言論自由 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "言論自由" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Chinese rank

78web.archive.org

1^st place

13books.google.com

3^rd place

8^th place

5google.com

163^rd place

188^th place

5smu.edu

6,719^th place

9,083^rd place

4stanford.edu

179^th place

275^th place

4archive.org

6^th place

4^th place

3guardian.co.uk

197^th place

183^rd place

3google.com.hk

3,651^st place

135^th place

3wikipedia.org

low place

2freedomforum.org

low place

2ait.org.tw

low place

1,531^st place

2archive.today

14^th place

18^th place

2cbc.ca

115^th place

346^th place

2oup.com

485^th place

489^th place

2bartleby.com

1,295^th place

1,584^th place

2theguardian.com

12^th place

60^th place

2loc.gov

70^th place

342^nd place

1bbc.com

20^th place

41^st place

1pansci.asia

low place

1,095^th place

1thenewslens.com

4,052^nd place

159^th place

1ohchr.org

1,210^th place

1,323^rd place

1allbusiness.com

2,914^th place

5,556^th place

1phiphicake.blogspot.com

low place

1un.org

97^th place

122^nd place

1hrcr.org

low place

1whitehouse.gov

1,241^st place

1,171^st place

1brainyquote.com

low place

1izquotes.com

low place

1udn.com

392^nd place

10^th place

1worldbank.org

231^st place

288^th place

1appledaily.com.tw

946^th place

36^th place

1npf.org.tw

low place

1,085^th place

1nellco.org

low place

1yale.edu

565^th place

664^th place

1northwestern.edu

2,302^nd place

3,128^th place

1utm.edu

1,379^th place

1,439^th place

1upi.com

290^th place

1,067^th place

1wsj.com

79^th place

143^rd place

1foxnews.com

152^nd place

440^th place

1dw.com

204^th place

124^th place

1americanbar.org

7,096^th place

low place

1google.co.kr

9,121^st place

3,593^rd place

1badmouth.net

low place

1freenetproject.org

low place

1thestandard.com

low place

1internetfreedom.org

low place

1rsf.org

2,397^th place

1,295^th place

1hrw.org

729^th place

973^rd place

1chinaeclaw.com

low place

1nytimes.com

7^th place

31^st place

1knightcolumbia.org

low place

1newyorker.com

146^th place

656^th place

1eff.org

3,285^th place

3,902^nd place

1harvard.edu

18^th place

57^th place

1interpretermag.com

low place

1telegraph.co.uk

30^th place

111^th place

1spectator.co.uk

1,811^th place

6,538^th place

ait.org.tw

民主的原則 Principles of Democracy - 言論自由. www.ait.org.tw. [2017-03-03]. （原始内容存档于2016-10-21）.
民主的原則，言論自由（页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆），美國國務院國際信息局出版物

allbusiness.com

Using Courts to Enforce the Free Speech Provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights – Australia & Oceania – Australia & New Zealand from All Business.... [2013-02-07]. （原始内容存档于2009-05-19）.

americanbar.org

"美国律师协会公共教育部：学生：辩论“强大的宪法对立面”：仇恨言论辩论". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the original on 13 October 2016. Retrieved 12 October 2016.

appledaily.com.tw

陳郁琦. 焦點評論：仇恨同志不是言論自由. 蘋果日報. [2017-03-03]. （原始内容存档于2017-10-20）（中文（臺灣））.

archive.org

Boller，Jr., Paul F.; George，John. They Never Said It: A Book of Fake Quotes，Misquotes，and Misleading Attributions. New York: Oxford University Press. 1989: 124–126. ISBN 0-19-505541-1.
Deibert, Robert; Palfrey, John G; Rohozinski, Rafal; Zittrain, Jonathan (2008). 访问被拒：全球互联网过滤的实践与政策. MIT Press. ISBN 978-0262541961.
de Sola Pool, Ithiel (1983). 自由的技术。 Harvard University Press. p. 14. ISBN 978-0-674-87233-2.
de Sola Pool, Ithiel (1983). 自由的技术。 Harvard University Press. p. 15. ISBN 978-0-674-87233-2.

archive.today

【朱家安不要偷懶了】哲學家：言論自由沒有禁止別人批評你. Readmoo閱讀最前線. 2017-03-03 [2017-03-03]. 原始内容存档于2017-03-03.
Pauli, Darren (14 January 2008). "业界拒绝澳大利亚政府的网络审查措施". The Industry Standard. Archived from the originalon 12 September 2012.

