甲骨文诉谷歌Java侵权案 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "甲骨文诉谷歌Java侵权案" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Chinese rank

80web.archive.org

1^st place

14arstechnica.com

388^th place

546^th place

8wikipedia.org

low place

7cnet.com

272^nd place

459^th place

6groklaw.net

low place

5theverge.com

114^th place

276^th place

4leagle.com

4,919^th place

low place

3pcworld.com

1,317^th place

1,390^th place

3reuters.com

49^th place

81^st place

3cnbc.com

220^th place

426^th place

3scotusblog.com

7,147^th place

low place

2justia.com

696^th place

2,022^nd place

2wired.com

193^rd place

421^st place

2espacenet.com

800^th place

1,214^th place

2fosspatents.com

low place

2supremecourt.gov

3,811^th place

7,287^th place

2courtlistener.com

5,477^th place

low place

2bloomberg.com

99^th place

225^th place

2cnn.com

28^th place

71^st place

2ipwatchdog.com

low place

2sun.com

5,060^th place

2,732^nd place

1eastmoney.com

low place

960^th place

1archive.org

6^th place

4^th place

1infoworld.com

3,696^th place

4,044^th place

1webcitation.org

24^th place

29^th place

1businessweek.com

712^th place

748^th place

1theregister.co.uk

1,216^th place

1,447^th place

1googlesystem.blogspot.com

low place

1nytimes.com

7^th place

31^st place

1macworld.com

2,573^rd place

3,574^th place

1extremetech.com

4,667^th place

3,134^th place

1openjurist.org

low place

1bitlaw.com

low place

1cornell.edu

332^nd place

526^th place

1potomaclaw.com

low place

1zdnet.com

786^th place

827^th place

1computerworld.com

2,429^th place

4,071^st place

1docketalarm.com

8,228^th place

low place

1eff.org

3,285^th place

3,902^nd place

1crn.com

8,240^th place

low place

1go.com

48^th place

146^th place

1lawandcrime.com

9,323^rd place

low place

1usatoday.com

41^st place

182^nd place

1wsj.com

79^th place

143^rd place

1ieee.org

652^nd place

712^th place

1vox.com

484^th place

976^th place

1qz.com

1,110^th place

1,562^nd place

1natlawreview.com

9,177^th place

low place

archive.org

Southwick, Karen. High Noon: the inside story of Scott McNealy and the rise of Sun Microsystems. New York [u.a.]: Wiley. 1999: 120-122. ISBN 0471297135.

arstechnica.com

Brodkin, Jon. Sun wanted up to $50 million from Google for Java license, Schmidt says. Ars Technica. April 24, 2012 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Amadeo, Ron. Android N switches to OpenJDK, Google tells Oracle it is protected by the GPL. Ars Technica. Condé Nast. January 7, 2016 [July 1, 2016]. （原始内容存档于2017-03-12）.
Joe Mullin. Google wins crucial API ruling, Oracle's case decimated. Ars Technica. May 31, 2012 [2012-06-01]. （原始内容存档于2017-03-12）.
Google puts its expert on the stand to combat Oracle, wraps up its case. Ars Technica. [2016-05-24]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Second Oracle v. Google trial could lead to huge headaches for developers. Ars Technica. [2016-05-24]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Oracle v. Google draws to a close, jury sent home until next week. Ars Technica. [28 May 2016]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Oracle slams Google to jury: "You don't take people's property". Ars Technica. [2016-05-24]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Sun's Jonathan Schwartz at trial: Java was free, Android had no licensing problem. Ars Technica. [2016-05-24]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Oracle economist: Android stole Java's 'window of opportunity'. Ars Technica. [2016-05-24]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Mullin, Joe. Google beats Oracle – Android makes 'fair use' of Java APIs. Ars Technica. 26 May 2016 [26 May 2016]. （原始内容存档于2017-01-20）.
Google beats Oracle – Android makes "fair use' of Java APIs. Ars Technica. [2016-05-26]. （原始内容存档于2017-01-20）.
Mullin, Joe. It's official: Oracle will appeal its "fair use" loss against Google. Ars Technica. 27 October 2016 [27 October 2016]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Lee, Timothy. Google asks Supreme Court to overrule disastrous ruling on API copyrights. Ars Technica. January 25, 2019 [January 25, 2019]. （原始内容存档于2019-04-23）.
Amadeo, Ron. Android N switches to OpenJDK, Google tells Oracle it is protected by the GPL. Ars Technica. January 6, 2016 [March 30, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2017-03-12）.

