版权欺诈 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "版权欺诈" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Chinese rank

46web.archive.org

1^st place

5techdirt.com

6,694^th place

low place

4eff.org

3,285^th place

3,902^nd place

3latimes.com

22^nd place

110^th place

3wikidata.org

43^rd place

1,123^rd place

3worldcat.org

5^th place

12^th place

2scholar.google.com

1,697^th place

3,337^th place

2americanantiquarian.org

822^nd place

3,694^th place

2doi.org

2^nd place

23^rd place

2independent-magazine.org

low place

2boingboing.net

3,475^th place

7,995^th place

2hollywoodreporter.com

15^th place

49^th place

2pdnonline.com

low place

2arstechnica.com

388^th place

546^th place

1illinois.edu

1,349^th place

2,070^th place

1bostonglobe.com

553^rd place

1,930^th place

1nyulawreview.org

low place

1justice.gov

918^th place

1,784^th place

1copyright.gov

6,605^th place

low place

1cornell.edu

332^nd place

526^th place

1bridgemanimages.com

low place

1fenimoreartmuseum.org

low place

1mfa.org

9,935^th place

low place

1wikipedia.org

low place

1zenodo.org

621^st place

1,608^th place

1nationalarchives.gov.uk

744^th place

1,175^th place

1theartnewspaper.com

3,687^th place

5,502^nd place

1moviemaker.com

4,632^nd place

7,037^th place

1publicdomainsherpa.com

low place

1harvard.edu

18^th place

57^th place

1semanticscholar.org

11^th place

332^nd place

1uga.edu

2,385^th place

3,507^th place

1likelihoodofconfusion.com

low place

1ssrn.com

703^rd place

1,016^th place

1theregister.co.uk

1,216^th place

1,447^th place

1flickr.com

1,013^th place

1,467^th place

1umn.edu

1,266^th place

1,781^st place

1theguardian.com

12^th place

60^th place

1variety.com

13^th place

48^th place

1klarmachen-zum-aendern.de

low place

1torrentfreak.com

785^th place

1,581^st place

1hyperallergic.com

6,997^th place

low place

1billboard.com

19^th place

136^th place

1courtlistener.com

5,477^th place

low place

1adafruit.com

low place

1americanexpress.com

low place

1reuters.com

49^th place

81^st place

adafruit.com

blog.adafruit.com

adafruit. Rumblefish claims it owns “America the Beautiful” by United States Navy Band? [zh：Rumblefish声称拥有美国海军乐队演奏的《美丽的阿美利加》的版权？]. Adafruit Industries - Makers, hackers, artists, designers and engineers!. 2015-07-03 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2024-09-26）（美国英语）.

americanantiquarian.org

美国古物学会许可证 (PDF). [2024-03-31]. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2021-06-03）.
Rights and Reproductions at the American Antiquarian Society [zh：美国古文物学会的权利与复制政策]. [2024-03-31]. （原始内容存档于2009-06-27）.

americanexpress.com

Entrepreneurial Innovators Series: Richard Gottehrer, The Orchard [zh：创业创新者系列：理查德·戈特赫勒，The Orchard公司]. Business Class: Trends and Insights | American Express. [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2023-02-13）（美国英语）.

arstechnica.com

Farivar, Cyrus. "将“Lawyers who yanked “Happy Birthday” into public domain now sue over “This Land”" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2017-08-13., Ars Technica, June 18, 2016
Mullin, Joe. A most unpatriotic YouTube hijacking: America the Beautiful [zh：一起极不爱国的YouTube劫持事件：《美丽的阿美利加》]. Ars Technica. 2015-07-03 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2024-06-17）（美国英语）.

billboard.com

Gardner, Eriq. "'“‘Happy Birthday’ Legal Team Turns Attention to ‘We Shall Overcome’" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-04-16., Billboard, April 12, 2016.

boingboing.net

Doctorow, Cory. "Copyfraud, uncertainty and doubt: the vanishing online public domain" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Boing Boing, June 25, 2014, accessed June 16, 2015. See also Coleman, Ron. "Who owns the copyright in scans of public domain works? （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）", Likelihood of Confusion, September 19, 2012, accessed October 30, 2018
Doctorow, Cory."Ashley Madison commits copyfraud in desperate bid to suppress news of its titanic leak" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-05-13.Boing Boing,August 20, 2015

bostonglobe.com

Katyal, Sonia K. and Simone C. Ross. "Can technoheritage be owned?" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-06-06. The Boston Globe, May 1, 2016

bridgemanimages.com

images-cdn.bridgemanimages.com

毕沙罗的《蒙马特大道之夜》，1897年. [2024-03-31]. （原始内容存档于2023-04-12）.