badmouth.net

Marcotte, John (1 May 2007). "free speech flag". Badmouth. Archived from the original on 4 May 2007. Retrieved 27 October 2017.

bartleby.com

Mill, John Stuart (1859). "思想与讨论的自由". On Liberty(4th ed.). London: Longman, Roberts & Green (published 1869). para. 19. Archived from the original on 14 November 2019. Retrieved 8 September2016. 对于所有除那些财务状况使其无需依赖他人好意的人之外的个体而言，在这一问题上，舆论的效力如同法律；人们被剥夺谋生手段，与被监禁无异。
Mill, John Stuart (1859). "Introductory". On Liberty (4th ed.). London: Longman, Roberts & Green (published 1869). para. 5. Archived from the original on 14 November 2019. Retrieved 8 September2016. 社会能够并确实执行自己的命令……它施加的社会暴政比许多形式的政治压迫更具威胁性，因为尽管通常不会伴随极端的惩罚，但它留下的逃避途径更少，深入生活的方方面面，甚至奴役人的灵魂。因此，仅仅防范政府的压迫是不够的……

bbc.com

存档副本. [2023-07-23]. （原始内容存档于2023-04-01）.

books.google.com

Nigel Warburton. Free Speech: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. 2009-04-22 [2013-02-08]. ISBN 978-0-19-923235-2. （原始内容存档于2015-03-20）.
David P. Forsythe. Encyclopedia of Human Rights. Oxford University Press. 2009-08-11: 4– [2013-02-08]. ISBN 978-0-19-533402-9. （原始内容存档于2015-03-20）.
Adamson, Barry. Freedom of Religion, the First Amendment, and the Supreme Court: How the Court Flunked History. Pelican Publishing. 2008: 93 [2013-02-09]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-05）.
Castillo, Anastasia. Banned Books: Censorship in Eighteenth-Century England. GRIN Verlag. 2010: 12. ISBN 978-3-640-71688-3.
Warburton, Nigel. Free Speech: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford. 2009: 24–29 [2013-02-07]. ISBN 978-0-19-923235-2. （原始内容存档于2015-03-20）.
Marlin, Randal. Propaganda and the Ethics of Persuasion. Broadview Press. 2002: 226–227. ISBN 1-55111-376-7. ISBN 978-1551113760.
Brett, Sebastian. Limits to tolerance: freedom of expression and the public debate in Chile. Human Rights Watch. 1999: xxv. ISBN 978-1-56432-192-3.
Klang, Mathias; Murray, Andrew (2005). 数字时代的人权。 Routledge. p. 1. ISBN 978-1-904385-31-8. Archived from the original on 15 August 2021. Retrieved 11 November2020.
Guibault, Lucy; Hugenholtz, Bernt (2006). 公共领域的未来：识别信息法中的共享资源。Kluwer Law International. p. 1. ISBN 9789041124357. Archived from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 25 November 2018.
MacQueen, Hector L; Waelde, Charlotte; Laurie, Graeme T (2007). 当代知识产权：法律与政策。 Oxford University Press. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-19-926339-4. Archived from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
Castillo, Anastasia (2010). 禁书：18世纪英国的审查制度。GRIN Verlag. p. 12. ISBN 978-3-640-71688-3. Archived from the original on 15 August 2021. Retrieved 11 November 2020.
Sanders, Karen (2003). 伦理与新闻. Sage. p. 66. ISBN 978-0-7619-6967-9. Archived from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 25 November 2018.
Sanders, Karen (2003). 伦理与新闻. Sage. p. 66. ISBN 978-0-7619-6967-9. Archived from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 25 November 2018.

brainyquote.com

Evelyn Beatrice Hall Quotes （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆），Brainyquote.com

cbc.ca

Church members enter Canada, aiming to picket bus victim's funeral. [2013-02-08]. （原始内容存档于2008-08-12）.
Church members enter Canada, aiming to picket bus victim's funeral Archived 15 February 2022 at the Wayback Machine, CBC News, 8 August 2008.

chinaeclaw.com

"关于互联网的中国法律和法规". Archived from the original on 20 February 2012.

dw.com

Chase Winter (26 October 2018). "欧洲法院裁定，称先知穆罕默德为恋童癖者不属于言论自由范畴。". Deutsche Welle. Archived from the original on 27 October 2018. Retrieved 27 October 2018. 欧洲人权法院周四裁定，奥地利一名女子因称先知穆罕默德为恋童癖者而被定罪并未侵犯她的言论自由。

eff.org

Gebhart, Jillian C. York, David Greene, and Gennie (1 May 2019). "审查不能成为应对网络虚假信息的唯一办法". Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved 3 May 2022.

