Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "السجناء السياسيون في الولايات المتحدة" in Arabic language version.
The right to freedom of thought and expression is well-established in US law. Nevertheless, Amnesty International has worked on behalf of prisoners of conscience in the USA, most recently in 1991–1992 when it campaigned for the release of more than 30 military personnel imprisoned for their conscientious objection to the Gulf War.
A government may regard a person as a threat to its security and detain him under a law that has nothing to do with security, such as income tax laws, or immigration laws. United States former Attorney General Richard Kleindienst has said: "There is enough play at the joints of our existing criminal law-enough flexibility-so that if we really felt that we had to pick up the leaders of a violent uprising, we could. We could find something to charge them with and we would be able to hold them that way for a while." Hence, many political prisoners are detained under non-security laws. [....] There is an analytical "fuzziness" because reasonable men can honestly differ on the subject. Perhaps the classic example of difficulty is determining whether conscientious objectors are political prisoners under any approach. Also, many legal prosecutions can be viewed as persecution in defense of excessive governmental claims to security, depending upon one's point of view as to the normal extent of human rights. A case in point concerns differing views on the permissibility of joining an opposition political party. Finally, any violation of law may be said to threaten the security of a government if such violation becomes widespread throughout society.
The right to freedom of thought and expression is well-established in US law. Nevertheless, Amnesty International has worked on behalf of prisoners of conscience in the USA, most recently in 1991–1992 when it campaigned for the release of more than 30 military personnel imprisoned for their conscientious objection to the Gulf War.
A government may regard a person as a threat to its security and detain him under a law that has nothing to do with security, such as income tax laws, or immigration laws. United States former Attorney General Richard Kleindienst has said: "There is enough play at the joints of our existing criminal law-enough flexibility-so that if we really felt that we had to pick up the leaders of a violent uprising, we could. We could find something to charge them with and we would be able to hold them that way for a while." Hence, many political prisoners are detained under non-security laws. [....] There is an analytical "fuzziness" because reasonable men can honestly differ on the subject. Perhaps the classic example of difficulty is determining whether conscientious objectors are political prisoners under any approach. Also, many legal prosecutions can be viewed as persecution in defense of excessive governmental claims to security, depending upon one's point of view as to the normal extent of human rights. A case in point concerns differing views on the permissibility of joining an opposition political party. Finally, any violation of law may be said to threaten the security of a government if such violation becomes widespread throughout society.