copyright.gov

“Copyright in Derivative Works and Compilations” （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆），“美国版权局第14号通告”，2019年4月5日访问

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

《Bridgeman Art Library, Ltd. v. Corel Corp.36 F. Supp. 2d 191 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)》（页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆），康奈尔法学院

courtlistener.com

United States District Court of Nebraska Case No. 19-353 [zh：美国内布拉斯加州第19-353号地方法院案件] (PDF). [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2020-11-12）.

doi.org

Andrea Wallace, A Culture of Copyright: A scoping study on open access to digital cultural heritage collections in the UK (PDF), 2022-02-23, doi:10.5281/ZENODO.6242611, Wikidata Q111275072 （英语）
Deazley, Ronan; Sullivan, Robert. Copyright, Licences, and Statutory Fraud [cn：版权、许可和法定欺诈]. Journal of Media Law: 287–303. S2CID 143774979. doi:10.5235/175776311799280782.

eff.org

白宫照片互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2015-09-22., 白宫 flickr 账户，发布于2009年12月6日。电子前哨基金会指出，“由白宫官方摄影师拍摄的官方照片……不受版权保护，应标记为公共领域。”参见 D'Andrade, Hugh。 3.5 "White House Photos — Does the Public Need a License to Use??" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2015-07-12., Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2009年5月1日访问，2015年7月11日。Techdirt 在谈到另一张白宫照片时写道，“白宫忽略了许可证中的规定，声称这张照片‘不得以任何方式修改’。根据法律，这显然是不正确的，属于版权欺诈的一种形式，因为他们过度伸张权利。” Masnick，Mike。“President Obama Is Not Impressed With Your Right To Modify His Photos”" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2015-07-13., Techdirt, November 20, 2012, accessed July 11, 2015
Diehl v. Crook. Electronic Frontier Foundation. 2011-07-01 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2009-08-02）（英语）.
Lenz v. 环球音乐中心互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-11-25., 572 F. Supp. 2d 1150 (N.D. Cal. 2008).
Malcolm, Jeremy. Portugal Bans Use of DRM to Limit Access to Public Domain Works [zh：葡萄牙禁止使用数字版权管理（DRM）限制公众获取公有领域作品]. Electronic Frontier Foundation. 2017-10-23 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2024-06-17）（英语）.

fenimoreartmuseum.org

菲尼莫尔艺术博物馆条款和条件. [2024-03-31]. （原始内容存档于2024-05-29）.

flickr.com

白宫照片互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2015-09-22., 白宫 flickr 账户，发布于2009年12月6日。电子前哨基金会指出，“由白宫官方摄影师拍摄的官方照片……不受版权保护，应标记为公共领域。”参见 D'Andrade, Hugh。 3.5 "White House Photos — Does the Public Need a License to Use??" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2015-07-12., Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2009年5月1日访问，2015年7月11日。Techdirt 在谈到另一张白宫照片时写道，“白宫忽略了许可证中的规定，声称这张照片‘不得以任何方式修改’。根据法律，这显然是不正确的，属于版权欺诈的一种形式，因为他们过度伸张权利。” Masnick，Mike。“President Obama Is Not Impressed With Your Right To Modify His Photos”" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2015-07-13., Techdirt, November 20, 2012, accessed July 11, 2015

harvard.edu

nrs.harvard.edu

Suber, Peter,"开放获取与版权" SPARC Open Access Newsletter, July 2, 2011, accessed July 17, 2016

hollywoodreporter.com

Gardner, Eriq. Conan Doyle Estate: Denying Sherlock Holmes Copyright Gives Him ‘Multiple Personalities’ [zh：Conan Doyle Estate: 否认福尔摩斯版权使其拥有“多重人格”的说法]. The Hollywood Reporter. 2013-09-13 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2024-06-17）（美国英语）.
Gardner, Eriq. “Happy Birthday” Copyright Ruled to Be Invalid [zh：裁定《生日快乐》版权无效]. The Hollywood Reporter. 2015-09-22 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2024-09-20）（美国英语）.

