美國憲法第四修正案 (Chinese Wikipedia)
Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "美國憲法第四修正案" in Chinese language version.
refsWebsite
Global rank
Chinese rank
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
696th place
2,022nd place
405th place
987th place
105th place
269th place
3rd place
8th place
7,147th place
low place
446th place
1,043rd place
low place
low place
low place
4,168th place
6th place
4th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
24th place
29th place
179th place
275th place
low place
low place
332nd place
526th place
low place
low place
3,811th place
7,287th place
41st place
182nd place
low place
low place
5th place
12th place
5,138th place
214th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7,926th place
2,302nd place
3,128th place
7th place
31st place
1,192nd place
44th place
low place
low place
110.com
- 同意搜查若干法律问题研究. 北大法律信息网. 2009-07-27 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2011-04-07）.
amazon.com
- 林达. 第九封信. 历史深处的忧虑. 生活·读书·新知 三联书店. 2006-06-01. ASIN B00114NQ78. ISBN 9787108010186.
- Levy, Leonard Williams. Seasoned Judgments: The American Constitution, Rights, and History. Transaction Publishers. 1995-01-01 [2013-09-20]. ISBN 978-1560009252. （原始内容存档于2013-06-28）.
- John Adams. Kinvin Wroth; Hiller B. Zobel , 编. Legal Papers of John Adams 2 1st. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 1965-01-01 [2013-09-20]. ISBN 978-0674522503. （原始内容存档于2013-07-01）.
The writs of assistance did not become an issue until news of King George II's death arrived in Boston December 27, 1760.
- Beeman, Richard. Plain, Honest Men: The Making of the American Constitution. Random House Trade Paperbacks. 2010-02-09 [2013-09-17]. ISBN 978-0812976847. （原始内容存档于2013-07-04）.
- Rakove, Jack N. Original Meanings. Vintage. 1997-05-27 [2013-09-17]. ISBN 978-0679781219. （原始内容存档于2012-11-10）.
- Stewart, David O. The Summer of 1787. Simon and Schuster. 2007-12-10 [2013-09-17]. ASIN B006HUE33W. （原始内容存档于2022-05-05）.
- Maier, Pauline. Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787–1788. Simon and Schuster. 2010: 431 [2013-09-17]. ASIN B00493ULIK. （原始内容存档于2013-07-05）.
- Wood, Gordon S. Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815. Oxford University Press. 2009-01-01: 71–72 [2013-09-17]. ASIN B002YYAKQE. （原始内容存档于2013-07-03）.
- Labunski, Richard E. James Madison and the struggle for the Bill of Rights. Oxford University Press. 2008-06-20 [2013-09-17]. ISBN 978-0195341423. （原始内容存档于2013-07-03）.
archive.org
- 任东来; 陈伟; 白雪峰; Charles J. McClain; Laurene Wu McClain. 附录二 美利坚合众国宪法及修正案. 美国宪政历程：影响美国的25个司法大案. 中国法制出版社. 2004年1月. ISBN 7-80182-138-6.
archives.gov
- Bill of Rights Transcript. Archives.gov. [2013-09-17]. （原始内容存档于2013-07-25）.
- Bill of Rights. National Archives. [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2013-04-04）.
arkansasnews.com
- Moritz, Rob. Fed appeals court says refusal to identify no cause for arrest. Arkansas News Bureau. 2008-04-05 [2008-12-07]. （原始内容存档于2008-12-07）.
books.google.com
- Adamson, Barry. Freedom of Religion, the First Amendment, and the Supreme Court: How the Court Flunked History. Pelican Publishing. 2008: 93 [2013-09-19]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-05）.
- Graham, John Remington. Free, Sovereign, and Independent States: The Intended Meaning of the American Constitution. Foreword by Laura Tesh. 2009. Footnote 54, pp. 193-194 [2013-09-18]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-05）.
- Schroeder, Steve. The Lure: The True Story of How the Department of Justice Brought Down Two of the World's Most Dangerous Cyber Criminals （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, p. 127 (Cengage Learning 2012).