bitlaw.com

Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc., 982 F. 2d 693 (2d Cir. 1992).

bloomberg.com

Decker, Susan. Oracle Wins Revival of Billion-Dollar Case Against Google. Bloomberg Businessweek. March 27, 2018 [March 27, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Stohr, Greg. Google Gets U.S. Supreme Court Hearing in Oracle Copyright Clash. Bloomberg Businessweek. November 15, 2019 [November 15, 2019]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.

businessweek.com

Elgin, Ben. Google Buys Android for Its Mobile Arsenal. Bloomberg Businessweek. Bloomberg. August 17, 2005 [2012-02-20]. （原始内容存档于February 24, 2011）. In what could be a key move in its nascent wireless strategy, Google (GOOG) has quietly acquired startup Android Inc. ...

cnbc.com

Higgens, Tucker. Supreme Court will hear Google's appeal in massive copyright suit brought by Oracle. CNBC. November 15, 2019 [November 15, 2019]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-11）.
Higgens, Tucker. Justices wary of upending tech industry in Google v. Oracle Supreme Court fight. CNBC. October 7, 2020 [October 7, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Higgens, Tucker. Supreme Court rules in Google's favor in copyright dispute with Oracle over Android software. CNBC. April 5, 2021 [April 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.

cnet.com

Lamonica, Martin. Sun picks GPL license for Java code. CNET. February 13, 2007 [March 30, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2021-08-14）.
Farber, Dan. Former Sun CEO says Google's Android didn't need license for Java APIs. CNET. April 26, 2012 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2021-06-13）.
Shankland, Stephan. Oracle buys Sun, becomes hardware company. CNET. January 27, 2010 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2021-12-12）.
Krazit, Tom. Oracle sues Google over Android and Java. CNET. August 13, 2010 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Lowenson, Josh. Jury verdict: Android doesn't infringe Oracle's patents. CNET. May 23, 2012 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2021-06-13）.
King, Rachel. Judge says 37 Oracle APIs are not copyrightable. CNET. May 31, 2012 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Rosenblatt, Seth. Court sides with Oracle over Android in Java patent appeal. CNET. May 9, 2014 [2014-05-10]. （原始内容存档于2014-05-10）.

cnn.com

de Vogue, Ariane. Supreme Court to hear cases on Trump's financial docs, religious freedom and Electoral College via telephone. CNN. April 13, 2020 [April 13, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Fung, Brian. Supreme Court hands Google a victory in a multibillion-dollar case against Oracle. CNN. April 5, 2021 [April 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.

computerworld.com

Niccolai, James. Oracle agrees to 'zero' damages in Google lawsuit, eyes appeal. June 20, 2012 [2012-06-23]. （原始内容存档于2012-11-17）.

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

17 U.S. Code § 107 – Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use. Legal Information Institute. Cornell University Law School. [November 16, 2015]. （原始内容存档于2019-05-07）.

courtlistener.com

Oracle Am., Inc. v. Google Inc., No. 3:10-cv-03561 1988 (N.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2016).
Oracle Am., Inc. v. Google Inc., No. 3:10-cv-03561 2070 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 27, 2016).

crn.com

Tsidulko, Joseph. Oracle v Google Copyright Case Slated For Supreme Court Arguments. CRN. July 13, 2020 [July 13, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.

docketalarm.com

Court Docket for Oracle v. Google Appeal. Docket Alarm, Inc. [10 May 2014]. （原始内容存档于2020-08-01）.

eastmoney.com

stock.eastmoney.com

界面新聞. 谷歌胜诉！美国最高法院裁定甲骨文诉谷歌Java侵权案. 2021-04-06 [2021-04-08]. （原始内容存档于2021-08-14）（中文（中国大陆））.

eff.org

Oracle v. Google. Electronic Frontier Foundation. [2022-01-09]. （原始内容存档于2020-12-31）.

espacenet.com

worldwide.espacenet.com

US patent 6061520,Yellin, Frank & Tuck, Richard D,「Method and system for performing static initialization」,发行于2000-05-09,指定于Sun Microsystems和Oracle
US patent RE38104,Gosling, James,「Method and apparatus for resolving data references in generated code」,发行于2003-04-29,指定于Sun Microsystems

extremetech.com

Anthony, Sebastian. Dalvik is dead: Next version of Android uses new ART runtime to boost speed, battery life. ExtremeTech（英语：ExtremeTech）. June 20, 2014 [April 12, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.