hyperallergic.com

Dunne, Carey. Photographer Files $1 Billion Suit Against Getty for Licensing Her Public Domain Images [UPDATED] [zh：摄影师对盖蒂提起 10 亿美元的诉讼，要求其许可她的公共领域图像 [已更新]]. Hyperallergic. 2016-07-27 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2016-07-28）（美国英语）.

illinois.edu

law.illinois.edu

"Jason Mazzone, Professor, Lynn H. Murray Faculty Scholar in Law" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2015-12-28. 纽约大学法律评论, accessed June 17, 2015

independent-magazine.org

Dunne, Matt. "清理的成本" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2020-07-28., The Independent magazine, April 2005, pp. 30–31
"Fair Use" 的多重含义（页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）The Independent magazine, December 1, 2005

justice.gov

“版权声明保护 – 17 USC § 506（c）和 506（d）” （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆），Justice.gov，2019年4月2日查阅

klarmachen-zum-aendern.de

musik.klarmachen-zum-aendern.de

"GEMA Strikes Again: Demands Licensing Fees For Music It Has No Rights To" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-06-17., Techdirt.com, October 10, 2011, accessed May 16, 2016; "MUSIKPIRATEN E.V. EXAMINES OPTION TO SUE GEMA FOR COPYFRAUD" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-06-11., Musikpiraten e.V., September 30, 2011, accessed May 16, 2016; and Van der Sar, Ernesto. "Music Royalty Collectors Accused of Copyfraud" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-06-24., Torrent Freak, October 2, 2011, accessed May 14, 2016

latimes.com

Twitter; Instagram; Email; Facebook. Column: Getty Images will bill you thousands to use a photo that belongs to the public. Is that legal? [zh:Getty Images会向您收取数千美元的费用来使用一张属于公共领域的照片。这合法吗？]. Los Angeles Times. 2016-08-02 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2016-08-03）（美国英语）.
Column: Photographer sues Getty Images for $1 billion after she's billed for her own photo [zh：摄影师因被索要自己的照片费用起诉盖蒂图片社，索赔10亿美元]. Los Angeles Times. 2016-07-29 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2016-08-01）（美国英语）.
All the 'Happy Birthday' song copyright claims are invalid, federal judge rules [zh：联邦法官裁定所有关于《生日快乐》歌曲的版权主张无效]. Los Angeles Times. 2015-09-23 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2024-09-05）（美国英语）.

likelihoodofconfusion.com

Doctorow, Cory. "Copyfraud, uncertainty and doubt: the vanishing online public domain" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Boing Boing, June 25, 2014, accessed June 16, 2015. See also Coleman, Ron. "Who owns the copyright in scans of public domain works? （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）", Likelihood of Confusion, September 19, 2012, accessed October 30, 2018

mfa.org

MFA-波士顿的条款和条件

moviemaker.com

“如何避免一场潜在的诉讼（页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）”, MovieMaker, February 11, 2003

nationalarchives.gov.uk

assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Lord Justice Arnold, THJ v Sheridan (PDF), 英格兰和威尔士上诉法院, 2023-11-20, Wikidata Q124044396 （英国英语）

nyulawreview.org

Mazzone, Jason. Copyfraud [zh：版权欺诈] (PDF). 纽约大学法律回复. 2006, 81 (3): 1062 [2024-03-31]. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2016-03-04）.

pdnonline.com

pdnpulse.pdnonline.com

Walker, David. "Court Dismisses $1 Billion Copyright Claim Against Getty" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2017-09-01., PDNPulse, November 22, 2016
Walker, David. "Court Dismisses $1 Billion Copyright Claim Against Getty" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2017-09-01., PDNPulse, November 22, 2016

publicdomainsherpa.com

Don't fall for false copyright claims [zh：不要被虚假的版权声明欺骗]. www.publicdomainsherpa.com. [2024-06-17].

reuters.com

Goh, Brenda. Furor over 'black hole' photo forces China's largest image provider to shut [zh：关于“黑洞”照片的争议迫使中国最大的图像提供商关闭]. April 12, 2019 [2024-03-31]. （原始内容存档于2023-04-17）（英语）.

scholar.google.com

Matthew Bender v. Jurisline （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）， 91 F.Supp.2d 677 （2000）
Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, 801 F.3d 1126 (2015), (9th Cir. 2015)

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Deazley, Ronan; Sullivan, Robert. Copyright, Licences, and Statutory Fraud [cn：版权、许可和法定欺诈]. Journal of Media Law: 287–303. S2CID 143774979. doi:10.5235/175776311799280782.

