西奧多·康托爾 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "西奧多·康托爾" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Chinese rank

3^rd place

8^th place

6^th place

4^th place

6,925^th place

low place

1^st place

archive.org

Balfour, E. The Cyclopædia of India and of Eastern and Southern Asia: Commercial, Industrial and Scientific, Products of the Mineral, Vegetable, and Animal Kingdoms, Useful Arts and Manufactures. B. Quartitch. 1885: 758 [10 June 2019]. The real fighting fish appears to be a variety produced by artificial means, like the varieties of the golden carp of China, and Dr. Cantor named it Macropodus pugnax. When the fish is in estate of quiet, with the fins at rest, its dull colours ... |issue=被忽略 (帮助)

Bretschneider, E. History of European Botanical Discoveries in China. Bod Third Party Titles. 2011: 359 [10 June 2019]. ISBN 978-3-86347-165-1.
Beolens, B.; Watkins, M.; Grayson, M. The Eponym Dictionary of Mammals. The Eponym Dictionary of Mammals. Johns Hopkins University Press. 2009: 71 [7 June 2019]. ISBN 978-0-8018-9533-3.
San Francisco Aquarium Society. Aquarium Journal. San Francisco Aquarium Society. 1954: 30 [10 June 2019] （拉丁语）. In his book, Malayan Fishes, Cantor describes and illustrates the imported Siamese fighting fishes he had seen in ... Anyway, he named a new species, called Macropodus pugnax Cantor, based on his Penang specimens, and said the ... |issue=被忽略 (帮助)
Raffles Museum and Library; National Museum (Singapore). Bulletin of the Raffles Museum. Bulletin of the Raffles Museum. 1956: 183 [10 June 2019]. His descriptions constitute not only the first published records of Malayan fresh-water fishes but also include a new species, Macropodus pugnax Cantor. Cantor's collections, which consist partly of skins and partly of spirit specimens, were ... |issue=被忽略 (帮助)
Freshwater and Marine Aquarium. R/C Modeler Corporation. 2003: 50 [10 June 2019]. The fighting Betta appeared as early as Cantor's 1 849 Catalog of Malayan Fishes where it was recognized (with illustrations) as different but a variant from the Macropodus pugnax with which it was grouped. |issue=被忽略 (帮助)