爱因斯坦-波多尔斯基-罗森佯谬 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "爱因斯坦-波多尔斯基-罗森佯谬" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Chinese rank

17doi.org

2^nd place

23^rd place

14web.archive.org

1^st place

10harvard.edu

18^th place

57^th place

5arxiv.org

69^th place

254^th place

4archive.org

6^th place

4^th place

4semanticscholar.org

11^th place

332^nd place

4worldcat.org

5^th place

12^th place

1drchinese.com

low place

1dtu.dk

low place

1rice.edu

3,843^rd place

4,247^th place

1pitt.edu

1,476^th place

2,181^st place

1psu.edu

207^th place

628^th place

1aps.org

1,503^rd place

968^th place

1caltech.edu

887^th place

966^th place

1njit.edu

low place

1aip.org

2,204^th place

1,725^th place

1scientificamerican.com

896^th place

1,333^rd place

1cern.ch

1,959^th place

2,362^nd place

1stanford.edu

179^th place

275^th place

1uni-due.de

low place

1nih.gov

4^th place

5^th place

1jstor.org

26^th place

113^th place

aip.org (Global: 2,204^th place; Chinese: 1,725^th place)

scitation.aip.org

Bykovetz, Nicholas. Readers offer their own magic moments with John Bell. Physics Today. 2015, 68 (12): 8–9 [2015-12-27]. （原始内容存档于2015-12-27）.

aps.org (Global: 1,503^rd place; Chinese: 968^th place)

link.aps.org

Ballentine, L. E., The Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics, 1970, 42: 358–381, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.42.358

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; Chinese: 4^th place)

Kumar, Manjit. Quantum: Einstein, Bohr, and the Great Debate about the Nature of Reality Reprint edition. W. W. Norton & Company. 2011. ISBN 978-0393339888.
Ballentine, Leslie. Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development 2nd, illustrated, reprint. World Scientific. 1998. ISBN 9789810241056.
Alexander Afriat; Franco Selleri. Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen Paradox in Atomic, Nuclear, and Particle Physics. Springer Science & Business Media. 1999. ISBN 978-0-306-45893-4.
Haroche, Serge; Raimond, Jean-Michel. Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities, and Photons 1st. Oxford University Press. 2006. ISBN 978-0198509141.

arxiv.org (Global: 69^th place; Chinese: 254^th place)

Blaylock, Guy. The EPR paradox, Bell's inequality, and the question of locality. American Journal of PHysics. January 2010, 78 (1): 111–120 [2013-04-04]. （原始内容存档于2018-01-09）.
Harrigan, Nicholas; Spekkens, Robert W. Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states. Foundations of Physics. 2010, 40 (2): 125. Bibcode:2010FoPh...40..125H. S2CID 32755624. arXiv:0706.2661 . doi:10.1007/s10701-009-9347-0.
Gregor, Weihs; et al. Violation of Bell’s inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 81 (23): pp. 5039–5043 [2013-04-28]. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5039. （原始内容存档于2016-02-04）.
Wiseman, H. M.; Jones, S. J.; Doherty, A. C. Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physical Review Letters. 2007, 98 (14): 140402. Bibcode:2007PhRvL..98n0402W. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 17501251. S2CID 30078867. arXiv:quant-ph/0612147 . doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.140402.
Peres, Asher. Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, and Shannon. Foundations of Physics. 2005, 35 (3): pp. 511–514 [2013-05-08]. doi:10.1007/s10701-004-1986-6. （原始内容存档于2014-09-06）.

caltech.edu (Global: 887^th place; Chinese: 966^th place)

theory.caltech.edu

Mermin, N. Is the moon there when nobody looks? Reality and the quantum theory (PDF). Physics Today. April 1985, 38 (4): 38–47 [2015-04-17]. doi:10.1063/1.880968. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2016-03-04）.

cern.ch (Global: 1,959^th place; Chinese: 2,362^nd place)

cds.cern.ch

Bell, John. Bertlmann's socks and the nature of reality. J. Physique colloques. 1981, C22: pp. 41–62 [2013-04-13]. （原始内容存档于2017-10-24）.

