Sign In

Login

Password

Forgot Password ? Sign Up

柏拉图主义 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "柏拉图主义" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Chinese rank
6web.archive.org
1st place
1st place
4google.com.br
622nd place
low place
2stanford.edu
179th place
275th place
1wikipedia.org
low place
low place

google.com.br

books.google.com.br

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

  • “哲学家承认抽象对象存在的，有时叫他们为柏拉图主义者；不承认抽象对象存在的，有时叫他们唯名论者。‘柏拉图主义’和‘唯名论’都有哲学史上的概念，这种语境下，和当代所说‘抽象对象’没有任何关联。注意：当代的柏拉图主义者（modern platonist。小写p以示区分），并不必然接受柏拉图的所有学说，当代的唯名论者（modern nominalists）也并不必然接受中世纪的唯名论学说。（Philosophers who affirm the existence of abstract objects are sometimes called platonists; those who deny their existence are sometimes called nominalists. The terms "platonism" and "nominalism" have established senses in the history of philosophy, where they denote positions that have little to do with the modern notion of an abstract object. In this connection, it is essential to bear in mind that modern platonists (with a small 'p') need not accept any of the doctrines of Plato, just as modern nominalists need not accept the doctrines of medieval nominalists.）” 抽象对象 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Gideon Rosen, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
  • 抽象对象 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Gideon Rosen, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).

web.archive.org

  • “哲学家承认抽象对象存在的，有时叫他们为柏拉图主义者；不承认抽象对象存在的，有时叫他们唯名论者。‘柏拉图主义’和‘唯名论’都有哲学史上的概念，这种语境下，和当代所说‘抽象对象’没有任何关联。注意：当代的柏拉图主义者（modern platonist。小写p以示区分），并不必然接受柏拉图的所有学说，当代的唯名论者（modern nominalists）也并不必然接受中世纪的唯名论学说。（Philosophers who affirm the existence of abstract objects are sometimes called platonists; those who deny their existence are sometimes called nominalists. The terms "platonism" and "nominalism" have established senses in the history of philosophy, where they denote positions that have little to do with the modern notion of an abstract object. In this connection, it is essential to bear in mind that modern platonists (with a small 'p') need not accept any of the doctrines of Plato, just as modern nominalists need not accept the doctrines of medieval nominalists.）” 抽象对象 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Gideon Rosen, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
  • 抽象对象 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Gideon Rosen, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
  • The G. K. Chesterton Collection II [65 Books]. Catholic Way Publishing. 2014 [2020-03-07]. ISBN 9781783792108. （原始内容存档于2020-08-06）. Plato in some sense anticipated the Catholic realism, as attacked by the heretical nominalism, by insisting on the equally fundamental fact that ideas are realities; that ideas exist just as men exist. 
  • [[G·K·卻斯特頓|]]. St. Thomas Aquinas. Courier Corporation. 2012 [2020-03-07]. ISBN 9780486122267. （原始内容存档于2021-02-02）. The truth is that the historical Catholic Church began by being Platonist; by being rather too Platonist. 
  • Bob Gillespie. Machiavelli and the Mayflower: How to Understand the Europeans. La Rémige SARL. 2009: 14 [2020-03-07]. ISBN 9782953386707. （原始内容存档于2020-08-06）. Roman Church doctrine is founded on many platforms, such as Plato's concept of the soul and of life after death 
  • Between Past and Future. Penguin. 2006 [2020-03-07]. ISBN 9781101662656. （原始内容存档于2020-08-06）. To the extent that the Catholic Church incorporated Greek philosophy into the structure of its doctrines and dogmatic beliefs 

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

  • Peter Stanford（英语：Peter Stanford）. Catholicism: An Introduction: A comprehensive guide to the history, beliefs and practices of the Catholic faith. Hachette UK. 2010. ISBN 9781444131031. Both Aristotle and Plato were crucial in shaping Catholic thinking