fosspatents.com

FOSS Patents. [2022-01-09]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
FOSS Patents. [2022-01-09]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.

go.com

abcnews.go.com

Gresko, Jessica. Top court sides with Google in copyright dispute with Oracle. Associated Press. April 5, 2021 [April 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-11） –通过ABC News.

googlesystem.blogspot.com

Google Launches Android, an Open Mobile Platform. Google Operating System. November 5, 2007 [2022-01-09]. （原始内容存档于2016-05-27）.

groklaw.net

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Equitable Defenses (PDF). United States District Court for the Northern District of California/Groklaw. May 31, 2012 [June 2, 2012]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2021-03-01）.
Oracle's Motion Regarding Apache Harmony (PDF). United States District Court for the Northern District of California/Groklaw. April 22, 2012 [December 4, 2015]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2021-06-13）.
Day 1 of Patent Phase in Oracle v. Google & Google Opp. Re Schwartz, as text. Groklaw. May 7, 2012 [June 1, 2012]. （原始内容存档于2021-02-24）.
Court filing (PDF). www.groklaw.net. [2022-01-09]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2021-06-13）.
Second Stipulation and (Proposed) Order Regarding Copyright Damages (PDF). United States District Court for the Northern District of California/Groklaw. [2012-06-23]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2021-04-19）.
Jones, Pamela. Oracle and Google File Appeals. Groklaw. October 5, 2012 [November 17, 2012]. （原始内容存档于2012-12-01）.

ieee.org

spectrum.ieee.org

Caballar, Rina Diane. Google v. Oracle Explained: The Fight for Interoperable Software. IEEE Spectrum. February 19, 2020 [September 8, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2021-05-18）.

infoworld.com

Krill, Paul. After a decade, open source Java is still controversial. InfoWorld（英语：InfoWorld）. November 11, 2016 [March 30, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2018-07-06）.

ipwatchdog.com

McDermott, Eileen. Justices Look for Reassurance That the Sky Won't Fall When They Rule in Google v. Oracle. IP Watchdog. October 7, 2020 [October 8, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Stricklett, Sue Ghosh. Google v. Oracle: An Expansive Fair Use Defense Deters Investment In Original Content. IP Watchdog. September 8, 2020 [September 8, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.

justia.com

supreme.justia.com

Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc., 593（英语：List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 593） U.S. 18-956 (2021).
Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994).

lawandcrime.com

Nanos, Elura. The Supreme Court Just Sided with Google's Copying of Thousands of Lines of Code. Justice Thomas Went Off.. Law and Crime（英语：Law and Crime）. April 5, 2021 [April 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.

leagle.com

Oracle Am., Inc. v. Google Inc., 872 F. Supp. 2d 974 (N.D. Cal. 2012).
" The point of contention between the parties was Google's refusal to make the implementation of its programs compatible with the Java virtual machine or interoperable with other Java programs. Because Sun/Oracle found that position to be anathema to the "write once, run anywhere" philosophy, it did not grant Google a license to use the Java API packages."Oracle Am., Inc. v. Google Inc., 872 F. Supp. 2d 974 (N.D. Cal. 2012).(para. 34)
Oracle Am., Inc. v. Google Inc., 750 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2014).
Oracle Am., Inc. v. Google Inc., 886 F.3d 1179 (Fed. Cir. 2018).

macworld.com

Google releases Android SDK. Macworld. November 12, 2007 [2022-01-09]. （原始内容存档于2010-08-22）.

natlawreview.com

Auth, Dorothy R.; Wizenfeld, Howard. Google v. Oracle: Will Software Be Free?. National Law Review（英语：National Law Review）. February 7, 2020 [September 8, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.

nytimes.com

query.nytimes.com

Helft, Miguel and John Markoff. Google Is Pursuing Plans to Put a PC Into Every Pocket. The New York Times. November 6, 2007 [June 2, 2012]. （原始内容存档于2018-01-04）.

openjurist.org

Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int'l, Inc., 516 U.S. 233 (1996).

pcworld.com

Montalbano, Elizabeth. Oracle, Entering Hardware Arena, Agrees to Buy Sun for $7.4 Billion. PC World. April 20, 2009 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2021-05-11）.
James Niccolai. Oracle seeks $9.3 billion for Google's use of Java in Android. PCWorld. 28 March 2016 [2022-01-09]. （原始内容存档于2021-09-26）.
Oracle denied new trial in copyright dispute with Google over Java. [2022-01-09]. （原始内容存档于2021-04-16）.

