曾母暗沙 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "曾母暗沙" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Chinese rank

17web.archive.org

1^st place

3wikipedia.org

low place

2wikisource.org

27^th place

30^th place

2scmp.com

362^nd place

236^th place

2google.com.sg

low place

1,346^th place

1rsis.edu.sg

low place

1nst.com.my

1,512^th place

1,241^st place

1nus.edu.sg

2,776^th place

1,200^th place

1chinapress.com.my

3,937^th place

156^th place

1sarawak.gov.my

low place

4,818^th place

1ourchinastory.com

low place

4,037^th place

1rddl.com.cn

low place

1thegazette.co.uk

200^th place

747^th place

1mofa.gov.tw

5,366^th place

233^rd place

1china.com

3,388^th place

139^th place

1theborneopost.com

5,133^rd place

2,975^th place

1mnr.gov.cn

low place

5,325^th place

1nansha.org.cn

low place

8,332^nd place

1cimsec.org

low place

1jstor.org

26^th place

113^th place

1worldcat.org

5^th place

12^th place

1bbc.com

20^th place

41^st place

1state.gov

264^th place

298^th place

1cna.com.tw

527^th place

24^th place

1foreignpolicy.com

1,116^th place

1,030^th place

1voa.gov

low place

bbc.com

焦点：海牙南海仲裁裁决要点总揽（页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. :BBC中文网, 2016-7-12

china.com

military.china.com

中国海监在曾母暗沙投放主权碑（页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）

chinapress.com.my

邱仁杰. 南海局势山雨欲来. 马来西亚中國報. 2020-08-05 （中文（马来西亚））.

cimsec.org

Bill Hayton. China's Claim to the Spratly Islands is Just a Mistake. Center for International Maritime Security. 2018-05-16. （原始内容存档于2024-06-18）（英语）.

cna.com.tw

林憬屏 (编). 蓬佩奧：中國對南海主權聲索「完全非法」. 中央通訊社. 14 July 2020 [2020年7月22日]. （原始内容存档于2021年2月18日）（中文（臺灣））. 美方也在聲明中反對中國對曾母暗沙（James Shoal）聲索主權。聲明指出，北京對外宣稱曾母暗沙為「中國最南端領土」，但曾母暗沙為水下地物，依據國際法任何國家不得提出主權聲索，且其離馬來西亞僅50海里，但距離中國沿岸有1000海里遠。

foreignpolicy.com

Bill Hayton. Pompeo Draws a Line Against Beijing in the South China Sea. Foreign Policy. 2020年7月15日 [2020年8月10日]. （原始内容存档于2021年2月18日）（英语）. The United States, quite sensibly, has never taken a position on which country is the rightful owner of these territories. However, Pompeo’s statement breaks new ground by asserting that China has “no lawful territorial or maritime claim to (or derived from) James Shoal.”

google.com.sg

books.google.com.sg

The Nautical Magazine and Journal of the Royal Naval Reserve, Volume 61. Spottiswoode. 1892 （英语）.
甲編、第一篇總論、第一章地理形勢、第一節位置與疆域. 中華民國年鑑. 中華民國年鑑社. 1959: 1. 極南境：南沙群島之曾母暗沙，北緯四度

jstor.org

Hayton, Bill. The Modern Origins of China's South China Sea Claims: Maps, Misunderstandings, and the Maritime Geobody. Modern China. 2019, 45 (2). ISSN 0097-7004.

mnr.gov.cn

中国疆域四至. 国家测绘地理信息局. 2016-08-11. （原始内容存档于2023-06-03）. 最南端位于海南省南沙群岛的曾母暗沙附近。

mofa.gov.tw

中華民國南海政策說帖 (PDF). 中華民國外交部: 9. [2019-10-12]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2021-07-23）.

nansha.org.cn

南海诸岛未公布的三个地名. [2009-04-16]. （原始内容存档于2019-11-02）.

nst.com.my

BA Hamzah. SOVEREIGNTY: James Shoal not disputed territory. New Straits Times. 2014-06-26 （英语）.

nus.edu.sg

cil.nus.edu.sg

SCS Gazetteer (PDF). Centre for International Law (CIL), National University of Singapore (NUS). [2021-06-02]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2021-06-02）.

ourchinastory.com

许诺. 神州冷知识｜中国疆域最南端曾母暗沙源自英国人名？. 当代中国. 2023-06-26.

rddl.com.cn

劉南威. 中国政府对南海诸岛的命名. 《熱帶地理》. 2017, 37 (5): 741 [2018-07-27]. （原始内容存档于2018-07-27）.

rsis.edu.sg

China's James Shoal Claim: Malaysia the Undisputed Owner. 新加坡南洋理工大學拉惹勒南國際研究學院. 2014-07-01 [2019-12-18]. （原始内容存档于2021-02-18）.

sarawak.gov.my

bintulu.sarawak.gov.my

Ketua Kaum Daerah Tatau. Portal Rasmi Pentadbiran Bahagian Bintulu （马来语）.

scmp.com

Hayton, B. How a non-existent island became China's southernmost territory （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. South China Morning Post, 9 February 2013
Laura Zhou. ‘Heightened risk’ of military conflict over South China Sea, observers warn. South China Morning Post. 2020年7月14日 [2020年8月11日]. （原始内容存档于2021年2月22日）（英语）. The statement also said China’s claims over the submerged feature James Shoal near Malaysia were unlawful.

state.gov

龐佩奧. U.S. Position on Maritime Claims in the South China Sea. 美國國務院. 2020年7月13日 [2020年7月22日]. （原始内容存档于2021年1月20日）（英语）.