foxnews.com

Lucia I. Suarez Sang (26 October 2018). "欧洲法院裁定，诽谤穆罕默德不属于言论自由的范畴。". Fox News. Archived from the original on 26 October 2018. Retrieved 27 October 2018. 欧洲人权法院周四裁定，言论自由不延伸至包括诽谤伊斯兰教先知的内容。

freedomforum.org

Limits of Freedom of Speech （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）Freedom Forum
When May Speech Be Limited?. [2013-02-08]. （原始内容存档于2006-06-02）.

freenetproject.org

Clarke, Ian; Miller, Scott G.; Hong, Theodore W.; Sandberg, Oskar; Wiley, Brandon (2002). "通过Freenet保护网络上的言论自由"(PDF). Internet Computing. IEEE. pp. 40–49. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 October 2017. Retrieved 15 October 2008.

google.co.kr

books.google.co.kr

Emanuel, Steven L. (25 March 2020). Emanuel Crunchtime for Constitutional Law. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business. pp. 153–154. ISBN 978-1-5438-0727-1. Archived from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 18 September 2021.

google.com

de Sola Pool, Ithiel. Technologies of freedom. Harvard University Press. 1983: 14 [2013-02-07]. ISBN 978-0-674-87233-2. （原始内容存档于2015-02-03）.
MacQueen, Hector L; Charlotte Waelde and Graeme T Laurie. Contemporary Intellectual Property: Law and Policy. Oxford University Press. 2007: 34 [2013-02-07]. ISBN 978-0-19-926339-4. （原始内容存档于2012-01-05）.
Sanders, Karen. Ethics & Journalism. Sage. 2003: 66 [2013-02-07]. ISBN 978-0-7619-6967-9. （原始内容存档于2015-01-25）.
de Sola Pool, Ithiel. Technologies of freedom. Harvard University Press. 1983: 15 [2013-02-07]. ISBN 978-0-674-87233-2. （原始内容存档于2012-05-23）.
Sanders, Karen. Ethics & Journalism. Sage. 2003: 67 [2013-02-07]. ISBN 978-0-7619-6967-9. （原始内容存档于2015-01-25）.

google.com.hk

books.google.com.hk

Raaflaub, Kurt; Ober, Josiah; Wallace, Robert. Origins of democracy in ancient Greece. University of California Press. 2007: 65 [2013-02-07]. ISBN 0-520-24562-8. （原始内容存档于2021-05-15）.
Kenneth Ira Kersch. Freedom of Speech: Rights and Liberties Under the Law. ABC-CLIO. 2003 [2013-02-07]. ISBN 9781576076002. （原始内容存档于2021-05-15）.
Wojciech Sadurski. Freedom of Speech and Its Limits. Springer. 2002 [2013-02-07]. ISBN 9781402002816. （原始内容存档于2021-05-15）.

guardian.co.uk

"Timeline: a history of free speech （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）" The Guardian. February 5, 2006.
Smith, David. Timeline: a history of free speech. The Guardian (London). 2006-02-05 [2010-05-02]. （原始内容存档于2013-05-24）.
"Timeline: a history of free speech （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）" The Guardian. February 5, 2006.

harvard.edu

cyber.harvard.edu

"哪些事物规范言论" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 November 2020. Retrieved 12 January 2021.

hrcr.org

HRCR.org. [2013-02-08]. （原始内容存档于2013-06-06）.

hrw.org

"II. 中国的审查机制运作方式：简要概述". Human Rights Watch. Archived from the original on 22 April 2015. Retrieved 30 August 2006.

internetfreedom.org

"我们的使命". 全球互联网自由联盟. Archived from the original on 27 September 2017.

interpretermag.com

"虚幻的威胁：克里姆林宫如何将信息、文化和金钱武器化". The Interpreter. 22 November 2014. Archived from the original on 12 January 2021. Retrieved 12 January2021.

izquotes.com

Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆），1992

knightcolumbia.org

Wu, Tim (1 September 2017). "第一修正案已过时了吗？". 哥伦比亚大学奈特第一修正案研究所。 Archived from the original on 21 September 2020. Retrieved 23 September 2020.

loc.gov

memory.loc.gov

Journal of the House of Representatives of the United States, 1789–1793: 85, 1789-08-21 [2021-05-17], （原始内容存档于2019-05-02）

loc.gov

Laws Criminalizing Apostasy Archived 11 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine Library of Congress (2014)

nellco.org

lsr.nellco.org

The Architecture of First Amendment Free Speech （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）NELLCO Legal Scholarship Repository

newyorker.com

Yaffa, Joshua (7 September 2020). "俄罗斯的干预有我们想象的那么危险吗？". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on 14 February 2021. Retrieved 21 September 2020.

