星際大戰五部曲:帝國大反擊 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "星際大戰五部曲:帝國大反擊" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Chinese rank
1st place
1st place
7th place
31st place
21st place
47th place
846th place
851st place
98th place
232nd place
923rd place
2,041st place
221st place
472nd place
150th place
643rd place
474th place
1,083rd place
410th place
1,057th place
15th place
49th place
61st place
145th place
35th place
138th place
6th place
4th place
193rd place
421st place
34th place
129th place
72nd place
163rd place
1,435th place
5,335th place
13th place
48th place
140th place
399th place
22nd place
110th place
107th place
503rd place
4,491st place
4,660th place
1,110th place
1,562nd place
631st place
4,904th place
53rd place
91st place
low place
low place
133rd place
1,180th place
166th place
570th place
136th place
794th place
760th place
2,121st place
246th place
469th place
12th place
60th place
29th place
89th place
110th place
235th place
8th place
32nd place
503rd place
1,207th place
1,230th place
low place
49th place
81st place
864th place
1,863rd place
3,700th place
4,616th place
388th place
546th place
5th place
12th place
128th place
498th place
1,545th place
low place
191st place
309th place
low place
low place
10th place
37th place
366th place
744th place
561st place
1,105th place
79th place
143rd place
3,651st place
135th place
1,536th place
6,135th place
95th place
678th place
143rd place
389th place
455th place
1,631st place
364th place
1,502nd place
426th place
1,433rd place
2,430th place
3,827th place
2,362nd place
4,512th place
290th place
1,067th place
2,876th place
6,001st place
484th place
976th place
139th place
367th place
36th place
153rd place
177th place
338th place
low place
low place
30th place
111th place
1,786th place
3,498th place
26th place
113th place
936th place
1,099th place
28th place
71st place
1,664th place
9,086th place
2,892nd place
4,807th place
41st place
182nd place
1,615th place
2,054th place
1,150th place
4,390th place
472nd place
1,296th place
259th place
738th place
126th place
599th place
20th place
41st place
47th place
296th place
37th place
84th place
114th place
276th place
185th place
1,454th place
568th place
1,570th place
131st place
458th place
499th place
587th place
70th place
342nd place
2,126th place
2,166th place
2,138th place
5,188th place
1,623rd place
3,779th place
1,483rd place
6,376th place
77th place
28th place
944th place
1,625th place
272nd place
459th place
99th place
225th place
376th place
535th place

abc.net.au (Global: 139th place; Chinese: 367th place)

afi.com (Global: 131st place; Chinese: 458th place)

archive.org (Global: 6th place; Chinese: 4th place)

arnnet.com.au (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

arstechnica.com (Global: 388th place; Chinese: 546th place)

avclub.com (Global: 136th place; Chinese: 794th place)

bafta.org (Global: 426th place; Chinese: 1,433rd place)

awards.bafta.org

bbc.co.uk (Global: 8th place; Chinese: 32nd place)

bbc.com (Global: 20th place; Chinese: 41st place)

bbfc.co.uk (Global: 191st place; Chinese: 309th place)

bfi.org.uk (Global: 150th place; Chinese: 643rd place)

www2.bfi.org.uk

bloomberg.com (Global: 99th place; Chinese: 225th place)

boxofficemojo.com (Global: 21st place; Chinese: 47th place)

buffalonews.com (Global: 1,545th place; Chinese: low place)

businessinsider.com (Global: 140th place; Chinese: 399th place)

cbr.com (Global: 246th place; Chinese: 469th place)

chicagoreader.com (Global: 1,536th place; Chinese: 6,135th place)

onfilm.chicagoreader.com

chicagotribune.com (Global: 95th place; Chinese: 678th place)

cinefex.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

cnet.com (Global: 272nd place; Chinese: 459th place)

cnn.com (Global: 28th place; Chinese: 71st place)

edition.cnn.com

collider.com (Global: 72nd place; Chinese: 163rd place)

comicbook.com (Global: 177th place; Chinese: 338th place)

deadline.com (Global: 10th place; Chinese: 37th place)

decider.com (Global: 864th place; Chinese: 1,863rd place)

denofgeek.com (Global: 410th place; Chinese: 1,057th place)

deseret.com (Global: 1,230th place; Chinese: low place)

ebscohost.com (Global: 1,786th place; Chinese: 3,498th place)

search.ebscohost.com

empireonline.com (Global: 221st place; Chinese: 472nd place)

escapistmagazine.com (Global: 2,126th place; Chinese: 2,166th place)

esquire.com (Global: 472nd place; Chinese: 1,296th place)

ew.com (Global: 35th place; Chinese: 138th place)

facebook.com (Global: 77th place; Chinese: 28th place)