ssrn.com

Cooper, Tanya Asim. "Corbis & Copyright?: Is Bill Gates Trying to Corner the Market on Public Domain Art?" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2015-10-30., Intellectual Property Law Bulletin, vol. 16, p. 1, University of Alabama 2011

techdirt.com

白宫照片互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2015-09-22., 白宫 flickr 账户，发布于2009年12月6日。电子前哨基金会指出，“由白宫官方摄影师拍摄的官方照片……不受版权保护，应标记为公共领域。”参见 D'Andrade, Hugh。 3.5 "White House Photos — Does the Public Need a License to Use??" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2015-07-12., Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2009年5月1日访问，2015年7月11日。Techdirt 在谈到另一张白宫照片时写道，“白宫忽略了许可证中的规定，声称这张照片‘不得以任何方式修改’。根据法律，这显然是不正确的，属于版权欺诈的一种形式，因为他们过度伸张权利。” Masnick，Mike。“President Obama Is Not Impressed With Your Right To Modify His Photos”" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2015-07-13., Techdirt, November 20, 2012, accessed July 11, 2015
Masnick, Mike. "Lawsuit Filed To Prove Happy Birthday Is In The Public Domain; Demands Warner Pay Back Millions Of License Fees" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2013-10-14., Techdirt.com, June 13, 2013
Masnick, Mike. "Warner Music Reprising The Role Of The Evil Slayer Of The Public Domain, Fights Back Against Happy Birthday Lawsuit" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2013-11-03., Techdirt.com, September 3, 2013; and Johnson, Ted. "Court Keeps Candles Lit on Dispute Over ‘Happy Birthday’ Copyright" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2017-06-28., Variety, October 7, 2013
"GEMA Strikes Again: Demands Licensing Fees For Music It Has No Rights To" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-06-17., Techdirt.com, October 10, 2011, accessed May 16, 2016; "MUSIKPIRATEN E.V. EXAMINES OPTION TO SUE GEMA FOR COPYFRAUD" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-06-11., Musikpiraten e.V., September 30, 2011, accessed May 16, 2016; and Van der Sar, Ernesto. "Music Royalty Collectors Accused of Copyfraud" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-06-24., Torrent Freak, October 2, 2011, accessed May 14, 2016
Okihiro, Gary Y. Notes from Shinagawa, July 28–29, 2012. Photographer Sues Getty Images For $1 Billion For Claiming Copyright On Photos She Donated To The Public [zh：摄影师起诉盖蒂图片社（Getty Images）索赔10亿美元，理由是对她捐赠至公有领域的图像提出版权主张]. University of Hawai'i Press. 2016-09-30 [2024-06-17]. ISBN 978-0-8248-4758-6. （原始内容存档于2024-07-01）.

theartnewspaper.com

本多·格羅夫納. Court of Appeal ruling will prevent UK museums from charging reproduction fees—at last. 艺术新闻. 2023-12-29. ISSN 0960-6556. Wikidata Q124044230 （英国英语）.

theguardian.com

Kennedy, Maev. Legal row over National Portrait Gallery images placed on Wikipedia [zh：关于国家肖像画廊图片被放置在维基百科上的法律纠纷]. The Guardian. 2009-07-14 [2024-06-17]. ISSN 0261-3077. （原始内容存档于2017-02-13）（英国英语）.

theregister.co.uk

Eicher, Charles. "Copyfraud: Poisoning the public domain" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-02-04., The Register, June 26, 2009, accessed June 16, 2015

torrentfreak.com

"GEMA Strikes Again: Demands Licensing Fees For Music It Has No Rights To" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-06-17., Techdirt.com, October 10, 2011, accessed May 16, 2016; "MUSIKPIRATEN E.V. EXAMINES OPTION TO SUE GEMA FOR COPYFRAUD" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-06-11., Musikpiraten e.V., September 30, 2011, accessed May 16, 2016; and Van der Sar, Ernesto. "Music Royalty Collectors Accused of Copyfraud" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-06-24., Torrent Freak, October 2, 2011, accessed May 14, 2016

uga.edu

digitalcommons.law.uga.edu

Heald, Paul J. "Payment Demands for Spurious Copyrights: Four Causes of Action " 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-05-28., Journal of Intellectual Property Law, vol. 1, 1993–1994, p. 259

umn.edu

scholarship.law.umn.edu

Cobia, Jeffrey. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act Takedown Notice Procedure: Misuses, Abuses, and Shortcomings of the Process [zh：《数字千禧年版权法案》下的下架通知程序：过程中的误用、滥用和不足]. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology. 2009-01-01, 10 (1) [2024-06-17]. ISSN 1552-9541. （原始内容存档于2024-09-07）.