- Morgan, Candace. "Challenges and Issues Today （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）" in Intellectual Freedom Manual, pp. 41-42 (American Library Association, Office for Intellectual Freedom, 2010).
casebriefs.com
- Florida v. Royer. casebriefs.com. [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2012-01-15）.
cert.org.cn
- I. 无授权情况下，计算机的搜查与扣捕 (doc). 国家互联网应急中心: 1. [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2005-12-31）.
|chapter=被忽略 (帮助)
chinalawinfo.com
article.chinalawinfo.com
- 孙长永; 闫召华. 欧洲人权法院视野中的非法证据排除制度——以“格夫根诉德国案”为例. 北大法律信息网. 环球法律评论. 2011-02 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2021-02-09）.
journal.chinalawinfo.com
- 尼克斯案与“必然发现”例外. 北大法律信息网. 云南大学学报法学版. 2008-02 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2013-09-23）.
cornell.edu
law.cornell.edu
- United States v. Mendenhall (No. 78-1821) 446 U.S. 544, 100 S.Ct. 1870 (1980). Legal Information Institute. Cornell University Law School. [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2013-01-20）.
doi.org
- Davies, Thomas Y. Recovering the Original Fourth Amendment. Michigan Law Review. 1999, 98 (3): 547–750. JSTOR 1290314. doi:10.2307/1290314.
eff.org
- John D Bates. [redacted] (pdf). United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court: 73-74. 2011-10-03 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2013-08-24）.
fas.org
- Selya, Bruce M. United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review Case No. 08-01 In Re Directives [redacted text] Pursuant to Section 105B of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (PDF). U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (via the Federation of American Scientists). 2008-08-22 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2013-09-08）.
fbi.gov
www2.fbi.gov
- Holcomb, Jayme Walker. Obtaining Written Consent to Search (PDF). FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. 2003-03 [2013-09-22]. ISSN 0014-5688. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2010-04-10）.
gonzagalawreview.org
- Roots, Roger. The Originalist Case for the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule (PDF). Gonzaga Law Review: 20 (fn. 118). 2010-01-13 [2013-09-20]. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2013-01-15）.
highbeam.com
- Cuddihy, William. Fourth Amendment, Historical Origins of. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research
. 1986 [2013-09-20]. （原始内容存档于2013-09-21）. - Levy, Leonard W. Bill of Rights (United States). Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-20]. （原始内容存档于2013-09-21）.
- Landynski, Jacob W. Mapp v. Ohio. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2013-09-21）.
- Arenella, Peter. Fourth Amendment. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1992 [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2013-09-21）.
- Schwartz, Herman. Katz v. United States 389 U.S. 347 (1967). Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2013-09-21）.
- Landynski, Jacob W. Terry v. Ohio 392 U.S. 1 (1968) Sibron v. New York 392 U.S. 40 (1968). Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- Landynski, Jacob W. Automobile search. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- Landynski, Jacob W. Carroll v. United States 267 U.S. 132 (1925). Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- Landynski, Jacob W. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte 412 U.S. 218 (1973). Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- Crawford, Kimberly A. Consent searches: guidelines for officers. The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1996-08-01 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-11）.
- Landynski, Jacob W. Plain View Doctrine. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- Landynski, Jacob W. Exigent Circumstances Search. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- Hendrie, Edward. The motor vehicle exception. The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. – 通过HighBeam Research . 2005-08-01 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2015-09-24）.
- Upright, Scott J. Suspicionless border seizures of electronic files: the overextension of the border search exception to the Fourth Amendment. William and Mary Law Review. – 通过HighBeam Research . 2009-10-01 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-11）.
- Levy, Leonard W. Exclusionary Rule. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 2000-01-01 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2013-11-11）.
- Landynski, Jacob W. Weeks v. United States 232 U.S. 383 (1914). Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 2000-01-01 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- Landynski, Jacob W. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States 251 U.S. 385 (1920). Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- Mapp v. Ohio. Supreme Court Drama: Cases That Changed America. – 通过HighBeam Research . 2001 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- Levy, Leonard W. Nix v. Williams 467 U.S. 431 (1984). Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 2000-01-01 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- Hendrie, Edward M. The Inevitable Discovery Exception to the Exclusionary Rule. The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1997-09-01 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-06）.
jdjournal.com
- June, Daniel. Supreme Court Approves Use of DNA Swabbing in Serious Arrests. JDJournal. 2013-06-03 [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2021-12-08）.
jstor.org
- Davies, Thomas Y. Recovering the Original Fourth Amendment. Michigan Law Review. 1999, 98 (3): 547–750. JSTOR 1290314. doi:10.2307/1290314.
justia.com
supreme.justia.com
- United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109 (1984): "This Court has ... consistently construed this protection as proscribing only governmental action; it is wholly inapplicable to a search or seizure, even an unreasonable one, effected by a private individual not acting as an agent of the Government or with the participation or knowledge of any governmental official." (punctuation omitted).
- Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)
- Silverman v. United States, 365 U.S. 505, 511 (1961)
- Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
- Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979).
- United States v. Jones, No. 10-1259, 565 U.S. ___ (2012).
- Florida v. Jardines, No. 11-564, 569 U.S. ___ (2013).
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)
- Soldal v. Cook County, 506 U.S. 56, 61 (1992); 113 S.Ct. 538, 543 (1992) at 69: "the right against unreasonable seizures would be no less transgressed if the seizure of the house was undertaken to collect evidence, verify compliance with a housing regulation, effect an eviction by the police, or on a whim, for no reason at all."
- United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544 (1980)
- Virginia v. Moore, 553 U.S. 164 (2008)
- Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 (1979)
- United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976)
- Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz 496 U.S. 444 (1990)
- Illinois v. Lidster, 540 U.S. 419 (2004)
- City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000)
- Maryland v. Dyson, 527 U.S. 465 (1999)
- Flippo v. West Virginia, 528 U.S. 11 (1999); California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991)
- Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925)
- Dumbra v. United States, 268 U.S. 435 (1925)
- Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 162 (1925)
- Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983)
- Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973)
- United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 (1974)
- Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 (1990)
- Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971)
- Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57 (1924), "the special protection accorded by the Fourth Amendment to the people in their persons, houses, papers and effects, is not extended to the open fields."
- Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170 (1984)
- Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 179 (1984)
- United States v. Dunn, 480 U.S. 294 (1987), 480 U.S. 300 (1987), 480 U.S. 301 (1987)
- Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914)
- Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966)
- Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967)
- Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009)
- Trupiano v. United States, 334 U.S. 699 (1948)
- United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56 (1950)
- Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969)
- United States v. Flores-Montano, 541 U.S. 149 (2004), United States v. Montoya De Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531 (1985), and United States v. Ramsey, 431 U.S. 606 (1977)
- United States v. Flores-Montano, 541 U.S. 152 (2004), 541 U.S. 153 (2004)
- United States v. U.S. District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972)
- New Jersey v. T. L. O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985)
- Safford Unified School District v. Redding, 557 U.S. 364 (2009)
- Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006)
- Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 (1960)
- United States v. Leon, 251 U.S. 385 (1920)
- Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 (1939)
- Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949)
- United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338 (1974)
- United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 354 (1974)
- United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984)
- United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 926 (1984)
- Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431 (1984)
- Segura v. United States, 468 U.S. 796 (1984)
- Arizona v. Evans, 514 U.S. 1 (1995)
- Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009)
- Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. ___ (2011), 131 S.Ct. 2419 (2011)
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. Scott, 524 U.S. 357 (1998)
- United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433 (1976)
- INS v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032 (1984)
- United States v. Andreas, 463 U.S. 765 (1983)
- Griffin v. Wisconsin, 483 U.S. 868 (1987); United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112 (2001)
- Burdeau v. McDowell, 256 U.S. 465 (1921)
law.com
- Mark Sherman. Court says evidence is valid despite police error. The Associated Press. 2009-01-15 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2012-11-06）.
lawfareblog.com
- Vladeck, Steve. More on Clapper and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Exception. Lawfare Blog - Hard National Security Choices. 2012-05-23 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2013-05-14）.
