爱因斯坦-波多尔斯基-罗森佯谬 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "爱因斯坦-波多尔斯基-罗森佯谬" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Chinese rank

13web.archive.org

1^st place

11doi.org

2^nd place

23^rd place

4harvard.edu

18^th place

57^th place

4archive.org

6^th place

4^th place

3arxiv.org

69^th place

254^th place

1drchinese.com

low place

1dtu.dk

low place

1rice.edu

3,843^rd place

4,247^th place

1aps.org

1,503^rd place

968^th place

1caltech.edu

887^th place

966^th place

1njit.edu

low place

1aip.org

2,204^th place

1,725^th place

1scientificamerican.com

896^th place

1,333^rd place

1cern.ch

1,959^th place

2,362^nd place

1stanford.edu

179^th place

275^th place

1uni-due.de

low place

1jstor.org

26^th place

113^th place

aip.org

scitation.aip.org

Bykovetz, Nicholas. Readers offer their own magic moments with John Bell. Physics Today. 2015, 68 (12): 8–9 [2015-12-27]. （原始内容存档于2015-12-27）.

aps.org

link.aps.org

Ballentine, L. E., The Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics, 1970, 42: 358–381, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.42.358

archive.org

Kumar, Manjit. Quantum: Einstein, Bohr, and the Great Debate about the Nature of Reality Reprint edition. W. W. Norton & Company. 2011. ISBN 978-0393339888.
Ballentine, Leslie. Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development 2nd, illustrated, reprint. World Scientific. 1998. ISBN 9789810241056.
Alexander Afriat; Franco Selleri. Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen Paradox in Atomic, Nuclear, and Particle Physics. Springer Science & Business Media. 1999. ISBN 978-0-306-45893-4.
Haroche, Serge; Raimond, Jean-Michel. Exploring the Quantum: Atoms, Cavities, and Photons 1st. Oxford University Press. 2006. ISBN 978-0198509141.

arxiv.org

Blaylock, Guy. The EPR paradox, Bell's inequality, and the question of locality. American Journal of PHysics. January 2010, 78 (1): 111–120 [2013-04-04]. （原始内容存档于2018-01-09）.
Gregor, Weihs; et al. Violation of Bell’s inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 81 (23): pp. 5039–5043 [2013-04-28]. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5039. （原始内容存档于2016-02-04）.
Peres, Asher. Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, and Shannon. Foundations of Physics. 2005, 35 (3): pp. 511–514 [2013-05-08]. doi:10.1007/s10701-004-1986-6. （原始内容存档于2014-09-06）.

caltech.edu

theory.caltech.edu

Mermin, N. Is the moon there when nobody looks? Reality and the quantum theory (PDF). Physics Today. April 1985, 38 (4): 38–47 [2015-04-17]. doi:10.1063/1.880968. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2016-03-04）.

cern.ch

cds.cern.ch

Bell, John. Bertlmann's socks and the nature of reality. J. Physique colloques. 1981, C22: pp. 41–62 [2013-04-13]. （原始内容存档于2017-10-24）.

doi.org

Einstein, A; B Podolsky; N Rosen. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? (PDF). Physical Review. 15 May 1935, 47 (10): 777–780 [2006-01-02]. Bibcode:1935PhRv...47..777E. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2006-03-14）.
Reid, M. D.; et al., Colloquium: The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox:From concepts to applications, REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2009, 81: pp. 1727–1751 [2013-04-04], doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1727, （原始内容存档于2016-03-04）
Aspect A. Bell's inequality test: more ideal than ever (PDF). Nature. 18 March 1999, 398 (6724): 189–90 [2010-09-08]. Bibcode:1999Natur.398..189A. doi:10.1038/18296. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2011-05-14）.
Ballentine, L. E., The Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics, 1970, 42: 358–381, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.42.358
Mermin, N. Is the moon there when nobody looks? Reality and the quantum theory (PDF). Physics Today. April 1985, 38 (4): 38–47 [2015-04-17]. doi:10.1063/1.880968. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2016-03-04）.
Vlatko, Vedral. Living In A Quantum World (PDF). Scientific American. 2011, 304 (6): 38–43 [2013-04-25]. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0611-38. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2016-01-29）. Space and time are two of the most fundamental classical concepts, but according to quantum mechanics they are secondary. The entanglements are primary.
Clauser, John F. Experimental consequences of objective local theories. Physical Review D. 1974, 10 (2): 526. Bibcode:1974PhRvD..10..526C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.526.
Eberhard, P. H. Bell's theorem without hidden variables. Nuovo Cimento B. 1977, 38: 75–80. Bibcode:1977NCimB..38...75E. doi:10.1007/BF02726212.
Aspect, Alain; et al. Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities (PDF). Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 49 (2): pp. 91–94 [2013-04-28]. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2015-04-16）.
Gregor, Weihs; et al. Violation of Bell’s inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 81 (23): pp. 5039–5043 [2013-04-28]. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5039. （原始内容存档于2016-02-04）.
Peres, Asher. Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, and Shannon. Foundations of Physics. 2005, 35 (3): pp. 511–514 [2013-05-08]. doi:10.1007/s10701-004-1986-6. （原始内容存档于2014-09-06）.

