智能设计 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "智能设计" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Chinese rank
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
5th place
12th place
70th place
342nd place
low place
low place
6th place
4th place
2nd place
23rd place
330th place
895th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
27th place
30th place
9,502nd place
low place
low place
low place
1,162nd place
1,724th place
3,695th place
6,619th place
4th place
5th place
low place
low place
26th place
113th place
234th place
227th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
14th place
18th place
907th place
1,343rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
9,065th place
7,035th place
132nd place
386th place
low place
low place
2,323rd place
8,946th place
low place
low place
61st place
145th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place

aaas.org

archive.org

archive.today

arn.org

  • Phillip Johnson. Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity. July/August 1999."...the first thing that has to be done is to get the Bible out of the discussion. ...This is not to say that the biblical issues are unimportant; the point is rather that the time to address them will be after we have separated materialist prejudice from scientific fact." The Wedge页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆
  • Phillip Johnson. "My colleagues and I speak of 'theistic realism'-- or sometimes, 'mere creation' -- as the defining concept of our [the ID] movement. This means that we affirm that God is objectively real as Creator, and that the reality of God is tangibly recorded in evidence accessible to science, particularly in biology." Starting a Conversation about Evolution页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆

au.org

canada.com

christianity.ca

citizenlink.org

coralridge.org

  • "I have built an intellectual movement in the universities and churches that we call The Wedge, which is devoted to scholarship and writing that furthers this program of questioning the materialistic basis of science."..."Now the way that I see the logic of our movement going is like this. The first thing you understand is that the Darwinian theory isn't true. It's falsified by all of the evidence and the logic is terrible. When you realize that, the next question that occurs to you is, well, where might you get the truth?"..."I start with John 1:1. In the beginning was the word. In the beginning was intelligence, purpose, and wisdom. The Bible had that right. And the materialist scientists are deluding themselves." Johnson 1999. Reclaiming America for Christ Conference. How the Evolution Debate Can Be Won 互联网档案馆存檔,存档日期2007-11-07.

creighton.edu

puffin.creighton.edu

csic.es

ebd10.ebd.csic.es

ctlibrary.com

designinference.com

discovery.org

doi.org

fandm.edu

server1.fandm.edu

ideacenter.org

infidels.org

interacademies.net

iscast.org.au

  • "While the ID crowd have some things of interest to say they, are indeed just a revamped God of the gaps and the Paylean argument from design in a more modern form. Their refusal to engage with the theological issues this engenders is their greatest weakness, it is also a deliberate strategy, to try and show to the secular world they are nothing but scientists and philosophers. It also hides from their Christian constituency that some of their people are not Christian - at least one is a Moonie. Their second weakness is to muddy the waters with terms like "methodological naturalism", "operations science" and "origins science". The fact that some leading Christian philosophers in the US(i.e. Plantiga)are also confused does not help. Their third weakness is that they are their refusal to come clean on the age of the earth. This is to try and hide the fact that they have strong links with the young earthers, at least one of their leading people is a strong young earther. Fourthly, the movement is strongly driven by a US political agenda - the "renewal" of US society and culture through the destruction of materialism via it's supposed foundation of "methodological naturalism", the greatest strength of which is supposedto be evolution. The export of this US agenda, redolent with the culture wars, to the rest of the world, is of grave concern." Intelligent Design? 互联网档案馆存檔,存档日期2006-08-21. ISCAST Bullentin, Issue 48, Spring 2005. Institute for the Study of Christianity in an Age of Science and Technology.(PDF file)

jstor.org

leaderu.com

loc.gov

lccn.loc.gov

nabt.org

nature.com

ncse.com

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

nwsource.com

seattletimes.nwsource.com

smh.com.au

stnews.org

talkorigins.org

thedailybeast.com

time.com

touchstonemag.com

ugent.be

biblio.ugent.be

web.archive.org

wikimedia.org

upload.wikimedia.org

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org

  • Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). Context, pp. 25–26页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆). " ID’s 'official position' does not acknowledge that the designer is God", "...[T]he writings of leading ID proponents reveal that the designer postulated by their argument is the God of Christianity." Context, p. 35页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆). "defense experts Professors Behe and Minnich testified that ID is not creationism".

    zh.wikisource.org

    • Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 04 cv 2688 (December 20, 2005). Context, pp. 24–25. "the argument for ID is not a new scientific argument, but is rather an old religious argument for the existence of God. He traced this argument back to at least Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century, who framed the argument as a syllogism: Wherever complex design exists, there must have been a designer; nature is complex; therefore nature must have had an intelligent designer. ...
      ...[T]his argument for the existence of God was advanced early in the 19th century by Reverend Paley... [the teleological argument] The only apparent difference between the argument made by Paley and the argument for ID, as expressed by defense expert witnesses Behe and Minnich, is that ID's 'official position' does not acknowledge that the designer is God."

worldcat.org