民主 (Chinese Wikipedia)
Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "民主" in Chinese language version.
refsWebsite
Global rank
Chinese rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
8th place
5th place
12th place
179th place
275th place
6th place
4th place
938th place
1,605th place
254th place
330th place
low place
low place
11th place
332nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
507th place
610th place
27th place
30th place
2,382nd place
72nd place
archive.org
- Przeworski, Adam. Democracy and the Market
. Cambridge University Press. 1991: 10–14.
berghahnjournals.com
- Gagnon, Jean-Paul. 2,234 Descriptions of Democracy. Democratic Theory. 1 June 2018, 5 (1): 92–113 [2023-08-21]. ISSN 2332-8894. S2CID 149825810. doi:10.3167/dt.2018.050107. （原始内容存档于2022-11-06）.
books.google.com
- Barker, Ernest. The Political Thought of Plato and Aristotle. Chapter VII, Section 2: G.P. Putnam's Sons. 1906 [2020-01-23]. （原始内容存档于2020-02-06）.
- Plant, Raymond. Community and Ideology: An Essay in Applied Social Philosphy. Routledge Revivals reprint. London: Routledge. 10 September 2009: 8 - 9 [11 August 2023]. ISBN 9781135191474. （原始内容存档于2023-08-11）.
In 1949 UNESCO sponsored an enquiry into the ideals associated with the concept of democracy [...]. [...] The idea of democracy was considered to be highly ambiguous. (UNESCO, 1951.)
已忽略未知参数|orig-date=(帮助)
coe.int
doi.org
dx.doi.org
- Gagnon, Jean-Paul. 2,234 Descriptions of Democracy. Democratic Theory. 1 June 2018, 5 (1): 92–113 [2023-08-21]. ISSN 2332-8894. S2CID 149825810. doi:10.3167/dt.2018.050107. （原始内容存档于2022-11-06）.
- Krauss, Alexander. The scientific limits of understanding the (potential) relationship between complex social phenomena: the case of democracy and inequality. Journal of Economic Methodology. January 2, 2016, 23 (1): 97–109 [2023-08-22]. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2015.1069372. （原始内容存档于2023-04-10） –通过CrossRef.
- Fuchs, Dieter; Roller, Edeltraud. Conceptualizing and Measuring the Quality of Democracy: The Citizens' Perspective. Politics and Governance. 2018, 6 (1): 22. doi:10.17645/pag.v6i1.1188
. - Mayne, Quinton; Geißel, Brigitte. Don't Good Democracies Need "Good" Citizens? Citizen Dispositions and the Study of Democratic Quality. Politics and Governance. 2018, 6 (1): 33. doi:10.17645/pag.v6i1.1216 .
doi.org
economist.com
- Staff writer. Liberty and justice for some. The Economist (Economist Group). 22 August 2007 [2023-08-22]. （原始内容存档于2016-12-28）.
Democracy can be seen as a set of practices and principles that institutionalise and thus ultimately protect freedom. Even if a consensus on precise definitions has proved elusive, most observers today would agree that, at a minimum, the fundamental features of a democracy include government based on majority rule and the consent of the governed, the existence of free and fair elections, the protection of minorities and respect for basic human rights. Democracy presupposes equality before the law, due process and political pluralism.
eiu.com
- EIU Democracy Index 2022 - World Democracy Report. www.eiu.com. [2023-02-02]. （原始内容存档于2023-02-02）.
m-w.com
- Pure democracy. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. [2006-07-28]. （原始内容存档于2006-07-18）.
semanticscholar.org
api.semanticscholar.org
- Gagnon, Jean-Paul. 2,234 Descriptions of Democracy. Democratic Theory. 1 June 2018, 5 (1): 92–113 [2023-08-21]. ISSN 2332-8894. S2CID 149825810. doi:10.3167/dt.2018.050107. （原始内容存档于2022-11-06）.
stanford.edu
web.stanford.edu
- Diamond, L., Lecture at Hilla University for Humanistic Studies 21 January 2004: "What is Democracy" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）; Diamond, L. and Morlino, L., The quality of democracy (2016). In Diamond, L., In Search of Democracy. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-78128-2.
tandfonline.com
- Krauss, Alexander. The scientific limits of understanding the (potential) relationship between complex social phenomena: the case of democracy and inequality. Journal of Economic Methodology. January 2, 2016, 23 (1): 97–109 [2023-08-22]. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2015.1069372. （原始内容存档于2023-04-10） –通过CrossRef.
voachinese.com
- 民调：过七成中国民众认为中国已足够民主 专家：言论不自由，不敢说真话. 美国之音. 2021-05-06 [2021-05-07]. （原始内容存档于2021-10-21） （中文）.
web.archive.org
- 民主. 聯合國. [2019-08-10]. （原始内容存档于2019-05-02）.