theborneopost.com

Loss of James Shoal could wipe out state’s EEZ. The Borneo Post（英语：The Borneo Post）. 5 February 2014 [17 May 2014]. （原始内容存档于2014-07-16）.

thegazette.co.uk

No. 488.—CAPE, EAST INDIES, CHINA, AND AUSTRALIA STATIONS. CHINA SEA.—BORNEO—NORTH-WEST AND NORTH COASTS. (PDF). 《倫敦憲報》. No. 26345. 1892-11-15: 6407 [2019-10-12]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2021-02-18）.

voa.gov

editorials.voa.gov

U.S. Repudiates China's Maritime Claims in South China Sea. Voice of America. 2020年7月21日 [2020年8月11日]. （原始内容存档于2021年2月18日）（英语）. On July 13, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a written statement that the U.S. position on China’s maritime claims in the South China Sea is aligned with key aspects of the Tribunal’s decision.“Beijing’s claims to offshore resources across most of the South China Sea are completely unlawful, as is its campaign of bullying to control them.” This means that the United States does not recognize Beijing’s maritime claims to waters within the 370 kilometer [200 nautical mile] Exclusive Economic Zone of another country beyond a lawful territorial sea generated from islands it claims in the Spratlys, nor do we recognize its claims to underwater features like James Shoal or low-tide elevations like Mischief Reef and Second Thomas Shoal, which, under international law, may not be claimed by any state and are incapable of generating maritime zones of their own.

web.archive.org

China's James Shoal Claim: Malaysia the Undisputed Owner. 新加坡南洋理工大學拉惹勒南國際研究學院. 2014-07-01 [2019-12-18]. （原始内容存档于2021-02-18）.
SCS Gazetteer (PDF). Centre for International Law (CIL), National University of Singapore (NUS). [2021-06-02]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2021-06-02）.
Hayton, B. How a non-existent island became China's southernmost territory （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. South China Morning Post, 9 February 2013
劉南威. 中国政府对南海诸岛的命名. 《熱帶地理》. 2017, 37 (5): 741 [2018-07-27]. （原始内容存档于2018-07-27）.
No. 488.—CAPE, EAST INDIES, CHINA, AND AUSTRALIA STATIONS. CHINA SEA.—BORNEO—NORTH-WEST AND NORTH COASTS. (PDF). 《倫敦憲報》. No. 26345. 1892-11-15: 6407 [2019-10-12]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2021-02-18）.
中華民國南海政策說帖 (PDF). 中華民國外交部: 9. [2019-10-12]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2021-07-23）.
中国海监在曾母暗沙投放主权碑（页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）
Loss of James Shoal could wipe out state’s EEZ. The Borneo Post（英语：The Borneo Post）. 5 February 2014 [17 May 2014]. （原始内容存档于2014-07-16）.
中国疆域四至. 国家测绘地理信息局. 2016-08-11. （原始内容存档于2023-06-03）. 最南端位于海南省南沙群岛的曾母暗沙附近。
南海诸岛未公布的三个地名. [2009-04-16]. （原始内容存档于2019-11-02）.
Bill Hayton. China's Claim to the Spratly Islands is Just a Mistake. Center for International Maritime Security. 2018-05-16. （原始内容存档于2024-06-18）（英语）.
焦点：海牙南海仲裁裁决要点总揽（页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. :BBC中文网, 2016-7-12
龐佩奧. U.S. Position on Maritime Claims in the South China Sea. 美國國務院. 2020年7月13日 [2020年7月22日]. （原始内容存档于2021年1月20日）（英语）.
林憬屏 (编). 蓬佩奧：中國對南海主權聲索「完全非法」. 中央通訊社. 14 July 2020 [2020年7月22日]. （原始内容存档于2021年2月18日）（中文（臺灣））. 美方也在聲明中反對中國對曾母暗沙（James Shoal）聲索主權。聲明指出，北京對外宣稱曾母暗沙為「中國最南端領土」，但曾母暗沙為水下地物，依據國際法任何國家不得提出主權聲索，且其離馬來西亞僅50海里，但距離中國沿岸有1000海里遠。
Bill Hayton. Pompeo Draws a Line Against Beijing in the South China Sea. Foreign Policy. 2020年7月15日 [2020年8月10日]. （原始内容存档于2021年2月18日）（英语）. The United States, quite sensibly, has never taken a position on which country is the rightful owner of these territories. However, Pompeo’s statement breaks new ground by asserting that China has “no lawful territorial or maritime claim to (or derived from) James Shoal.”
Laura Zhou. ‘Heightened risk’ of military conflict over South China Sea, observers warn. South China Morning Post. 2020年7月14日 [2020年8月11日]. （原始内容存档于2021年2月22日）（英语）. The statement also said China’s claims over the submerged feature James Shoal near Malaysia were unlawful.
U.S. Repudiates China's Maritime Claims in South China Sea. Voice of America. 2020年7月21日 [2020年8月11日]. （原始内容存档于2021年2月18日）（英语）. On July 13, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a written statement that the U.S. position on China’s maritime claims in the South China Sea is aligned with key aspects of the Tribunal’s decision.“Beijing’s claims to offshore resources across most of the South China Sea are completely unlawful, as is its campaign of bullying to control them.” This means that the United States does not recognize Beijing’s maritime claims to waters within the 370 kilometer [200 nautical mile] Exclusive Economic Zone of another country beyond a lawful territorial sea generated from islands it claims in the Spratlys, nor do we recognize its claims to underwater features like James Shoal or low-tide elevations like Mischief Reef and Second Thomas Shoal, which, under international law, may not be claimed by any state and are incapable of generating maritime zones of their own.