尊重婚姻法案 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "尊重婚姻法案" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Chinese rank
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
28th place
71st place
1,716th place
3,372nd place
7th place
31st place
41st place
182nd place
2,558th place
2,642nd place
92nd place
352nd place
529th place
1,280th place
446th place
1,043rd place
8,070th place
low place
3,811th place
7,287th place
312th place
1,093rd place
61st place
145th place
2,186th place
4,317th place
129th place
436th place
2,002nd place
6,998th place
79th place
143rd place
low place
low place
730th place
1,463rd place
1,278th place
4,428th place
220th place
426th place

advocate.com

apnews.com

  • David Crary. Faith groups split over bill to protect same-sex marriage. 美联社. 2022-11-17 [2022-11-30]. (原始内容存档于2023-04-06). Among U.S. faith leaders and denominations, there are sharp differences over the bill advancing in the Senate that would protect same-sex and interracial marriages in federal law... On Tuesday, one of the most prominent conservative-leaning denominations -- The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints -- came out in favor of the legislation. But the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and leaders of the Southern Baptist Convention remain opposed... 

archives.gov

obamawhitehouse.archives.gov

axios.com

christianitytoday.com

  • Carl Esbeck. Everything You Need to Know About the Respect for Marriage Act. 今日基督教. 2022-11-17 [2022-11-30]. (原始内容存档于2023-03-07). Rather than just say no to RMA, a small collective of faith groups moved quickly in the Senate to see if the act could be brought into balance. A few senators from both parties who were keen on doing just that helped. After adding in a measure of religious liberty protections, the Senate substitute of the House bill passed the higher chamber earlier this week, 62–37. Churches, Christian colleges, K-12 religious schools, and faith-based social service providers can take comfort in these boundary lines. All in all, RMA is a modest but good day’s work. It shows that religious liberty champions and LGBT advocates can work together for the common good. It says to the original House bill, “If a bill is about us, it has to be with us.” And it shows that Congress can still legislate, not just be a gaggle of egos who go to Washington to perform but never fix. 

cnbc.com

cnn.com

edition.cnn.com

congress.gov

gallup.com

news.gallup.com

glad.org

house.gov

npr.org

nytimes.com

politico.com

reason.com

supremecourt.gov

time.com

usatoday.com

washingtonblade.com

web.archive.org

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

wsj.com