- Vladeck, Steve. Why Clapper Matters: The Future of Programmatic Surveillance. Lawfare Blog - Hard National Security Choices. 2013-05-22 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2013-05-14）.
lmu.edu
digitalcommons.lmu.edu
- Sorosky, Schuyler. "United States v. Forrester: An Unwarranted Narrowing of the Fourth Amendment （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）", Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 41, p. 1121, 1126 (2008).
malegislature.gov
- Mass. Const. pt. 1, art. XIV.. [2013-09-27]. （原始内容存档于2019-05-21）.
nccu.edu.tw
nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw
- 公权力利用卫星科技对隐私权的影响 (PDF). 政大機構典藏: 60. [2013-09-22]. （原始内容 (pdf)存档于2021-02-09）.
|chapter=被忽略 (帮助)
northwestern.edu
scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu
- Goring, Darlene C. Fourth Amendment--Prison Cells: Is there a Right to Privacy. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology: 609. [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2017-03-05）.
nytimes.com
- California's Backfire on Crime. The New York Times. June 21, 1982 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2021-04-14）.
richmond.edu
jolt.richmond.edu
- Stinger, C. Maureen. Arizona v. Evans: Adapting the Exclusionary Rule to Advancing Computer Technology. The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology. 1996-02-13 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2013-06-03）.
scotusblog.com
- Denniston, Lyle. Opinion recap: Tight limit on police GPS use. SCOTUSblog. 2012-01-23 [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2013-05-22）.
- Moore, Kristina. Limits on warrantless car searches, compensation to terrorism victims, veterans benefit disputes. SCOTUSblog. 2009-04-21 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2013-05-22）.
- Denniston, Lyle. Analysis: Some expansion of student privacy. SCOTUSblog. 2009-06-25 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2013-05-22）.
- Denniston, Lyle. Opinion analysis: The fading "exclusionary rule". SCOTUSblog. 2011-06-25 [2013-09-23]. （原始内容存档于2013-05-22）.
stanford.edu
stlr.stanford.edu
- Freiwald, Susan. First Principles of Communications Privacy (PDF). Stanford Technlogy Law Review. 2007, (3). （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2013-06-17）.
supremecourt.gov
- Virginia v. Moore (pdf). Supreme Court Of The United States. [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2013-06-27）.
teachingamericanhistory.org
- Lloyd, Gordon. Introduction to the Constitutional Convention. Teaching American History. [2013-09-17]. （原始内容存档于2013-08-16）.
tmcnet.com
callcenterinfo.tmcnet.com
- U.S. Spy Bill Protecting Telecoms Heads To President Bush. TMC News. 2008-07-10 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2021-02-09）.
usatoday.com
usatoday30.usatoday.com
- Court allows search and seizure in Va. Case. USA Today. 2008-04-23 [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2013-01-20）.
volokh.com
- Kerr, Orin. The Origins of the “Search Incident to Arrest” Exception. The Volokh Conspiracy. 2010-12-14 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2013-06-24）.
web.archive.org
- Bill of Rights Transcript. Archives.gov. [2013-09-17]. （原始内容存档于2013-07-25）.
- Levy, Leonard Williams. Seasoned Judgments: The American Constitution, Rights, and History. Transaction Publishers. 1995-01-01 [2013-09-20]. ISBN 978-1560009252. （原始内容存档于2013-06-28）.
- John Adams. Kinvin Wroth; Hiller B. Zobel , 编. Legal Papers of John Adams 2 1st. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. 1965-01-01 [2013-09-20]. ISBN 978-0674522503. （原始内容存档于2013-07-01）.
The writs of assistance did not become an issue until news of King George II's death arrived in Boston December 27, 1760.
- 弗吉尼亚权利宣言. iCitizenForum. [2013-09-20]. （原始内容存档于2011-12-22）.
- Roots, Roger. The Originalist Case for the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule (PDF). Gonzaga Law Review: 20 (fn. 118). 2010-01-13 [2013-09-20]. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2013-01-15）.
- Mass. Const. pt. 1, art. XIV.. [2013-09-27]. （原始内容存档于2019-05-21）.
- 美国马塞诸塞州宪法翻译(草稿). 燕谈. [2013-09-20]. （原始内容存档于2013-09-21）.
- Cuddihy, William. Fourth Amendment, Historical Origins of. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-20]. （原始内容存档于2013-09-21）.
- Lloyd, Gordon. Introduction to the Constitutional Convention. Teaching American History. [2013-09-17]. （原始内容存档于2013-08-16）.
