التعاليم الأرثوذوكسية الشرقية المتعلقة بالفيليوك (Arabic Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "التعاليم الأرثوذوكسية الشرقية المتعلقة بالفيليوك" in Arabic language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank Arabic rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
8th place
low place
low place
4,351st place
6,299th place
649th place
2,441st place
40th place
15th place
1,688th place
1,157th place

books.google.com

  • William J. La Due (1 فبراير 2003). The Trinity guide to the Trinity. Continuum International Publishing Group. ص. 63. ISBN:978-1-56338-395-3. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2023-04-07. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2011-12-22.
  • Religious Bodies: 1906: Separate Denominations: History, Description, and Statistics William Chamberlin Hunt (Author), United States. Bureau Of The Census [1] نسخة محفوظة 2021-03-07 على موقع واي باك مشين.
  • Boulnois، Marie-Odile (2003). "The mystery of the Trinity according to Cyril of Alexandria: the deployment of the triad and its recapitulation into the unity of divinity". في Weinandy، Thomas G.؛ Keating، Daniel A. (المحررون). The theology of St. Cyril of Alexandria. Edinburgh: T & T Clark. ص. 105–107. ISBN:978-0-567-08900-7.
  • Farrelly، John (2005). "Later soundings: the fifth to the nineteenth century". The Trinity: rediscovering the central Christian mystery. Lanham [u.a.]: Rowman & Littlefield. ص. 101, 119. ISBN:9780742532267. Congar recalls three Eastern Fathers of the church from the fourth to the eighth centuries who asserted in one way or another a certain origin in being of the Spirit from the Son within the Trinity: Cyril of Alexandria, مكسيموس المعترف, and يوحنا الدمشقي.

britannica.com

ccel.org

  • "John of Damascus, who gave the doctrine of the Greek fathers its scholastic shape, about a.d. 750, one hundred years before the controversy between Photius and Nicolas, maintained that the procession is from the Father alone, but through the Son, as mediator. The same formula, Ex Patre per Filium, was used by Tarasius, patriarch of Constantinople, who presided over the seventh oecumenical Council (787), approved by Pope Hadrian I., and was made the basis for the compromise at the Council of Ferrara (1439), and at the Old Catholic Conference at Bonn (1875). Photius and the later Eastern controversialists dropped or rejected the per Filium, as being nearly equivalent to ex Filio or Filioque, or understood it as being applicable only to the mission of the Spirit, and emphasized the exclusiveness of the procession from the Father" (Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, volume IV, §108). نسخة محفوظة 2023-04-05 على موقع واي باك مشين.

oca.org

pelagia.org

web.archive.org

  • William J. La Due (1 فبراير 2003). The Trinity guide to the Trinity. Continuum International Publishing Group. ص. 63. ISBN:978-1-56338-395-3. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2023-04-07. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2011-12-22.
  • Religious Bodies: 1906: Separate Denominations: History, Description, and Statistics William Chamberlin Hunt (Author), United States. Bureau Of The Census [1] نسخة محفوظة 2021-03-07 على موقع واي باك مشين.
  • Vlachos، Hierotheos. "Life after death". pelagia.org. مؤرشف من الأصل في 2001-02-10.
  • "Against Anathema IX of Cyril". مؤرشف من الأصل في 2011-06-07. اطلع عليه بتاريخ 2011-12-21.
  • "John of Damascus, who gave the doctrine of the Greek fathers its scholastic shape, about a.d. 750, one hundred years before the controversy between Photius and Nicolas, maintained that the procession is from the Father alone, but through the Son, as mediator. The same formula, Ex Patre per Filium, was used by Tarasius, patriarch of Constantinople, who presided over the seventh oecumenical Council (787), approved by Pope Hadrian I., and was made the basis for the compromise at the Council of Ferrara (1439), and at the Old Catholic Conference at Bonn (1875). Photius and the later Eastern controversialists dropped or rejected the per Filium, as being nearly equivalent to ex Filio or Filioque, or understood it as being applicable only to the mission of the Spirit, and emphasized the exclusiveness of the procession from the Father" (Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, volume IV, §108). نسخة محفوظة 2023-04-05 على موقع واي باك مشين.

wiktionary.org

ar.wiktionary.org

  • Bulgakov 2004، صفحة 83. "Cyril of Alexandria, even more than St. Epiphanius, can present difficulties for the polemicists with the Catholics and lend support to the Filioque partisans, for it is his wont not only to call the Holy Spirit proper, idios, to the Son, in all the ambiguity of this expression, but also to speak of the origination (proeisi) of the Holy Spirit from the Father and the Son, or even from 'Both'. Orthodox polemicists try to show, with little success, that St. Cyril is referring only to temporary, 'economic' procession."