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; Chinese: 23^rd place)

Einstein, A; B Podolsky; N Rosen. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? (PDF). Physical Review. 15 May 1935, 47 (10): 777–780 [2006-01-02]. Bibcode:1935PhRv...47..777E. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2006-03-14）.
Reid, M. D.; et al., Colloquium: The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox:From concepts to applications, REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2009, 81: pp. 1727–1751 [2013-04-04], doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1727, （原始内容存档于2016-03-04）
Aspect A. Bell's inequality test: more ideal than ever (PDF). Nature. 18 March 1999, 398 (6724): 189–90 [2010-09-08]. Bibcode:1999Natur.398..189A. doi:10.1038/18296. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2011-05-14）.
Harrigan, Nicholas; Spekkens, Robert W. Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states. Foundations of Physics. 2010, 40 (2): 125. Bibcode:2010FoPh...40..125H. S2CID 32755624. arXiv:0706.2661 . doi:10.1007/s10701-009-9347-0.
Howard, D. Einstein on locality and separability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 1985, 16 (3): 171–201. Bibcode:1985SHPSA..16..171H. doi:10.1016/0039-3681(85)90001-9.
Sauer, Tilman. An Einstein manuscript on the EPR paradox for spin observables. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2007-12-01, 38 (4): 879–887 [2025-05-06]. Bibcode:2007SHPMP..38..879S. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.571.6089 . ISSN 1355-2198. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2007.03.002. （原始内容存档于2022-01-18）（英语）.
Ballentine, L. E., The Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics, 1970, 42: 358–381, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.42.358
Mermin, N. Is the moon there when nobody looks? Reality and the quantum theory (PDF). Physics Today. April 1985, 38 (4): 38–47 [2015-04-17]. doi:10.1063/1.880968. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2016-03-04）.
Vlatko, Vedral. Living In A Quantum World (PDF). Scientific American. 2011, 304 (6): 38–43 [2013-04-25]. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0611-38. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2016-01-29）. Space and time are two of the most fundamental classical concepts, but according to quantum mechanics they are secondary. The entanglements are primary.
Clauser, John F. Experimental consequences of objective local theories. Physical Review D. 1974, 10 (2): 526. Bibcode:1974PhRvD..10..526C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.526.
Eberhard, P. H. Bell's theorem without hidden variables. Nuovo Cimento B. 1977, 38: 75–80. Bibcode:1977NCimB..38...75E. doi:10.1007/BF02726212.
Aspect, Alain; et al. Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities (PDF). Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 49 (2): pp. 91–94 [2013-04-28]. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2015-04-16）.
Gregor, Weihs; et al. Violation of Bell’s inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 81 (23): pp. 5039–5043 [2013-04-28]. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5039. （原始内容存档于2016-02-04）.
Schrödinger, E. Probability relations between separated systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. October 1936, 32 (3): 446–452. Bibcode:1936PCPS...32..446S. ISSN 0305-0041. S2CID 122822435. doi:10.1017/s0305004100019137.
Schrödinger, E. Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. October 1935, 31 (4): 555–563. Bibcode:1935PCPS...31..555S. ISSN 0305-0041. S2CID 121278681. doi:10.1017/s0305004100013554.
Wiseman, H. M.; Jones, S. J.; Doherty, A. C. Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physical Review Letters. 2007, 98 (14): 140402. Bibcode:2007PhRvL..98n0402W. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 17501251. S2CID 30078867. arXiv:quant-ph/0612147 . doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.140402.
Peres, Asher. Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, and Shannon. Foundations of Physics. 2005, 35 (3): pp. 511–514 [2013-05-08]. doi:10.1007/s10701-004-1986-6. （原始内容存档于2014-09-06）.

drchinese.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

Einstein, A; B Podolsky; N Rosen. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? (PDF). Physical Review. 15 May 1935, 47 (10): 777–780 [2006-01-02]. Bibcode:1935PhRv...47..777E. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2006-03-14）.

dtu.dk (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

orbit.dtu.dk

Reid, M. D.; et al., Colloquium: The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox:From concepts to applications, REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2009, 81: pp. 1727–1751 [2013-04-04], doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1727, （原始内容存档于2016-03-04）

harvard.edu (Global: 18^th place; Chinese: 57^th place)

