自然醫學 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "自然醫學" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Chinese rank
1st place
1st place
2nd place
23rd place
4th place
5th place
6th place
4th place
low place
low place
5th place
12th place
11th place
332nd place
3rd place
8th place
4,757th place
8,633rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,915th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
696th place
2,022nd place
8,771st place
9,752nd place
12th place
60th place
5,063rd place
low place
4,052nd place
159th place
115th place
346th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
279th place
951st place
1,916th place
1,764th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
209th place
356th place
low place
low place
441st place
1,550th place
462nd place
758th place
low place
low place
2,121st place
5,035th place
198th place
378th place
6,337th place
6,421st place
low place
low place
54th place
88th place
14th place
18th place
2,041st place
1,694th place
621st place
1,608th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
367th place
665th place
3,680th place
2,728th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,608th place
8,619th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
330th place
895th place
low place
low place
70th place
342nd place
3,828th place
3,368th place
5,396th place
low place
low place
low place
1,989th place
2,409th place
294th place
772nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
836th place
2,476th place
4,009th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
266th place
1,051st place
195th place
179th place
1,673rd place
52nd place
1,885th place
2,102nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
8,907th place
low place
7,916th place
low place
low place
low place
530th place
2,043rd place
low place
low place
2,917th place
4,919th place
3,914th place
169th place
302nd place
6th place
low place
low place
low place
2,101st place

aafp.org

admin.ch

admin.ch

sbfi.admin.ch

ajp.com.au

allinsonflour.co.uk

ama.com.au

ancb.net

archive.org

archive.today

azlibrary.gov

azmemory.azlibrary.gov

bcna.ca

bda.uk.com

books.google.com

  • Singh S, Ernst E. Naturopathy. Trick or Treatment?: Alternative Medicine on Trial (Transworld). 2009: 197– [2016-01-27]. ISBN 978-1-4090-8180-7. (原始内容存档于2016-02-06). many naturopaths are against mainstream medicine and advise their patients accordingly – for instance many are not in favour of vaccination. 
  • Dyde, Sean. Chapter 5: Life and the Mind in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Normandin, Sebastian; Wolfe, T. Charles (编). Vitalism and the Scientific Image in Post-Enlightenment Life Science, 1800–2010. Springer. 2013: 104. ISBN 978-94-007-2445-7. In medicine and biology, vitalism has been seen as a philosophically-charged term, a pseudoscientific gloss that corrupted scientific practice … 
  • Pizzorno JE. Naturopathy: Practice Issues. Clark CC, Gordon RJ (编). Encyclopedia of Complementary Health Practice. Springer Publishing. 1999: 57–59 [2013-09-03]. ISBN 978-0-8261-1722-9. (原始内容存档于2018-04-13). 
  • Cassileth BR. Chapter 42: Craniosacral Therapy. The Complete Guide to Complementary Therapies in Cancer Care: Essential Information for Patients, Survivors and Health Professionals. World Scientific. 2011: 247–250. ISBN 978-981-4335-16-4. 
  • Cordón, LA, Rolfing, Popular Psychology: An Encyclopedia, Greenwood Publishing Group: 217–18, 2005, ISBN 978-0-313-32457-4 : "The idea of vital energy... does not correspond to known facts of how the human body operates. Similarly, there is absolutely no support in psychological literature for the idea of traumatic experiences being repressed in the form of muscle memory, and so the basic ideas of Rolfing certainly fall into the category of pseudoscience."

cancer.org

cand.ca

cbc.ca

centerforinquiry.org

chop.edu

cnme.org

devbio.com

7e.devbio.com

dm-note.com

doi.org