variety.com

Masnick, Mike. "Warner Music Reprising The Role Of The Evil Slayer Of The Public Domain, Fights Back Against Happy Birthday Lawsuit" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2013-11-03., Techdirt.com, September 3, 2013; and Johnson, Ted. "Court Keeps Candles Lit on Dispute Over ‘Happy Birthday’ Copyright" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2017-06-28., Variety, October 7, 2013

web.archive.org

"Jason Mazzone, Professor, Lynn H. Murray Faculty Scholar in Law" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2015-12-28. 纽约大学法律评论, accessed June 17, 2015
Katyal, Sonia K. and Simone C. Ross. "Can technoheritage be owned?" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-06-06. The Boston Globe, May 1, 2016
Mazzone, Jason. Copyfraud [zh：版权欺诈] (PDF). 纽约大学法律回复. 2006, 81 (3): 1062 [2024-03-31]. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2016-03-04）.
“版权声明保护 – 17 USC § 506（c）和 506（d）” （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆），Justice.gov，2019年4月2日查阅
Twitter; Instagram; Email; Facebook. Column: Getty Images will bill you thousands to use a photo that belongs to the public. Is that legal? [zh:Getty Images会向您收取数千美元的费用来使用一张属于公共领域的照片。这合法吗？]. Los Angeles Times. 2016-08-02 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2016-08-03）（美国英语）.
Column: Photographer sues Getty Images for $1 billion after she's billed for her own photo [zh：摄影师因被索要自己的照片费用起诉盖蒂图片社，索赔10亿美元]. Los Angeles Times. 2016-07-29 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2016-08-01）（美国英语）.
Matthew Bender v. Jurisline （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）， 91 F.Supp.2d 677 （2000）
“Copyright in Derivative Works and Compilations” （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆），“美国版权局第14号通告”，2019年4月5日访问
《Bridgeman Art Library, Ltd. v. Corel Corp.36 F. Supp. 2d 191 (S.D.N.Y. 1999)》（页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆），康奈尔法学院
毕沙罗的《蒙马特大道之夜》，1897年. [2024-03-31]. （原始内容存档于2023-04-12）.
美国古物学会许可证 (PDF). [2024-03-31]. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2021-06-03）.
菲尼莫尔艺术博物馆条款和条件. [2024-03-31]. （原始内容存档于2024-05-29）.
Dunne, Matt. "清理的成本" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2020-07-28., The Independent magazine, April 2005, pp. 30–31
“如何避免一场潜在的诉讼（页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）”, MovieMaker, February 11, 2003
"Fair Use" 的多重含义（页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）The Independent magazine, December 1, 2005
Heald, Paul J. "Payment Demands for Spurious Copyrights: Four Causes of Action " 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-05-28., Journal of Intellectual Property Law, vol. 1, 1993–1994, p. 259
Doctorow, Cory. "Copyfraud, uncertainty and doubt: the vanishing online public domain" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Boing Boing, June 25, 2014, accessed June 16, 2015. See also Coleman, Ron. "Who owns the copyright in scans of public domain works? （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）", Likelihood of Confusion, September 19, 2012, accessed October 30, 2018
Cooper, Tanya Asim. "Corbis & Copyright?: Is Bill Gates Trying to Corner the Market on Public Domain Art?" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2015-10-30., Intellectual Property Law Bulletin, vol. 16, p. 1, University of Alabama 2011
Eicher, Charles. "Copyfraud: Poisoning the public domain" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-02-04., The Register, June 26, 2009, accessed June 16, 2015
白宫照片互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2015-09-22., 白宫 flickr 账户，发布于2009年12月6日。电子前哨基金会指出，“由白宫官方摄影师拍摄的官方照片……不受版权保护，应标记为公共领域。”参见 D'Andrade, Hugh。 3.5 "White House Photos — Does the Public Need a License to Use??" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2015-07-12., Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2009年5月1日访问，2015年7月11日。Techdirt 在谈到另一张白宫照片时写道，“白宫忽略了许可证中的规定，声称这张照片‘不得以任何方式修改’。根据法律，这显然是不正确的，属于版权欺诈的一种形式，因为他们过度伸张权利。” Masnick，Mike。“President Obama Is Not Impressed With Your Right To Modify His Photos”" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2015-07-13., Techdirt, November 20, 2012, accessed July 11, 2015
The plight of Pirates on the information superwaves [zh：信息超浪上的海盗困境]. web.archive.org. 2012-07-30 [2024-06-17]. 原始内容存档于2012-07-30.
Diehl v. Crook. Electronic Frontier Foundation. 2011-07-01 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2009-08-02）（英语）.
Cobia, Jeffrey. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act Takedown Notice Procedure: Misuses, Abuses, and Shortcomings of the Process [zh：《数字千禧年版权法案》下的下架通知程序：过程中的误用、滥用和不足]. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology. 2009-01-01, 10 (1) [2024-06-17]. ISSN 1552-9541. （原始内容存档于2024-09-07）.
Kennedy, Maev. Legal row over National Portrait Gallery images placed on Wikipedia [zh：关于国家肖像画廊图片被放置在维基百科上的法律纠纷]. The Guardian. 2009-07-14 [2024-06-17]. ISSN 0261-3077. （原始内容存档于2017-02-13）（英国英语）.
