美帝國主義 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "美帝國主義" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Chinese rank
1st place
1st place
6th place
4th place
3rd place
8th place
2,088th place
3,020th place
low place
low place
274th place
320th place
11th place
332nd place
2nd place
23rd place
928th place
1,898th place
1,228th place
509th place
1,634th place
2,089th place
5th place
12th place
657th place
871st place
9,738th place
5,170th place
360th place
921st place
552nd place
1,135th place
low place
low place
782nd place
866th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,133rd place
321st place
5,363rd place
4,407th place
1,953rd place
1,684th place
low place
low place
6,760th place
5,207th place
5,283rd place
5,157th place
2,812th place
3,499th place
low place
low place
1,698th place
3,554th place
14th place
18th place
low place
low place
264th place
298th place
low place
7,691st place
70th place
342nd place
9,125th place
5,754th place
low place
444th place

angelfire.com

  • (原文:"the United States does indeed occupy a privileged position in Empire, but this privilege derives not from its similarities to the old European imperialist powers, but from its differences.")Negri, Antonio; Hardt, Michael. Empire. Harvard University Press. 2000: xiii–xiv [2007-03-29]. ISBN 978-0-674-00671-3. (原始内容存档于2021-04-12). 

archive.org

archive.today

  • (原文:"the United States has pursued imperial policies, especially toward weak countries in the periphery. But U.S. relations with Europe, Japan, China, and Russia cannot be described as imperial... the use or threat of force is unthinkable. Their economies are deeply interwoven... they form a political order built on bargains, diffuse reciprocity, and an array of intergovernmental institutions and ad hoc working relationships. This is not empire; it is a U.S.-led democratic political order that has no name or historical antecedent.")Ikenberry, G. John. Illusions of Empire: Defining the New American Order. Foreign Affairs. March–April 2004. (原始内容存档于2012-07-09). 

books.google.com

brookings.edu

cfr.org

commondreams.org

cssn.cn

ex.cssn.cn

dailykos.net

doi.org

foreignaffairs.org

fullaccess.foreignaffairs.org

  • (原文:"the United States has pursued imperial policies, especially toward weak countries in the periphery. But U.S. relations with Europe, Japan, China, and Russia cannot be described as imperial... the use or threat of force is unthinkable. Their economies are deeply interwoven... they form a political order built on bargains, diffuse reciprocity, and an array of intergovernmental institutions and ad hoc working relationships. This is not empire; it is a U.S.-led democratic political order that has no name or historical antecedent.")Ikenberry, G. John. Illusions of Empire: Defining the New American Order. Foreign Affairs. March–April 2004. (原始内容存档于2012-07-09). 

freeindiamedia.com

globalpolicy.org

holysmoke.org

jeetheer.com

leftbusinessobserver.com

lewrockwell.com

livejournal.com

loc.gov

webarchive.loc.gov

monthlyreview.org

  • (原文:"in Britain, empire was justified as a benevolent “white man’s burden.” And in the United States, empire does not even exist; “we” are merely protecting the causes of freedom, democracy, and justice worldwide.")Magdoff, Harry; John Bellamy Foster. After the Attack...The War on Terrorism. 當月評論. November 2001, 53 (6): 7 [2007-03-29]. (原始内容存档于2011-03-17). 
  • Foster, John Bellamy. The New Age of Imperialism. Monthly Review. July–August 2003 [2007-03-29]. (原始内容存档于2011-03-17). 

mtholyoke.edu

  • (原文:"the United States was least likely to intervene in those nations (such as Argentina and Costa Rica) where American investors held the biggest stakes. The longest occupations were undertaken in precisely those countries--Nicaragua, Haiti, the Dominican Republic--where the United States had the smallest economic stakes... Unlike the Dutch in the East Indies, the British in Malaya, or the French in Indochina, the Americans left virtually no legacy of economic exploitation.")Boot, Max. Neither New nor Nefarious: The Liberal Empire Strikes Back. Current History. November 2003, 102 (667). (原始内容存档于2008-05-15). 

nationalinterest.org

nationalreview.com

  • (原文:"If we really are imperial, we rule over a very funny sort of empire... The United States hasn't annexed anyone's soil since the Spanish-American War... Imperial powers order and subjects obey. But in our case, we offer the Turks strategic guarantees, political support — and money... Isolationism, parochialism, and self-absorption are far stronger in the American character than desire for overseas adventurism.")Hanson, Victor Davis. A Funny Sort of Empire. National Review. November 2002 [2007-03-29]. (原始内容存档于2008-05-11). 

oed.com

dictionary.oed.com

orlandodirectaction.us

play.google.com

reference.com

dictionary.reference.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

socialismconference.org

springer.com

link.springer.com

state.gov

usinfo.state.gov

  • (原文:"With the exception of the purchase of Alaska from Russia in 1867, American territory had remained fixed since 1848. In the 1890s a new spirit of expansion took hold... Yet Americans, who had themselves thrown off the shackles of empire, were not comfortable with administering one. In 1902 American troops left Cuba... The Philippines obtained... complete independence in 1946. Puerto Rico became a self-governing commonwealth... and Hawaii became a state in 1959.")ed. George Clack. A brief history of the United States. A Portrait of the USA. United States Information Agency. September 1997 [2006-03-20]. (原始内容存档于2007-12-01). 

theconversation.com

thenation.com

thirdworldtraveler.com

  • (原文:"fix the premises of discourse and interpretation, and the definition of what is newsworthy in the first place, and they explain the basis and operations of what amount to propaganda campaigns.")Chomsky, Noam. Manufacturing Consent. Pantheon Books. 1988. ISBN 978-0-375-71449-8. (原始内容存档于2007-03-14). 

ucla.edu

gseis.ucla.edu

  • (原文:"proceeding along a path to which no limit can be perceived.")Kellner, Douglas. American Exceptionalism. 2003-04-25 [2006-02-20]. (原始内容存档于2006-02-17). 

web.archive.org

wikiquote.org

en.wikiquote.org

worldcat.org

zmag.org