potomaclaw.com

Barry, Michaela. Oracle v. Google – Copyrightability of APIs. Potomac Law Group. 2013 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2019-07-11）.

qz.com

Livni, Ephrat. US Supreme Court holds innovation in the balance in Google v Oracle. Quartz. November 20, 2019 [September 8, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.

reuters.com

Oracle sues Google over Android. Reuters. August 13, 2010 [January 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Levine, Dan. Google asks Supreme Court to decide Oracle copyright fight. Reuters. October 8, 2014 [January 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Chung, Andrew. U.S. Supreme Court seeks Trump administration views on Google-Oracle copyright feud. Reuters. April 29, 2019 [January 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.

scotusblog.com

Howe, Amy. Justices postpone March argument session. SCOTUSblog（英语：SCOTUSblog）. March 16, 2020 [March 17, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Mann, Ronald. Case preview: Justices to weigh in on landmark copyright battle between Google and Oracle. SCOTUSblog（英语：SCOTUSblog）. Oct 5, 2020 [January 9, 2022]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Mann, Ronald. Justices validate Google's use of Java platform in Android software code. SCOTUSBlog（英语：SCOTUSBlog）. April 6, 2021 [April 7, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.

sun.com

java.sun.com

Jon Byous. Java Technology: The Early Years. Sun Microsystems. April 2003 [2009-08-02]. （原始内容存档于May 30, 2008）.

blogs.sun.com

Schwartz, Jonathan. Congratulations Google, Red Hat and the Java Community!. Sun Microsystems. November 5, 2007 [June 1, 2012]. （原始内容存档于October 23, 2010）.

supremecourt.gov

135 S. Ct. 2887 (2015), Order List (06/29/2015) (PDF). U.S. Supreme Court. [29 June 2015]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2022-01-09）.
Docket for 18-956. November 15, 2019 [January 8, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2021-04-05）.

theregister.co.uk

Metz, Cade. Google's 'copied Java code' disowned by Apache. The Register. November 1, 2010 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2018-08-23）.

theverge.com

Jeong, Sarah. The Judge's Code. The Verge. October 19, 2017 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2020-12-23）.
Brandom, Russell; Robertson, Aid. Supreme Court sides with Google in Oracle's API copyright case. The Verge. April 5, 2021 [April 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-12）.
Bishop, Bryan. Jury finds Google infringed Oracle copyrights in partial verdict; Google moves for mistrial. The Verge. May 7, 2012 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Robertson, Adi. Some of Google's biggest rivals are taking its side in a Supreme Court battle. The Verge. January 14, 2020 [January 14, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-15）.
Robertson, Adi. Oracle strikes back at Google in Supreme Court copyright case. The Verge. February 13, 2020 [February 13, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.

usatoday.com

Fritze, John. Supreme Court sides with Google in years long fight with tech giant Oracle. USA Today. April 5, 2021 [April 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.

vox.com

Lee, Timothy. Why Google's victory in a copyright fight with Oracle is a big deal. Vox. May 26, 2016 [September 8, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-11）.

