of Hippo, Augustine. Confessions. Book 7. ~397.请检查|date=中的日期值 (帮助)
books.google.com
Coogan, Michael. 6. Fire in Divine Loins: God's Wives in Myth and Metaphor. God and Sex. What the Bible Really Says 1st. New York, Boston: Twelve. Hachette Book Group. October 2010: 175 [2011-05-05]. ISBN 978-0-446-54525-9. humans are modeled on elohim, specifically in their sexual differences.
doi.org
McDaniel, June (2013), A Modern Hindu Monotheism: Indonesian Hindus as ‘People of the Book’. The Journal of Hindu Studies, Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/jhs/hit030
"G-d has no body, no genitalia, therefore the very idea that G-d is male or female is patently absurd. Although in the Talmudic part of the Torah and especially in Kabalah G-d is referred to under the name 'Sh'chinah' – which is feminine, this is only to accentuate the fact that all the creation and nature are actually in the receiving end in reference to the creator and as no part of the creation can perceive the creator outside of nature, it is adequate to refer to the divine presence in feminine form. We refer to G-d using masculine terms simply for convenience's sake, because Hebrew has no neutral gender; G-d is no more male than a table is." Judaism 101 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. "The fact that we always refer to God as 'He' is also not meant to imply that the concept of sex or gender applies to God." Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan, The Aryeh Kaplan Reader, Mesorah Publications (1983), p. 144
newadvent.org
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. Part 1, Question 3, Article 1. 1274 [2014-02-06]. （原始内容存档于2011-11-09）.
"G-d has no body, no genitalia, therefore the very idea that G-d is male or female is patently absurd. Although in the Talmudic part of the Torah and especially in Kabalah G-d is referred to under the name 'Sh'chinah' – which is feminine, this is only to accentuate the fact that all the creation and nature are actually in the receiving end in reference to the creator and as no part of the creation can perceive the creator outside of nature, it is adequate to refer to the divine presence in feminine form. We refer to G-d using masculine terms simply for convenience's sake, because Hebrew has no neutral gender; G-d is no more male than a table is." Judaism 101 （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）. "The fact that we always refer to God as 'He' is also not meant to imply that the concept of sex or gender applies to God." Rabbi Aryeh Kaplan, The Aryeh Kaplan Reader, Mesorah Publications (1983), p. 144
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. Part 1, Question 3, Article 1. 1274 [2014-02-06]. （原始内容存档于2011-11-09）.