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

Einstein, A; B Podolsky; N Rosen. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? (PDF). Physical Review. 15 May 1935, 47 (10): 777–780 [2006-01-02]. Bibcode:1935PhRv...47..777E. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2006-03-14）.
Aspect A. Bell's inequality test: more ideal than ever (PDF). Nature. 18 March 1999, 398 (6724): 189–90 [2010-09-08]. Bibcode:1999Natur.398..189A. doi:10.1038/18296. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2011-05-14）.
Harrigan, Nicholas; Spekkens, Robert W. Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states. Foundations of Physics. 2010, 40 (2): 125. Bibcode:2010FoPh...40..125H. S2CID 32755624. arXiv:0706.2661 . doi:10.1007/s10701-009-9347-0.
Howard, D. Einstein on locality and separability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 1985, 16 (3): 171–201. Bibcode:1985SHPSA..16..171H. doi:10.1016/0039-3681(85)90001-9.
Sauer, Tilman. An Einstein manuscript on the EPR paradox for spin observables. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2007-12-01, 38 (4): 879–887 [2025-05-06]. Bibcode:2007SHPMP..38..879S. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.571.6089 . ISSN 1355-2198. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2007.03.002. （原始内容存档于2022-01-18）（英语）.
Clauser, John F. Experimental consequences of objective local theories. Physical Review D. 1974, 10 (2): 526. Bibcode:1974PhRvD..10..526C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.526.
Eberhard, P. H. Bell's theorem without hidden variables. Nuovo Cimento B. 1977, 38: 75–80. Bibcode:1977NCimB..38...75E. doi:10.1007/BF02726212.
Schrödinger, E. Probability relations between separated systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. October 1936, 32 (3): 446–452. Bibcode:1936PCPS...32..446S. ISSN 0305-0041. S2CID 122822435. doi:10.1017/s0305004100019137.
Schrödinger, E. Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. October 1935, 31 (4): 555–563. Bibcode:1935PCPS...31..555S. ISSN 0305-0041. S2CID 121278681. doi:10.1017/s0305004100013554.
Wiseman, H. M.; Jones, S. J.; Doherty, A. C. Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physical Review Letters. 2007, 98 (14): 140402. Bibcode:2007PhRvL..98n0402W. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 17501251. S2CID 30078867. arXiv:quant-ph/0612147 . doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.140402.

jstor.org (Global: 26^th place; Chinese: 113^th place)

Trimmer, John. The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics: A Translation of Schrödinger's "Cat Paradox" Paper. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society (American Philosophical Society). 10 October 1980, 124 (5): pp. 323–338. JSTOR 986572.

nih.gov (Global: 4^th place; Chinese: 5^th place)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Wiseman, H. M.; Jones, S. J.; Doherty, A. C. Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physical Review Letters. 2007, 98 (14): 140402. Bibcode:2007PhRvL..98n0402W. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 17501251. S2CID 30078867. arXiv:quant-ph/0612147 . doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.140402.

njit.edu (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

web.njit.edu

Vlatko, Vedral. Living In A Quantum World (PDF). Scientific American. 2011, 304 (6): 38–43 [2013-04-25]. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0611-38. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2016-01-29）. Space and time are two of the most fundamental classical concepts, but according to quantum mechanics they are secondary. The entanglements are primary.

pitt.edu (Global: 1,476^th place; Chinese: 2,181^st place)

philsci-archive.pitt.edu

Sauer, Tilman. An Einstein manuscript on the EPR paradox for spin observables. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2007-12-01, 38 (4): 879–887 [2025-05-06]. Bibcode:2007SHPMP..38..879S. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.571.6089 . ISSN 1355-2198. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2007.03.002. （原始内容存档于2022-01-18）（英语）.

psu.edu (Global: 207^th place; Chinese: 628^th place)

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

Sauer, Tilman. An Einstein manuscript on the EPR paradox for spin observables. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2007-12-01, 38 (4): 879–887 [2025-05-06]. Bibcode:2007SHPMP..38..879S. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.571.6089 . ISSN 1355-2198. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2007.03.002. （原始内容存档于2022-01-18）（英语）.

rice.edu (Global: 3,843^rd place; Chinese: 4,247^th place)

www-ece.rice.edu

Aspect A. Bell's inequality test: more ideal than ever (PDF). Nature. 18 March 1999, 398 (6724): 189–90 [2010-09-08]. Bibcode:1999Natur.398..189A. doi:10.1038/18296. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2011-05-14）.

scientificamerican.com (Global: 896^th place; Chinese: 1,333^rd place)

d'Espagnat, Bernard. The Quantum Theory and Reality (PDF). Scientific American. 1979, 241 (5): 158–181 [2013-04-24]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2012-08-03）.