web.archive.org

界面新聞. 谷歌胜诉！美国最高法院裁定甲骨文诉谷歌Java侵权案. 2021-04-06 [2021-04-08]. （原始内容存档于2021-08-14）（中文（中国大陆））.
Jon Byous. Java Technology: The Early Years. Sun Microsystems. April 2003 [2009-08-02]. （原始内容存档于May 30, 2008）.
Krill, Paul. After a decade, open source Java is still controversial. InfoWorld（英语：InfoWorld）. November 11, 2016 [March 30, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2018-07-06）.
Lamonica, Martin. Sun picks GPL license for Java code. CNET. February 13, 2007 [March 30, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2021-08-14）.
Jeong, Sarah. The Judge's Code. The Verge. October 19, 2017 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2020-12-23）.
Farber, Dan. Former Sun CEO says Google's Android didn't need license for Java APIs. CNET. April 26, 2012 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2021-06-13）.
Vogelstein, Fred. How the Android Ecosystem Threatens the iPhone. Wired. April 2011 [June 2, 2012]. （原始内容存档于2014-03-16）.
Brodkin, Jon. Sun wanted up to $50 million from Google for Java license, Schmidt says. Ars Technica. April 24, 2012 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Equitable Defenses (PDF). United States District Court for the Northern District of California/Groklaw. May 31, 2012 [June 2, 2012]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2021-03-01）.
Oracle's Motion Regarding Apache Harmony (PDF). United States District Court for the Northern District of California/Groklaw. April 22, 2012 [December 4, 2015]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2021-06-13）.
Metz, Cade. Google's 'copied Java code' disowned by Apache. The Register. November 1, 2010 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2018-08-23）.
Google Launches Android, an Open Mobile Platform. Google Operating System. November 5, 2007 [2022-01-09]. （原始内容存档于2016-05-27）.
Helft, Miguel and John Markoff. Google Is Pursuing Plans to Put a PC Into Every Pocket. The New York Times. November 6, 2007 [June 2, 2012]. （原始内容存档于2018-01-04）.
Google releases Android SDK. Macworld. November 12, 2007 [2022-01-09]. （原始内容存档于2010-08-22）.
Schwartz, Jonathan. Congratulations Google, Red Hat and the Java Community!. Sun Microsystems. November 5, 2007 [June 1, 2012]. （原始内容存档于October 23, 2010）.
Shankland, Stephan. Oracle buys Sun, becomes hardware company. CNET. January 27, 2010 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2021-12-12）.
Montalbano, Elizabeth. Oracle, Entering Hardware Arena, Agrees to Buy Sun for $7.4 Billion. PC World. April 20, 2009 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2021-05-11）.
Anthony, Sebastian. Dalvik is dead: Next version of Android uses new ART runtime to boost speed, battery life. ExtremeTech（英语：ExtremeTech）. June 20, 2014 [April 12, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Brandom, Russell; Robertson, Aid. Supreme Court sides with Google in Oracle's API copyright case. The Verge. April 5, 2021 [April 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-12）.
Amadeo, Ron. Android N switches to OpenJDK, Google tells Oracle it is protected by the GPL. Ars Technica. Condé Nast. January 7, 2016 [July 1, 2016]. （原始内容存档于2017-03-12）.
17 U.S. Code § 107 – Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use. Legal Information Institute. Cornell University Law School. [November 16, 2015]. （原始内容存档于2019-05-07）.
Oracle sues Google over Android. Reuters. August 13, 2010 [January 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Krazit, Tom. Oracle sues Google over Android and Java. CNET. August 13, 2010 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Bishop, Bryan. Jury finds Google infringed Oracle copyrights in partial verdict; Google moves for mistrial. The Verge. May 7, 2012 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Barry, Michaela. Oracle v. Google – Copyrightability of APIs. Potomac Law Group. 2013 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2019-07-11）.
Day 1 of Patent Phase in Oracle v. Google & Google Opp. Re Schwartz, as text. Groklaw. May 7, 2012 [June 1, 2012]. （原始内容存档于2021-02-24）.
Court filing (PDF). www.groklaw.net. [2022-01-09]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2021-06-13）.
Lowenson, Josh. Jury verdict: Android doesn't infringe Oracle's patents. CNET. May 23, 2012 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2021-06-13）.
Josh Lowensohn. Jury clears Google of infringing on Oracle's patents. ZDNet. May 23, 2012 [2012-05-25]. （原始内容存档于2014-10-09）.
King, Rachel. Judge says 37 Oracle APIs are not copyrightable. CNET. May 31, 2012 [March 28, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Joe Mullin. Google wins crucial API ruling, Oracle's case decimated. Ars Technica. May 31, 2012 [2012-06-01]. （原始内容存档于2017-03-12）.
Niccolai, James. Oracle agrees to 'zero' damages in Google lawsuit, eyes appeal. June 20, 2012 [2012-06-23]. （原始内容存档于2012-11-17）.
Second Stipulation and (Proposed) Order Regarding Copyright Damages (PDF). United States District Court for the Northern District of California/Groklaw. [2012-06-23]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2021-04-19）.
Court Docket for Oracle v. Google Appeal. Docket Alarm, Inc. [10 May 2014]. （原始内容存档于2020-08-01）.
Jones, Pamela. Oracle and Google File Appeals. Groklaw. October 5, 2012 [November 17, 2012]. （原始内容存档于2012-12-01）.
FOSS Patents. [2022-01-09]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
FOSS Patents. [2022-01-09]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Rosenblatt, Seth. Court sides with Oracle over Android in Java patent appeal. CNET. May 9, 2014 [2014-05-10]. （原始内容存档于2014-05-10）.
Levine, Dan. Google asks Supreme Court to decide Oracle copyright fight. Reuters. October 8, 2014 [January 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
135 S. Ct. 2887 (2015), Order List (06/29/2015) (PDF). U.S. Supreme Court. [29 June 2015]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2022-01-09）.
Google puts its expert on the stand to combat Oracle, wraps up its case. Ars Technica. [2016-05-24]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Second Oracle v. Google trial could lead to huge headaches for developers. Ars Technica. [2016-05-24]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
James Niccolai. Oracle seeks $9.3 billion for Google's use of Java in Android. PCWorld. 28 March 2016 [2022-01-09]. （原始内容存档于2021-09-26）.