Gardner, Eriq. Conan Doyle Estate: Denying Sherlock Holmes Copyright Gives Him ‘Multiple Personalities’ [zh：Conan Doyle Estate: 否认福尔摩斯版权使其拥有“多重人格”的说法]. The Hollywood Reporter. 2013-09-13 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2024-06-17）（美国英语）.
Masnick, Mike. "Lawsuit Filed To Prove Happy Birthday Is In The Public Domain; Demands Warner Pay Back Millions Of License Fees" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2013-10-14., Techdirt.com, June 13, 2013
Masnick, Mike. "Warner Music Reprising The Role Of The Evil Slayer Of The Public Domain, Fights Back Against Happy Birthday Lawsuit" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2013-11-03., Techdirt.com, September 3, 2013; and Johnson, Ted. "Court Keeps Candles Lit on Dispute Over ‘Happy Birthday’ Copyright" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2017-06-28., Variety, October 7, 2013
All the 'Happy Birthday' song copyright claims are invalid, federal judge rules [zh：联邦法官裁定所有关于《生日快乐》歌曲的版权主张无效]. Los Angeles Times. 2015-09-23 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2024-09-05）（美国英语）.
Gardner, Eriq. “Happy Birthday” Copyright Ruled to Be Invalid [zh：裁定《生日快乐》版权无效]. The Hollywood Reporter. 2015-09-22 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2024-09-20）（美国英语）.
Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, 801 F.3d 1126 (2015), (9th Cir. 2015)
Lenz v. 环球音乐中心互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-11-25., 572 F. Supp. 2d 1150 (N.D. Cal. 2008).
"GEMA Strikes Again: Demands Licensing Fees For Music It Has No Rights To" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-06-17., Techdirt.com, October 10, 2011, accessed May 16, 2016; "MUSIKPIRATEN E.V. EXAMINES OPTION TO SUE GEMA FOR COPYFRAUD" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-06-11., Musikpiraten e.V., September 30, 2011, accessed May 16, 2016; and Van der Sar, Ernesto. "Music Royalty Collectors Accused of Copyfraud" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-06-24., Torrent Freak, October 2, 2011, accessed May 14, 2016
Walker, David. "Court Dismisses $1 Billion Copyright Claim Against Getty" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2017-09-01., PDNPulse, November 22, 2016
Dunne, Carey. Photographer Files $1 Billion Suit Against Getty for Licensing Her Public Domain Images [UPDATED] [zh：摄影师对盖蒂提起 10 亿美元的诉讼，要求其许可她的公共领域图像 [已更新]]. Hyperallergic. 2016-07-27 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2016-07-28）（美国英语）.
Okihiro, Gary Y. Notes from Shinagawa, July 28–29, 2012. Photographer Sues Getty Images For $1 Billion For Claiming Copyright On Photos She Donated To The Public [zh：摄影师起诉盖蒂图片社（Getty Images）索赔10亿美元，理由是对她捐赠至公有领域的图像提出版权主张]. University of Hawai'i Press. 2016-09-30 [2024-06-17]. ISBN 978-0-8248-4758-6. （原始内容存档于2024-07-01）.
Walker, David. "Court Dismisses $1 Billion Copyright Claim Against Getty" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2017-09-01., PDNPulse, November 22, 2016
Gardner, Eriq. "'“‘Happy Birthday’ Legal Team Turns Attention to ‘We Shall Overcome’" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-04-16., Billboard, April 12, 2016.
Farivar, Cyrus. "将“Lawyers who yanked “Happy Birthday” into public domain now sue over “This Land”" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2017-08-13., Ars Technica, June 18, 2016
United States District Court of Nebraska Case No. 19-353 [zh：美国内布拉斯加州第19-353号地方法院案件] (PDF). [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2020-11-12）.
Rights and Reproductions at the American Antiquarian Society [zh：美国古文物学会的权利与复制政策]. [2024-03-31]. （原始内容存档于2009-06-27）.
Mullin, Joe. A most unpatriotic YouTube hijacking: America the Beautiful [zh：一起极不爱国的YouTube劫持事件：《美丽的阿美利加》]. Ars Technica. 2015-07-03 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2024-06-17）（美国英语）.
adafruit. Rumblefish claims it owns “America the Beautiful” by United States Navy Band? [zh：Rumblefish声称拥有美国海军乐队演奏的《美丽的阿美利加》的版权？]. Adafruit Industries - Makers, hackers, artists, designers and engineers!. 2015-07-03 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2024-09-26）（美国英语）.
Entrepreneurial Innovators Series: Richard Gottehrer, The Orchard [zh：创业创新者系列：理查德·戈特赫勒，The Orchard公司]. Business Class: Trends and Insights | American Express. [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2023-02-13）（美国英语）.
Doctorow, Cory."Ashley Madison commits copyfraud in desperate bid to suppress news of its titanic leak" 互联网档案馆的存檔，存档日期2016-05-13.Boing Boing,August 20, 2015
Malcolm, Jeremy. Portugal Bans Use of DRM to Limit Access to Public Domain Works [zh：葡萄牙禁止使用数字版权管理（DRM）限制公众获取公有领域作品]. Electronic Frontier Foundation. 2017-10-23 [2024-06-17]. （原始内容存档于2024-06-17）（英语）.
Goh, Brenda. Furor over 'black hole' photo forces China's largest image provider to shut [zh：关于“黑洞”照片的争议迫使中国最大的图像提供商关闭]. April 12, 2019 [2024-03-31]. （原始内容存档于2023-04-17）（英语）.