northwestern.edu

scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu

Harcourt. "Conclusion". The Collapse of the Harm Principle. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 7 September 2015.

npf.org.tw

http://www.npf.org.tw/post/2/8400 網路言論自由界限（页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）國家政策研究基金會

nytimes.com

Nereim, Vivian (21 February 2023). "'所有人的不公正平等”：沙特阿拉伯扩大对异见的打压". The New York Times. Retrieved 21 February 2023.

ohchr.org

www2.ohchr.org

Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by UN General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, entry into force 23 March 1976

oup.com

academic.oup.com

Wragg, Paul (2015). "工作中的言论自由权：解决实践与自由主义原则之间的差异". Industrial Law Journal. 44 (1). Oxford University Press: 11. doi:10.1093/indlaw/dwu031. 可以将密尔的“暴政多数”与因道德原因而解雇表达出异见的员工的雇主进行比较。在这种情况下对雇主行为的保护，唤起了密尔对于国家容忍强制手段以确保人们遵循正统道德观点、并消除异端思想的担忧。
Marshall, Paul; Shea, Nina (1 December 2011). 被噤声：叛教与亵渎法如何扼杀全球自由。Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812264.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-981226-4.

pansci.asia

存档副本. [2023-07-23]. （原始内容存档于2023-07-23）.

phiphicake.blogspot.com

哲學哲學雞蛋糕: 言論自由和管制言論的自由. 哲學哲學雞蛋糕. 2013-04-17 [2017-03-03]. （原始内容存档于2021-05-15）.

rsf.org

march12.rsf.org

"互联网公敌" (PDF). 巴黎：无国界记者组织. March 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 March 2011.

smu.edu

13. John Milton（1608–1674）Areopagitica; A Speech of Mr. John Milton for the Liberty of Unlicenc’d Printing，to the Parlament of England. London: [s.n.]，1644. Early Censorship in England，“Heresy and Error”: The Ecclesiastical Censorship of Books，1400-1800. Bridwell Library. Exhibition September 20 – December 17，2000 [2011-06-26]. （原始内容存档于2012-09-05）. 请检查|date=中的日期值 (帮助)
"6.亨里克·范·库伊克，鲁尔蒙德主教（1546–1609）。《七篇颂词》。鲁汶：菲利普·赞格里乌斯，1596年。". Ecclesiastical Censorship, "Heresy and Error": The Ecclesiastical Censorship of Books, 1400–1800. Bridwell Library. 17 December 2000. Archived from the original on 8 September 2012. Retrieved 26 June 2011.
"13. John Milton (1608–1674). Areopagitica; 约翰·弥尔顿先生关于未经许可的出版自由致英国议会的演讲。London: [s.n.], 1644". 英国早期的审查制度，“异端与谬误”：教会对书籍的审查, 1400–1800. Bridwell Library. 17 December 2000. Archived from the original on 5 September 2012. Retrieved 26 June 2011.
"删改书目索引". "Heresy and Error": The Ecclesiastical Censorship of Books, 1400–1800. Bridwell Library. 17 December 2000. Archived from the original on 8 September 2012. Retrieved 26 June 2011.
"52. 雅各布斯·德·沃拉吉尼（约1230–1298）。《圣徒的黄金传说》。马德里：胡安·加西亚，1688年。". The Index of Expurgations, "Heresy and Error": The Ecclesiastical Censorship of Books, 1400–1800. Bridwell Library. 17 December 2000. Archived from the original on 8 September 2012. Retrieved 26 June 2011.

spectator.co.uk

blogs.spectator.co.uk

Nelson, Fraser (24 November 2012). "戴维·布伦基特警告议员不要对新闻媒体进行监管。". The Spectator. Archived from the original on 19 October 2017. Retrieved 9 May 2018. 杰里米·帕克斯曼曾著名地表示，他之所以进入新闻业，是因为他听说记者与政客之间的关系就像狗与路灯的关系。现在有几位议员希望用一个原则来取代这种关系，即由议员定义新闻运作的参数，并“共同合作”。这是一个必须抵制的可怕想法。上一次发生这种情况是在1643年的《出版许可令》下，该法令在1688年光荣革命后引入的《权利法案》之后，于1695年被允许失效。正如我昨天在《每日电讯报》专栏中写的那样，让人惊讶的是，竟有如此多的保守党议员想要把时钟倒拨300年。