Oracle v. Google. Electronic Frontier Foundation. [2022-01-09]. （原始内容存档于2020-12-31）.
Oracle v. Google draws to a close, jury sent home until next week. Ars Technica. [28 May 2016]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Oracle slams Google to jury: "You don't take people's property". Ars Technica. [2016-05-24]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Sun's Jonathan Schwartz at trial: Java was free, Android had no licensing problem. Ars Technica. [2016-05-24]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Oracle economist: Android stole Java's 'window of opportunity'. Ars Technica. [2016-05-24]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Mullin, Joe. Google beats Oracle – Android makes 'fair use' of Java APIs. Ars Technica. 26 May 2016 [26 May 2016]. （原始内容存档于2017-01-20）.
Google beats Oracle – Android makes "fair use' of Java APIs. Ars Technica. [2016-05-26]. （原始内容存档于2017-01-20）.
Oracle denied new trial in copyright dispute with Google over Java. [2022-01-09]. （原始内容存档于2021-04-16）.
Mullin, Joe. It's official: Oracle will appeal its "fair use" loss against Google. Ars Technica. 27 October 2016 [27 October 2016]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Decker, Susan. Oracle Wins Revival of Billion-Dollar Case Against Google. Bloomberg Businessweek. March 27, 2018 [March 27, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Lee, Timothy. Google asks Supreme Court to overrule disastrous ruling on API copyrights. Ars Technica. January 25, 2019 [January 25, 2019]. （原始内容存档于2019-04-23）.
Chung, Andrew. U.S. Supreme Court seeks Trump administration views on Google-Oracle copyright feud. Reuters. April 29, 2019 [January 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Stohr, Greg. Google Gets U.S. Supreme Court Hearing in Oracle Copyright Clash. Bloomberg Businessweek. November 15, 2019 [November 15, 2019]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Robertson, Adi. Some of Google's biggest rivals are taking its side in a Supreme Court battle. The Verge. January 14, 2020 [January 14, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-15）.
Docket for 18-956. November 15, 2019 [January 8, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2021-04-05）.
Higgens, Tucker. Supreme Court will hear Google's appeal in massive copyright suit brought by Oracle. CNBC. November 15, 2019 [November 15, 2019]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-11）.
Robertson, Adi. Oracle strikes back at Google in Supreme Court copyright case. The Verge. February 13, 2020 [February 13, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Howe, Amy. Justices postpone March argument session. SCOTUSblog（英语：SCOTUSblog）. March 16, 2020 [March 17, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
de Vogue, Ariane. Supreme Court to hear cases on Trump's financial docs, religious freedom and Electoral College via telephone. CNN. April 13, 2020 [April 13, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Tsidulko, Joseph. Oracle v Google Copyright Case Slated For Supreme Court Arguments. CRN. July 13, 2020 [July 13, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Mann, Ronald. Case preview: Justices to weigh in on landmark copyright battle between Google and Oracle. SCOTUSblog（英语：SCOTUSblog）. Oct 5, 2020 [January 9, 2022]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Higgens, Tucker. Justices wary of upending tech industry in Google v. Oracle Supreme Court fight. CNBC. October 7, 2020 [October 7, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Gresko, Jessica. Top court sides with Google in copyright dispute with Oracle. Associated Press. April 5, 2021 [April 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-11） –通过ABC News.
McDermott, Eileen. Justices Look for Reassurance That the Sky Won't Fall When They Rule in Google v. Oracle. IP Watchdog. October 7, 2020 [October 8, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Fung, Brian. Supreme Court hands Google a victory in a multibillion-dollar case against Oracle. CNN. April 5, 2021 [April 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Mann, Ronald. Justices validate Google's use of Java platform in Android software code. SCOTUSBlog（英语：SCOTUSBlog）. April 6, 2021 [April 7, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Nanos, Elura. The Supreme Court Just Sided with Google's Copying of Thousands of Lines of Code. Justice Thomas Went Off.. Law and Crime（英语：Law and Crime）. April 5, 2021 [April 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Higgens, Tucker. Supreme Court rules in Google's favor in copyright dispute with Oracle over Android software. CNBC. April 5, 2021 [April 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Fritze, John. Supreme Court sides with Google in years long fight with tech giant Oracle. USA Today. April 5, 2021 [April 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Kendall, Brent; Greene, Jay. Oracle Wins Court Ruling Against Google in Multibillion-Dollar Copyright Case. The Wall Street Journal. March 27, 2018 [March 27, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Amadeo, Ron. Android N switches to OpenJDK, Google tells Oracle it is protected by the GPL. Ars Technica. January 6, 2016 [March 30, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2017-03-12）.
Finley, Klint. The Oracle-Google Case Will Decide The Future Of Software. Wired. May 23, 2016 [March 27, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2021-11-01）.
Caballar, Rina Diane. Google v. Oracle Explained: The Fight for Interoperable Software. IEEE Spectrum. February 19, 2020 [September 8, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2021-05-18）.
Lee, Timothy. Why Google's victory in a copyright fight with Oracle is a big deal. Vox. May 26, 2016 [September 8, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-11）.
Livni, Ephrat. US Supreme Court holds innovation in the balance in Google v Oracle. Quartz. November 20, 2019 [September 8, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Auth, Dorothy R.; Wizenfeld, Howard. Google v. Oracle: Will Software Be Free?. National Law Review（英语：National Law Review）. February 7, 2020 [September 8, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Stricklett, Sue Ghosh. Google v. Oracle: An Expansive Fair Use Defense Deters Investment In Original Content. IP Watchdog. September 8, 2020 [September 8, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.