- Beeman, Richard. Plain, Honest Men: The Making of the American Constitution. Random House Trade Paperbacks. 2010-02-09 [2013-09-17]. ISBN 978-0812976847. （原始内容存档于2013-07-04）.
- Rakove, Jack N. Original Meanings. Vintage. 1997-05-27 [2013-09-17]. ISBN 978-0679781219. （原始内容存档于2012-11-10）.
- Stewart, David O. The Summer of 1787. Simon and Schuster. 2007-12-10 [2013-09-17]. ASIN B006HUE33W. （原始内容存档于2022-05-05）.
- Maier, Pauline. Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787–1788. Simon and Schuster. 2010: 431 [2013-09-17]. ASIN B00493ULIK. （原始内容存档于2013-07-05）.
- Adamson, Barry. Freedom of Religion, the First Amendment, and the Supreme Court: How the Court Flunked History. Pelican Publishing. 2008: 93 [2013-09-19]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-05）.
- Graham, John Remington. Free, Sovereign, and Independent States: The Intended Meaning of the American Constitution. Foreword by Laura Tesh. 2009. Footnote 54, pp. 193-194 [2013-09-18]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-05）.
- Wood, Gordon S. Empire of Liberty: A History of the Early Republic, 1789-1815. Oxford University Press. 2009-01-01: 71–72 [2013-09-17]. ASIN B002YYAKQE. （原始内容存档于2013-07-03）.
- Levy, Leonard W. Bill of Rights (United States). Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-20]. （原始内容存档于2013-09-21）.
- Labunski, Richard E. James Madison and the struggle for the Bill of Rights. Oxford University Press. 2008-06-20 [2013-09-17]. ISBN 978-0195341423. （原始内容存档于2013-07-03）.
- Landynski, Jacob W. Mapp v. Ohio. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2013-09-21）.
- Arenella, Peter. Fourth Amendment. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1992 [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2013-09-21）.
- Schwartz, Herman. Katz v. United States 389 U.S. 347 (1967). Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2013-09-21）.
- Schroeder, Steve. The Lure: The True Story of How the Department of Justice Brought Down Two of the World's Most Dangerous Cyber Criminals （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, p. 127 (Cengage Learning 2012).
- Morgan, Candace. "Challenges and Issues Today （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）" in Intellectual Freedom Manual, pp. 41-42 (American Library Association, Office for Intellectual Freedom, 2010).
- Freiwald, Susan. First Principles of Communications Privacy (PDF). Stanford Technlogy Law Review. 2007, (3). （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2013-06-17）.
- Sorosky, Schuyler. "United States v. Forrester: An Unwarranted Narrowing of the Fourth Amendment （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）", Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 41, p. 1121, 1126 (2008).
- Denniston, Lyle. Opinion recap: Tight limit on police GPS use. SCOTUSblog. 2012-01-23 [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2013-05-22）.
- Landynski, Jacob W. Terry v. Ohio 392 U.S. 1 (1968) Sibron v. New York 392 U.S. 40 (1968). Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- Florida v. Royer. casebriefs.com. [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2012-01-15）.
- United States v. Mendenhall (No. 78-1821) 446 U.S. 544, 100 S.Ct. 1870 (1980). Legal Information Institute. Cornell University Law School. [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2013-01-20）.
- Moritz, Rob. Fed appeals court says refusal to identify no cause for arrest. Arkansas News Bureau. 2008-04-05 [2008-12-07]. （原始内容存档于2008-12-07）.
- Virginia v. Moore (pdf). Supreme Court Of The United States. [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2013-06-27）.
- Court allows search and seizure in Va. Case. USA Today. 2008-04-23 [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2013-01-20）.
- June, Daniel. Supreme Court Approves Use of DNA Swabbing in Serious Arrests. JDJournal. 2013-06-03 [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2021-12-08）.
- Landynski, Jacob W. Automobile search. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- 陳瑞仁檢察官. 個別盤查與集體盤查. 台灣法律網. [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2021-02-09）.
- Landynski, Jacob W. Carroll v. United States 267 U.S. 132 (1925). Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- Holcomb, Jayme Walker. Obtaining Written Consent to Search (PDF). FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. 2003-03 [2013-09-22]. ISSN 0014-5688. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2010-04-10）.