filmschoolrejects.com (Global: 2,138th place; Chinese: 5,188th place)

filmsite.org (Global: 1,615th place; Chinese: 2,054th place)

gale.com (Global: 1,435th place; Chinese: 5,335th place)

link.gale.com

gameinformer.com (Global: 499th place; Chinese: 587th place)

gamesradar.com (Global: 376th place; Chinese: 535th place)

gettyimagesgallery.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

gizmodo.com (Global: 474th place; Chinese: 1,083rd place)

goldenglobes.com (Global: 455th place; Chinese: 1,631st place)

google.com.hk (Global: 3,651st place; Chinese: 135th place)

books.google.com.hk

gq.com (Global: 568th place; Chinese: 1,570th place)

grammy.com (Global: 364th place; Chinese: 1,502nd place)

hollywoodreporter.com (Global: 15th place; Chinese: 49th place)

ign.com (Global: 53rd place; Chinese: 91st place)

independent.co.uk (Global: 36th place; Chinese: 153rd place)

jstor.org (Global: 26th place; Chinese: 113th place)

  • Lancashire, Anne. Complex Design in The Empire Strikes Back. Film Criticism. Vol. 5 no. 3 (Pennsylvania: Allegheny College). 1981: 38–52. JSTOR 44018994. 

latimes.com (Global: 22nd place; Chinese: 110th place)

loc.gov (Global: 70th place; Chinese: 342nd place)

mashable.com (Global: 561st place; Chinese: 1,105th place)

metacritic.com (Global: 37th place; Chinese: 84th place)

movieweb.com (Global: 366th place; Chinese: 744th place)

nerdist.com (Global: 1,623rd place; Chinese: 3,779th place)

nme.com (Global: 128th place; Chinese: 498th place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; Chinese: 31st place)

nytimes.com

archive.nytimes.com

observer.com (Global: 760th place; Chinese: 2,121st place)

oscars.org (Global: 143rd place; Chinese: 389th place)

playboy.com (Global: 1,664th place; Chinese: 9,086th place)

popmatters.com (Global: 631st place; Chinese: 4,904th place)

qz.com (Global: 1,110th place; Chinese: 1,562nd place)

radiotimes.com (Global: 185th place; Chinese: 1,454th place)

reuters.com (Global: 49th place; Chinese: 81st place)

rogerebert.com (Global: 133rd place; Chinese: 1,180th place)

rollingstone.com (Global: 47th place; Chinese: 296th place)

rottentomatoes.com (Global: 29th place; Chinese: 89th place)

editorial.rottentomatoes.com

rottentomatoes.com

saturnawards.org (Global: 2,430th place; Chinese: 3,827th place)

scifi.com (Global: 2,876th place; Chinese: 6,001st place)

screenrant.com (Global: 98th place; Chinese: 232nd place)

sfgate.com (Global: 166th place; Chinese: 570th place)

slate.com (Global: 259th place; Chinese: 738th place)

smithsonianmag.com (Global: 503rd place; Chinese: 1,207th place)

snopes.com (Global: 944th place; Chinese: 1,625th place)

space.com (Global: 936th place; Chinese: 1,099th place)

starwars.com (Global: 846th place; Chinese: 851st place)

syfy.com (Global: 923rd place; Chinese: 2,041st place)

techrepublic.com (Global: 4,491st place; Chinese: 4,660th place)

telegraph.co.uk (Global: 30th place; Chinese: 111th place)

the-numbers.com (Global: 110th place; Chinese: 235th place)

theguardian.com (Global: 12th place; Chinese: 60th place)

thehugoawards.org (Global: 2,362nd place; Chinese: 4,512th place)

theregister.com (Global: 3,700th place; Chinese: 4,616th place)

theringer.com (Global: 1,150th place; Chinese: 4,390th place)

theverge.com (Global: 114th place; Chinese: 276th place)

time.com (Global: 61st place; Chinese: 145th place)

content.time.com

time.com

tor.com (Global: 1,483rd place; Chinese: 6,376th place)

totalfilm.com (Global: 2,892nd place; Chinese: 4,807th place)

upi.com (Global: 290th place; Chinese: 1,067th place)

usatoday.com (Global: 41st place; Chinese: 182nd place)

vanityfair.com (Global: 107th place; Chinese: 503rd place)

variety.com (Global: 13th place; Chinese: 48th place)

vox.com (Global: 484th place; Chinese: 976th place)

vulture.com (Global: 126th place; Chinese: 599th place)

washingtonpost.com (Global: 34th place; Chinese: 129th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Chinese: 1st place)

wired.com (Global: 193rd place; Chinese: 421st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 5th place; Chinese: 12th place)

wsj.com (Global: 79th place; Chinese: 143rd place)