wikidata.org

Andrea Wallace, A Culture of Copyright: A scoping study on open access to digital cultural heritage collections in the UK (PDF), 2022-02-23, doi:10.5281/ZENODO.6242611, Wikidata Q111275072 （英语）
Lord Justice Arnold, THJ v Sheridan (PDF), 英格兰和威尔士上诉法院, 2023-11-20, Wikidata Q124044396 （英国英语）
本多·格羅夫納. Court of Appeal ruling will prevent UK museums from charging reproduction fees—at last. 艺术新闻. 2023-12-29. ISSN 0960-6556. Wikidata Q124044230 （英国英语）.

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

Bendor Grosvenor [zh：本多·格罗夫纳]. Wikipedia. 2024-06-14 （英语）.

worldcat.org

本多·格羅夫納. Court of Appeal ruling will prevent UK museums from charging reproduction fees—at last. 艺术新闻. 2023-12-29. ISSN 0960-6556. Wikidata Q124044230 （英国英语）.
Cobia, Jeffrey. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act Takedown Notice Procedure: Misuses, Abuses, and Shortcomings of the Process [zh：《数字千禧年版权法案》下的下架通知程序：过程中的误用、滥用和不足]. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology. 2009-01-01, 10 (1) [2024-06-17]. ISSN 1552-9541. （原始内容存档于2024-09-07）.
Kennedy, Maev. Legal row over National Portrait Gallery images placed on Wikipedia [zh：关于国家肖像画廊图片被放置在维基百科上的法律纠纷]. The Guardian. 2009-07-14 [2024-06-17]. ISSN 0261-3077. （原始内容存档于2017-02-13）（英国英语）.

zenodo.org

Andrea Wallace, A Culture of Copyright: A scoping study on open access to digital cultural heritage collections in the UK (PDF), 2022-02-23, doi:10.5281/ZENODO.6242611, Wikidata Q111275072 （英语）