webcitation.org

Elgin, Ben. Google Buys Android for Its Mobile Arsenal. Bloomberg Businessweek. Bloomberg. August 17, 2005 [2012-02-20]. （原始内容存档于February 24, 2011）. In what could be a key move in its nascent wireless strategy, Google (GOOG) has quietly acquired startup Android Inc. ...

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc., 593（英语：List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 593） U.S. 18-956 (2021).
Krill, Paul. After a decade, open source Java is still controversial. InfoWorld（英语：InfoWorld）. November 11, 2016 [March 30, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2018-07-06）.
Anthony, Sebastian. Dalvik is dead: Next version of Android uses new ART runtime to boost speed, battery life. ExtremeTech（英语：ExtremeTech）. June 20, 2014 [April 12, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Howe, Amy. Justices postpone March argument session. SCOTUSblog（英语：SCOTUSblog）. March 16, 2020 [March 17, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Mann, Ronald. Case preview: Justices to weigh in on landmark copyright battle between Google and Oracle. SCOTUSblog（英语：SCOTUSblog）. Oct 5, 2020 [January 9, 2022]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Mann, Ronald. Justices validate Google's use of Java platform in Android software code. SCOTUSBlog（英语：SCOTUSBlog）. April 6, 2021 [April 7, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Nanos, Elura. The Supreme Court Just Sided with Google's Copying of Thousands of Lines of Code. Justice Thomas Went Off.. Law and Crime（英语：Law and Crime）. April 5, 2021 [April 5, 2021]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.
Auth, Dorothy R.; Wizenfeld, Howard. Google v. Oracle: Will Software Be Free?. National Law Review（英语：National Law Review）. February 7, 2020 [September 8, 2020]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.

wired.com

Vogelstein, Fred. How the Android Ecosystem Threatens the iPhone. Wired. April 2011 [June 2, 2012]. （原始内容存档于2014-03-16）.
Finley, Klint. The Oracle-Google Case Will Decide The Future Of Software. Wired. May 23, 2016 [March 27, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2021-11-01）.

wsj.com

Kendall, Brent; Greene, Jay. Oracle Wins Court Ruling Against Google in Multibillion-Dollar Copyright Case. The Wall Street Journal. March 27, 2018 [March 27, 2018]. （原始内容存档于2022-01-09）.

zdnet.com

Josh Lowensohn. Jury clears Google of infringing on Oracle's patents. ZDNet. May 23, 2012 [2012-05-25]. （原始内容存档于2014-10-09）.