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

van Mill, David, "Freedom of Speech" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta（ed.）
Freedom of Speech. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2008-04-17 [2013-02-04]. （原始内容存档于2019-03-23）.
"Freedom of Speech". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 17 April 2008. Archived from the original on 23 March 2019. Retrieved 29 May 2011.
"Freedom of Speech". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 17 April 2008. Archived from the original on 23 March 2019. Retrieved 29 May 2011.

telegraph.co.uk

Rayner, Gordon (7 October 2011). "勒维森调查：英国的新闻自由是世界的典范，”编辑在调查中表示。". The Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group Limited. Archived from the original on 7 October 2011. Retrieved 9 May 2018. 鲁斯布里杰先生说：“当人们谈论给记者或报纸颁发许可时，本能的反应应该是让他们参考历史。阅读关于1695年英国如何废除新闻出版许可的资料。

theguardian.com

Glanville, Jo (17 November 2008). "The big business of net censorship". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 28 January 2013. Retrieved 26 March 2014.
Watts, Jonathan (20 February 2006). "文字之战". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 11 December 2016.

thenewslens.com

存档副本. [2023-07-23]. （原始内容存档于2023-07-23）.

thestandard.com

Pauli, Darren (14 January 2008). "业界拒绝澳大利亚政府的网络审查措施". The Industry Standard. Archived from the originalon 12 September 2012.

udn.com

opinion.udn.com

溫朗東. 為什麼公共對話經常變成彼此對罵？（內文不附解答，不喜勿入）. 鳴人堂. [2017-03-03]. （原始内容存档于2021-05-15）（中文（臺灣））.

un.org

Universal Declaration of Human Rights. [2013-02-07]. （原始内容存档于2011-02-27）.

upi.com

"Italian Parliament introduces holocaust denial legislation". UPI. Archived from the original on 15 March 2020. Retrieved 28 June 2019.

utm.edu

iep.utm.edu

Kenneth Einar Himma. "Philosophy of Law". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 14 September 2008. Retrieved 13 March 2014.