drchinese.com

Einstein, A; B Podolsky; N Rosen. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? (PDF). Physical Review. 15 May 1935, 47 (10): 777–780 [2006-01-02]. Bibcode:1935PhRv...47..777E. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2006-03-14）.

dtu.dk

orbit.dtu.dk

Reid, M. D.; et al., Colloquium: The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox:From concepts to applications, REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2009, 81: pp. 1727–1751 [2013-04-04], doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1727, （原始内容存档于2016-03-04）

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

Einstein, A; B Podolsky; N Rosen. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? (PDF). Physical Review. 15 May 1935, 47 (10): 777–780 [2006-01-02]. Bibcode:1935PhRv...47..777E. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2006-03-14）.
Aspect A. Bell's inequality test: more ideal than ever (PDF). Nature. 18 March 1999, 398 (6724): 189–90 [2010-09-08]. Bibcode:1999Natur.398..189A. doi:10.1038/18296. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2011-05-14）.
Clauser, John F. Experimental consequences of objective local theories. Physical Review D. 1974, 10 (2): 526. Bibcode:1974PhRvD..10..526C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.526.
Eberhard, P. H. Bell's theorem without hidden variables. Nuovo Cimento B. 1977, 38: 75–80. Bibcode:1977NCimB..38...75E. doi:10.1007/BF02726212.

jstor.org

Trimmer, John. The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics: A Translation of Schrödinger's "Cat Paradox" Paper. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society (American Philosophical Society). 10 October 1980, 124 (5): pp. 323–338. JSTOR 986572.

njit.edu

web.njit.edu

Vlatko, Vedral. Living In A Quantum World (PDF). Scientific American. 2011, 304 (6): 38–43 [2013-04-25]. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0611-38. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2016-01-29）. Space and time are two of the most fundamental classical concepts, but according to quantum mechanics they are secondary. The entanglements are primary.

rice.edu

www-ece.rice.edu

Aspect A. Bell's inequality test: more ideal than ever (PDF). Nature. 18 March 1999, 398 (6724): 189–90 [2010-09-08]. Bibcode:1999Natur.398..189A. doi:10.1038/18296. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2011-05-14）.

scientificamerican.com

d'Espagnat, Bernard. The Quantum Theory and Reality (PDF). Scientific American. 1979, 241 (5): 158–181 [2013-04-24]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2012-08-03）.

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

Fine, Arthur. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. 2009 [2013-05-10]. （原始内容存档于2019-03-18）.

uni-due.de

exp.physik.uni-due.de

Aspect, Alain; et al. Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities (PDF). Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 49 (2): pp. 91–94 [2013-04-28]. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2015-04-16）.

web.archive.org

Einstein, A; B Podolsky; N Rosen. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? (PDF). Physical Review. 15 May 1935, 47 (10): 777–780 [2006-01-02]. Bibcode:1935PhRv...47..777E. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.47.777. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2006-03-14）.
Reid, M. D.; et al., Colloquium: The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox:From concepts to applications, REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2009, 81: pp. 1727–1751 [2013-04-04], doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1727, （原始内容存档于2016-03-04）
Aspect A. Bell's inequality test: more ideal than ever (PDF). Nature. 18 March 1999, 398 (6724): 189–90 [2010-09-08]. Bibcode:1999Natur.398..189A. doi:10.1038/18296. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2011-05-14）.
Blaylock, Guy. The EPR paradox, Bell's inequality, and the question of locality. American Journal of PHysics. January 2010, 78 (1): 111–120 [2013-04-04]. （原始内容存档于2018-01-09）.
Mermin, N. Is the moon there when nobody looks? Reality and the quantum theory (PDF). Physics Today. April 1985, 38 (4): 38–47 [2015-04-17]. doi:10.1063/1.880968. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2016-03-04）.
Vlatko, Vedral. Living In A Quantum World (PDF). Scientific American. 2011, 304 (6): 38–43 [2013-04-25]. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0611-38. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2016-01-29）. Space and time are two of the most fundamental classical concepts, but according to quantum mechanics they are secondary. The entanglements are primary.
Bykovetz, Nicholas. Readers offer their own magic moments with John Bell. Physics Today. 2015, 68 (12): 8–9 [2015-12-27]. （原始内容存档于2015-12-27）.
d'Espagnat, Bernard. The Quantum Theory and Reality (PDF). Scientific American. 1979, 241 (5): 158–181 [2013-04-24]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2012-08-03）.
Bell, John. Bertlmann's socks and the nature of reality. J. Physique colloques. 1981, C22: pp. 41–62 [2013-04-13]. （原始内容存档于2017-10-24）.
Fine, Arthur. The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. 2009 [2013-05-10]. （原始内容存档于2019-03-18）.
Aspect, Alain; et al. Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities (PDF). Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 49 (2): pp. 91–94 [2013-04-28]. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.91. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2015-04-16）.
Gregor, Weihs; et al. Violation of Bell’s inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 81 (23): pp. 5039–5043 [2013-04-28]. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5039. （原始内容存档于2016-02-04）.
Peres, Asher. Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen, and Shannon. Foundations of Physics. 2005, 35 (3): pp. 511–514 [2013-05-08]. doi:10.1007/s10701-004-1986-6. （原始内容存档于2014-09-06）.