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11^th place; Chinese: 332^nd place)

api.semanticscholar.org

Harrigan, Nicholas; Spekkens, Robert W. Einstein, incompleteness, and the epistemic view of quantum states. Foundations of Physics. 2010, 40 (2): 125. Bibcode:2010FoPh...40..125H. S2CID 32755624. arXiv:0706.2661 . doi:10.1007/s10701-009-9347-0.
Schrödinger, E. Probability relations between separated systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. October 1936, 32 (3): 446–452. Bibcode:1936PCPS...32..446S. ISSN 0305-0041. S2CID 122822435. doi:10.1017/s0305004100019137.
Schrödinger, E. Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. October 1935, 31 (4): 555–563. Bibcode:1935PCPS...31..555S. ISSN 0305-0041. S2CID 121278681. doi:10.1017/s0305004100013554.
Wiseman, H. M.; Jones, S. J.; Doherty, A. C. Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physical Review Letters. 2007, 98 (14): 140402. Bibcode:2007PhRvL..98n0402W. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 17501251. S2CID 30078867. arXiv:quant-ph/0612147 . doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.140402.

stanford.edu (Global: 179^th place; Chinese: 275^th place)

plato.stanford.edu

Fine, Arthur. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. 2009 [2013-05-10]. （原始内容存档于2019-03-18）.

uni-due.de (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

exp.physik.uni-due.de

Aspect, Alain; et al. Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities (PDF). Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 49 (2): pp. 91–94 [2013-04-28]. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2015-04-16）.

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; Chinese: 1^st place)

Einstein, A; B Podolsky; N Rosen. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? (PDF). Physical Review. 15 May 1935, 47 (10): 777–780 [2006-01-02]. Bibcode:1935PhRv...47..777E. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2006-03-14）.
Reid, M. D.; et al., Colloquium: The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox:From concepts to applications, REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2009, 81: pp. 1727–1751 [2013-04-04], doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1727, （原始内容存档于2016-03-04）
Aspect A. Bell's inequality test: more ideal than ever (PDF). Nature. 18 March 1999, 398 (6724): 189–90 [2010-09-08]. Bibcode:1999Natur.398..189A. doi:10.1038/18296. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2011-05-14）.
Blaylock, Guy. The EPR paradox, Bell's inequality, and the question of locality. American Journal of PHysics. January 2010, 78 (1): 111–120 [2013-04-04]. （原始内容存档于2018-01-09）.
Sauer, Tilman. An Einstein manuscript on the EPR paradox for spin observables. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2007-12-01, 38 (4): 879–887 [2025-05-06]. Bibcode:2007SHPMP..38..879S. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.571.6089 . ISSN 1355-2198. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2007.03.002. （原始内容存档于2022-01-18）（英语）.
Mermin, N. Is the moon there when nobody looks? Reality and the quantum theory (PDF). Physics Today. April 1985, 38 (4): 38–47 [2015-04-17]. doi:10.1063/1.880968. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2016-03-04）.
Vlatko, Vedral. Living In A Quantum World (PDF). Scientific American. 2011, 304 (6): 38–43 [2013-04-25]. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0611-38. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2016-01-29）. Space and time are two of the most fundamental classical concepts, but according to quantum mechanics they are secondary. The entanglements are primary.
Bykovetz, Nicholas. Readers offer their own magic moments with John Bell. Physics Today. 2015, 68 (12): 8–9 [2015-12-27]. （原始内容存档于2015-12-27）.
d'Espagnat, Bernard. The Quantum Theory and Reality (PDF). Scientific American. 1979, 241 (5): 158–181 [2013-04-24]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2012-08-03）.
Bell, John. Bertlmann's socks and the nature of reality. J. Physique colloques. 1981, C22: pp. 41–62 [2013-04-13]. （原始内容存档于2017-10-24）.
Fine, Arthur. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. 2009 [2013-05-10]. （原始内容存档于2019-03-18）.
Aspect, Alain; et al. Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities (PDF). Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 49 (2): pp. 91–94 [2013-04-28]. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2015-04-16）.
Gregor, Weihs; et al. Violation of Bell’s inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 81 (23): pp. 5039–5043 [2013-04-28]. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5039. （原始内容存档于2016-02-04）.
Peres, Asher. Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, and Shannon. Foundations of Physics. 2005, 35 (3): pp. 511–514 [2013-05-08]. doi:10.1007/s10701-004-1986-6. （原始内容存档于2014-09-06）.

