-5. （原始内容存档于2019-05-13）. 
  • Sam Van Schaik. Tibet: A History. Yale University Press. 2011年: 306頁 [2017-09-18]. ISBN 978-0-300-17217-1. （原始内容存档于2019-05-13）. 
  • Smith, Warren, Tibetan Nation: A History of Tibetan Nationalism and Sino-Tibetan Relations, p157 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, "Negotiations were reopened in 1906 at Peking. The British Government was not interested in an alliance with Russia. A first step in that direction would be to alleviate Russian fears concerning British designs upon Tibet. An agreement was therefore quickly concluded. The Chinese agreed to accept the Lhasa Convention of 1904; the British agreed not to interfere in China's administration of Tibet if the Chinese would exclude all other foreign power. China was defined as not a foreign power in relation to Tibet, which implicitly recognized Chinese sovereignty over Tibet."
  • 西藏問題從何而來？. 德国之声. 2008-03-18 [2013-12-29]. （原始内容存档于2014-01-03）. 現代國際法將北京與拉薩在1907年的關係界定為『宗主關係』，也就是說，除了外交事務由中國掌控外，西藏在其他方面擁有自主權。中國的皇權體制被推翻後，西藏於1913年宣布獨立。達賴喇嘛所領導的西藏流亡政府目前主要依據這項獨立宣言作為立場依據，而中國則堅持認為，西藏的獨立從未獲得中國或其他國家的承認。 
  • Proclamation Issued by His Holiness the Dalai Lama XIII (1913). 1913-01-08 [2013-12-29]. （原始内容存档于2019-02-04）. （英文）
  • Spencer, Richard. UK recognises China's direct rule over Tibet. The Daily Telegraph. 2008-11-05 [2010-07-12]. （原始内容存档于2010-11-03）. 
  • Addy, P., Tibet: Pawn anf Pivot of the Great Game, pp321-322 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）
  • 《中蘇解決懸案大綱協定》第五條 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）
  • Keltie, J.S. (Ed.), The Statesman's Year-Book: Statistical and Historical Annual of the States of the World for the Year 1892, p1030 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, "The Principality of Bulgaria was created by the Treaty of Berlin, signed July 13, 1878. It was ordered by Art. 1 of the Treaty that Bulgaria should he 'constituted an autonomous and tributary Principality under the suzerainty of His Imperial Majesty the Sultan. It will have a Christian Government and a national militia.'"
  • Pretoria Convention (1881) （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Article 2, "Her Majesty reserves to herself, her heirs and successors,(a) the right from time to time to appoint a British Resident in and for the said State, with such duties and functions as are hereinafter defined ; (b) the right to move troops through the said State in time of war, or in case of the apprehension of immediate war between the Suzerain Power and any Foreign State or Native Tribe in South Africa ; and (c) the control of the external relations of the said State"
  • Oppenheim, L., International Law: A Treatise (Volume I), p163 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）
  • London Convention (1884) （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Article IV, "Such approval shall be considered to have been granted if Her Majesty's Government shall not, within six months after receiving a copy of such treaty (which shall be delivered to them immediately upon its completion), have notified that the conclusion of such treaty is in conflict with the interests of Great Britain or any of Her Majesty's possessions in South Africa."

wikisource.org (Global: 27th place; Chinese: 30th place)

en.wikisource.org

  • Pretoria Convention (1881) （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Article 2, "Her Majesty reserves to herself, her heirs and successors,(a) the right from time to time to appoint a British Resident in and for the said State, with such duties and functions as are hereinafter defined ; (b) the right to move troops through the said State in time of war, or in case of the apprehension of immediate war between the Suzerain Power and any Foreign State or Native Tribe in South Africa ; and (c) the control of the external relations of the said State"
  • London Convention (1884) （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Article IV, "Such approval shall be considered to have been granted if Her Majesty's Government shall not, within six months after receiving a copy of such treaty (which shall be delivered to them immediately upon its completion), have notified that the conclusion of such treaty is in conflict with the interests of Great Britain or any of Her Majesty's possessions in South Africa."

zh.wikisource.org

worldcat.org (Global: 5th place; Chinese: 12th place)