逻辑 (Chinese Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "逻辑" in Chinese language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank Chinese rank

14web.archive.org

1^st place

6stanford.edu

179^th place

275^th place

3books.google.com

3^rd place

8^th place

3archive.org

6^th place

4^th place

2britannica.com

40^th place

100^th place

1worldcat.org

5^th place

12^th place

1doi.org

2^nd place

23^rd place

1sunyat-sen.org

low place

1nankai.edu.cn

low place

3,931^st place

1informallogic.ca

low place

1springer.com

274^th place

320^th place

archive.org

Gensler, Harry J. Chapter 1: Introduction. Introduction to logic 3rd. New York: Routledge. 2017: 1 [2002]. ISBN 9781138910591. OCLC 957680480. doi:10.4324/9781315693361.
Hurley, Patrick J. A Concise Introduction to Logic, 10th Edition. The United States of America: Thomson Wadsworth. 2008: 1. ISBN 978-0-495-50383-5.
Mendelson, Elliott. Quantification Theory: Completeness Theorems. Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Van Nostrand. 1964. ISBN 0412808307.

books.google.com

Richard Henry Popkin; Avrum Stroll. Philosophy Made Simple. Random House Digital, Inc. 1 July 1993: 238 [5 March 2012]. ISBN 978-0-385-42533-9. （原始内容存档于2015-04-08）.
John P. Burgess. Philosophical logic. Princeton University Press. 2009: vii–viii [2021-07-01]. ISBN 978-0-691-13789-6. （原始内容存档于2020-08-06）.
Lou Goble (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Oxford: Blackwell: 2009 (ISBN 0-631-20693-0).

britannica.com

logic, britannica.com. [2021-06-27]. （原始内容存档于2022-07-10）.
Formal logic, Encyclopædia Britannica. [2021-06-27]. （原始内容存档于2021-04-22）.

doi.org

Gensler, Harry J. Chapter 1: Introduction. Introduction to logic 3rd. New York: Routledge. 2017: 1 [2002]. ISBN 9781138910591. OCLC 957680480. doi:10.4324/9781315693361.

informallogic.ca

Informal Logic. informallogic.ca. [2021-05-09]. （原始内容存档于2021-05-11）.

nankai.edu.cn

news.nankai.edu.cn

中国社会科学报：“logic”之中译名考：意译到音译的回归-媒体南开-南开大学. news.nankai.edu.cn. [27 July 2022].

springer.com

Gabbay, Dov M.; Guenthner, Franz (编), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, [2021-07-01], （原始内容存档于2016-09-03）

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

Hofweber, T. Logic and Ontology. Zalta, Edward N (编). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2004 [2006-01-20]. （原始内容存档于2021-01-13）.
Smith, Robin. Aristotle’s Logic. 2000-03-18 [2021-05-09]. （原始内容存档于2021-05-09）.
Shapiro, Stewart; Kouri Kissel, Teresa. Classical Logic. 2000-09-16 [2021-05-09]. （原始内容存档于2021-05-10）.
Priest, Graham; Tanaka, Koji; Weber, Zach. Paraconsistent Logic. Zalta, Edward N. (编). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Summer 2018. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2018 [2021-05-09]. （原始内容存档于2021-05-06）.
Mares, Edwin, "Relevance Logic", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). [2021-06-27]. （原始内容存档于2021-08-15）.
Priest, Graham, Francesco Berto, and Zach Weber, "Dialetheism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). [2021-06-27]. （原始内容存档于2020-07-25）.

sunyat-sen.org

建国方略之一·孙文学说·第三章以作文为证 - 主要著述 - 孙中山故居纪念馆_伟人孙中山. sunyat-sen.org. [2022-07-27]. （原始内容存档于2022-07-26）. 然则逻辑究为何物？当译以何名而后妥？作者于此，盖欲有所商榷也。凡稍涉猎乎逻辑者，莫不知此为诸学诸事之规则，为思想行为之门径也。人类由之而不知其道者众矣，而中国则至今尚未有其名。吾以为当译之为“理则”者也。夫斯学至今尚未大为发明，故专治此学者，所持之说，亦莫衷一是。而此外学者之对于理则之学，则大都如陶渊明之读书，不求甚解而已。惟人类之禀赋，其方寸自具有理则之感觉，故能文之士，研精构思，而作成不朽之文章，则无不暗合于理则者；而叩其造诣之道，则彼亦不自知其何由也。

web.archive.org

logic, britannica.com. [2021-06-27]. （原始内容存档于2022-07-10）.
Richard Henry Popkin; Avrum Stroll. Philosophy Made Simple. Random House Digital, Inc. 1 July 1993: 238 [5 March 2012]. ISBN 978-0-385-42533-9. （原始内容存档于2015-04-08）.
Hofweber, T. Logic and Ontology. Zalta, Edward N (编). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2004 [2006-01-20]. （原始内容存档于2021-01-13）.
建国方略之一·孙文学说·第三章以作文为证 - 主要著述 - 孙中山故居纪念馆_伟人孙中山. sunyat-sen.org. [2022-07-27]. （原始内容存档于2022-07-26）. 然则逻辑究为何物？当译以何名而后妥？作者于此，盖欲有所商榷也。凡稍涉猎乎逻辑者，莫不知此为诸学诸事之规则，为思想行为之门径也。人类由之而不知其道者众矣，而中国则至今尚未有其名。吾以为当译之为“理则”者也。夫斯学至今尚未大为发明，故专治此学者，所持之说，亦莫衷一是。而此外学者之对于理则之学，则大都如陶渊明之读书，不求甚解而已。惟人类之禀赋，其方寸自具有理则之感觉，故能文之士，研精构思，而作成不朽之文章，则无不暗合于理则者；而叩其造诣之道，则彼亦不自知其何由也。
Smith, Robin. Aristotle’s Logic. 2000-03-18 [2021-05-09]. （原始内容存档于2021-05-09）.
Shapiro, Stewart; Kouri Kissel, Teresa. Classical Logic. 2000-09-16 [2021-05-09]. （原始内容存档于2021-05-10）.
Priest, Graham; Tanaka, Koji; Weber, Zach. Paraconsistent Logic. Zalta, Edward N. (编). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Summer 2018. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2018 [2021-05-09]. （原始内容存档于2021-05-06）.
Mares, Edwin, "Relevance Logic", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). [2021-06-27]. （原始内容存档于2021-08-15）.
Priest, Graham, Francesco Berto, and Zach Weber, "Dialetheism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). [2021-06-27]. （原始内容存档于2020-07-25）.
Formal logic, Encyclopædia Britannica. [2021-06-27]. （原始内容存档于2021-04-22）.
Informal Logic. informallogic.ca. [2021-05-09]. （原始内容存档于2021-05-11）.
John P. Burgess. Philosophical logic. Princeton University Press. 2009: vii–viii [2021-07-01]. ISBN 978-0-691-13789-6. （原始内容存档于2020-08-06）.
Lou Goble (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic （页面存档备份，存于互联网档案馆）, Oxford: Blackwell: 2009 (ISBN 0-631-20693-0).
Gabbay, Dov M.; Guenthner, Franz (编), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, [2021-07-01], （原始内容存档于2016-09-03）

worldcat.org

Gensler, Harry J. Chapter 1: Introduction. Introduction to logic 3rd. New York: Routledge. 2017: 1 [2002]. ISBN 9781138910591. OCLC 957680480. doi:10.4324/9781315693361.