worldcat.org (Global: 5^th place; Chinese: 12^th place)

Sauer, Tilman. An Einstein manuscript on the EPR paradox for spin observables. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics. 2007-12-01, 38 (4): 879–887 [2025-05-06]. Bibcode:2007SHPMP..38..879S. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.571.6089 . ISSN 1355-2198. doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2007.03.002. （原始内容存档于2022-01-18）（英语）.
Schrödinger, E. Probability relations between separated systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. October 1936, 32 (3): 446–452. Bibcode:1936PCPS...32..446S. ISSN 0305-0041. S2CID 122822435. doi:10.1017/s0305004100019137.
Schrödinger, E. Discussion of Probability Relations between Separated Systems. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. October 1935, 31 (4): 555–563. Bibcode:1935PCPS...31..555S. ISSN 0305-0041. S2CID 121278681. doi:10.1017/s0305004100013554.
Wiseman, H. M.; Jones, S. J.; Doherty, A. C. Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Physical Review Letters. 2007, 98 (14): 140402. Bibcode:2007PhRvL..98n0402W. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 17501251. S2CID 30078867. arXiv:quant-ph/0612147 . doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.140402.

爱因斯坦-波多尔斯基-罗森佯谬 (Chinese Wikipedia)

aip.org (Global: 2,204th place; Chinese: 1,725th place)

scitation.aip.org

aps.org (Global: 1,503rd place; Chinese: 968th place)

link.aps.org

archive.org (Global: 6th place; Chinese: 4th place)

arxiv.org (Global: 69th place; Chinese: 254th place)

caltech.edu (Global: 887th place; Chinese: 966th place)

theory.caltech.edu

cern.ch (Global: 1,959th place; Chinese: 2,362nd place)

cds.cern.ch

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; Chinese: 23rd place)

drchinese.com (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

dtu.dk (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

orbit.dtu.dk

harvard.edu (Global: 18th place; Chinese: 57th place)

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

jstor.org (Global: 26th place; Chinese: 113th place)

nih.gov (Global: 4th place; Chinese: 5th place)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

njit.edu (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

web.njit.edu

pitt.edu (Global: 1,476th place; Chinese: 2,181st place)

philsci-archive.pitt.edu

psu.edu (Global: 207th place; Chinese: 628th place)

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

rice.edu (Global: 3,843rd place; Chinese: 4,247th place)

www-ece.rice.edu

scientificamerican.com (Global: 896th place; Chinese: 1,333rd place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11th place; Chinese: 332nd place)

api.semanticscholar.org

stanford.edu (Global: 179th place; Chinese: 275th place)

plato.stanford.edu

uni-due.de (Global: low place; Chinese: low place)

exp.physik.uni-due.de

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; Chinese: 1st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 5th place; Chinese: 12th place)

aip.org (Global: 2,204^th place; Chinese: 1,725^th place)

aps.org (Global: 1,503^rd place; Chinese: 968^th place)

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; Chinese: 4^th place)

arxiv.org (Global: 69^th place; Chinese: 254^th place)

caltech.edu (Global: 887^th place; Chinese: 966^th place)

cern.ch (Global: 1,959^th place; Chinese: 2,362^nd place)

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; Chinese: 23^rd place)

harvard.edu (Global: 18^th place; Chinese: 57^th place)

jstor.org (Global: 26^th place; Chinese: 113^th place)

nih.gov (Global: 4^th place; Chinese: 5^th place)

pitt.edu (Global: 1,476^th place; Chinese: 2,181^st place)

psu.edu (Global: 207^th place; Chinese: 628^th place)

rice.edu (Global: 3,843^rd place; Chinese: 4,247^th place)

scientificamerican.com (Global: 896^th place; Chinese: 1,333^rd place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11^th place; Chinese: 332^nd place)

stanford.edu (Global: 179^th place; Chinese: 275^th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; Chinese: 1^st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 5^th place; Chinese: 12^th place)