- Landynski, Jacob W. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte 412 U.S. 218 (1973). Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- Crawford, Kimberly A. Consent searches: guidelines for officers. The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1996-08-01 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-11）.
- 同意搜查若干法律问题研究. 北大法律信息网. 2009-07-27 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2011-04-07）.
- Landynski, Jacob W. Plain View Doctrine. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- 公权力利用卫星科技对隐私权的影响 (PDF). 政大機構典藏: 60. [2013-09-22]. （原始内容 (pdf)存档于2021-02-09）.
|chapter=被忽略 (帮助) - I. 无授权情况下，计算机的搜查与扣捕 (doc). 国家互联网应急中心: 1. [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2005-12-31）.
|chapter=被忽略 (帮助) - Landynski, Jacob W. Exigent Circumstances Search. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- Hendrie, Edward. The motor vehicle exception. The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. – 通过HighBeam Research . 2005-08-01 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2015-09-24）.
- Moore, Kristina. Limits on warrantless car searches, compensation to terrorism victims, veterans benefit disputes. SCOTUSblog. 2009-04-21 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2013-05-22）.
- Kerr, Orin. The Origins of the “Search Incident to Arrest” Exception. The Volokh Conspiracy. 2010-12-14 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2013-06-24）.
- Upright, Scott J. Suspicionless border seizures of electronic files: the overextension of the border search exception to the Fourth Amendment. William and Mary Law Review. – 通过HighBeam Research . 2009-10-01 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-11）.
- Vladeck, Steve. More on Clapper and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Exception. Lawfare Blog - Hard National Security Choices. 2012-05-23 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2013-05-14）.
- Selya, Bruce M. United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review Case No. 08-01 In Re Directives [redacted text] Pursuant to Section 105B of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (PDF). U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (via the Federation of American Scientists). 2008-08-22 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2013-09-08）.
- Vladeck, Steve. Why Clapper Matters: The Future of Programmatic Surveillance. Lawfare Blog - Hard National Security Choices. 2013-05-22 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2013-05-14）.
- John D Bates. [redacted] (pdf). United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court: 73-74. 2011-10-03 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2013-08-24）.
- U.S. Spy Bill Protecting Telecoms Heads To President Bush. TMC News. 2008-07-10 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2021-02-09）.
- Denniston, Lyle. Analysis: Some expansion of student privacy. SCOTUSblog. 2009-06-25 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2013-05-22）.
- Goring, Darlene C. Fourth Amendment--Prison Cells: Is there a Right to Privacy. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology: 609. [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2017-03-05）.
- Levy, Leonard W. Exclusionary Rule. Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 2000-01-01 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2013-11-11）.
- Landynski, Jacob W. Weeks v. United States 232 U.S. 383 (1914). Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 2000-01-01 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- Landynski, Jacob W. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States 251 U.S. 385 (1920). Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1986 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- Mapp v. Ohio. Supreme Court Drama: Cases That Changed America. – 通过HighBeam Research . 2001 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- California's Backfire on Crime. The New York Times. June 21, 1982 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2021-04-14）.
- 孙长永; 闫召华. 欧洲人权法院视野中的非法证据排除制度——以“格夫根诉德国案”为例. 北大法律信息网. 环球法律评论. 2011-02 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2021-02-09）.
- Levy, Leonard W. Nix v. Williams 467 U.S. 431 (1984). Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. – 通过HighBeam Research . 2000-01-01 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-10）.
- 尼克斯案与“必然发现”例外. 北大法律信息网. 云南大学学报法学版. 2008-02 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2013-09-23）.
- Hendrie, Edward M. The Inevitable Discovery Exception to the Exclusionary Rule. The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. – 通过HighBeam Research . 1997-09-01 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2014-06-06）.
- Stinger, C. Maureen. Arizona v. Evans: Adapting the Exclusionary Rule to Advancing Computer Technology. The Richmond Journal of Law and Technology. 1996-02-13 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2013-06-03）.
- Mark Sherman. Court says evidence is valid despite police error. The Associated Press. 2009-01-15 [2013-09-22]. （原始内容存档于2012-11-06）.
