毛澤東:鮮為人知的故事 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "毛澤東:鮮為人知的故事" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Chinese rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
8th place
197th place
183rd place
24th place
29th place
3,577th place
5,460th place
7th place
31st place
low place
554th place
low place
726th place
626th place
578th place
7,042nd place
279th place
2,189th place
4,593rd place
241st place
416th place
36th place
153rd place
30th place
111th place
8,282nd place
8,254th place
440th place
14th place
504th place
314th place
low place
5,548th place
2,100th place
90th place
1,785th place
2,159th place
132nd place
386th place
5th place
12th place
26th place
113th place
351st place
20th place
61st place
145th place

barnesandnoble.com

books.google.com

chinatimes.com

news.chinatimes.com

  • 陈希林. 学者看张戎著作:史料证据不够完整. 中國時報. 2006年4月19日. (原始内容存档于2014-02-22).
    陈希林╱台北报导 (20060419)
    《毛泽东:不为人知的故事》当中指我国名将胡宗南为共产党间谍,胡的后嗣、出版人、创作者各方都曾向中研院院士许倬云、中研院近史所所长陈永发等人请教意见。而学界普遍认为,《毛》并非严肃的学术著作,当中的史料证据谈不上完整可信。
    许倬云昨日指出,《毛》不是学术著作,但很不幸地被误以为是学术著作。他说,书中很多部分「没有证据,没有来历,口头访谈也没有时间地点,无从查证」。
    但他相信,张戎的《毛》一书将会是另一波「批判毛泽东」风潮的开端。许倬云解释,毛泽东个性极其复杂,所处的中国革命时代又是个极其复杂的年代,所以历史上对于这样的人物,会反复、不断地翻案再翻案。 若仅因为胡宗南后嗣旧部的抗议,该书中文版就不能出版,则读者在言论市场上是否失去了「公开质疑胡宗南的权利」?对于这个问题,许倬云认为张戎的《毛》基本上属于垃圾,不必为了保护言论自由而留下垃圾。
    陈永发则认为,言论可以公开,然后由各界自行判断与批评。但他也说,张戎的作品当中「太快跳进结论,对毛泽东有先入为主之见」,证据与结论之间的关连不紧密,因此不能当成学术著作来看待。他认为《毛》是一本「有学术根底的通俗著作」。
     

cnd.org

my.cnd.org

google.co.uk

books.google.co.uk

guardian.co.uk

books.guardian.co.uk

observer.guardian.co.uk

independent.co.uk

jstor.org

lrb.co.uk

  • Andrew Nathan. Jade and Plastic. London Review of Books. 2005-11-17 [2007-04-04]. (原始内容存档于2007-04-15). 
  • Jung Chang and Jon Halliday. A Question of Sources. London Review of Books. 2005-12-04 [2007-11-14]. (原始内容存档于2012-09-15). 

nssd.org

old.nssd.org

nybooks.com

  • Jonathan Spence. Portrait of a Monster. The New York Review of Books. 2005-11-03 [2007-04-04]. (原始内容存档于2008-07-24). 

nytimes.com

cn.nytimes.com

nytimes.com

  • Kristof, Nicholas. 'Mao': The Real Mao. The New York Times. 2005-10-23 [2010-09-13]. (原始内容存档于2008-12-10). 

people.com.cn

theory.people.com.cn

powells.com

sinica.edu.tw

mh.sinica.edu.tw

sites.google.com

smh.com.au

telegraph.co.uk

time.com

timesonline.co.uk

entertainment.timesonline.co.uk

web.archive.org

webcitation.org

worldcat.org

worldjournal.com

la.worldjournal.com

ylib.com