web.archive.org

Nigel Warburton. Free Speech: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. 2009-04-22 [2013-02-08]. ISBN 978-0-19-923235-2. （原始内容存档于2015-03-20）.
van Mill, David, "Freedom of Speech" （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta（ed.）
David P. Forsythe. Encyclopedia of Human Rights. Oxford University Press. 2009-08-11: 4– [2013-02-08]. ISBN 978-0-19-533402-9. （原始内容存档于2015-03-20）.
Limits of Freedom of Speech （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）Freedom Forum
存档副本. [2023-07-23]. （原始内容存档于2023-04-01）.
存档副本. [2023-07-23]. （原始内容存档于2023-07-23）.
存档副本. [2023-07-23]. （原始内容存档于2023-07-23）.
民主的原則 Principles of Democracy - 言論自由. www.ait.org.tw. [2017-03-03]. （原始内容存档于2016-10-21）.
Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by UN General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, entry into force 23 March 1976
Using Courts to Enforce the Free Speech Provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights – Australia & Oceania – Australia & New Zealand from All Business.... [2013-02-07]. （原始内容存档于2009-05-19）.
哲學哲學雞蛋糕: 言論自由和管制言論的自由. 哲學哲學雞蛋糕. 2013-04-17 [2017-03-03]. （原始内容存档于2021-05-15）.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights. [2013-02-07]. （原始内容存档于2011-02-27）.
"Timeline: a history of free speech （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）" The Guardian. February 5, 2006.
Raaflaub, Kurt; Ober, Josiah; Wallace, Robert. Origins of democracy in ancient Greece. University of California Press. 2007: 65 [2013-02-07]. ISBN 0-520-24562-8. （原始内容存档于2021-05-15）.
Smith, David. Timeline: a history of free speech. The Guardian (London). 2006-02-05 [2010-05-02]. （原始内容存档于2013-05-24）.
"Timeline: a history of free speech （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）" The Guardian. February 5, 2006.
HRCR.org. [2013-02-08]. （原始内容存档于2013-06-06）.
Adamson, Barry. Freedom of Religion, the First Amendment, and the Supreme Court: How the Court Flunked History. Pelican Publishing. 2008: 93 [2013-02-09]. （原始内容存档于2021-03-05）.
Journal of the House of Representatives of the United States, 1789–1793: 85, 1789-08-21 [2021-05-17], （原始内容存档于2019-05-02）
The Constitution （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）,The White House
de Sola Pool, Ithiel. Technologies of freedom. Harvard University Press. 1983: 14 [2013-02-07]. ISBN 978-0-674-87233-2. （原始内容存档于2015-02-03）.
MacQueen, Hector L; Charlotte Waelde and Graeme T Laurie. Contemporary Intellectual Property: Law and Policy. Oxford University Press. 2007: 34 [2013-02-07]. ISBN 978-0-19-926339-4. （原始内容存档于2012-01-05）.
Sanders, Karen. Ethics & Journalism. Sage. 2003: 66 [2013-02-07]. ISBN 978-0-7619-6967-9. （原始内容存档于2015-01-25）.
13. John Milton（1608–1674）Areopagitica; A Speech of Mr. John Milton for the Liberty of Unlicenc’d Printing，to the Parlament of England. London: [s.n.]，1644. Early Censorship in England，“Heresy and Error”: The Ecclesiastical Censorship of Books，1400-1800. Bridwell Library. Exhibition September 20 – December 17，2000 [2011-06-26]. （原始内容存档于2012-09-05）. 请检查|date=中的日期值 (帮助)
de Sola Pool, Ithiel. Technologies of freedom. Harvard University Press. 1983: 15 [2013-02-07]. ISBN 978-0-674-87233-2. （原始内容存档于2012-05-23）.
Sanders, Karen. Ethics & Journalism. Sage. 2003: 67 [2013-02-07]. ISBN 978-0-7619-6967-9. （原始内容存档于2015-01-25）.
Warburton, Nigel. Free Speech: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford. 2009: 24–29 [2013-02-07]. ISBN 978-0-19-923235-2. （原始内容存档于2015-03-20）.
Evelyn Beatrice Hall Quotes （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆），Brainyquote.com
Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆），1992
溫朗東. 為什麼公共對話經常變成彼此對罵？（內文不附解答，不喜勿入）. 鳴人堂. [2017-03-03]. （原始内容存档于2021-05-15）（中文（臺灣））.
民主的原則，言論自由（页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆），美國國務院國際信息局出版物
A Decade of Measuring the Quality of Governance (PDF). [2008-04-08]. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2008-04-08）.
Church members enter Canada, aiming to picket bus victim's funeral. [2013-02-08]. （原始内容存档于2008-08-12）.
When May Speech Be Limited?. [2013-02-08]. （原始内容存档于2006-06-02）.
Freedom of Speech. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2008-04-17 [2013-02-04]. （原始内容存档于2019-03-23）.
陳郁琦. 焦點評論：仇恨同志不是言論自由. 蘋果日報. [2017-03-03]. （原始内容存档于2017-10-20）（中文（臺灣））.
Kenneth Ira Kersch. Freedom of Speech: Rights and Liberties Under the Law. ABC-CLIO. 2003 [2013-02-07]. ISBN 9781576076002. （原始内容存档于2021-05-15）.
Wojciech Sadurski. Freedom of Speech and Its Limits. Springer. 2002 [2013-02-07]. ISBN 9781402002816. （原始内容存档于2021-05-15）.
http://www.npf.org.tw/post/2/8400 網路言論自由界限（页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）國家政策研究基金會
The Architecture of First Amendment Free Speech （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）NELLCO Legal Scholarship Repository
Church members enter Canada, aiming to picket bus victim's funeral Archived 15 February 2022 at the Wayback Machine, CBC News, 8 August 2008.
"Freedom of Speech". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 17 April 2008. Archived from the original on 23 March 2019. Retrieved 29 May 2011.
Ten Cate, Irene M. (2010). "言论、真理与自由：约翰·斯图尔特·密尔与奥利弗·温德尔·霍姆斯大法官的言论自由辩护探究". Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities. 22 (1). Article 2. Archived from the original on 24 September 2016. Retrieved 8 September 2016. 《论自由》中支持言论自由的核心论点是，为了最大化社会能够获得的利益，必须始终致力于抑制主导群体要求他人服从的自然倾向。
Mill, John Stuart (1859). "思想与讨论的自由". On Liberty(4th ed.). London: Longman, Roberts & Green (published 1869). para. 19. Archived from the original on 14 November 2019. Retrieved 8 September2016. 对于所有除那些财务状况使其无需依赖他人好意的人之外的个体而言，在这一问题上，舆论的效力如同法律；人们被剥夺谋生手段，与被监禁无异。
