路德維希·馮·米塞斯 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "路德維希·馮·米塞斯" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Chinese rank
1st place
1st place
3,237th place
2,322nd place
6th place
4th place
9,512th place
4,474th place
2,186th place
4,317th place
8,043rd place
low place
3,651st place
135th place
26th place
113th place
5th place
12th place
24th place
29th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2,359th place
low place
low place
5,270th place
6,052nd place

archive.org

econlib.org

  • Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆) by Ludwig von Mises.
  • Nye, John V.C. The Myth of Free-Trade Britain. Econlib. War, Wine, and Taxes. 2003-03-03 [2024-10-01]. (原始内容存档于2024-04-12) (美国英语). Doctrinaire free traders and economic theorists opposed the use of commercial treaties since they felt that unilateral reductions were the most efficient policies for all countries. While correct in the abstract, such claims did little to overcome political resistance to trade liberalization in most countries. On the other hand, unwillingness on the part of the British to lower wine tariffs killed early trade negotiations with both France and Spain. When the British finally decided to moderate their wine tariffs, Britain and France successfully concluded a treaty in 1860 which dramatically changed the landscape of European commerce. Politicians throughout Europe—who had till then resisted all pressure to liberalize trade—suddenly became fearful of being left out of a trade pact that united the two great European powers. The result was that the other major European powers quickly signed bilateral treaties with Britain and France as well. 

google.com.hk

books.google.com.hk

jacobin.com

jstor.org

  • Leeson, Peter T.; Boettke, Peter J. Was Mises Right?. Review of Social Economy (Taylor & Francis, Ltd.). 2006, 64 (2): 247-265 [2022-12-10]. ISSN 0034-6764. (原始内容存档于2022-12-10) –通过JSTOR. 

libcom.org

libertyfund.org

oll.libertyfund.org

  • Mises on the Foundations of Classical Liberalism | Online Library of Liberty. oll.libertyfund.org. [2022-12-13]. (原始内容存档于2022-12-13). Nowhere is the difference between the reasoning of the older liberalism and that of neoliberalism clearer and easier to demonstrate than in their treatment of the problem of equality. The liberals of the eighteenth century, guided by the ideas of natural law and of the Enlightenment, demanded for everyone equality of political and civil rights because they assumed that all men are equal. God created all men equal, endowing them with fundamentally the same capabilities and talents, breathing into all of them the breath of His spirit. 
  • Auberon Herbert on compulsory taxation as the. oll.libertyfund.org. [2024-03-03]. (原始内容存档于2024-03-03). 

mises.org

mises.org

blog.mises.org

reason.com

viaction.org

  • Perry, Sarah. What is Voluntaryism?. Voluntaryism in Action. 2020-02-03 [2022-06-12]. (原始内容存档于2022-06-29) (美国英语). 

voluntaryist.com

web.archive.org

webcitation.org

worldcat.org

  • Leeson, Peter T.; Boettke, Peter J. Was Mises Right?. Review of Social Economy (Taylor & Francis, Ltd.). 2006, 64 (2): 247-265 [2022-12-10]. ISSN 0034-6764. (原始内容存档于2022-12-10) –通过JSTOR. 

wyzxwk.com

  • 叶攀. 再谈秦晖的“共同的底线”. 烏有之鄉. 2015-11-20 [2019-12-21]. (原始内容存档于2019-12-21) –通过破土網 (中文). 而且,无论在意大利,还是在德国,都有不少自由主义者直接转向法西斯和纳粹(比如秦晖先生多次引用的意大利帕累托,比如大量违背秦先生教导,转向纳粹的德国自由主义选民,还有奥地利学派的米塞斯等)。