比尔·克林顿弹劾案 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "比尔·克林顿弹劾案" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Chinese rank
1st place
1st place
28th place
71st place
34th place
129th place
61st place
145th place
529th place
1,280th place
48th place
146th place
758th place
1,367th place
2nd place
23rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
518th place
2,062nd place
109th place
368th place
2,839th place
3,693rd place
24th place
29th place
low place
8,043rd place
1,478th place
2,525th place
low place
low place
1,674th place
2,877th place
1,389th place
860th place
179th place
275th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
259th place
738th place
low place
low place
879th place
low place
7th place
31st place
low place
low place

aim.org (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

americasfuture.org (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

cairn.info (Global: 879th place; Chinese: low place)

caller2.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

cnn.com (Global: 28th place; Chinese: 71st place)

cnn.com

  • Specter, Arlen. Sen. Specter's closed-door impeachment statement. CNN. 1999-02-12 [2008-03-13]. (原始内容存档于2008-06-14). My position in the matter is that the case has not been proved. I have gone back to Scottish law where there are three verdicts: guilty, not guilty, and not proved. I am not prepared to say on this record that President Clinton is not guilty. But I am certainly not prepared to say that he is guilty. There are precedents for a Senator voting present. I hope that I will be accorded the opportunity to vote not proved in this case. [...] But on this record, the proofs are not present. Juries in criminal cases under the laws of Scotland have three possible verdicts: guilty, not guilty, not proven. Given the option in this trial, I suspect that many Senators would choose 'not proven' instead of 'not guilty'.
    That is my verdict: not proven. The President has dodged perjury by calculated evasion and poor interrogation. Obstruction of justice fails by gaps in the proofs.
     
  • Clinton found in civil contempt for Jones testimony – April 12, 1999. [2012-04-25]. (原始内容存档于2006-04-08). 
  • Jones v. Clinton finally settled. CNN. 1998-11-13 [2009-01-16]. (原始内容存档于2010-01-13). 
  • Clinton-Jones Settlement Text. CNN. 1998-11-13 [2012-04-25]. (原始内容存档于2009-01-23). 

articles.cnn.com

edition.cnn.com

archives.cnn.com

dailyprincetonian.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Chinese: 23rd place)

findlaw.com (Global: 1,478th place; Chinese: 2,525th place)

conlaw.usatoday.findlaw.com

go.com (Global: 48th place; Chinese: 146th place)

abcnews.go.com

greens.org (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

historyplace.com (Global: low place; Chinese: 8,043rd place)

house.gov (Global: 529th place; Chinese: 1,280th place)

clerk.house.gov

huffingtonpost.com (Global: 109th place; Chinese: 368th place)

huppi.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

nigerdeltacongress.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; Chinese: 31st place)

oxfordjournals.org (Global: 1,389th place; Chinese: 860th place)

poq.oxfordjournals.org

senate.gov (Global: 758th place; Chinese: 1,367th place)

slate.com (Global: 259th place; Chinese: 738th place)

stanford.edu (Global: 179th place; Chinese: 275th place)

thecrimson.com (Global: 1,674th place; Chinese: 2,877th place)

thefreelibrary.com (Global: 518th place; Chinese: 2,062nd place)

time.com (Global: 61st place; Chinese: 145th place)

umkc.edu (Global: 2,839th place; Chinese: 3,693rd place)

law.umkc.edu

washingtonpost.com (Global: 34th place; Chinese: 129th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Chinese: 1st place)

webcitation.org (Global: 24th place; Chinese: 29th place)