- Denniston, Lyle. Opinion analysis: The fading "exclusionary rule". SCOTUSblog. 2011-06-25 [2013-09-23]. （原始内容存档于2013-05-22）.
webcitation.org
- Bill of Rights. National Archives. [2013-09-21]. （原始内容存档于2013-04-04）.
wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
- United States v. Jacobsen, 466 U.S. 109 (1984): "This Court has ... consistently construed this protection as proscribing only governmental action; it is wholly inapplicable to a search or seizure, even an unreasonable one, effected by a private individual not acting as an agent of the Government or with the participation or knowledge of any governmental official." (punctuation omitted).
- Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)
- Silverman v. United States, 365 U.S. 505, 511 (1961)
- Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
- Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979).
- United States v. Jones, No. 10-1259, 565 U.S. ___ (2012).
- Florida v. Jardines, No. 11-564, 569 U.S. ___ (2013).
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)
- Soldal v. Cook County, 506 U.S. 56, 61 (1992); 113 S.Ct. 538, 543 (1992) at 69: "the right against unreasonable seizures would be no less transgressed if the seizure of the house was undertaken to collect evidence, verify compliance with a housing regulation, effect an eviction by the police, or on a whim, for no reason at all."
- United States v. Mendenhall, 446 U.S. 544 (1980)
- Virginia v. Moore, 553 U.S. 164 (2008)
- Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648 (1979)
- United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976)
- Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz 496 U.S. 444 (1990)
- Illinois v. Lidster, 540 U.S. 419 (2004)
- City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000)
- Maryland v. Dyson, 527 U.S. 465 (1999)
- Flippo v. West Virginia, 528 U.S. 11 (1999); California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991)
- Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925)
- Dumbra v. United States, 268 U.S. 435 (1925)
- Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 162 (1925)
- Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983)
- Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973)
- United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 (1974)
- Illinois v. Rodriguez, 497 U.S. 177 (1990)
- Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 (1971)
- Hester v. United States, 265 U.S. 57 (1924), "the special protection accorded by the Fourth Amendment to the people in their persons, houses, papers and effects, is not extended to the open fields."
- Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170 (1984)
- Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 179 (1984)
- United States v. Dunn, 480 U.S. 294 (1987), 480 U.S. 300 (1987), 480 U.S. 301 (1987)
- Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914)
- Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966)
- Warden v. Hayden, 387 U.S. 294 (1967)
- Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009)
- Trupiano v. United States, 334 U.S. 699 (1948)
- United States v. Rabinowitz, 339 U.S. 56 (1950)
- Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969)
- United States v. Flores-Montano, 541 U.S. 149 (2004), United States v. Montoya De Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531 (1985), and United States v. Ramsey, 431 U.S. 606 (1977)
- United States v. Flores-Montano, 541 U.S. 152 (2004), 541 U.S. 153 (2004)
- United States v. U.S. District Court, 407 U.S. 297 (1972)
- New Jersey v. T. L. O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985)
- Safford Unified School District v. Redding, 557 U.S. 364 (2009)
- Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843 (2006)
- Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206 (1960)
- United States v. Leon, 251 U.S. 385 (1920)
- Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 (1939)
- Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949)
- United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338 (1974)
- United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 354 (1974)
- United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984)
- United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 926 (1984)
- Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431 (1984)
- Segura v. United States, 468 U.S. 796 (1984)
- Arizona v. Evans, 514 U.S. 1 (1995)
- Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009)
- Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. ___ (2011), 131 S.Ct. 2419 (2011)
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. Scott, 524 U.S. 357 (1998)
- United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433 (1976)
- INS v. Lopez-Mendoza, 468 U.S. 1032 (1984)
- United States v. Andreas, 463 U.S. 765 (1983)
- Griffin v. Wisconsin, 483 U.S. 868 (1987); United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112 (2001)
- Burdeau v. McDowell, 256 U.S. 465 (1921)
worldcat.org
- Holcomb, Jayme Walker. Obtaining Written Consent to Search (PDF). FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. 2003-03 [2013-09-22]. ISSN 0014-5688. （原始内容存档 (PDF)于2010-04-10）.
yantan.cc
- 美国马塞诸塞州宪法翻译(草稿). 燕谈. [2013-09-20]. （原始内容存档于2013-09-21）.