Mill, John Stuart (1859). "Introductory". On Liberty (4th ed.). London: Longman, Roberts & Green (published 1869). para. 5. Archived from the original on 14 November 2019. Retrieved 8 September2016. 社会能够并确实执行自己的命令……它施加的社会暴政比许多形式的政治压迫更具威胁性，因为尽管通常不会伴随极端的惩罚，但它留下的逃避途径更少，深入生活的方方面面，甚至奴役人的灵魂。因此，仅仅防范政府的压迫是不够的……
Harcourt. "Conclusion". The Collapse of the Harm Principle. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 7 September 2015.
"Freedom of Speech". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 17 April 2008. Archived from the original on 23 March 2019. Retrieved 29 May 2011.
Kenneth Einar Himma. "Philosophy of Law". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Archived from the original on 14 September 2008. Retrieved 13 March 2014.
"Italian Parliament introduces holocaust denial legislation". UPI. Archived from the original on 15 March 2020. Retrieved 28 June 2019.
Laws Criminalizing Apostasy Archived 11 October 2017 at the Wayback Machine Library of Congress (2014)
Bojan Pancevski (26 October 2018). "欧洲人权法院维持对侮辱伊斯兰教女性的判决". The Wall Street Journal. Archivedfrom the original on 26 October 2018. Retrieved 27 October 2018. 欧洲最高人权法院周五裁定，侮辱宗教教义（如侮辱先知穆罕默德）不受言论自由保护，可以受到起诉。
Lucia I. Suarez Sang (26 October 2018). "欧洲法院裁定，诽谤穆罕默德不属于言论自由的范畴。". Fox News. Archived from the original on 26 October 2018. Retrieved 27 October 2018. 欧洲人权法院周四裁定，言论自由不延伸至包括诽谤伊斯兰教先知的内容。
"美国律师协会公共教育部：学生：辩论“强大的宪法对立面”：仇恨言论辩论". www.americanbar.org. Archived from the original on 13 October 2016. Retrieved 12 October 2016.
Emanuel, Steven L. (25 March 2020). Emanuel Crunchtime for Constitutional Law. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business. pp. 153–154. ISBN 978-1-5438-0727-1. Archived from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 18 September 2021.
Marcotte, John (1 May 2007). "free speech flag". Badmouth. Archived from the original on 4 May 2007. Retrieved 27 October 2017.
Glanville, Jo (17 November 2008). "The big business of net censorship". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 28 January 2013. Retrieved 26 March 2014.
Klang, Mathias; Murray, Andrew (2005). 数字时代的人权。 Routledge. p. 1. ISBN 978-1-904385-31-8. Archived from the original on 15 August 2021. Retrieved 11 November2020.
Guibault, Lucy; Hugenholtz, Bernt (2006). 公共领域的未来：识别信息法中的共享资源。Kluwer Law International. p. 1. ISBN 9789041124357. Archived from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 25 November 2018.
Clarke, Ian; Miller, Scott G.; Hong, Theodore W.; Sandberg, Oskar; Wiley, Brandon (2002). "通过Freenet保护网络上的言论自由"(PDF). Internet Computing. IEEE. pp. 40–49. Archived (PDF) from the original on 11 October 2017. Retrieved 15 October 2008.
"我们的使命". 全球互联网自由联盟. Archived from the original on 27 September 2017.
"互联网公敌" (PDF). 巴黎：无国界记者组织. March 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 March 2011.
Watts, Jonathan (20 February 2006). "文字之战". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 11 December 2016.
"II. 中国的审查机制运作方式：简要概述". Human Rights Watch. Archived from the original on 22 April 2015. Retrieved 30 August 2006.
"关于互联网的中国法律和法规". Archived from the original on 20 February 2012.
Wu, Tim (1 September 2017). "第一修正案已过时了吗？". 哥伦比亚大学奈特第一修正案研究所。 Archived from the original on 21 September 2020. Retrieved 23 September 2020.
Yaffa, Joshua (7 September 2020). "俄罗斯的干预有我们想象的那么危险吗？". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on 14 February 2021. Retrieved 21 September 2020.
"哪些事物规范言论" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 November 2020. Retrieved 12 January 2021.
"虚幻的威胁：克里姆林宫如何将信息、文化和金钱武器化". The Interpreter. 22 November 2014. Archived from the original on 12 January 2021. Retrieved 12 January2021.
MacQueen, Hector L; Waelde, Charlotte; Laurie, Graeme T (2007). 当代知识产权：法律与政策。 Oxford University Press. p. 34. ISBN 978-0-19-926339-4. Archived from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 11 November 2016.
"6.亨里克·范·库伊克，鲁尔蒙德主教（1546–1609）。《七篇颂词》。鲁汶：菲利普·赞格里乌斯，1596年。". Ecclesiastical Censorship, "Heresy and Error": The Ecclesiastical Censorship of Books, 1400–1800. Bridwell Library. 17 December 2000. Archived from the original on 8 September 2012. Retrieved 26 June 2011.
Castillo, Anastasia (2010). 禁书：18世纪英国的审查制度。GRIN Verlag. p. 12. ISBN 978-3-640-71688-3. Archived from the original on 15 August 2021. Retrieved 11 November 2020.
Sanders, Karen (2003). 伦理与新闻. Sage. p. 66. ISBN 978-0-7619-6967-9. Archived from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 25 November 2018.
"13. John Milton (1608–1674). Areopagitica; 约翰·弥尔顿先生关于未经许可的出版自由致英国议会的演讲。London: [s.n.], 1644". 英国早期的审查制度，“异端与谬误”：教会对书籍的审查, 1400–1800. Bridwell Library. 17 December 2000. Archived from the original on 5 September 2012. Retrieved 26 June 2011.
"删改书目索引". "Heresy and Error": The Ecclesiastical Censorship of Books, 1400–1800. Bridwell Library. 17 December 2000. Archived from the original on 8 September 2012. Retrieved 26 June 2011.
"52. 雅各布斯·德·沃拉吉尼（约1230–1298）。《圣徒的黄金传说》。马德里：胡安·加西亚，1688年。". The Index of Expurgations, "Heresy and Error": The Ecclesiastical Censorship of Books, 1400–1800. Bridwell Library. 17 December 2000. Archived from the original on 8 September 2012. Retrieved 26 June 2011.
Sanders, Karen (2003). 伦理与新闻. Sage. p. 66. ISBN 978-0-7619-6967-9. Archived from the original on 15 February 2022. Retrieved 25 November 2018.
Rayner, Gordon (7 October 2011). "勒维森调查：英国的新闻自由是世界的典范，”编辑在调查中表示。". The Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group Limited. Archived from the original on 7 October 2011. Retrieved 9 May 2018. 鲁斯布里杰先生说：“当人们谈论给记者或报纸颁发许可时，本能的反应应该是让他们参考历史。阅读关于1695年英国如何废除新闻出版许可的资料。
Nelson, Fraser (24 November 2012). "戴维·布伦基特警告议员不要对新闻媒体进行监管。". The Spectator. Archived from the original on 19 October 2017. Retrieved 9 May 2018. 杰里米·帕克斯曼曾著名地表示，他之所以进入新闻业，是因为他听说记者与政客之间的关系就像狗与路灯的关系。现在有几位议员希望用一个原则来取代这种关系，即由议员定义新闻运作的参数，并“共同合作”。这是一个必须抵制的可怕想法。上一次发生这种情况是在1643年的《出版许可令》下，该法令在1688年光荣革命后引入的《权利法案》之后，于1695年被允许失效。正如我昨天在《每日电讯报》专栏中写的那样，让人惊讶的是，竟有如此多的保守党议员想要把时钟倒拨300年。