- 存档副本. [2021-04-28]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-04）.
- Diamond, L., Lecture at Hilla University for Humanistic Studies 21 January 2004: "What is Democracy" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）; Diamond, L. and Morlino, L., The quality of democracy (2016). In Diamond, L., In Search of Democracy. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-78128-2.
- Barker, Ernest. The Political Thought of Plato and Aristotle. Chapter VII, Section 2: G.P. Putnam's Sons. 1906 [2020-01-23]. （原始内容存档于2020-02-06）.
- Democracy. Oxford University Press. [24 February 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-11-16）.
- Staff writer. Liberty and justice for some. The Economist (Economist Group). 22 August 2007 [2023-08-22]. （原始内容存档于2016-12-28）.
Democracy can be seen as a set of practices and principles that institutionalise and thus ultimately protect freedom. Even if a consensus on precise definitions has proved elusive, most observers today would agree that, at a minimum, the fundamental features of a democracy include government based on majority rule and the consent of the governed, the existence of free and fair elections, the protection of minorities and respect for basic human rights. Democracy presupposes equality before the law, due process and political pluralism.
- Gagnon, Jean-Paul. 2,234 Descriptions of Democracy. Democratic Theory. 1 June 2018, 5 (1): 92–113 [2023-08-21]. ISSN 2332-8894. S2CID 149825810. doi:10.3167/dt.2018.050107. （原始内容存档于2022-11-06）.
- Plant, Raymond. Community and Ideology: An Essay in Applied Social Philosphy. Routledge Revivals reprint. London: Routledge. 10 September 2009: 8 - 9 [11 August 2023]. ISBN 9781135191474. （原始内容存档于2023-08-11）.
In 1949 UNESCO sponsored an enquiry into the ideals associated with the concept of democracy [...]. [...] The idea of democracy was considered to be highly ambiguous. (UNESCO, 1951.)
已忽略未知参数|orig-date=(帮助) - 存档副本. [2016-02-05]. （原始内容存档于2013-11-26）.
- Pure democracy. Merriam-Webster Dictionary. [2006-07-28]. （原始内容存档于2006-07-18）.
- EIU Democracy Index 2022 - World Democracy Report. www.eiu.com. [2023-02-02]. （原始内容存档于2023-02-02）.
- Krauss, Alexander. The scientific limits of understanding the (potential) relationship between complex social phenomena: the case of democracy and inequality. Journal of Economic Methodology. January 2, 2016, 23 (1): 97–109 [2023-08-22]. doi:10.1080/1350178X.2015.1069372. （原始内容存档于2023-04-10） –通过CrossRef.
- James Madison，（November 22, 1787）. "The Federalist No. 10 - The Utility of the Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection (continued)" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Daily Advertiser. New York. Republished by Wikisource.
- 民调：过七成中国民众认为中国已足够民主 专家：言论不自由，不敢说真话. 美国之音. 2021-05-06 [2021-05-07]. （原始内容存档于2021-10-21） （中文）.
wikisource.org
en.wikisource.org
- James Madison，（November 22, 1787）. "The Federalist No. 10 - The Utility of the Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection (continued)" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Daily Advertiser. New York. Republished by Wikisource.
worldcat.org
- Gagnon, Jean-Paul. 2,234 Descriptions of Democracy. Democratic Theory. 1 June 2018, 5 (1): 92–113 [2023-08-21]. ISSN 2332-8894. S2CID 149825810. doi:10.3167/dt.2018.050107. （原始内容存档于2022-11-06）.
- Keane, John. The life and death of democracy 1st American. New York: W. W. Norton & Co. 2009: 104–105. ISBN 978-0-393-05835-2. OCLC 286488039.