洛克纳诉纽约州案 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "洛克纳诉纽约州案" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Chinese rank

1^st place

3^rd place

8^th place

low place

696^th place

2,022^nd place

low place

6^th place

4^th place

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; Chinese: 4^th place)

Bernstein, David. Only One Place of Redress: African Americans, Labor Regulations, and the Courts from Reconstruction to the New Deal （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, p. 100 (Duke University Press, 2001): "The Court also directly overturned Lochner by adding that it is no 'longer open to question that it is within the legislative power to fix maximum hours.'"
Dorf, Michael and Morrison, Trevor. Constitutional Law （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, p. 18 (Oxford University Press, 2010).
Patrick, John. The Supreme Court of the United States: A Student Companion （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, p. 362 (Oxford University Press, 2006).

White, G. Edward. Revisiting Substantive Due Process and Holmes's Lochner Dissent. Brooklyn Law Review. January 1, 1997, 63 (1): 87 [2024-06-25]. （原始内容存档于2024-04-11）.

Bernstein, David. Only One Place of Redress: African Americans, Labor Regulations, and the Courts from Reconstruction to the New Deal （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, p. 100 (Duke University Press, 2001): "The Court also directly overturned Lochner by adding that it is no 'longer open to question that it is within the legislative power to fix maximum hours.'"
Dorf, Michael and Morrison, Trevor. Constitutional Law （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, p. 18 (Oxford University Press, 2010).
Patrick, John. The Supreme Court of the United States: A Student Companion （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, p. 362 (Oxford University Press, 2006).
White, G. Edward. Revisiting Substantive Due Process and Holmes's Lochner Dissent. Brooklyn Law Review. January 1, 1997, 63 (1): 87 [2024-06-25]. （原始内容存档于2024-04-11）.