whitehouse.gov

The Constitution （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）,The White House

wikipedia.org

zh.wikipedia.org

保护儿童免遭反传统家庭价值观信息的影响法. 维基百科，自由的百科全书. 2024-09-25 （中文）.
纳粹大屠杀否认论. 维基百科，自由的百科全书. 2024-10-17 （中文）.
2022年第32-FZ號聯邦法律. 维基百科，自由的百科全书. 2024-09-06 （中文）.

worldbank.org

info.worldbank.org

A Decade of Measuring the Quality of Governance (PDF). [2008-04-08]. （原始内容 (PDF)存档于2008-04-08）.

wsj.com

Bojan Pancevski (26 October 2018). "欧洲人权法院维持对侮辱伊斯兰教女性的判决". The Wall Street Journal. Archivedfrom the original on 26 October 2018. Retrieved 27 October 2018. 欧洲最高人权法院周五裁定，侮辱宗教教义（如侮辱先知穆罕默德）不受言论自由保护，可以受到起诉。

yale.edu

openyls.law.yale.edu

Ten Cate, Irene M. (2010). "言论、真理与自由：约翰·斯图尔特·密尔与奥利弗·温德尔·霍姆斯大法官的言论自由辩护探究". Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities. 22 (1). Article 2. Archived from the original on 24 September 2016. Retrieved 8 September 2016. 《论自由》中支持言论自由的核心论点是，为了最大化社会能够获得的利益，必须始终致力于抑制主导群体要求他人服从的自然倾向。